| Users Online Now: 1,181 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 148,932 | |
| Pageviews Today: 231,315 | Threads Today: 90 | Posts Today: 1,311 |
| 02:33 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,181 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 148,932 | |
| Pageviews Today: 231,315 | Threads Today: 90 | Posts Today: 1,311 |
| 02:33 AM | ||
Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 865798  United States11/29/2011 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: aether anti matter dark matter black hole anti christ the fear of light "sight" reflected in word? Could these be concepts which alow FTL light to light or below light speed? Wouldn't we be able to 'hear' that instead of 'see' it? Do we have any cern experiments tracking this? Toad and I are theorizing on this. It is inverted mass/energy. TRUE anti-matter is INVERTED matter. Inverted matter makes up the black holes...the dark matter. good because here ...... And having seen the likeness of Pistis in the waters, the prime parent grieved very much, especially when he heard her voice, like the first voice that had called to him out of the waters. And when he knew that it was she who had given a name to him, he sighed. He was ashamed on account of his transgression. And when he had come to know in truth that an immortal man of light had been existing before him, he was greatly disturbed; for he had previously said to all the gods and their angels, "It is I who am god. No other one exists apart from me." For he had been afraid they might know that another had been in existence before him, and might condemn him. But he, being devoid of understanding, scoffed at the condemnation and acted recklessly. He said, "If anything has existed before me, let it appear, so that we may see its light." Quoting: aether:On the Origins of the WorldAnd immediately, behold! Light came out of the eighth heaven above and passed through all of the heavens of the earth. It was the ‘Prime Parent’ that said that ‘let there be light’. Who is the ‘Prime Parent’? Thus, when the prime parent of chaos saw his son Sabaoth and the glory that he was in, and perceived that he was greatest of all the authorities of chaos, he envied him. And having become wrathful, he engendered Death out of his death: Quoting: aether:On the Origins of the Worldwhoa amm weird sensations from your post approaching something nothing ever goes near is the sensation ....was a meeting, me and it instant , as they are as i settled from the meeting i went for a shower within the shower the consequences of our meeting continued to form into practicable information: the scale of energy/information that is the nature of it causes that which is not it to experience "deconstruction" experience chaos is the sensation to the contactee the reason is because all that is known (information) in the light dimension of contactee is a fraction of the infinite known (information) within it thus the contactee experiences everything known to it`s self "falling apart" because the majority of the information that "holds together" the contactee whist unknown to the contactee, floods into the contactees awareness all the "knots" unravel because the answer to the knots is discovered by the contactee this is never the purpose of meeting as it is never the purpose for the "knots" to come undone it is an effect past contactee`s experience because of theirs awareness at point of contact accurate awareness of the nature of it before contact resolves this issue  I get what your saying. You applied a perfect 'sequence of words' as we used to say. So, it is a natural occurrence...a natural 'emotion' that is experienced when contacting or experiencing something that is 'beyond' the Ego. The sensation of chaos...of the possibility of losing yourself, because the knots that keep you what you are AT THAT MOMENT IN YOUR OWN INDIVIDUALIZED EXPERIENCE, can be untied. "What to do, what to do!?" Do you go for it, untie the knots and change who you are? Or do you deny, cling tight to the knots, and forget again. Funny, it is the change that we view as destructive. We are bizarre little creatures. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 865798 United States11/29/2011 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492096 United States11/29/2011 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492096 United States11/29/2011 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 865798 United States11/29/2011 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aether  User ID: 1412926  United Kingdom11/29/2011 03:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | it was amm post made the contact but remembering mara is a humankind archetype formed and sustained by our awareness (information) thus to mara this was the "big one" (fear) i know know well were i not sitting here mara was out the door, out the country, out the magnetosphere, out of the heliosphere with never a thought of stop or look back  it`s so sweet all is fine, mara is fine, no aftershocks all cool |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492096 United States11/29/2011 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 865798 United States11/29/2011 03:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The feminine name is Pronoia (Forethought). How does that vibe with the synapses info you received, SS. What fires up the ‘week’ or what is deemed the masculine opposite of Pronoia? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492096 Intuitive thought comes to mind. Therefor, forethought would be superluminal, and not part of the normal 'physical' function of synapses. BUT, say synapses fires and creates a slight charge (and field). (Thinking out loud here). That slight charge and field (light) has the opportunity to allow manifestation of the superluminal into the event of firing synapses. My guess would be if you were in tune enough to recognize it for what it is, and not discard it. Most, would discard it, as it was an 'impulse' that had no real physical cause. The synapses didn't fire because of the incoming superluminal intuitive 'forethought'. It fired because something physical was needed or occurring to the brain/body. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1037270 United States11/29/2011 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The feminine name is Pronoia (Forethought). How does that vibe with the synapses info you received, SS. What fires up the ‘week’ or what is deemed the masculine opposite of Pronoia? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492096 Intuitive thought comes to mind. Therefor, forethought would be superluminal, and not part of the normal 'physical' function of synapses. BUT, say synapses fires and creates a slight charge (and field). (Thinking out loud here). That slight charge and field (light) has the opportunity to allow manifestation of the superluminal into the event of firing synapses. My guess would be if you were in tune enough to recognize it for what it is, and not discard it. Most, would discard it, as it was an 'impulse' that had no real physical cause. The synapses didn't fire because of the incoming superluminal intuitive 'forethought'. It fired because something physical was needed or occurring to the brain/body. Insight? That's what I keep getting, but it comes backward. The feminine insight, the masculine forethought. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492096 United States11/29/2011 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | yes, i`m not relaying back other than contact Quoting: aether it was amm post made the contact but remembering mara is a humankind archetype formed and sustained by our awareness (information) thus to mara this was the "big one" (fear) i know know well were i not sitting here mara was out the door, out the country, out the magnetosphere, out of the heliosphere with never a thought of stop or look back it`s so sweet all is fine, mara is fine, no aftershocks all cool Any weakness in the knees though... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1386956 United States11/29/2011 03:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In my sidereal vision something of this nature with spirals and fractals of energy all around it follows me as an energetic eye I call it... What can you remote about this ? [link to www.ezskins.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492096 United States11/29/2011 03:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The feminine name is Pronoia (Forethought). How does that vibe with the synapses info you received, SS. What fires up the ‘week’ or what is deemed the masculine opposite of Pronoia? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492096 Intuitive thought comes to mind. Therefor, forethought would be superluminal, and not part of the normal 'physical' function of synapses. BUT, say synapses fires and creates a slight charge (and field). (Thinking out loud here). That slight charge and field (light) has the opportunity to allow manifestation of the superluminal into the event of firing synapses. My guess would be if you were in tune enough to recognize it for what it is, and not discard it. Most, would discard it, as it was an 'impulse' that had no real physical cause. The synapses didn't fire because of the incoming superluminal intuitive 'forethought'. It fired because something physical was needed or occurring to the brain/body. Insight? That's what I keep getting, but it comes backward. The feminine insight, the masculine forethought. Well maybe forethought churns counterclockwise. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492096 United States11/29/2011 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The feminine name is Pronoia (Forethought). How does that vibe with the synapses info you received, SS. What fires up the ‘week’ or what is deemed the masculine opposite of Pronoia? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492096 Intuitive thought comes to mind. Therefor, forethought would be superluminal, and not part of the normal 'physical' function of synapses. BUT, say synapses fires and creates a slight charge (and field). (Thinking out loud here). That slight charge and field (light) has the opportunity to allow manifestation of the superluminal into the event of firing synapses. My guess would be if you were in tune enough to recognize it for what it is, and not discard it. Most, would discard it, as it was an 'impulse' that had no real physical cause. The synapses didn't fire because of the incoming superluminal intuitive 'forethought'. It fired because something physical was needed or occurring to the brain/body. That feels on target to me SS. And the ‘discarding’ issue brings up the Thrice denial of synchronicity as well as the path that might cause the so-called mind parasites. |
| aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom11/29/2011 03:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have to ask about this also Aether... Quoting: Want ~S'More~ Fringe In my sidereal vision something of this nature with spirals and fractals of energy all around it follows me as an energetic eye I call it... What can you remote about this ? [link to www.ezskins.com] i was shown that in the past few days by someone (female) and i was prompted to ask ,"what is it" . i got "alive" , nice nature the person never answered my question or mentioned it again |
| aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom11/29/2011 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | yes, i`m not relaying back other than contact Quoting: aether it was amm post made the contact but remembering mara is a humankind archetype formed and sustained by our awareness (information) thus to mara this was the "big one" (fear) i know know well were i not sitting here mara was out the door, out the country, out the magnetosphere, out of the heliosphere with never a thought of stop or look back it`s so sweet all is fine, mara is fine, no aftershocks all cool Any weakness in the knees though...  no all good still laughing funny dear amm |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492096 United States11/29/2011 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1549773 United States11/29/2011 03:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have to ask about this also Aether... Quoting: Want ~S'More~ Fringe In my sidereal vision something of this nature with spirals and fractals of energy all around it follows me as an energetic eye I call it... What can you remote about this ? [link to www.ezskins.com] i was shown that in the past few days by someone (female) and i was prompted to ask ,"what is it" . i got "alive" , nice nature the person never answered my question or mentioned it again |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492096 United States11/29/2011 03:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And I will tell you in the moment, that if you stay in the forethought churning backwards for a sustained period you will get a headache. You can feel it flowing in the opposite direction. The freaking headache is what feels as though it is keeping me grounded at the moment. I can feel the pulsing. Or perhaps the pulsing just feels what one might describe a headache. The tingles things on the top of the head are pre-runners to feeling the pulse. Tingles moving to the forehead now. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492096    Gone and no drugs required. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492096 United States11/29/2011 03:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And I will tell you in the moment, that if you stay in the forethought churning backwards for a sustained period you will get a headache. You can feel it flowing in the opposite direction. The freaking headache is what feels as though it is keeping me grounded at the moment. I can feel the pulsing. Or perhaps the pulsing just feels what one might describe a headache. The tingles things on the top of the head are pre-runners to feeling the pulse. Tingles moving to the forehead now. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492096 Gone and no drugs required. And I suspect the info that just gushed in might catch up to me or I might catch up it or visa versa in about a ‘week’ from now. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1386956 United States11/29/2011 03:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have to ask about this also Aether... Quoting: Want ~S'More~ Fringe In my sidereal vision something of this nature with spirals and fractals of energy all around it follows me as an energetic eye I call it... What can you remote about this ? [link to www.ezskins.com] i was shown that in the past few days by someone (female) and i was prompted to ask ,"what is it" . i got "alive" , nice nature the person never answered my question or mentioned it again Alive ...yes = humming to a "new tune" "New ART" in the making.. Also heard "Light Number 2 is on the way Get Ready..." |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492096 United States11/29/2011 04:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And I will tell you in the moment, that if you stay in the forethought churning backwards for a sustained period you will get a headache. You can feel it flowing in the opposite direction. The freaking headache is what feels as though it is keeping me grounded at the moment. I can feel the pulsing. Or perhaps the pulsing just feels what one might describe a headache. The tingles things on the top of the head are pre-runners to feeling the pulse. Tingles moving to the forehead now. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492096 Gone and no drugs required. And I suspect the info that just gushed in might catch up to me or I might catch up it or visa versa in about a ‘week’ from now. Oh shit...or maybe the above experience just caught up to the post that triggered aether’s contact earlier. Whoa. Post that triggered his contact that just happened to be a post I did just caught up to this forethought experience thing. That is the thing. We might not need the ‘week’ the opposite of Forethought anymore. The info does arrive first. Or maybe the tingling in the head is when the info arrives. Oh this is very confusing. Coming or going indeed as my mom used to say. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492096 United States11/29/2011 04:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yup, they mis-measured time. “Week” to the Gnostics must have meant something else and it was misinterpreted. The Gnostics must have been describing the speed of light thing which could have easily been converted to twinkling of an eye concept. Does any of this make any sense? |
| aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom11/29/2011 05:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The feminine name is Pronoia (Forethought). How does that vibe with the synapses info you received, SS. What fires up the ‘week’ or what is deemed the masculine opposite of Pronoia? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492096 Intuitive thought comes to mind. Therefor, forethought would be superluminal, and not part of the normal 'physical' function of synapses. BUT, say synapses fires and creates a slight charge (and field). (Thinking out loud here). That slight charge and field (light) has the opportunity to allow manifestation of the superluminal into the event of firing synapses. My guess would be if you were in tune enough to recognize it for what it is, and not discard it. Most, would discard it, as it was an 'impulse' that had no real physical cause. The synapses didn't fire because of the incoming superluminal intuitive 'forethought'. It fired because something physical was needed or occurring to the brain/body. Insight? That's what I keep getting, but it comes backward. The feminine insight, the masculine forethought. the man bias is to see the completed image of what is there to see the woman bias is to feel the information (source) that comprises the finished image that is there to see thus man leans towards mechanical/physical women leans towards emotional/physical |
| aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom11/29/2011 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The feminine name is Pronoia (Forethought). How does that vibe with the synapses info you received, SS. What fires up the ‘week’ or what is deemed the masculine opposite of Pronoia? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492096 Intuitive thought comes to mind. Therefor, forethought would be superluminal, and not part of the normal 'physical' function of synapses. BUT, say synapses fires and creates a slight charge (and field). (Thinking out loud here). That slight charge and field (light) has the opportunity to allow manifestation of the superluminal into the event of firing synapses. My guess would be if you were in tune enough to recognize it for what it is, and not discard it. Most, would discard it, as it was an 'impulse' that had no real physical cause. The synapses didn't fire because of the incoming superluminal intuitive 'forethought'. It fired because something physical was needed or occurring to the brain/body. Insight? That's what I keep getting, but it comes backward. The feminine insight, the masculine forethought. the man bias is to see the completed image of what is there to see the woman bias is to feel the information (source) that comprises the finished image that is there to see thus man leans towards mechanical/physical women leans towards emotional/physical notice i feel "tired" of mind as in thought is effort that is a first |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1549773 United States11/29/2011 05:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom11/29/2011 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: SickScent Intuitive thought comes to mind. Therefor, forethought would be superluminal, and not part of the normal 'physical' function of synapses. BUT, say synapses fires and creates a slight charge (and field). (Thinking out loud here). That slight charge and field (light) has the opportunity to allow manifestation of the superluminal into the event of firing synapses. My guess would be if you were in tune enough to recognize it for what it is, and not discard it. Most, would discard it, as it was an 'impulse' that had no real physical cause. The synapses didn't fire because of the incoming superluminal intuitive 'forethought'. It fired because something physical was needed or occurring to the brain/body. Insight? That's what I keep getting, but it comes backward. The feminine insight, the masculine forethought. the man bias is to see the completed image of what is there to see the woman bias is to feel the information (source) that comprises the finished image that is there to see thus man leans towards mechanical/physical women leans towards emotional/physical notice i feel "tired" of mind as in thought is effort that is a first thus man seeks a mechanical/physical answer women seek an emotional/physical answer answer as in: why ? man = why/how women = why because they intuitively are aware how thus wonder why as intuitive awareness (how)does not fit their emotional experience (lifestyle) when it should oh lol |
| aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom11/29/2011 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | thus man seeks a mechanical/physical answer Quoting: aetherwomen seek an emotional/physical answer answer as in: why ? man = why/how women = why because they intuitively are aware how thus wonder why as intuitive awareness (how)does not fit their emotional experience (lifestyle) when it should oh lol feels awkward writing that or guilt fuck it why should i feel guilt fuck that if it is wrong so what seems to me |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 865798 United States11/29/2011 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | thus man seeks a mechanical/physical answer Quoting: aetherwomen seek an emotional/physical answer answer as in: why ? man = why/how women = why because they intuitively are aware how thus wonder why as intuitive awareness (how)does not fit their emotional experience (lifestyle) when it should oh lol feels awkward writing that or guilt fuck it why should i feel guilt fuck that if it is wrong so what seems to me I'm confused, are we discussing sex?  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492096 United States11/29/2011 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The feminine name is Pronoia (Forethought). How does that vibe with the synapses info you received, SS. What fires up the ‘week’ or what is deemed the masculine opposite of Pronoia? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1492096 Intuitive thought comes to mind. Therefor, forethought would be superluminal, and not part of the normal 'physical' function of synapses. BUT, say synapses fires and creates a slight charge (and field). (Thinking out loud here). That slight charge and field (light) has the opportunity to allow manifestation of the superluminal into the event of firing synapses. My guess would be if you were in tune enough to recognize it for what it is, and not discard it. Most, would discard it, as it was an 'impulse' that had no real physical cause. The synapses didn't fire because of the incoming superluminal intuitive 'forethought'. It fired because something physical was needed or occurring to the brain/body. Insight? That's what I keep getting, but it comes backward. The feminine insight, the masculine forethought. the man bias is to see the completed image of what is there to see the woman bias is to feel the information (source) that comprises the finished image that is there to see thus man leans towards mechanical/physical women leans towards emotional/physical So then what happens when the two become one? The left and right brains consummate so to speak. Mechanical/Emotional become one? That feels like intuition which is always associated with the right side of the brain. Which harkens back the the negative and positive being stored in the negative. |
| aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom11/29/2011 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | thus man seeks a mechanical/physical answer Quoting: aetherwomen seek an emotional/physical answer answer as in: why ? man = why/how women = why because they intuitively are aware how thus wonder why as intuitive awareness (how)does not fit their emotional experience (lifestyle) when it should oh lol feels awkward writing that or guilt fuck it why should i feel guilt fuck that if it is wrong so what seems to me I'm confused, are we discussing sex?  not once in my imagination since i awoke no |
