Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology

We've been thinking of a photon as it travels through space. However, that same photon also travels through time. That is, it is a phenomenon that has duration. It exists from moment to moment as it moves, not just from place to place. So let's look at the photon at different instants in time, rather than at different places in space.

The first thing we can say in this regard is that the photon exists entirely in the present. That is, it doesn't concurrently spread its energy over the past, present, and future; if we can isolate the photon at any instant of time, the entire photon will exist at that instant.

But how much time is an "instant?" The two fields are constantly changing over time. If we use even a short duration as our "instant," there will still be a change in those fields.

However, we can note that as we make the time interval of our "snapshot" sample shorter, the amount of change is measurably less. So we apply the concept of the limit here: If we keep reducing the time interval, it will approach (but never quite reach) zero time interval as a limit. In the limit, the energy in the electric and magnetic fields will also be unchanging, and we can examine the instantaneous energy content of both fields as a static phenomenon.

The figure above shows eight evenly-spaced "snapshots" of our photon over the duration of one cycle of its wave, at 45° intervals (that's /4 radians between "snapshots.") We will now proceed to look at the magnetic field strength at each "snapshot" and determine, based on the equation for photon energy, how the electric field strength must vary.

nice link

[link to www.webelements.com]

Reaction of fluorine with air
Fluorine, F2 is not particularly reactive towards with oxygen, O2, or nitrogen, N2. It reacts with moisture in air to form oxygen, O2.

2F2(g) + 2H2O(g) → O2(g) + 4HF(g)

Reaction of fluorine with water
Fluorine reacts with water to produce oxygen, O2, and ozone, O3.

2F2(g) + 2H2O(l) → O2(g) + 4HF(aq)

3F2(g) + 3H2O(l) → O3(g) + 6HF(aq)

Reaction of fluorine with the halogens
Fluorine, F2, reacts with chlorine, Cl2, at 225°C to form the interhalogen species ClF. The trifluoride chlorine(III) fluoride is also formed and the reaction does not go to completion.

Cl2(g) + F2(g) → 2ClF(g)

Cl2(g) + 3F2(g) → 2ClF3(g)

Under more forcing conditions, excess fluorine reacts with chlorine, Cl2, at 350°C and 225 atmospheres pressure to form the interhalogen species ClF5.

Cl2(g) + 5F2(g) → 2ClF5(g)

Fluorine, F2, reacts with bromine, Br2, in the gas phase to form the interhalogen species BrF. The product is difficult to obtain pure since BrF disproportionates at toom temperature to form bromine, Br2, and BrF3 and BrF5.

Br2(g) + F2(g) → 2BrF(g)

3BrF(g) → Br2(l) + BrF3(l)

5BrF(g) → 2Br2(l) + BrF5(l)

Under more forcing conditions, excess fluorine reacts with bromine, Br2, at 150°C to form the interhalogen species BrF5.

Br2(l) + 5F2(g) → 2BrF5(l)

Fluorine, F2, reacts with iodine, I2, at about -45°C in CCl3F solvent to form the interhalogen species IF. The product is dificult to obtain pure since IF disproportionates at toom temperature to form iodine, I2, and IF5.

I2(g) + F2(g) → 2IF(g)

5IF(g) → 2I2(s) + IF5(l)

Reaction of fluorine with acids
With dilute acids, fluorine's reaction is probaly dominated by that with water, which produces oxygen, O2, and ozone, O3.

2F2(g) + 2H2O(l) → O2(g) + 4HF(aq)

3F2(g) + 3H2O(l) → O3(g) + 6HF(aq)

Reaction of fluorine with bases
Fluorine, F2 reacts with dilute aqueous hydroxide solutions to form oxygen(II) fluoride.

2F2(g) + 2OH-(aq) → OF2(g) + 2F-(aq) + H2O(l)

My opinion differs until proven otherwise. It’s actually the chlorine in relation to ozone hole in arctic. More direct relationship to ocean and salinity. "It has the highest electron affinity and the third highest electronegativity of all the elements.” And in looking at things in relation to ‘ancient’ context and where ancient and future meet in the middle:

"In nature, chlorine is found primarily as the chloride ion, a component of the salt that is deposited in the earth or dissolved in the oceans — about 1.9% of the mass of seawater is chloride ions. Even higher concentrations of chloride are found in the Dead Sea and in underground brine deposits."

"Electronic and vibrational spectra of hexacyanobenzene and 35 electron donor-acceptor complexes have been obtained. The values of hνct were correlated with the ionization potential of the donor and a linear relationship was obtained with a slope approximating to unity, allowing the determination of the energy of interaction in the excited state. The origin of band splittings is discussed and the most probable reason is the electron transition from various levels of the donor. The vibrational spectra of the complexes exhibit a new band related to the electronic vibration which may be ascribed to the vibration stimulated by the Raman active νC–CA1g mode."

i`m sure you are correct

my point is it seems to me that all of these elements are archetypes, they do what they do by force (influence)

discovering the natural sequence (hierarchy) of their manifestation (order of sequence/hierarchical events) occurring within nature enables us to discover each archetypes personality and place within natures flow (expression)

speaking for myself ,i realize i am in contact with archetypes whose personalities i get but i don`t possess their names (identity) similarly, i don`t know their hierarchy, (natural order), so i can`t place what they collectively tell me into sense because i don`t know what order to put what they tell into

it`s me, i just realized this thus will give it some thought

Tell me the ‘ancient’ context of ‘fluorine’. Perhaps that is the part that I am missing. If I can’t see it in ancient context. I just can’t see archetypes. Not being argumentative or stubborn. It is just a way of how I see and wrap my mind around it. As at core I am a firm believer “that there is nothing new under the sun.” If that metaphor makes sense as to how it is in my mind. And of course when I see more synch in topics others and puzzle pieces coming together I see better too.

Things like this:

The most common compound of chlorine, sodium chloride, has been known since ancient times; archaeologists have found evidence that rock salt was used as early as 3000 BC and brine as early as 6000 BC. Around 1630, chlorine was recognized as a gas by the Belgian chemist and physician Jan Baptist van Helmont.”

And like this as to how it relates to Japan 'unintended consequence’ (and of course methane hydrate instability off their coast as well):

"Cl were produced by irradiation of seawater during atmospheric detonations of nuclear weapons between 1952 and 1958. The residence time of 36Cl in the atmosphere is about 1 week. Thus, as an event marker of 1950s water in soil and ground water, 36Cl is also useful for dating waters less than 50 years before the present. 36Cl has seen use in other areas of the geological sciences, including dating ice and sediments.”

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

One more variable that comes down to ocean, methane hydrates, methane, chorine, ozone hole over arctic, ice-cyrstal clouds, pretty colors...lol

"Electron affinity of Surfaces

"The electron affinity measured from a material's surface is a function of the bulk material as well as the surface condition. Often negative electron affinity is desired to obtain efficient cathodes that can supply electrons to the vacuum with little energy loss. The observed electron yield as a function of various parameters such as bias voltage or illumination conditions can be used to describe these structures with band diagrams in which the electron affinity is one parameter. For one illustration of the apparent effect of surface termination on electron emission, see Figure 3 in Marchywka Effect.”

~~~~~~~~~

"The effect has been mentioned in passing with regard to novel devices such as quantum coherent devices while patents on emerging uses for amorphous carbon and diamond thermal conductors by manufacturers of high density electronic chips reference the related lift-off technology.”

Maybe it is just my brain and how it collates. What I do with hits and what I do not do with them. Hits that brush up against stuff. And hits that don’t. Nothing more. Nothing less.

But I don’t know why I found that so funny. Song would probably be better. But can’t think of one off the top of my head at the moment...lol

Thread: Polar Plasma Wave...creating the sounds people are hearing around the world??...sounds of the magnetosphere..Listen for yourself...

Haha, I woke up with like 6 words the other day that actually formed a sentence, gave me a lot more confidence in myself. Initially I wanted to write them down, than when I compared when I usually read when people right these kinds of things I returned to a state of Lucid Dreaming and wrote them in a place I keep things at there and went back to sleep. I've been thinking about this word a lot too, and the possible implications of CME's being electric like they are considered to be in leading Russian Science.

If you look at the photon in stages of time...0 mass...mass...mass rest...duration is like a blink of the eye...yea, that quick! Take fluorine and it's weight...look to the stable isotope and it's weight too. Of course, all keeping in mind time...or time travel if ya want...should also look to plasma form...F18 and F19....with Divine, it'a all about timming....kairos timing...;-)I think maybe the connection for you Muse may lay in the states of matter and the halogen and
Quark–gluon plasma

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

btw...my chart also reveals by arise to physics....

Hi Aether...

Mine on the other hand does not...lol Not being sarcastic there. It is just funny in some funny freaking way.

‘Lift-off’ theory above in relation to Methane to Chlorine to ozone hole over arctic to mass moment of inertia and polar vortexes opening more the same in relation to quantum is import though.

Tell me. Passage. Quote. Where fluorine fits into that arctic ozone hole in relation to polarity shift. Perhaps that is the passage I missed.

Fuck. I am not even supposed to be talking about this shit on line anymore anyway.

So that was it for me in regards to any of this. Good luck all.

I just got it. I just got the rat race goose chase sensation of focus on fluorine rather than chlorine in relation to methane. Same old same old. Best agin. And I do mean that.

fuck Muse....do the research...they are connected but you let your feelings for me get in the way...thats the sad part here!

I gave you the links you need to make that connection...

and fluorine is the source of steller evolution...another link for you


ancestor is old school...it took almost 3 days to understand that piggyback picture....lol for Aether

No different the any other politico/economic sensation of goose chase at any other time. Which then confirms it has little to do with you besides the triggering that sensation. With that trigger happening long ago based upon your behaviors.

Done with it all now. I won’t be back to this thread. You enjoy thinking that decision on my part has anything to do with you.

Why in the world not?

Haha, because it does what its told or it gets the hose again!!!! It puts the lotion on its skin!!!! Haha, sorry silence of the lambs flash back.

spot on

does this tell us anything?


[link to www.chemicalelements.com]

it fits what we have discovered which is fluorine presence influences (forces) the flow (charge/information attractor)


[link to pt.chemicalstore.com]

and that fits what we discovered thus in the material dimension it is fluorine's presence that is vital because of it`s attraction of charge that shapes the field thus shaping it`self and elements it combines with, which seems most to all others

so what was flow in the ancient world attributed to?

Last Edited by aether on 01/16/2012 12:41 PM

it`s gonna be theoi, wife of cronus

Hmmmmm......

or maybe not

what is theoi?