Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology

Another way to explain it would be the concept of reframing, like in therapy, looking from the outside in objectively. Lots of times the energy isn't so much negative as twisted with emotion. Remove the emotion from the energy and it's purifed.

How do you do that Bea? I mean, how does one remove the emotion...and how can there be motives without emotion? or have I misunderstood?

Objectivity surmises looking at a thing from an outside point of view with logic, not flavoring with emotion. Subjectiveness surmises looking at things from an emotional/personal point of view. Once you get the hang of stepping outside and looking in, it's very easy to strip energy down the root, to pure potential. Emotions have nothing to do with it unless you let them. It's a choice, like all things.

i forget sometimes and i talk about emotion all the time

nuts

the transmission of information utilizes the shared/same "mechanism" that expresses emotion(s) thus as beau tells
our choice of emotion expressed both in quality and quantity in response to the information received and we transmit upon receipt

Objectivity surmises looking at a thing from an outside point of view with logic, not flavoring with emotion. Subjectiveness surmises looking at things from an emotional/personal point of view. Once you get the hang of stepping outside and looking in, it's very easy to strip energy down the root, to pure potential. Emotions have nothing to do with it unless you let them. It's a choice, like all things.

common sense informs us that thoughts, emotions and/or sensations can, in fact, be false...yet none of these things in their primal states are false or unreal...which leads us to the real culprit in human error...our interpretive mechanisms and the degree to which these can be influenced through *unconscious ignorance*...

Raw emotion often causes reaction rather than action. The Hegelian Dialetic... problem, reaction, solution... and we know where that's got us. A better way would be to avoid reaction and gather information for action. The kneejerk emotional response implicates others for our "feelings". The only person responsible for emotion is the person having them. Emotional reaction effectively becomes an excuse to blame others for our actions. The "look what you made me do!" syndrome. :)

well no surprise but is a surprise now they said it
update from what was satans mandated master
so he once said



is that a blink ?

teasing

one of the things to consider about *nothing* is *indistinguishability*. if we could imagine a mode of existence that was completely unfettered by Code on any level we would have an interesting modality indeed, since we can never confine any *thing* to just one packaging or another if whatever it is that lives there doesn't have these kinds of constraints. In this place, Nothing and Everything are exactly synonymous. We cannot qualify a *thing* if it is technically indistinguishable from any other thing. Matter as we know it is not capable of this but Consciousness may be and if Consciousness ultimately rules over matter our possibility is complete.

*Nothingness* may simply be another word for *Omnipresence*...
It is difficult for us to imagine this on a regular basis but occasionally we do catch glimpses and the surprising thing is that it's not as *weird* as we thought!

consider a tennis ball, spin it about its axis, now we may also imagine it rolling over the poles of that axial spin, but how exactly can these additional "stacked spins" attach in any way to the ball. Maybe it's something to do with every object in the universe, and the space between those objects, expanding at some incredible rate. Is any of that reasonable? No, not in the slightest.

How about electrons flowing through a wire at some incredibly slow speed, but bumping into each other so that the electrical energy travels along the wire at c or close to it. This is fairies at the bottom of the garden logic. But just to be 100% absolutely no doubt whatsoever certain, let's consider electrostatic charge, magnetic fields, electric fields - do these consist of electrons, or even massive protons, travelling at c? NO they do not. This leaves ONLY two choices:
- There is some real material that is the cause of these affects, although it is invisible to us and interacts in a variable manner with the atomic structures that we are familiar with.
OR
- Action at a distance. You may argue that this is simply a placeholder for an unknown cause, but regardless, it completely destroys the argument for electricity as a flow of electrons, which we already know to be absent of credibility.

Clearly, plasmas contain kinetic electrons and protons; logs float in the current of a river, but no-one ever proposed that the logs are the cause of the current - the "flow of electrons" suggestion really is that ridiculous.

Flawed logic relativity and action at a distance theories will not provide any understanding.

Nothingness may equate to omnipresence, or like a supraconsciousness, there lying in the background of everything, but indestiguishable for everything.

off topic....sorry...but wanted to post it here...;-)

[link to occupy-monsanto.com]

In a major victory for public health and what will hopefully lead to other nations taking action, a French court decided today that GMO crops monster Monsanto is guilty of chemically poisoning a French farmer. The grain grower, Paul Francois, says he developed neurological problems such as memory loss and headaches after being exposed to Monsanto’s Lasso weedkiller back in 2004. The monumental case paves the way for legal action against Monsanto’s Roundup and other harmful herbicides and pesticides made by other manufacturers

hey sickscent xox

first time i`ve seen that topic approached that way, you know the occult and myself are getting closer, finally
i like it

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

We can all thank Vandana Shiva for her work for the turn around regarding Monsanto. She is the forerunner to the whole movement of biodiversity and the politics involved. Taking on a company that went to India trying to patent the Basmati Rice seed. She almost single handedly stopped that from happening.

As Gandhi said, "the earth has enough for everyone’s needs, but not for some people’s greed.”

One of her favorite things to quote.

I really liked that 'master' quote you provided. Extremely interesting thought process right there!

And you and the occult are getting closer? In what way? You coming into the knowledge more understandably?

[link to www.washingtontimes.com]

Feds shut down Amish farm for selling fresh milk