Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology

I think you have this down correctly, regarding field line "reconnection" and double layer phenomena, and that the reconnection version is not only a reification of the imaginary lines used to describe local field direction (or lines of equal intensity, depending on the purpose) in 3-D magnetic fields, which are located as volumes in 3-D space, and not on sheets of paper in a book. Double layers are a necessary but not sufficient description of plasma events and interactions, and are absolutely foundational to understanding how energy is stored and released as well as conveyed across long distances throughout the cosmos.

Worse, scientists generally do not use the Alfvén corrections to the use of MHD in describing or modeling plasma physics, despite his realization and publication that it is too simplistic in the assumptions it makes to be computationally tractable. "Advice unheeded does not mean un-needed." Particle-in-cell (PIC) and its modern derivations are much better suited to tracking events at the particle level, as you know Peratt discusses at length in his textbook, even giving the TRISTAN pseudo-code so someone can follow the general outline of how the program works. Peratt updated his thinking on programs in Advanced Topics on Astrophysical and Space Plasmas, the proceedings of the 1994 International Conference on Plasma Physics in Brazil, in his talk titled Advances in Numerical Modeling of Astrophysical and Space Plasmas.

Please keep up your references to good sources, textbooks and articles and links. They are invaluable. In fact, the more mainstream the source is in confirming the tenets of the EU perspective, the better, as those tend to be the hardest to argue against. I like to quote Philipp Kronberg's paper, "Current measurement in a Kpc-Scaled Jet" for that very reason. It helps other astronomers and EU enthusiasts both understand the carefully rigorous, very mainstream methodology he uses and the conclusions that he draws. It is harder for the types of "mainstream police" who harass Michael Suede to say that their own people are wrong and stupid for it, even though that is essentially what they can do on Wikipedia. And do, sadly. "Move on; move on. No counter-mainstream interesting chatter here."

Thanks for your information. I need to study double layers in more detail.

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, VOL. PS-14, NO. 6, DECEMBER 1986
Double Layers and Circuits in Astrophysics
[link to ieeexplore.ieee.org]

without motive imagination could never imagine

Im done

Should we flip you or apply sauce?

Some questions: If Lagrange points for gravity can be calculated, where are the Lagrange points for the electromagnetic forces? Electromagnetic force is reckoned to be 10 to the power of 43 times stronger than gravity. As these forces interact in the orbit around the sun the points must be moving. When will the earth be, once again, at the focal point of massive electromagnetic forces? What would the effect be? Can they be additive, subtractive, or reflective? Do the points comb interstellar space and latch onto debris?

The trouble with this kind of theory is that it assumes the space around the objects is vacuum. In fact they are embedded in a plasma. In a plasma, charge carriers are free to move and will move to balance out the electric field and hence the field only extends out to a certain distance called a DeBye length.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

In almost all cases the DeBye length will be far inside any Lagrange point, unless you are willing to invoke some more interesting dynamic plasma physics which allows static electric fields to be stable in a conductive media, in which case I am all ears

thank you for your compassion...done as in can't do it anymore...


bye aether

Cheers, to inevitability. We all swim.

You said it right there, We will never understand it. Thinking is what got us into this mess in the first place. ;)

Think too much and you'll be telling me there are giants in your underpants defying gravity. lol

It's the line I like to use on my wife.

this is the saturn/earth topic

In a red plush robe with gold trim, a roaring fire behind him. Yup, that's how I picture aether, too :)

thanks for your input

I just did something batshit crazy

and it came out of the blue!

Now I'm done

I love thinking these thoughts...


EDIT: Oops, Dion said not to think about them.

I love connecting to these images.

Watch them in your head and apply tones and chroma at your leisure. Without poisoning the well my 5 cents is that inevitability is the pendulum.

It evokes time, locality and by inferring the totality of it's arc, the circle and by changing the length of it's weight it can confer the imperfection of the oblate sphere.

It confers the impermanence of thought as by the time you infer 'there' it is 'here'. But, it amply confers dynamism and the nature of duality as to define good or any gradating pole we must know the compulsion of it's opposite. As material motive is impelled or compelled by it's opposite.

The immaterial needs no gravity but orientation to define it's perfect cycles as localities are 'immaterial' and seamlessly move through one another without the perturbation of materials conjunction.

The motive of the immaterial is as plain as dreams and potentiality, as scarcity and the mutability of object relationships do not need to be recognized as the interred patterns of motivation.

Thus we see the compulsion of the material towards reconciling vision with 'reality'.

I just did something batshit crazy

and it came out of the blue!

Now I'm done

I just did something batshit crazy

and it came out of the blue!

Now I'm done

I'm always early...just wait...Angels or Aether will probably let you know when they feel...give a bit longer for the non-material to do their thing then we will hear...

What is behind motive, or what creates motive?

Is it lacking in information? A need to understand? Or experience?

I'mma go stand in line for a ticket to the magical mystery tour...and figure out how best to fake a "oooh ahhhh" surprised look so I can be convincing.

I just did something batshit crazy

and it came out of the blue!

Now I'm done

Space to fill.


Stay in a white room long enough with no definable corners and the walls will eventually be filled to add dimension.

Or sit in silent darkness until you manufacture the light.

A bottle of dlsd 25 will give you that look permanently, why fake it? ;)

I don't know why I thought of depth and height when reading this.

Space to fill.


Stay in a white room long enough with no definable corners and the walls will eventually be filled to add dimension.

Or sit in silent darkness until you manufacture the light.