Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology

If the universe is a mirror, then wouldn't there be micro mirrors in it as well?


I'm thinking about Jupiter in a duality context, good and evil.

I see evidence of charges of different strengths (i.e. magnitude), but not necessarily charges of different polarity. As for charges attracted or repelled from a different polarity, is it really a different polarity or is one simply a greater strength than another? After all, if the Earth is enclosed in a double layer, as are all objects in space, then all matter within the double layer is basically the same, just some with a slightly higher charge than others. This difference in strength of charge is what I believe to be mistaken as positive, negative or neutral. If one charge is stronger, we will call it positive and one is weaker, we will call it negative, then it is only reasonable that the weaker charge would be attracted to the stronger charge. Charges of the same strength we will call neutral. Electron alignment can also play a part in whether a charge is attracted or repelled. Just as in a magnet the north pole is always stronger than the south pole, not due to positive or negative charges but electron alignment. A magnet has very little overall charge, yet will repel or attract another magnet depending on their orientation, and both poles will attract non-magnetized metals. So do positive and negative charges repel or attract as we decide they need to, or is it simply strength of charge and electron alignment?

i thought that a double layer was defined by areas of different charges.....If we knew what "charge" was, it would be easier to understand. ?

[Your suggestion that positive and negative are the same, but of different intensities would be somewhat valid if we defined these by comparison, but we do not. Each is an arbitrary designation and is defined by comparison to as neutral an environment as we can generate. They are not compared to one another. Detectors will react
the opposite to negative as they will to positive

Double layers are defined by areas of differing charge, but then would that not by definition mean that everything on Earth within its DL was of the same charge (negative or positive) if we wish to define by positive or negative charge? If the DL is the line of separation, then everything within must be all negative or all positive by definition. Since we claim to measure both negative and positive charges on earth, that definition cannot be wholly correct. This is why I subscribe to charges of differing strength. All within the DL are of similar magnitude, with only slight variation within the atomic structures.

I think of an electron as a cluster of smaller particles, similar to a globular cluster, I do not believe an electron is a single particle, but a conglomerate of billions completely surrounding the nucleus. Once they begin to align they take on spiral galaxy shape, or planetary ring shape, and as all galaxies in this configuration do they emit synchrotron radiation from the lobes or galactic poles, or in the case of electrons perhaps photons. If someone is aware of any globular clusters emitting such in distinct jets, please let me know so I can revise my idea.

It would help if we understood what charge was, other than the somewhat lacking definition we have currently. I am as unsatisfied with it as I am with the explanation of how vision works. Current theory would have a photon somehow capturing both surface texture and color upon contact and transferring that image to my eye. This from a particle that has neither mass nor charge. yet this same photon can reflect from a surface, reflect from a mirror, and yet it is the first object it contacted that makes it to my eye, not the captured image of the mirror's substrate. Do photons only capture the information from the first contacted surface, silly putty in action?

Actually its more of a religious belief than a logical fallacy. For to believe in Black Holes, when the very math they rely on points against it and all observations point to Z-Pinches instead, requires faith in something that can never be proven. Even IF they existed and an observer could approach one, the theory says it would take an infinite amount of time, i.e. eternity to determine its existence. Supposedly as one nears the event horizon time slows. This means that the matter supposedly falling into the horizon and the radiation it emits should also take an infinite amount of time to reach us, much more than the supposed 14 billion year old existence since the big bang. According to theory, the first wisp of radiation emitted as a particle fell into the horizon should not yet be observable at all, the particle still should be falling in, yet we observe vast jets of plasma from the center of galaxies.

Well. Maybe we should talk about eli...you realy think its wise to rip a whole in the fabric ?

The ELI project, a collaboration of 13 European countries, will comprise three branches:

Ultra High Field Science that will explore laser-matter interaction in an energy range where relativistic laws could stop to be valid;
Attosecond Laser Science designed to conduct temporal investigation of electron dynamics in atoms, molecules, plasmas and solids at attosecond scale (10-18 sec.: a billion of billions of a second);
the High Energy Beam Science devoted to the development and usage of dedicated beam lines with ultra short pulses of high energy radiation and particles reaching almost the speed of light (100 GeV).

For context, an attosecond is to a second what a second is to about 31.71 billion years, or twice the age of the universe.

Do you have a back up plan...just in case?

Femtotechnology is a hypothetical term used in reference to structuring of matter on a femtometer, which is 10-15 m. This is a smaller scale in comparison to nanotechnology and picotechnology which are 10-9 m and 10-12 m respectively. Work in the femtometer range involves manipulation of excited energy states within atomic nuclei (see nuclear isomer) to produce metastable (or otherwise stabilized) states with unusual properties.

And you did not answer the question...what can come through it ?

You can answer if you want...but the truthful answer is you dont know...

i do know , it is where i came from before i came here
so to me that is never an issue
it is the same environment i will utilize when i leave

i do know , it is where i came from before i came here
so to me that is never an issue
it is the same environment i will utilize when i leave

well on the topic of electric universe it was not publicly known that it was until our two satellites went outside of our suns heliosphere
until then it was argued by the good and the great that it was possible that the electrical nature of our solar system, which overwhelms the force of gravity on every instrument we ever sent into space, may have only occurred within our solar system, for reasons as yet unknown

now the voyagers have met more electricity outside the heliosphere than there is inside it, our good and great have no plan b

in our era of global information and communication it can not be hidden nor can it be explained, because to do so leads the public to realize that, the entire social structure of our world, including our military to protect it, has been constructed to function in a gravity universe

Last week, in the corners of the Internet devoted to outer space, things started to get a little, well, hot. Voyager 1, the man-made object farthest away from Earth, was encountering a sharp uptick in the number of a certain kind of energetic particles around it. Had the spacecraft become the first human creation to "officially" leave the solar system?..........................

In parts of the Amazonian rainforest, traditional costume included a headdress consisting of a circular arrangement of feathers. The ring of 36 feathers, most of which are white, lacks an obvious counterpart in the skies we see above us.

The above example was collected in c. 1910 from the Kayapó, a small nation living in central Brazil, and was locally known as an .... or a ‘footed feather headdress’.

In stark contrast to the modern world, traditional societies often used to derive their fashion standards from mythological or religious sources, looking backward rather than ahead for inspiration. Jolene Rickard and Gabrielle Tayac, of the Smithsonian Museum of the American Indian, explain that the .... ’reflects the Kayapó view of the universe’. It is a cosmogram, representative of the sky, which is inserted in a beeswax hat known as a kutop, that signifies ‘the physical world’. The wooden stick running vertically through the opening is interpreted as ‘the rope that Kayapó descended to reach this earth’. In the latter, anthropologists readily recognise an expression of the axis mundi, a vertical connector between the spiritual realms above and the human world here below.

None of this would make any headlines were it not for the awkward fact that the ‘world’ or the ‘sky’ looks nothing like the Kayapó outfit. If the heavens are circular, no vertical ‘rope’ is seen to dangle down from the centre. Neither the central red feather on top nor the two orange feathers flanking the bottom strike one as familiar...................

good morning blue

cool pockets of air where ac?

Thread: Photos from an "Apocalyptic-like" Hail Storm in Dallas!!!

Crazy! Is it still going on? Hope wf is okay!

Why is it when you look through a glass of water or a spoon, that the image is upside down? They say on the internet it is because the spoon and glass is bent. Any thoughts?

wf is aaay ok! we have some more severe weather comming in this evening...

Awesome avatar! Stay safe! Is that normal there this time of year?

but when I saw that thread about the glass shower doors shattering...I immediatly thought about that post I made here but I can't find it...I thought I remembered it being that I had read about salt being main compound of glass. I made a post on that thread but I have to find what I posted here to remember it right electrolytes etc

but when I saw that thread about the glass shower doors shattering...I immediatly thought about that post I made here but I can't find it...I thought I remembered it being that I had read about salt being main compound of glass. I made a post on that thread but I have to find what I posted here to remember it right electrolytes etc

nope...it's those cool air pockets that set these conditions we are having here now;-)

I thought it had to do with the way our occular lenses work, the first funtion of the brain when interpreting light from the occular cavaties is flipping it right side up from what I understand.

I thought it had to do with the way our occular lenses work, the first funtion of the brain when interpreting light from the occular cavaties is flipping it right side up from what I understand.