|Users Online Now: 2,951 (Who's On?)||Visitors Today: 2,663,037|
|Pageviews Today: 3,717,243||Threads Today: 965||Posts Today: 18,242|
Other countries taking over peoples pensions now... I wonder who is next???
User ID: 1212725
01/04/2011 12:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
[link to www.blacklistednews.com]
[link to www.csmonitor.com]
The Adam Smith Institute Blog
European nations begin seizing private pensions
Hungary, Poland, and three other nations take over citizens' pension money to make up government budget shortfalls.
Old women eat lunch in a retirement home in Budapest Dec. 13, 2010. Hungarian lawmakers rolled back a 1997 pension reform, allowing the government to effectively seize up to $14 billion in private pension assets to reduce the budget gap while avoiding painful austerity measures.
By Jan Iwanik, Guest blogger / January 2, 2011
People’s retirement savings are a convenient source of revenue for governments that don’t want to reduce spending or make privatizations. As most pension schemes in Europe are organised by the state, European ministers of finance have a facilitated access to the savings accumulated there, and it is only logical that they try to get a hold of this money for their own ends. In recent weeks I have noted five such attempts: Three situations concern private personal savings; two others refer to national funds.
Skip to next paragraph
The Adam Smith Institute
The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog.
Has England eliminated the gender pay gap?
The most striking example is Hungary, where last month the government made the citizens an offer they could not refuse. They could either remit their individual retirement savings to the state, or lose the right to the basic state pension (but still have an obligation to pay contributions for it). In this extortionate way, the government wants to gain control over $14bn of individual retirement savings.
The Bulgarian government has come up with a similar idea. $300m of private early retirement savings was supposed to be transferred to the state pension scheme. The government gave way after trade unions protested and finally only about 20% of the original plans were implemented.
A slightly less drastic situation is developing in Poland. The government wants to transfer of 1/3 of future contributions from individual retirement accounts to the state-run social security system. Since this system does not back its liabilities with stocks or even bonds, the money taken away from the savers will go directly to the state treasury and savers will lose about $2.3bn a year. The Polish government is more generous than the Hungarian one, but only because it wants to seize just 1/3 of the future savings and also allows the citizens to keep the money accumulated so far.
The fourth example is Ireland. In 2001, the National Pension Reserve Fund was brought into existence for the purpose of supporting pensions of the Irish people in the years 2025-2050. The scheme was also supposed to provide for the pensions of some public sector employees (mainly university staff). However, in March 2009, the Irish government earmarked €4bn from this fund for rescuing banks. In November 2010, the remaining savings of €2.5bn was seized to support the bailout of the rest of the country.
The final example is France. In November, the French parliament decided to earmark €33bn from the national reserve pension fund FRR to reduce the short-term pension scheme deficit. In this way, the retirement savings intended for the years 2020-2040 will be used earlier, that is in the years 2011-2024, and the government will spend the saved up resources on other purposes.
It looks like although the governments are able to enforce general participation in pension schemes, they do not seem to be the best guardians of the money accumulated there.
The table below is a summary of the discussed fiscal-retirement situations (source):
*These figures do not include the costs of higher taxes, price inflation and low interest rates, which additionally devaluate retirement savings.
[This article was originally posted at mises.pl]
Add/view comments on this post.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.
|1||JPMorganChase, Citi, Cerberus, Morgan Stanley among firms lobbying Washington to let them take over and run corporate pension funds||08/06/08|
|2||COMMODITIES GURU JIM ROGERS:“I Suspect They’ll Take The Pension Plans Next; I For One Am Worried, And I’m Taking Preparations”||04/06/13|
|3||JIM ROGERS: “I Suspect They’ll Take The Pension Plans Next; I For One Am Worried, And I’m Taking Preparations”||04/05/13|
|4||Breaking: S&P drops Obama's Illinois to *worst* credit rating of any state in country - blames Union pensions!||01/25/13|
|5||Fat cats 'take £80 for every £100 you pay into a pension'||10/12/10|
|6||Christine Lagarde – IMF Advocates Taking Pensions & Extending Maturities of Gov’t Debt to Prevent Redempt||06/29/14|
|7||Why do people hate those with pensions?||07/23/10|
|8||Just look at the pensions that congress gets!! Too bad us "little people" can´t get a deal like this..||05/09/05|
|9||The Osama Scandal Has Us Looking One Way. Could Obama be Moving to Take Private Pension Funds?||05/07/11|
|10||Take out my pension or not ?||06/20/08|