Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,165 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,662,244
Pageviews Today: 2,432,820Threads Today: 669Posts Today: 13,738
07:50 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject !!! ANALYZED DATA SUGGEST mysterious "plume" of magnetism arising from deep in Earths Core !!!
Poster Handle fairflight
Post Content
Thunderstorms have been around, but that does not mean our atmosphere has been the same. There are scientific research papers that show that when we enter interstellar cloud regions Earth's climatology changes. We entered a region recently, and even more recent, have entered a denser region of plasma. THAT affects our climatology as well as climates and atmospheric phenomena on all planets and moons in our solar system.

So, to say that thunderstorms (lightning) reaction to atmospheric conditions have always been the same, well that holds less value than saying that they can change.



-- Yes, I realize that change is the only constant.
-- And I'm sure T-storm characteristics evolved, just like everything else.
-- And I also understand about the interstellar region and its effect upon climatology.

-- But as you know, evolution is a very slow process.
-- So, again, it comes down to the odds, much like an ELE asteroid.
-- Just like a plasma region's possible effect on climate, ELE asteroids do exist, but they are extremely rare. EXTREMELY.
-- Again, once every 50 million years means the odds of one happening this year or next are 50 million to 1. And those are pretty long odds.

-- So I submit that the same is true of the plasma/climate/T-storm connection.
-- And it's difficult to sympathize with the kind of wild conjecture that happens every day here at GLP, when people breathlessly insist that a 50 million to 1 shot is ABSOLUTELY IMMINENT.
-- Especially when they really, really, really, WANT that long shot to come true, for the sake of their ascension.
-- It's just not very credible.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1052218


I thought "evolution" was/is a theory.
In theory it is a slow process.

If "evolution" is a wrong theory (it might be) then what ever process governs may not be slow.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP