Breaking - 20 NATO oil tankers on fire in Pakistan !

they have done heaps of damage with this tactic...

sorry.. I meant to also add, you would think there would be heavily armed soldiers travelling with it?

no one even want to venture a guess as to why this supply line wasn't being given support?

no one even curious?


there must be a reason..


Supply lines traditionally are lightly defended, they are seen as 'coming in from the rear'. So are defined as safe. Also to protect these supplly lines would be a huge drain on material and military resources. So they are conveniently defined as low risk, and often it is civillian contracters ie Joe Public that is taking the risk. So no big loss as defined by the US of nAzi, care of Bush, the Neocons and all the other Nazis that run the US fascist State.

they have done heaps of damage with this tactic...

sorry.. I meant to also add, you would think there would be heavily armed soldiers travelling with it?

no one even want to venture a guess as to why this supply line wasn't being given support?

no one even curious?


there must be a reason..


Supply lines traditionally are lightly defended, they are seen as 'coming in from the rear'. So are defined as safe. Also to protect these supplly lines would be a huge drain on material and military resources. So they are conveniently defined as low risk, and often it is civillian contracters ie Joe Public that is taking the risk. So no big loss as defined by the US of nAzi, care of Bush, the Neocons and all the other Nazis that run the US fascist State.

I have yet to see and understand just who/what we are fighting over there. Without an understanding of who/what I sure do NOT know just WHY THE F*$K we are there.
I have not seen a front line of a war. All I see is an occupation that purports to build a free government (WITH GUNS????). yeah right
I guess we think we need to drag their freedoms down to the same level we enjoy here.

The U.S. needs to go in there and take those nukes before the terrorists get to them.

they have done heaps of damage with this tactic...

sorry.. I meant to also add, you would think there would be heavily armed soldiers travelling with it?

no one even want to venture a guess as to why this supply line wasn't being given support?

no one even curious?


there must be a reason..


Supply lines traditionally are lightly defended, they are seen as 'coming in from the rear'. So are defined as safe. Also to protect these supplly lines would be a huge drain on material and military resources. So they are conveniently defined as low risk, and often it is civillian contracters ie Joe Public that is taking the risk. So no big loss as defined by the US of nAzi, care of Bush, the Neocons and all the other Nazis that run the US fascist State.

I have yet to see and understand just who/what we are fighting over there. Without an understanding of who/what I sure do NOT know just WHY THE F*$K we are there.
I have not seen a front line of a war. All I see is an occupation that purports to build a free government (WITH GUNS????). yeah right
I guess we think we need to drag their freedoms down to the same level we enjoy here.

My congratulation to who destroyed the tankers. Well done boys ! Why are the US and NATO in Pakistan ?
NATO = North Atlantic Treaty Organization .
What has that organization got to do with Pakistan ?
Pakistan is in the wrong direction to the Atlantic Ocean.
Now Nato is used to support and help the Empire of EVIL - called Amerikka other wise known as the land of the SLAVES .
Amerikka the country that cannot win wars and spends 250,000 bullets to kill a person . Amerika the poodle of the Zionist scums . Amerikka the 3rd rate country where the whole population counts less than the criminals bankers in Wall Street . Amerikka soon to be in the garbage bin of history . I rejoice at the thought !
Who defends his country from the criminal US army and NATO is a hero and a patriot . FU@@@ the US ARMY and NATO .

Call in the Drones !


or.... how bout ...

JUST DANCE !

dii di di di diiii!

they have done heaps of damage with this tactic...

sorry.. I meant to also add, you would think there would be heavily armed soldiers travelling with it?

no one even want to venture a guess as to why this supply line wasn't being given support?

no one even curious?


there must be a reason..


Supply lines traditionally are lightly defended, they are seen as 'coming in from the rear'. So are defined as safe. Also to protect these supplly lines would be a huge drain on material and military resources. So they are conveniently defined as low risk, and often it is civillian contracters ie Joe Public that is taking the risk. So no big loss as defined by the US of nAzi, care of Bush, the Neocons and all the other Nazis that run the US fascist State.

I have yet to see and understand just who/what we are fighting over there. Without an understanding of who/what I sure do NOT know just WHY THE F*$K we are there.
I have not seen a front line of a war. All I see is an occupation that purports to build a free government (WITH GUNS????). yeah right
I guess we think we need to drag their freedoms down to the same level we enjoy here.

they have done heaps of damage with this tactic...

sorry.. I meant to also add, you would think there would be heavily armed soldiers travelling with it?

no one even want to venture a guess as to why this supply line wasn't being given support?

no one even curious?


there must be a reason..


Supply lines traditionally are lightly defended, they are seen as 'coming in from the rear'. So are defined as safe. Also to protect these supplly lines would be a huge drain on material and military resources. So they are conveniently defined as low risk, and often it is civillian contracters ie Joe Public that is taking the risk. So no big loss as defined by the US of nAzi, care of Bush, the Neocons and all the other Nazis that run the US fascist State.

I have yet to see and understand just who/what we are fighting over there. Without an understanding of who/what I sure do NOT know just WHY THE F*$K we are there.
I have not seen a front line of a war. All I see is an occupation that purports to build a free government (WITH GUNS????). yeah right
I guess we think we need to drag their freedoms down to the same level we enjoy here.

Lets be very very clear the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are war crimes of the highest order as defined under international law and the Nuremburg Protocols after WW2.

Under the Nuremburg protocols it is the duty of every citizen to resist. A government that commits crimes against peace, genocide, torture and high treason is an illegal government.
1.911 was an inside job
2.It was an act of high treason by the nazi us government
3. Bin Laden has never even been charged with being responsible for 911.
4.It follows therefore that the invasion of Afghnaistan is illegal.
5.There were never any legal excuses to invade Iraq.
6. The wars are a pretext to steal natural resources and to destroy human rights globally.
7.By it's actions it is not unreasonable to define the US as the Forth Reich.
8.It's actions and governence is completly consistent with a nazi state.

False flag by globalists to give us reason to start a ground war in Pakistan.

We've already been targeting and killing Pakistanis by drones for some time to provoke them into fighting back so we can invade them.

Same script over and over and the sheep never get it.

I just say, we lift off, and nuke Pakistan from orbit. Its only way to be sure.

I just say, we lift off, and nuke Pakistan from orbit. Its only way to be sure.

What a statement. A true lover of death and a hate puppet, a product of nazi america.

I just say, we lift off, and nuke Pakistan from orbit. Its only way to be sure.

What a statement. A true lover of death and a hate puppet, a product of nazi america.

I just say, we lift off, and nuke Pakistan from orbit. Its only way to be sure.

What a statement. A true lover of death and a hate puppet, a product of nazi america.


Damn fucking socialist England. Your broken society is a breeding ground of terrorists and brainwashed euro lib-tards like you.

they have done heaps of damage with this tactic...

sorry.. I meant to also add, you would think there would be heavily armed soldiers travelling with it?

no one even want to venture a guess as to why this supply line wasn't being given support?

no one even curious?


there must be a reason..


Supply lines traditionally are lightly defended, they are seen as 'coming in from the rear'. So are defined as safe. Also to protect these supplly lines would be a huge drain on material and military resources. So they are conveniently defined as low risk, and often it is civillian contracters ie Joe Public that is taking the risk. So no big loss as defined by the US of nAzi, care of Bush, the Neocons and all the other Nazis that run the US fascist State.

I have yet to see and understand just who/what we are fighting over there. Without an understanding of who/what I sure do NOT know just WHY THE F*$K we are there.
I have not seen a front line of a war. All I see is an occupation that purports to build a free government (WITH GUNS????). yeah right
I guess we think we need to drag their freedoms down to the same level we enjoy here.

Lets be very very clear the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are war crimes of the highest order as defined under international law and the Nuremburg Protocols after WW2.

Under the Nuremburg protocols it is the duty of every citizen to resist. A government that commits crimes against peace, genocide, torture and high treason is an illegal government.
1.911 was an inside job
2.It was an act of high treason by the nazi us government
3. Bin Laden has never even been charged with being responsible for 911.
4.It follows therefore that the invasion of Afghnaistan is illegal.
5.There were never any legal excuses to invade Iraq.
6. The wars are a pretext to steal natural resources and to destroy human rights globally.
7.By it's actions it is not unreasonable to define the US as the Forth Reich.
8.It's actions and governence is completly consistent with a nazi state.

The news is intresting , but warmonger has issues.


EYE on WAR ... get it mo fo? i on war ... EYE muda fuckin on WAR.

alive!

How'd they get those tankers so far inland anyway?

and in todays crazy world... this may not even get a reply, yet alone a pin.

oh my.

Not good. Not good at all.


o shut it snark.