Germans are most intelligent people in the world

In fact Britain has never defeated Germany, in WW I the British were on its knees in 1916...it was just the tiny little thing that Germany had to fight half of the world. Tough job with limited ressources.


Sore loser. Germany was defeated twice, try it again and it won't be 3rd time lucky. The British Empire took on way more than the Germans ever did that's why Hitler was such a fan. But he fucked things up by adding psychopathic tendencies to his tactics. Evil never wins. He wanted to emulate Britain but and even wanted to collaborate with Britain - but as the Brits had more sense and didn't want to he tried his luck to defeat Britain and failed catastrophically. End results of both Wars Germany 0 Britain 1.


Yes defeated ONLY with the help of the US and Russia. Hitler was even so kind and let the Britsh expeditionary army retreat at Dunkirch (300.000 soldiers). But he underestimated the lunacy of that liar Churchill. As one famous historian stated, one day the British will recognise what a badass Churchill was for his country.

End results: Russia, US and England + a lot of smaller countries 1 Germany + Italy + some smaller countries 0.

Also the bulk of burden was on the Russians in WWII. Kill/death ratio was 1:8

Germans are most intelligent people in the world....
Who could deny this statement? Its pretty much self evident.



If that was the case...then why was germany reduced to a SMOLDERING CINDER in 1945?

:multleylaugh:


Nuff said.


:hahafail:


Cause you kidnapped all the brilliant minds and then burned it to a cinder. talk about double standards.

Indeed Nuff said, look up operation paperclip.

The earliest coherent Germanic text preserved is the 4th century Gothic translation of the New Testament by Ulfilas. Early testimonies of West Germanic are in Old Frankish (5th century), Old High German (scattered words and sentences 6th century, coherent texts 9th century) and Old English (coherent texts 10th century). North Germanic is only attested in scattered runic inscriptions, as Proto-Norse, until it evolves into Old Norse by about 800.


[link to en.wikipedia.org]



Tiny Excerpts won't do it. Face it you're not British and you don't speak English and English is not German. Clearly we have some historical evolution that did not derive from your hideous language. Just listen to both, there are clues in that. If there is a grain or input, it's a grain thank God.


English is an Anglo-Frisian language derived from Western Germanic origin. The cultures are in modern times very different.



No, you're missing details. Read up more. Don't forget the Romans don't forget the other areas in Europe. We evolved our own language over a great time. Your point is as valid as giving pre historic man credit for inventing the TV.



yes, the devil is in the details.
english is one of the most creolic languages today. there have been many studies written trying to deny it, but all are quite unpersuasive.
it is classified as german for obvious political reasons. it could as well be classified as a corrupt slavonic language.
the evidence is the verb formation.
while the slavonic languages have the infinitive ending in -ti, the english put the article in front to-,
for instance: to be = biti
of course, english, as a creole language, has lost most of the conjugations...

another thing the british can be proud of...or better put can feel important because of it, is the project of an (anglosaxon) new world order
[link to www.citizinemag.com]

In fact Britain has never defeated Germany, in WW I the British were on its knees in 1916...it was just the tiny little thing that Germany had to fight half of the world. Tough job with limited ressources.


Sore loser. Germany was defeated twice, try it again and it won't be 3rd time lucky. The British Empire took on way more than the Germans ever did that's why Hitler was such a fan. But he fucked things up by adding psychopathic tendencies to his tactics. Evil never wins. He wanted to emulate Britain but and even wanted to collaborate with Britain - but as the Brits had more sense and didn't want to he tried his luck to defeat Britain and failed catastrophically. End results of both Wars Germany 0 Britain 1.


Yes defeated ONLY with the help of the US and Russia. Hitler was even so kind and let the Britsh expeditionary army retreat at Dunkirch (300.000 soldiers). But he underestimated the lunacy of that liar Churchill. As one famous historian stated, one day the British will recognise what a badass Churchill was for his country.

End results: Russia, US and England + a lot of smaller countries 1 Germany + Italy + some smaller countries 0.

Also the bulk of burden was on the Russians in WWII. Kill/death ratio was 1:8


I believe that the Russians counterattack was comprised of the last hope of the Russian people to save Russia from Nazi Germany if they did not stop the German attack nothing would have of. But the Russians who defeated them were among some of the best fighters in the war and were comprised of tough and battle tested men from Siberia.

In fact Britain has never defeated Germany, in WW I the British were on its knees in 1916...it was just the tiny little thing that Germany had to fight half of the world. Tough job with limited ressources.


Sore loser. Germany was defeated twice, try it again and it won't be 3rd time lucky. The British Empire took on way more than the Germans ever did that's why Hitler was such a fan. But he fucked things up by adding psychopathic tendencies to his tactics. Evil never wins. He wanted to emulate Britain but and even wanted to collaborate with Britain - but as the Brits had more sense and didn't want to he tried his luck to defeat Britain and failed catastrophically. End results of both Wars Germany 0 Britain 1.


Yes defeated ONLY with the help of the US and Russia. Hitler was even so kind and let the Britsh expeditionary army retreat at Dunkirch (300.000 soldiers). But he underestimated the lunacy of that liar Churchill. As one famous historian stated, one day the British will recognise what a badass Churchill was for his country.

End results: Russia, US and England + a lot of smaller countries 1 Germany + Italy + some smaller countries 0.

Also the bulk of burden was on the Russians in WWII. Kill/death ratio was 1:8


I believe that the Russians counterattack was comprised of the last hope of the Russian people to save Russia from Nazi Germany if they did not stop the German attack nothing would have of. But the Russians who defeated them were among some of the best fighters in the war and were comprised of tough and battle tested men from Siberia.


Nah, it was mostly commissars and soviet propaganda IMO. There was even a Russian army under General Wlassow fighting with Germany against the bolsheviks.

You're only as good as your last fight though.

Intelligence at what?

Every race has their special qualities.
Intelligence comes at the personal level. Not at the ethnic level.
Germans are passionate about precision and quality.

No people are better or worse than another people. Thats like says "whats a better car, a corvette or a porche?", or "Who is finner, Lisa Marie Scott or Farrah Faucett?"..or "what band is better, Van Halen or Led Zeppelin".

Once something or somethings(s) are great, there is no such thing as better, only different.

Our creator knew what he was doing.


Please you are quite ridiculous the Germans and British are by far the most intelligent people there collective consciousness is much more intelligent then most other peoples. For goodness sake the Germans produced some of the most rigorous, disciplined, and technical thinkers known to mankind. The British produced some good thinkers too not as fine and precise as the Germans but they were certainly fine thinkers. I don't think any other people have produced as much geniuses as the Germans and British people.

Intelligence at what?

Every race has their special qualities.
Intelligence comes at the personal level. Not at the ethnic level.
Germans are passionate about precision and quality.

No people are better or worse than another people. Thats like says "whats a better car, a corvette or a porche?", or "Who is finner, Lisa Marie Scott or Farrah Faucett?"..or "what band is better, Van Halen or Led Zeppelin".

Once something or somethings(s) are great, there is no such thing as better, only different.

Our creator knew what he was doing.


Please you are quite ridiculous the Germans and British are by far the most intelligent people there collective consciousness is much more intelligent then most other peoples. For goodness sake the Germans produced some of the most rigorous, disciplined, and technical thinkers known to mankind. The British produced some good thinkers too not as fine and precise as the Germans but they were certainly fine thinkers. I don't think any other people have produced as much geniuses as the Germans and British people.


We're not 'collective' with the Germans. The Germans may have some efficiency in their new thinking after being totally defeated twice - but they had hell of a lot of help from Britain after WW2 as Britain became part of an occupying force and to rebuild Germany at their cost. But we're not the same and not collective. British are a crank above the Germans in their contributions, whatever the failings are. Point being, the original claim is false. Bullshit in fact.

Germany is better than England in football.

As I have heard it the Cossacks hated their Russian counterparts so greatly they fought with the SS and as I have heard there were stories told by Ukrainian women who lived in World War 2 that when the Germans came in they offered everyone chocolates while the Russians when they came in ended up raping all the nicest women around.

Germany is better than England in football.



football doesn't change the world. It's just kicking a ball.
Wow they can kick balls. Having said that, not that long ago England beat them 5-1.

*Copernicus was Polish...carry on

In fact Britain has never defeated Germany, in WW I the British were on its knees in 1916...it was just the tiny little thing that Germany had to fight half of the world. Tough job with limited ressources.


Sore loser. Germany was defeated twice, try it again and it won't be 3rd time lucky. The British Empire took on way more than the Germans ever did that's why Hitler was such a fan. But he fucked things up by adding psychopathic tendencies to his tactics. Evil never wins. He wanted to emulate Britain but and even wanted to collaborate with Britain - but as the Brits had more sense and didn't want to he tried his luck to defeat Britain and failed catastrophically. End results of both Wars Germany 0 Britain 1.


Yes defeated ONLY with the help of the US and Russia. Hitler was even so kind and let the Britsh expeditionary army retreat at Dunkirch (300.000 soldiers). But he underestimated the lunacy of that liar Churchill. As one famous historian stated, one day the British will recognise what a badass Churchill was for his country.

End results: Russia, US and England + a lot of smaller countries 1 Germany + Italy + some smaller countries 0.

Also the bulk of burden was on the Russians in WWII. Kill/death ratio was 1:8

Einstein

You lost accept it. There is always strength in numbers. But Germany was so repellent and vile it was always going to be the weaker force. Only evil or stupidity would want to be it's ally. The end result shows that. Evil never wins. Trying to justify it shows evil still lurks. But if it rises again it will be crushed, it will be defeated and it will be sent to where is should reside forever. And that ain't heaven.


The SouL

Germany is better than England in football.



football doesn't change the world. It's just kicking a ball.
Wow they can kick balls. Having said that, not that long ago England beat them 5-1.


Sounds you like to want to ignore all the facts because you do not wish to admit the Germans are indeed better then the British in a lot of ways. I remember a good quote from the German thinker Schelling regarding the British he said they were to pragmatic and focused on the surface while they Germans were focused on the internal mechanisms and the transcendent features underlying the surface and the boundaries of reason so they could integrate reason properly with these transcendent features and the transcendent features with reason.

Einstein

You lost accept it. There is always strength in numbers. But Germany was so repellent and vile it was always going to be the weaker force. Only evil or stupidity would want to be it's ally. The end result shows that. Evil never wins. Trying to justify it shows evil still lurks. But if it rises again it will be crushed, it will be defeated and it will be sent to where is should reside forever. And that ain't heaven.


The SouL


Yeah repellent and vile. Because propaganda told people that. Just as today. The British had been undermined since the setup of the Bank of England. Only fools won*t recognise this.

The earliest coherent Germanic text preserved is the 4th century Gothic translation of the New Testament by Ulfilas. Early testimonies of West Germanic are in Old Frankish (5th century), Old High German (scattered words and sentences 6th century, coherent texts 9th century) and Old English (coherent texts 10th century). North Germanic is only attested in scattered runic inscriptions, as Proto-Norse, until it evolves into Old Norse by about 800.


[link to en.wikipedia.org]



Tiny Excerpts won't do it. Face it you're not British and you don't speak English and English is not German. Clearly we have some historical evolution that did not derive from your hideous language. Just listen to both, there are clues in that. If there is a grain or input, it's a grain thank God.


English is an Anglo-Frisian language derived from Western Germanic origin. The cultures are in modern times very different.



No, you're missing details. Read up more. Don't forget the Romans don't forget the other areas in Europe. We evolved our own language over a great time. Your point is as valid as giving pre historic man credit for inventing the TV.



yes, the devil is in the details.
english is one of the most creolic languages today. there have been many studies written trying to deny it, but all are quite unpersuasive.
it is classified as german for obvious political reasons. it could as well be classified as a corrupt slavonic language.
the evidence is the verb formation.
while the slavonic languages have the infinitive ending in -ti, the english put the article in front to-,
for instance: to be = biti
of course, english, as a creole language, has lost most of the conjugations...

another thing the british can be proud of...or better put can feel important because of it, is the project of an (anglosaxon) new world order
[link to www.citizinemag.com]


Oh please you slovene go back to your Slavic hole and stop thinking you gave the world anything special or like the world owes you anything. I have to admit the slovenes are the most well developed of all of the Slavic peoples but please don't get me started that the German language has any slavic roots. The German language is what it is and it is defined in regards to the fact they stopped the Slavs from moving any further they did. The Germans have always placed boundaries on how far an opponent or enemy was allowed to progress.

You lost accept it. There is always strength in numbers. But Germany was so repellent and vile it was always going to be the weaker force. Only evil or stupidity would want to be it's ally. The end result shows that. Evil never wins. Trying to justify it shows evil still lurks. But if it rises again it will be crushed, it will be defeated and it will be sent to where is should reside forever. And that ain't heaven.


The SouL


Yeah repellent and vile. Because propaganda told people that. Just as today. The British had been undermined since the setup of the Bank of England. Only fools won*t recognise this.



Maybe the people of Germany should have used their own minds not to be repellent and vile enough to support the victimisation and killing of Jews together with a stupid collection of invasion and occupation plans. Doesn't make the German people clever or 'intelligent' by following and not recognizing that it was an evil and immoral plan. Being easily duped brings the word stupid to mind not 'intelligent'. Seriously stupid in fact.


The SouL

Maybe the people of Germany should have used their own minds not to be repellent and vile enough to support the victimisation and killing of Jews together with a stupid collection of invasion and occupation plans. Doesn't make the German people clever or 'intelligent' by following and not recognizing that it was an evil and immoral plan. Being easily duped brings the word stupid to mind not 'intelligent'. Seriously stupid in fact.


The SouL

LOL, the Germans even invented the moon, the woman and the story of Al Qaida and G.W.Bush ....

[link to uncyclopedia.wikia.com]

Nobody can beat that !