to all CIA/NWO/ILLUMINATI who troll GLP!!!

they are illuminaty, if they care to, im sure they can find and track me, without me needing to register for anything.

please...loyal U.S. citizen!

[link to www.dhs.gov]

You get the red dot on the mailbox.

Life itself I would say. The way a baddie get instantantly hit back if he doesnt conceal , dupe or manipulate someone to his end. How negativity hinder success , evilness radiate weakness ( movies aren't revelent ). The positivity favor the life in every regards.

Forgetting about the One do bring a void in ones mind.

And do you have any statistically relevant evidence to support this hypotheiss.

Can you even objectively define "negativity"?

Spiral theory. It's not an actual theory, so don't look it up.

Drug addicts taking stronger and stronger hits. People with money making more and more money the more they have. That sort of crazy stuff.

Law of diminishing returns, also.

The truism that most things are beneficial in moderation has nothing to do with negativity and "evil". Just because you are Hitler does not mean you have to drink more then 1 glass of wine per day and die of cyrosis.

I wasn't advocating that. I'll exerpt spiral theory further;

Spiral theory is the theory that all things 'spiral' to one side or the other. For example, a man with no money can't make money, and ergo, remains poor, and a rich man with money, can make even more money, becoming more rich. Likewise, an evil person finds it easier being evil, and a good person finds it easier doing good. One car might have an accident, then cause 2-3-4 other vehicles to have accidents. And a traffic delay, causing other knock on negative effects.

A bit like cascade theory, but spiral theory is that it gets better or worse as it progresses.

i still dont understand how this has anything to do with statistically relevant evidence to support the hypothesis that:
negativity hinder success , evilness radiate weakness

in other words i am disputing the premisse that good alwais wins, whereas evil looses becuase it attracts bad karma (and this is in real life not movies)

I am also disputing that good gets to hang out in Nirvana, and evil continues to go through endless karmatic cycles, there is no proof either way

Well, actually, if we're talking pessimism V optimism, apparently optimists were better suited to spotting opportunities. The psychologist guy basically had them count the pictures in a newspaper, and on the 3rd page an article that said 'you can stop reading now, there are X pictures in the newspaper'. The pessimists all missed it.

I also conducted AI studies (own built AI), and found self-limiting beliefs obviously, self-limit. You may refuse to take a completely viable choice due to a previous bad experience.

As for weakness, I don't know what weakness he refers to. If it's a lack of self-control, then yes. But it's a bit ambiguous.

If we consider evil for a second; we have to assume it involves hate. If we hate people, we don't know how to Love them, and ergo, will also hate ourselves. If you think about evil activities, those are self-indulgent addictive behaviours that aren't healthy.



I am not at such a level I could convince you of anything.

But, see it this way; if evil mistreats itself, then Love can look after itself, and by being Loving, generates a form of Love within.

If that makes sense?

Well the modern day Judas; how many pieces of silver will you ask for OP.

I dont believe you can define evil as such.

Evil can also be considered as one that loves itself so much, and does not care for others considering them beneath it.

Or we can define a good person as someone that cares more about others then about itself, therefore not taking care of its own needs and suffering as a result

Evil does not have to be excessive in every regard or stupid and ignorant, evil can be just as intelligent and rational

There are some naive enough to believe that it makes a difference which political party, religious belief, survival theory, or any other "convenient label" matters at all to the controllers.
A wolf will be shot as quickly and efficiently as a sheepdog, as a sheep.

Asking favors from psychopath murderers for betrayal and breach of faith will be rewarded by a similar fate to those you betray.

Even the evil hate traitors.

The "even evil has standards" line.

This why they wouldn't want rats.

What about seven inches of white meat?



.

This enters territory of hard to define words.

Take evil. Evil, as you say, is not caring about others. It's about doing bad things (or otherwise we would have no definition, and wouldn't be able to distinguish). It might not be this definition, but in effect...

It's the opposite of Love... [continuing on...]



...Love. You might see Love as having two different forms, selflessness-type Love (say compassion or affection), or 'romantic' (attraction, desire) pleasure seeking love.

Once we do this, we define two different kinds.

When I am talking about Love, I refer to the first. Most people use it to refer to dual or multi terms. But I mean it in concept of the first.

Now, say we take your point... [requote for relevancy]


If a person loves themselves so much, you'd agree that they think their opinion and life is more important than others?

If they think their opinion is greater (they care about nobody else's), what happens if they are wrong? They can't be corrected. So they cause themselves harm.

Likewise, if they love their own life so much, they can't think it's flawed enough to change. So say a person smokes, and they think themselves so right, when they are told it's bad for them, they don't think it's true - to their own harm.

In a sense, it's a selfishness so great, that it even harms themselves. I will take a problem that afflicted me - I used to eat lots of junk food and be overweight. I did not listen to anybody about changing it because I thought they were wrong (just being offensive) and I was right, and besides, it's my life, who cares if I die of heart attack? This isn't Love.

But if I can show a caring attitude to someone - say I give healthy vegetables to a guest because I am worried about their health - when I next go to get food, in my mind, I think "Well, what about me? If I give some stranger healthy food, why am I giving myself junk food? I know him even less than I know myself!".

Does that make sense?

It only makes sense to those who understand it.

Some humans have a capacity to empathize, and to make decisions based on this and act on that impulse.

Others do not.

That is the basic difference between good and evil.

True.

that is a nice pic

Fiat voluntas tua

Statistic ? Go out and try it yourself , observe peoples and analyze , mostly yourself. Feel things.

Negativity as negativity , the obscure side of things , the unwise..the selfish. Hate for instance isn't always negative , depending of if its self-defence related and if it doesnt blind your judgment.

one of the few logical responces i got to this lol good point

())=============D~~~~~~~~~

you cant eat silver ill take clean water and food.

thats a huge cock AC!

i bet you play d&d, i caught a few key terms.

i bet you play d&d, i caught a few key terms.

Leeroy Jenkins is my d&d hero.

Doubleplusgoodspeak


[link to uncyclopedia.wikia.com]