Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,935 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,574,940
Pageviews Today: 2,165,864Threads Today: 523Posts Today: 10,534
03:29 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted

 
Night_Sky
User ID: 1239917
Canada
01/22/2011 08:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
Honestly, all are created equal, no one is better than anyone else.

Hopefully we can evolve from petty differences.


Peace. :o)

hf
 Quoting: Night_Sky 1239917


All are not equal, but all deserve an equal chance to prove themselves as individuals.
 Quoting: The Guy

I will agree to disagree with you on this. I see everyone as God's children, regardless of race, religion, or geographic location. I agree that we all have the opportunity to make choices in our lives, which determines the individual we become.


Peace. hf
Night_Sky
User ID: 1239917
Canada
01/22/2011 09:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
When you say hierarchically, are you meaning kings and queens?
Isn't that like a pyramid (how the military is setup)?
 Quoting: Night_Sky 1239917


A high priest/mage run monarchy - every sound ancient society was setup this way.
 Quoting: LVPravdaFan

Until someone of unscrupulous morals was in power? Is that how those died out? Very few remain today, and don't seem to be as powerful as they once were.

Just my observation though.

Peace.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 959838
United States
01/22/2011 09:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
no one hates africans but to say they created all advanced civilization is just pure lmao
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1081433

 Quoting: The Guy



LOL
LVPravdaFan

User ID: 1174300
Germany
01/22/2011 09:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
All are not equal, but all deserve an equal chance to prove themselves as individuals.
 Quoting: The Guy


The problem with this attitude is, that it heavily depends on the body, what parts of the spirit can reincarnate and most of the attributes get passed down to the next generations - the reason for all sorts of dynasties to exist throughout history and the obsession of some people with "bloodlines". Although ultimately mind is everything, a suitable body can make a lot of things a lot easier, so it makes sense to believe, that you're not just an atomistic individual, that came out of nothing, but that a long chain lead to, what you're now. It is dangerous though, to overexaggerate this kind of beliefs and create completely closed circles, because this quickly becomes "counterproductive".
LVPravdaFan

User ID: 1174300
Germany
01/22/2011 09:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
Until someone of unscrupulous morals was in power? Is that how those died out? Very few remain today, and don't seem to be as powerful as they once were.
 Quoting: Night_Sky 1239917


The fault of the democrats is, that if you take a great mass of uneducated people, this will add up to what? Politics as show business.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 959838
United States
01/22/2011 09:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
Until someone of unscrupulous morals was in power? Is that how those died out? Very few remain today, and don't seem to be as powerful as they once were.
 Quoting: Night_Sky 1239917


The fault of the democrats is, that if you take a great mass of uneducated people, this will add up to what? Politics as show business.
 Quoting: LVPravdaFan


mentally soft
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 870381
Australia
01/22/2011 09:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
So, what is this supposed to mean? Did the early races all work together and lived in harmony?

Or, did the Africans have an uprising and kicked out the Pharoah who fled to Ireland?


Peace. hf
 Quoting: Night_Sky 1239917



The red hair stuff is intriguing and dovetails with stories of these ancient red-haired Gods…

"As the red haired gods went up the Shannon river and settled in central Ireland, they met the dark haired, dark eyed, smallish cave-dwelling type of the Mediterranean savage. The Conquerors, the Tuath de Danaan, were a tall, blue-eyed, red-haired Caledonian type of Hall dwellers. Today both types may be seen among the Irish people."
— Henry Binkley Stein; Thirty Thousand Gods Before Jehovah
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 870381


Just found this site with all these links to red haired mummies across the globe:

[link to www.burlingtonnews.net]

Red hair is significant because it is so rare:

"Red hair is the rarest of all, about 1% of the world. It is due to high levels of pheomelanin plus low levels of
eumelanin."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 664301
United States
01/22/2011 09:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
ATOM
User ID: 1219735
United States
01/22/2011 09:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
Hmmm, quite a healthy dose of good old fashioned racism in this thread. Well at least we all know we're just a bunch of angry monkies throwing shit at each other.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1118155
United States
01/22/2011 09:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
Obama has Ikhnaton's DNA. figure that one out and you got the whole conspiracy.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1175610
Australia
01/22/2011 10:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted


[/]

Whoever they were, they didnt do pretty!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1175610
Australia
01/22/2011 10:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
so alot of the Egyptian mummies had red hair, so what! The neanderthals also had red hair, so the Egyptians werent "white" as much as a good part neanderthal ..... probably.

Also the "red hair" bit probably explains the use of henna. If the most important people in society have red hair you can be sure everyone would want to copy that and adopt red hair for themselves. It would have been a status thing.

We see something similar today with everyone dyeing their hair blonde. When I was a kid all the most desirable women were blonde, so what did all my friends do? Dyed their hair to look as "desirable" as the blonde girls. Its funny seeing latin women with blonde hair, but hell everyone tries to do it!!!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 870381
Australia
01/22/2011 10:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
so alot of the Egyptian mummies had red hair, so what! The neanderthals also had red hair, so the Egyptians werent "white" as much as a good part neanderthal ..... probably.

Also the "red hair" bit probably explains the use of henna. If the most important people in society have red hair you can be sure everyone would want to copy that and adopt red hair for themselves. It would have been a status thing.

We see something similar today with everyone dyeing their hair blonde. When I was a kid all the most desirable women were blonde, so what did all my friends do? Dyed their hair to look as "desirable" as the blonde girls. Its funny seeing latin women with blonde hair, but hell everyone tries to do it!!!!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1175610


The red hair is rare (1%). Extraordinarily so in the case of Egypt because it is uncommon to the region:

‘In modern people from equatorial areas, dark skin and hair is needed to guard against skin cancer caused by strong UV radiation from the Sun.

By contrast, pale skin - along with red or blond hair - appears to be the product of lower levels of sunlight present in areas further from the equator such as Europe. ‘

[link to news.bbc.co.uk]

The Neanderthal stuff is interesting but appears to be a red herring in this case.

'The researchers saw the same loss of function in the Neanderthal form of MC1R as they did in modern variants of the gene which produce red hair.

"In Neanderthals, there was probably the whole range of hair colour we see today in modern European populations, from dark to blond right through to red," Dr Lalueza-Fox told the BBC News website.

To Dr Lalueza-Fox, the observation that the Neanderthal version of the gene is not found in modern humans suggests they did not interbreed with each other, as some scientists have proposed.
[link to news.bbc.co.uk]

Still it’s something to think about.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1240036
United States
01/22/2011 11:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
no one mentioned MICHAEL TSARION?irish origins?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 870381
Australia
01/22/2011 11:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
no one mentioned MICHAEL TSARION?irish origins?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1240036


I referenced Tsarion on pg 4.
telling it straight
User ID: 642221
United States
01/22/2011 11:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
the only thing caucasian about king tut was his diamonds. ive never seen a white face anywhere on the walls of ancient egyptian kingdom. not one. why dont you whites be proud of your lackluster european history and leave african history alone. bunch of thieves.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1048760



The picture you're showing here as "proof" is of Nubians.

The Egyptians warred with the black Nubians of what is now Sudan. The Nubians are depicted in ancient Egyptian paintings as ENEMIES of the Egyptians. They are shown being conquered by the Egyptians or as slaves of the Egyptians.

I was in Egypt in September and I've seen this for myself. My guide, an Egyptian with a degree in Egyptology, teaches in Egypt and has taught in the United States. He was exceedingly clear that the Nubians were NOT Egyptians.

NONE of the pharaohs--save one--were pictured with Afro-centric features.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1228167
Canada
01/22/2011 11:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
According to history, Britain traded with Phenicians 3000 years B.C. So they had connections to that part of the world. Not sure but I think the English alphabet is based on the Phenician alphabet.
SouthernLight

User ID: 1130009
United States
01/22/2011 11:22 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
Hmmm, quite a healthy dose of good old fashioned racism in this thread. Well at least we all know we're just a bunch of angry monkies throwing shit at each other.
 Quoting: ATOM 1219735



chuckle
Yeah, pretty weird huh?

A Lot of interesting info and speculations too!
History... REAL historic information... is priceless.

something a teacher used to say...
"Know what has been to know what will be."
“You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep”
Navajo proverb
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1240036
United States
01/22/2011 11:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
sorry mate
Nothing is true

User ID: 1239192
United Kingdom
01/22/2011 11:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
Total bsflag
 Quoting: Nothing is true

You have my attention. But please say why.
 Quoting: Fallenmonk

Basically, it's the opening sentence of the thread that does it for me..
'Despite the refusal of the Secretary General of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, Zahi Hawass, to release any DNA results which might indicate the racial ancestry of Pharaoh Tutankhamen, the leaked results reveal that King Tut’s DNA is a 99.6 percent match with Western European Y chromosomes.'
I could write an archaeological essay about that very sentence. It just gets posted over and over again (Google it) without proper references. I think it was first used as a caption on a YouTube vid, but I'm not yet absolutely sure of it's true origin. I wish I'd written it though! lol It's one of those archaeo-nuggets on the internet that snowball - and end up in meme/mantra territory. To use it just shows a lack of proper research by the poster.
Everything is permitted..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1237114
Bahamas
01/22/2011 11:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
the only thing caucasian about king tut was his diamonds. ive never seen a white face anywhere on the walls of ancient egyptian kingdom. not one. why dont you whites be proud of your lackluster european history and leave african history alone. bunch of thieves.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1048760



The picture you're showing here as "proof" is of Nubians.

The Egyptians warred with the black Nubians of what is now Sudan. The Nubians are depicted in ancient Egyptian paintings as ENEMIES of the Egyptians. They are shown being conquered by the Egyptians or as slaves of the Egyptians.

I was in Egypt in September and I've seen this for myself. My guide, an Egyptian with a degree in Egyptology, teaches in Egypt and has taught in the United States. He was exceedingly clear that the Nubians were NOT Egyptians.

NONE of the pharaohs--save one--were pictured with Afro-centric features.
 Quoting: telling it straight 642221


nubians were apart of egyptian society as clearly depicted on the walls of the tombs. the nubians were very dark as the egyptians were brown skinned but they were still apart of the negro race. the sphinx face is negroid as all of the pharaohs. ancient egyptians were african. simple as that.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1240061
Canada
01/23/2011 12:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
the only thing caucasian about king tut was his diamonds. ive never seen a white face anywhere on the walls of ancient egyptian kingdom. not one. why dont you whites be proud of your lackluster european history and leave african history alone. bunch of thieves.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1048760

You are probably right, but the Ancient Egyptian were certainly not Negro. They may well have been more like the East Africans, like Ethiopians. Probably Ethiopian types mixed with Greek and other Mediterranean types.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 959838
United States
01/23/2011 12:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted

the Ancient Egyptian were certainly not Negro.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1048760


Red haired and blonde haired. DNA is DNA
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1237114
Bahamas
01/23/2011 01:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
the only thing caucasian about king tut was his diamonds. ive never seen a white face anywhere on the walls of ancient egyptian kingdom. not one. why dont you whites be proud of your lackluster european history and leave african history alone. bunch of thieves.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1048760

You are probably right, but the Ancient Egyptian were certainly not Negro. They may well have been more like the East Africans, like Ethiopians. Probably Ethiopian types mixed with Greek and other Mediterranean types.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1240061

bullshit! egyptians were negro. blacks come in all colors, looks and sizes. from lt brown to jet black. nappy hair to wavy hair. broad noses to straight noses . thick lips to thin lips. tall or short. australoid, melanoid to negroid. they are all of the black race. ethiopians are negroes. they arent mixed with european. not all blacks have nappy hair. just because a black man might have wavy hair or straight noses does not mean they have caucasian blood. egyptians and ethiopians are who they are, AFRICANS.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1235449
United States
01/23/2011 01:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
Obama has Ikhnaton's DNA. figure that one out and you got the whole conspiracy.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1118155


???? That comes with a link or you stink ???
MG-42

User ID: 1240128
Canada
01/23/2011 01:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
Thread: The truth, 2012, Obama, and the cycle/ updated
No New World Order, only a New World of Brotherhood and Unity.

'The workers have to rebel against their masters, and to become masters of themselves. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains'

Education is a RIGHT, NOT a privilege

No one deserves privileges, we ALL deserve rights! A privilege means that some one is better than you. Which is NOT CORRECT. We ALL breath the same air, we ALL share the same Earth. ONLY Brotherhood and Unity

We ALL bleed RED.

Thread: The real facts about your leaders / The Fascist NWO agenda
Thread: NATO funded neo-Nazi's during Yugoslav Civil War/breakup of Yugoslavia
Thread: NATO symbol is the Swastika/National Socialist Empire
Thread: the Doppler Effect, the spirals, and Nibiru
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 959838
United States
01/23/2011 01:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1236634
Saudi Arabia
01/23/2011 04:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
If this is true,and I do not think that .
Then that it will be prove that the white Race is a very bloodiest Races ,since time immemorial,and they are still, the most slaughter bloodiest butcheries persecutions people in the all history... Oh my God
Fallenmonk

User ID: 1240290
United Kingdom
01/23/2011 06:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
Total bsflag
 Quoting: Nothing is true

You have my attention. But please say why.
 Quoting: Fallenmonk

Basically, it's the opening sentence of the thread that does it for me..
'Despite the refusal of the Secretary General of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, Zahi Hawass, to release any DNA results which might indicate the racial ancestry of Pharaoh Tutankhamen, the leaked results reveal that King Tut’s DNA is a 99.6 percent match with Western European Y chromosomes.'
I could write an archaeological essay about that very sentence. It just gets posted over and over again (Google it) without proper references. I think it was first used as a caption on a YouTube vid, but I'm not yet absolutely sure of it's true origin. I wish I'd written it though! lol It's one of those archaeo-nuggets on the internet that snowball - and end up in meme/mantra territory. To use it just shows a lack of proper research by the poster.
 Quoting: Nothing is true

Thanks for the reply.
We will pass through the Seven Years or serve God's Will as martyrs.
The Guy

User ID: 1233535
United States
01/23/2011 09:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: King Tut's Royal DNA Results Posted
bullshit! egyptians were negro. blacks come in all colors, looks and sizes. from lt brown to jet black. nappy hair to wavy hair. broad noses to straight noses . thick lips to thin lips. tall or short. australoid, melanoid to negroid. they are all of the black race. ethiopians are negroes. they arent mixed with european. not all blacks have nappy hair. just because a black man might have wavy hair or straight noses does not mean they have caucasian blood. egyptians and ethiopians are who they are, AFRICANS.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1237114


I have thin lips, a straight nose, and wavy hair. Does that mean I'm black?
It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out.

News