Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,040 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 927,752
Pageviews Today: 1,546,134Threads Today: 629Posts Today: 11,026
03:36 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject THE PERFECT GENETIC STORM - Synthetic DNA & the Gulf Blue Plague
Poster Handle Oiled in Florida
Post Content
That's what I was thinking. I think they knew that the spew was introducing a great deal of "food" so-to-speak, into the gulf, but also knew they have to provide catalysts for breakdowns to occur at a rapid pace.

Does it seem like we're tempting fate ?

Or is it just me ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1235854


TRACE ELEMENTS ADDED TO THE GULF

In the same CS Monitor report, University of Georgia microbiologist Samantha Joye stated how

“[The Gulf] is not well stocked with trace elements the bacteria need to survive - among them, copper, which bacteria specifically use to deal with the methane. Shortages of copper, as well as other trace elements, likely would have slammed the brakes on the exponential growth in bacterial populations needed to get rid of the methane in fewer than four months.”

The same applies to hydrocarbon-eating bacteria that consume oil, except that iron is needed more than the other trace elements. Since copper and iron are not prevalent mineral elements normally found in the Gulf of Mexico, the synthetic bacterium eating both the oil and the methane would not be able to do so at the remarkable speed they have without such essential earth elements. The only possible way these synthetic bacterium could have done this is by adding the required elements to the Gulf. Spraying a highly dissolved or colloidal mixture of trace elements onto and into the Gulf of Mexico would be absolutely required to accomplish this.

In our October 21, 2010 research article The Gulf BLUE PLAGUE (BP): It’s Not Wise To Fool Mother Nature [link to worldvisionportal.org] , we had revealed the abnormally high amounts of elements found in the Gulf and that it was being sprayed along with or separately from the oil dispersants.

In August 2010, rain water samples were tested by the Coastal Heritage Society of Louisiana [link to chsl.webs.com] where rain coming directly from the Gulf had unusually high concentrations of iron, copper, nickel, aluminum, manganese, and arsenic.

Without a doubt, the synthetically created bacterium introduced into the Gulf of Mexico to consume the oil and gasses were – and continue to be - fed these essential trace elements. Otherwise, they could not have thrived or reproduced at the accelerated rate they have.

The continued spraying in the Gulf by aircraft and by boat is not Corexit or other oil dispersal chemicals. Consider the current spraying to have the same effect of adding liquid fertilizer to your crops.

[link to blueplague.org]
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP