Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,391 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 303,170
Pageviews Today: 443,029Threads Today: 182Posts Today: 2,562
04:06 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/22/2011 09:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
'My Plan for a Freedom President
How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'


by: Ron Paul



Since my 2008 campaign for the presidency I have often been asked, “How would a constitutionalist president go about dismantling the welfare-warfare state and restoring a constitutional republic?” This is a very important question, because without a clear road map and set of priorities, such a president runs the risk of having his pro-freedom agenda stymied by the various vested interests that benefit from big government.

Of course, just as the welfare-warfare state was not constructed in 100 days, it could not be dismantled in the first 100 days of any presidency. While our goal is to reduce the size of the state as quickly as possible, we should always make sure our immediate proposals minimize social disruption and human suffering. Thus, we should not seek to abolish the social safety net overnight because that would harm those who have grown dependent on government-provided welfare. Instead, we would want to give individuals who have come to rely on the state time to prepare for the day when responsibility for providing aide is returned to those organizations best able to administer compassionate and effective help — churches and private charities.

Now, this need for a transition period does not apply to all types of welfare. For example, I would have no problem defunding corporate welfare programs, such as the Export-Import Bank or the TARP bank bailouts, right away. I find it difficult to muster much sympathy for the CEO's of Lockheed Martin and Goldman Sachs.

No matter what the president wants to do, most major changes in government programs would require legislation to be passed by Congress. Obviously, the election of a constitutionalist president would signal that our ideas had been accepted by a majority of the American public and would probably lead to the election of several pro-freedom congressmen and senators. Furthermore, some senators and representatives would become “born again” constitutionalists out of a sense of self-preservation. Yet there would still be a fair number of politicians who would try to obstruct our freedom agenda. Thus, even if a president wanted to eliminate every unconstitutional program in one fell swoop, he would be very unlikely to obtain the necessary support in Congress.

Yet a pro-freedom president and his legislative allies could make tremendous progress simply by changing the terms of the negotiations that go on in Washington regarding the size and scope of government. Today, negotiations over legislation tend to occur between those who want a 100 percent increase in federal spending and those who want a 50 percent increase. Their compromise is a 75 percent increase. With a president serious about following the Constitution, backed by a substantial block of sympathetic representatives in Congress, negotiations on outlays would be between those who want to keep funding the government programs and those who want to eliminate them outright — thus a compromise would be a 50 percent decrease in spending!

While a president who strictly adheres to the Constitution would need the consent of Congress for very large changes in the size of government, such as shutting down cabinet departments, he could use his constitutional authority as head of the executive branch and as commander in chief to take several significant steps toward liberty on his own. The area where the modern chief executive has greatest ability to act unilaterally is in foreign affairs. Unfortunately, Congress has abdicated its constitutional authority to declare wars, instead passing vague “authorization of force” bills that allow the president to send any number of troops to almost any part of the world. The legislature does not even effectively use its power of the purse to rein in the executive. Instead, Congress serves as little more than a rubber stamp for the president's requests.

If the president has the power to order U.S. forces into combat on nothing more than his own say-so, then it stands to reason he can order troops home. Therefore, on the first day in office, a constitutionalist can begin the orderly withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq and Afghanistan. He can also begin withdrawing troops from other areas of the world. The United States has over 300,000 troops stationed in more than 146 countries. Most if not all of these deployments bear little or no relationship to preserving the safety of the American people. For example, over 20 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the U.S. still maintains troops in Germany.

Domestically, the president can use his authority to set policies and procedures for the federal bureaucracy to restore respect for the Constitution and individual liberty. For example, today manufacturers of dietary supplements are subject to prosecution by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or Federal Trade Commission (FTC) if they make even truthful statements about the health benefits of their products without going through the costly and time-consuming procedures required to gain government approval for their claims. A president can put an end to this simply by ordering the FDA and FTC not to pursue these types of cases unless they have clear evidence that the manufacturer's clams are not true. Similarly, the president could order the bureaucracy to stop prosecuting consumers who wish to sell raw milk across state lines.

A crucial policy that a president could enact to bring speedy improvements to government is ordering the bureaucracy to respect the 10th Amendment and refrain from undermining state laws. We have already seen a little renewed federalism with the current administration's policy of not prosecuting marijuana users when their use of the drug is consistent with state medical-marijuana laws. A constitutionalist administration would also defer to state laws refusing compliance with the REAL ID act and denying federal authority over interstate gun transactions. None of these actions repeals a federal law; they all simply recognize a state's primary authority, as protected by the 10th amendment, to set policy in these areas.

In fact, none of the measures I have discussed so far involves repealing any written law. They can be accomplished simply by a president exercising his legitimate authority to set priorities for the executive branch. And another important step he can take toward restoring the balance of powers the Founders intended is repealing unconstitutional executive orders issued by his predecessors.

Executive orders are a useful management tool for the president, who must exercise control over the enormous federal bureaucracy. However, in recent years executive orders have been used by presidents to create new federal laws without the consent of Congress. As President Clinton's adviser Paul Begala infamously said, “stroke of the pen, law of the land, pretty cool.” No, it is not “pretty cool,” and a conscientious president could go a long way toward getting us back to the Constitution's division of powers by ordering his counsel or attorney general to comb through recent executive orders so the president can annul those that exceed the authority of his office. If the President believed a particular Executive Order made a valid change in the law, then he should work with Congress to pass legislation making that change.

Only Congress can directly abolish government departments, but the president could use his managerial powers to shrink the federal bureaucracy by refusing to fill vacancies created by retirements or resignations. This would dramatically reduce the number of federal officials wasting our money and taking our liberties. One test to determine if a vacant job needs to be filled is the “essential employees test.” Whenever D.C. has a severe snowstorm, the federal government orders all “non-essential” federal personal to stay home. If someone is classified as non-essential for snow-day purposes, the country can probably survive if that position is not filled when the jobholder quits or retires. A constitutionalist president should make every day in D.C. like a snow day!

A president could also enhance the liberties and security of the American people by ordering federal agencies to stop snooping on citizens when there is no evidence that those who are being spied on have committed a crime. Instead, the president should order agencies to refocus on the legitimate responsibilities of the federal government, such as border security. He should also order the Transportation Security Administration to stop strip-searching grandmothers and putting toddlers on the no-fly list. The way to keep Americans safe is to focus on real threats and ensure that someone whose own father warns U.S. officials he's a potential terrorist is not allowed to board a Christmas Eve flight to Detroit with a one-way ticket.

Perhaps the most efficient step a president could take to enhance travel security is to remove the federal roadblocks that have frustrated attempts to arm pilots. Congress created provisions to do just that in response to the attacks of September 11, 2001. However, the processes for getting a federal firearms license are extremely cumbersome, and as a result very few pilots have gotten their licenses. A constitutionalist in the Oval Office would want to revise those regulations to make it as easy as possible for pilots to get approval to carry firearms on their planes.

While the president can do a great deal on his own, to really restore the Constitution and cut back on the vast unconstitutional programs that have sunk roots in Washington over 60 years, he will have to work with Congress. The first step in enacting a pro-freedom legislative agenda is the submission of a budget that outlines the priorities of the administration. While it has no legal effect, the budget serves as a guideline for the congressional appropriations process. A constitutionalist president's budget should do the following:

1. Reduce overall federal spending
2. Prioritize cuts in oversize expenditures, especially the military
3. Prioritize cuts in corporate welfare
4. Use 50 percent of the savings from cuts in overseas spending to shore up entitlement programs for those who are dependent on them and the other 50 percent to pay down the debt
5. Provide for reduction in federal bureaucracy and lay out a plan to return responsibility for education to the states
6. Begin transitioning entitlement programs from a system where all Americans are forced to participate into one where taxpayers can opt out of the programs and make their own provisions for retirement and medical care

If Congress failed to produce a budget that was balanced and moved the country in a pro-liberty direction, a constitutionalist president should veto the bill. Of course, vetoing the budget risks a government shutdown. But a serious constitutionalist cannot be deterred by cries of “it's irresponsible to shut down the government!” Instead, he should simply say, “I offered a reasonable compromise, which was to gradually reduce spending, and Congress rejected it, instead choosing the extreme path of continuing to jeopardize America's freedom and prosperity by refusing to tame the welfare-warfare state. I am the moderate; those who believe that America can afford this bloated government are the extremists.”

Unconstitutional government spending, after all, is doubly an evil: it not only means picking the taxpayer's pocket, it also means subverting the system of limited and divided government that the Founders created. Just look at how federal spending has corrupted American education.

Eliminating federal involvement in K—12 education should be among a constitutionalist president's top domestic priorities. The Constitution makes no provision for federal meddling in education. It is hard to think of a function less suited to a centralized, bureaucratic approach than education. The very idea that a group of legislators and bureaucrats in D.C. can design a curriculum capable of meeting the needs of every American schoolchild is ludicrous. The deteriorating performance of our schools as federal control over the classroom has grown shows the folly of giving Washington more power over American education. President Bush's No Child Left Behind law claimed it would fix education by making public schools “accountable.” However, supporters of the law failed to realize that making schools more accountable to federal agencies, instead of to parents, was just perpetuating the problem.

In the years since No Child Left Behind was passed, I don't think I have talked to any parent or teacher who is happy with the law. Therefore, a constitutionalist president looking for ways to improve the lives of children should demand that Congress cut the federal education bureaucracy as a down payment on eventually returning 100 percent of the education dollar to parents.

Traditionally, the battle to reduce the federal role in education has been the toughest one faced by limited-government advocates, as supporters of centralized education have managed to paint constitutionalists as “anti-education.” But who is really anti-education? Those who wish to continue to waste taxpayer money on failed national schemes, or those who want to restore control over education to the local level? When the debate is framed this way, I have no doubt the side of liberty will win. When you think about it, the argument that the federal government needs to control education is incredibly insulting to the American people, for it implies that the people are too stupid or uncaring to educate their children properly. Contrary to those who believe that only the federal government can ensure children's education, I predict a renaissance in education when parents are put back in charge.

The classroom is not the only place the federal government does not belong. We also need to reverse the nationalization of local police. Federal grants have encouraged the militarization of law enforcement, which has led to great damage to civil liberties. Like education, law enforcement is inherently a local function, and ending programs such as the Byrne Grants is essential not just to reducing federal spending but also to restoring Americans' rights.

Obviously, a president concerned with restoring constitutional government and fiscal responsibility would need to address the unstable entitlement situation, possibly the one area of government activity even more difficult to address than education. Yet it is simply unfair to continue to force young people to participate in a compulsory retirement program when they could do a much better job of preparing for their own retirements. What is more, the government cannot afford the long-term expenses of entitlements, even if we were to reduce all other unconstitutional foreign and domestic programs.

As I mentioned in the introduction to this article, it would be wrong simply to cut these programs and throw those who are dependent on them “into the streets.” After all, the current recipients of these programs have come to rely on them, and many are in a situation where they cannot provide for themselves without government assistance. The thought of people losing the ability to obtain necessities for them because they were misled into depending on a government safety net that has been yanked away from them should trouble all of us. However, the simple fact is that if the government does not stop spending money on welfare and warfare, America may soon face an economic crisis that could lead to people being thrown into the street.

Therefore, a transition away from the existing entitlement scheme is needed. This is why a constitutionalist president should propose devoting half of the savings from the cuts in wars and other foreign spending, corporate welfare, and unnecessary and unconstitutional bureaucracies to shoring up Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid and providing enough money to finance government's obligations to those who are already stuck in the system and cannot make alternative provisions. This re-routing of spending would allow payroll taxes to be slashed. The eventual goal would be to move to a completely voluntary system where people only pay payroll taxes into Social Security and Medicare if they choose to participate in those programs. Americans who do not want to participate would be free not to do so, but they would forgo any claim to Social Security or Medicare benefits after retirement.

Some people raise concerns that talk of transitions is an excuse for indefinitely putting off the end of the welfare state. I understand those concerns, which is why a transition plan must lay out a clear timetable for paying down the debt, eliminating unconstitutional bureaucracies, and setting a firm date for when young people can at last opt out of the entitlement programs.

A final area that should be front and center in a constitutionalist's agenda is monetary policy. The Founders obviously did not intend for the president to have much influence over the nation's money — in fact, they never intended any part of the federal government to operate monetary policy as it defined now. However, today a president could play an important role in restoring stability to monetary policy and the value of the dollar. To start, by fighting for serious reductions in spending, a constitutionalist administration would remove one of the major justifications for the Federal Reserve's inflationary policies, the need to monetize government debt.

There are additional steps a pro-freedom president should pursue in his first term to restore sound monetary policy. He should ask Congress to pass two pieces of legislation I have introduced in the 110th Congress. The first is the Audit the Fed bill, which would allow the American people to learn just how the Federal Reserve has been conducting monetary policy. The other is the Free Competition in Currency Act, which repeals legal tender laws and all taxes on gold and silver. This would introduce competition in currency and put a check on the Federal Reserve by ensuring that people have alternatives to government-produced fiat money.

All of these measures will take a lot of work — a lot more than any one person, even the president of the United States, can accomplish by himself. In order to restore the country to the kind of government the Founders meant for us to have, a constitutionalist president would need the support of an active liberty movement. Freedom activists must be ready to pressure wavering legislators to stand up to the special interests and stay the course toward freedom. Thus, when the day comes when someone who shares our beliefs sits in the Oval Office, groups like Young Americans for Liberty and Campaign for Liberty will still have a vital role to play. No matter how many pro-freedom politicians we elect to office, the only way to guarantee constitutional government is through an educated and activist public devoted to the ideals of the liberty.

For that reason, the work of Young Americans for Liberty in introducing young people to the freedom philosophy and getting them involved in the freedom movement is vital to the future of our country. I thank all the members and supporters of YAL for their dedication to changing the political debate in this country, so that in the not-too-distant future we actually will have a president and a Congress debating the best ways to shrink the welfare-warfare state and restore the republic.

This essay originally appeared in Young American Revolution, the magazine of Young Americans for Liberty.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/22/2011 10:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
bump yoda
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 769657
United States
01/22/2011 10:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
He's too great to succeed in this phony lying zionshithole.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/23/2011 07:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
History of Men and Laws are rooted in individual Liberty.
Our current struggles are just a bump in the road.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/23/2011 09:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
bump for Liberty.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/24/2011 07:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
bump for America.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/24/2011 09:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
bump Ron Paul 2012
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1085245
United States
01/24/2011 09:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
Ron Paul is a MORAN an an obstructionist!!



.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1242146
United States
01/24/2011 09:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
Ron Paul is a MORAN an an obstructionist!!



.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1085245


And you're a commie douchebag.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/24/2011 09:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
Ron Paul is a MORAN an an obstructionist!!



.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1085245


Proove it.
Matrix
User ID: 1166681
Australia
01/24/2011 09:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
When a nations leaders(public servants(representatives) take oaths(limited government), and then they enter into other "oaths" to bring forth global governance(unlimited government), you have to wonder which master is being served, for a slave can't love two Masters, they will love the one, and fear the other
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/25/2011 02:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
bump for Truth.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 931933
United States
01/25/2011 02:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
He's too great to succeed in this phony lying zionshithole.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 769657



To great to succeed. That's an oxymoron. oxymoran.

If he was so great, he'd have the knowledge to know how to overthrow the system! He's so great he can't even get into power.

Now, Obama, he knows the system. He got into Power, and look at what he did. Threw healthcare down our throats and now his ratings are going back up setting him up for a 2012 win.

Obama's so great, you are under his power. That is what greatness is.

PS, for those that think the ratings are a lie, no, they are the truth. The President was able to give you something you didn't like, and you came back to liking him.

PSS, for those who don't think Obama is legally President, he is until someone legally says otherwise.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/25/2011 03:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
bump to unshackle us from the political machine. Down with the CFR agenda.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/25/2011 03:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
bump yoda
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/25/2011 04:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
“We can achieve much more in peace than we can ever achieve in these needless, unconstitutional, undeclared wars.” -Ron Paul

bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/25/2011 05:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
Ron Paul vs TSA

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1243306
United States
01/25/2011 05:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
“We can achieve much more in peace than we can ever achieve in these needless, unconstitutional, undeclared wars.” -Ron Paul

bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1185634


clappa

It's no wonder the Jews hate him.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/25/2011 07:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
"The Federal Reserve Is Responsible For The Inflation, The Business Cycle, Unemployment!" -Ron Paul 1/24/2011

Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/25/2011 07:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'


Ron Paul 2012
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1222286
United States
01/25/2011 07:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
he should legalize drugs finally

and order all current corrupt officials and elites in America to pay restitution to the American people for their crimes in addition to being punished to the full extent of the law.

BUT it'll NEVER happen. He would be quickly taken care of; I'm sure of it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1243306
United States
01/25/2011 07:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
Ron Paul is a MORAN an an obstructionist!!



.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1085245


Proove it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1185634


He means Ron Paul is obstructing the zionazi agenda.
DanfromtheHills

User ID: 945238
United States
01/25/2011 07:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
Thanks for posting OP.

Dammit Dr. Paul, why didn't you say this stuff in 2008? Your biggest problem was the public perceived that your changes would be too drastic!

agumball

That piece would have been invaluable to promote Dr. Paul in 2008.

Last Edited by DanfromtheHills on 01/25/2011 07:39 PM
"Nothing to see here, go back to sheep..." --- AC 1251379
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/25/2011 11:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
You're welcome.

bump for Freedom and the common sense of Ron Paul.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/26/2011 01:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
Ron Paul during Stossels' Libertarian response of the 1/25/2011 State of the Union Address

[Part 1]


[Part 2]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/26/2011 02:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
bump yoda
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/26/2011 09:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
"If you like small government you need to work hard at having a strong national defense that is not so militant. Personal liberty is the purpose of government, to protect liberty - not to run your personal life, not to run the economy, and not to pretend that we can tell the world how they ought to live." -Ron Paul



bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 989190
United States
01/26/2011 09:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
The 26th amendment (granting the right to vote for 18-year-olds) took
only 3 months & 8 days to be ratified! Why? Simple! The people
demanded it. That was in 1971...before computers, before e-mail,
before cell phones, etc.

Of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, seven (7) took 1 year or less
to become the law of the land...all because of public pressure.



I'm asking each addressee to forward this email to a minimum of twenty
people on their address list; in turn ask each of those to do likewise.

In three days, most people in The United States of America will have
the message.. This is one idea that really should be passed around.


Congressional Reform Act of 2011



1. Term Limits.

12 years only, one of the possible options below..

A. Two Six-year Senate terms

B. Six Two-year House terms

C. One Six-year Senate term and three Two-Year House terms


2. No Tenure / No Pension.

A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay
when they are out of office.


3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security.

All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social
Security system immediately.

All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress
participates with the American people.


4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all
Americans do.


5. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional
pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.


6. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in
the same health care system as the American people.


7. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American
people.


8. All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective
1/1/11.

The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen.
Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers
envisioned citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home and back to work.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/26/2011 10:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
"Ron Paul and other non-interventionist conservatives to discuss alternatives to Afghan war (with the president of the CFR!)"

Thread: Ron Paul and other non-interventionist conservatives to discuss alternatives to Afghan war (with the president of the CFR!)
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/26/2011 08:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
"We've taken upon ourselves too much. We've become the policeman of the World, we take care of our people from cradle to grave We have a monetary system that is out of control, we don't have any control of the interest rates and people own our debt, foreigner own our debt, we're indebted to the World. It's a big, big problem. So, I think we have to have a revolutionary idea about the role of government. What should the scope of Government be. And, we will have that argument; not tonight, not next week, and not next year. We'll have it because this is unsustainable system and then we'll have to sit down and talk about what is the proper role of Government in a Free society." - Ron Paul 1/25/11 'The Neil Cavuto Show'


Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1185634
United States
01/26/2011 08:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 'My Plan for a Freedom President How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office'
"It is no coincidence that the century of total war coincided with the century of central banking." — Ron Paul