Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,154 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 374,526
Pageviews Today: 478,333Threads Today: 118Posts Today: 1,964
04:11 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK

 
ME
User ID: 1240139
Germany
01/23/2011 01:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
ANYONE HERE ACTUALLY READ ALL OF HIS EARTH CHRONICLES?

AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED THAT IS MOST LIKELY WHAT HAPPENED-IT CERTAINLY MAKES SENSE WITH WHAT IS GOING ON THESE DAYS,

I AM NOT SAYING THAT ALL OF IT WENT DOWN EXACTLY LIKE THAT BUT WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE MAIN POINTS AND THE WEALTH OF INFORMATION HE TIES TOGETHER THEN I WOULD SAY HE IS ON THE RIGHT TRACK.

I HAVE READ THE WORKS SEVERAL TIMES OVER TWENTY YEARS AND IN THAT TIME HAVE SEEN NEW RESEARCH AND/OR SCIENTIFIC BREAKTHROUGHS FIT RIGHT IN.

ALSO VILEKOVSKIS WORKS CONCERNING CATASTROPHISM,YOU READ IT?
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1229928
United States
01/23/2011 01:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
Real quick and then im going to let you finish.

In the alternate timeline where you did not use all caps more people were receptive to your post.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1240139
Germany
01/23/2011 01:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
Real quick and then im going to let you finish.

In the alternate timeline where you did not use all caps more people were receptive to your post.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1229928


IF THAT REALLY MAKES A DIFFERENCE THEN HUMANITY IS TRULY PATHETIC BUT OF COURSE IT DOES NOT,only to the caveman.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1239080
United States
01/23/2011 01:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
FlyingInTheLight

User ID: 1111184
United States
01/23/2011 02:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
With the exception of The Lost Book of Enki, I have not read all of his works in their entireties, but I have read synopses of each of them. I agree that there are some things that Mr. Sitchin either may have got wrong or misinterpreted, but I also believe that his general version of the events is far more accurate than what "science" has come up with.

Shortly before Mr. Sitchin passed, I read an interview with him (which, of course, I can't find now!) wherein the interviewer said that several people had pointed out some seeming inconsistencies across the arc of the books. Mr. Sitchin's response was that because he was learning more about the language as he went along, he did make mistakes in the translations in the earlier works. However, since they were already into multiple printings by the time he realized his errors, there was no way to go back and edit them, so he simply corrected the issues in the later books.

Unfortunately, he never published a list of such errata, and that interview was the only time he was ever asked about or referred to the issue.
The Professor
User ID: 660063
United States
01/23/2011 04:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
I've read 12 of Sitchin's books and three of Velikovsky's.

Velikovsky was not aware of Planet X but he did opine that the Earth goes through periods of great catastrophe, including pole shifts, which he attributed to an unidentified extraterrestrial influence. He claimed that such events occurred every 3,500-4,00 years, and Sitchin - writing later - claimed that Planet X entered our solar system every 3,600 years. Velikovsky did not claim that pole shits happened every 3,500-4,000 years, but rather in multiples of that time span. He wrote about global floods caused by the Earth's rotation stoppage, and stated that Earth changes which were previously attributed to glaciers moving across the land were in reality caused by flood waters going north and south from the equator. When the Earth stopped rotating, the absence of centrifugal force allowed water accumulated around the equator to recede towards the poles, causing devastating flooding across the continents.

The only thing I can say is that Planet X is for real. Everything ties together: Velikovsky, Sitchin, the Bible, NASA records and newspaper articles from the 70s and 80s concerning the search for Planet X, and present-day earth changes.

What I find most interesting is that in the 1970s scientists around the world verified that there was another body in our solar system which had an outward and downward attraction on the outer planets. These scientists confirmed that this body was much larger than the Earth, had a highly elliptical orbit and was below the ecliptic. This information was published in newspapers and discussed openly. It wasn't until the 1990s that a lid was clamped down on all news related to Planet X. I believe this is when the government first realized the danger associated with the passage of Planet X. Note: According to Sitchin, Planet X has a very elliptical orbit and approaches our inner solar system from 30 degrees below the ecliptic, so that Sitchin's description of Planet X matches the early scientific consensus.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1230511
United States
01/23/2011 04:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
Hello OP, I haven't read Sitchins books, but my Dad is an avid reader. There is a few things I have trouble believing.
1. How can a jupiter sized planet sustain humanoid life since the force of gravity would be enourmous.
2. How can such a planet with such a wide orbit outside of the solar system maintain temperatures and conditions to sustain life.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 687593
Sweden
01/23/2011 05:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
Tantalus

User ID: 967932
United States
01/23/2011 05:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
I believe you have to tell a little bit of the truth to tell a believable lie.

I am aware that many of the specifics of his translations are inacurate, however, the overall theme is correct.

There are other translation sources.
"Those who would sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither"
--Benjamin Franlkin

No one ever said freedom was safe. Upon true understanding of the concepts of freedom, you shall realize that freedom is the most dangerous choice of lifestyle. There are no guarantees in freedom but those one provides for themselves, at their own will. True freedom comes with extreme personal risk. Are you willing to take the risk?

Thread: No One Ever Said Freedom Was Safe - A Short Thesis on Gun Control

------------------------
Other Interesting Threads by Tantalus:
Thread: The Real Secret of the Pentagram - Venus Transit - 6/6/12 - and ISON
Thread: Anunnaki, Nibiru, Brown Dwarfs, and Gravitational Time Dilation
Thread: Amazing Connection!! The Great Pyramid was a Weapon. Valles Marineris the Result?
Allabtme
User ID: 1238590
Brazil
01/23/2011 06:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
Did not read from the originals but lot of stuff over the net. Don't believe or disbelieve. It is a possibility you have to take under consideration. Many solar systems are binary, around 80%, and serious physicists and astronomers study it. It explains many things, like Golden and Dark ages, precession of the equinoxes etc. Take a good look at: binaryreasearchinstitute. But to believe in ET from one planet of this brother solar system that created mankind and enslaved us to produce gold in order to warm them...
FlyingInTheLight

User ID: 1111184
United States
01/23/2011 03:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
Unfortunately, he never published a list of such errata, and that interview was the only time he was ever asked about or referred to the issue.
 Quoting: FlyingInTheLight


Yes, I'm quoting myself. ;-) I wanted to point out one of the problems that I'm talking about here. In one of the earlier books, Mr. Sitchen said that the Great Pyramid was called E.Kur by the anunnaki, which translates - so he said - as "house that is like a mountain". Okay, that makes sense, I guess, but in one of the later books (Wars of Gods and Men, maybe?) he says that it was a huge ziggurat built *near* the pyramid that had this name. So I have to wonder which is it, the pyramid, or the ziggurat?

*shrug* All in all, I don't think such details really matter that much, but it does make one curious whether other more important details were fudged or misinterpreted.

Last Edited by FlyingInTheLight on 01/23/2011 03:02 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1118155
United States
01/23/2011 03:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
Hello OP, I haven't read Sitchins books, but my Dad is an avid reader. There is a few things I have trouble believing.
1. How can a jupiter sized planet sustain humanoid life since the force of gravity would be enourmous.
2. How can such a planet with such a wide orbit outside of the solar system maintain temperatures and conditions to sustain life.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1230511


1) gravity is a function of energy not of mass.

2) Physical life is a relative term, there are degrees of physicality throughout the universe.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1118155
United States
01/23/2011 03:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
All sightings of Nibiru are simply not those of a planet, but a very large mothership. The sightings described in the Kolbrin Bible are not a planet at all, they are more like a vengeful God throwing bombs at the Egyptians, So Nibiru is probably a reoccurring nemesis craft of the Elohim or something.

Also Ra says Nibiru is broken up now so we get asteroids not more Anunnaki. There are reptiles here now though for sure and they are running things and pulling strings.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1230511
United States
01/23/2011 03:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DISCUSSING SITCHINS WORK
Hello OP, I haven't read Sitchins books, but my Dad is an avid reader. There is a few things I have trouble believing.
1. How can a jupiter sized planet sustain humanoid life since the force of gravity would be enourmous.
2. How can such a planet with such a wide orbit outside of the solar system maintain temperatures and conditions to sustain life.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1230511


1) gravity is a function of energy not of mass.

2) Physical life is a relative term, there are degrees of physicality throughout the universe.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1118155


(force due to gravity)=
G*(mass 1st object)*(mass 2nd object)/(distance between them)^2

If the mass of the first object is jupiter instead of earth, the force due to gravity will be much greater then what is experienced on earth.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!