(OFFICIAL) JESUS: Who is Jesus? Please comment! | |
LVPravdaFan User ID: 1163481 Germany 02/13/2011 09:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Jesus is the Son of God who was born of the virgin Mary who took upon all the sins of the world to die and shed His blood on the cross for our salvation, who rose from the dead on the third day. Quoting: Mr. Bugs nli 1264399Isn't this the ultimate laziness? I do not have to change, because there is some sacrifice lamb, who does all the "work" for me. The ultimate ego trap and it's quite unlikely, that it works this way. |
Salaama User ID: 1253664 United States 02/13/2011 09:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | More of your Islamic shit. Quoting: Sandi_T"Oh, you christians have to be muslims because allah is the same god as the bible, only the quran is actually right!" Well, actually Islam has been formed by dictate of Rome. Sort of "divide et impera" application. Where do you people come up with these lies? |
Salaama User ID: 1253664 United States 02/13/2011 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even more important, instead of trying to 'split hairs' by arguing what may have been said by Jesus, or interpreted by so many of His followers. Quoting: T of G 1242676Jesus is NOT some dead relic of the past. He is absolutely ALIVE and as He said, "I will never leave you, or forsake you." He meant it! He has appeared and was photographed Nov 26, 2000 in Medellin Columbia. Check it out at this website for photos: [link to jesusphotos.altervista.org] And what was going on about that time in Columbia? Lots of drug cartel problems, making Columbia a frightening hell on earth to those who lived there. Columbia today is reported to be a much nicer place today. He has appeared to those who really love Him and have total faith in Him. He probably doesn't appear to too many 'intellectuals' since they wouldn't believe Him if they bumped into Him. In 1965 He dictated His book "A Course In Miracles", through a scribe, (psychologist Helen Schucman of Columbia University, NYC. It took 7 years to complete the book. Its being studied WORLDWIDE by MILLIONS today, because we are all completely convinced that it is in fact Jesus who says EVERYTHING in this 1200 page document. And it has been proven to each of us in a way that each of us needs to know that this Book, comes directly from God, through Jesus. In it Jesus says; "This book is not open to interpretation, it is Knowledge, and it comes directly from God." THERE IS NO SENSE TALKING ABOUT JESUS AND NOT FOCUSING ON HIS BOOK 'A COURSE IN MIRACLES' SINCE IT IS FOR US NOW, ESPECIALLY IN THIS TIME OF TROUBLE. AND HE GAVE IT TO US THROUGH WHAT CAN ONLY BE CALLED 'DIVINE INTERVENTION' BECAUSE WE NEED WHAT HE REALLY SAYS AND NOT SOME INTERPRETATION OF SOME RE-INTERPRETED DOCUMENTS OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO. Which to this day, many still do not understand what He said then. ...... We all need to be careful with material channelled through a medium; it is satanically inspired. Satan is very clever and there is a lot of truth contained in such material, in order to hook people into believing it....BUT most people don't understand that Satan, the father of lies, includes 1000 untruths for each truth revealed in order to distract and otherwise disorient well-intentioned people from the true path. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1056702 Spain 02/13/2011 09:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LVPravdaFan User ID: 1163481 Germany 02/13/2011 09:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We all need to be careful with material channelled through a medium; it is satanically inspired. Satan is very clever and there is a lot of truth contained in such material, in order to hook people into believing it....BUT most people don't understand that Satan, the father of lies, includes 1000 untruths for each truth revealed in order to distract and otherwise disorient well-intentioned people from the true path. Quoting: SalaamaThere isn't any talk about "magical" abilities in the Bible, the Koran and even the course in miracles, so despite, that this books may be quite useful in one way or another, i would take a look at Bardon, to get an idea, what it is all about. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1100531 United States 02/13/2011 09:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1100531 United States 02/13/2011 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
JM User ID: 1264437 United States 02/13/2011 10:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you need more information...correct information try this link. It is very enlighting. I beleive that Jordan Maxwell made a similiar documentary. Movie 2007 Zeitgeist [link to www.zeitgeistthefilm.com] Last Edited by JM on 02/13/2011 10:05 AM |
Salaama User ID: 1253664 United States 02/13/2011 10:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | One of the main differences between Muslims and Christians is that it is a Muslim's DUTY to seek knowledge of his/her religion and to sincerely attempt to apply logical reasoning to all facets of everything learned. Most Christians, on the other hand, are not encouraged to ask any questions about their faith AND ARE ACTUALLY DISCOURAGED IN MANY CASES. An average Christian who is not a priest or scholar is discouraged from seeking the logical truth on many topics and often will be told "It is a mystery" and to have "blind faith." The Messiah foretold of in the Old Testament was to be a DIRECT descendant of King David. While Joseph, Mary's betrothed, was from the direct line of David, Mary was not. Since Joseph was not Jesus' biological father, how can it be said Jesus came from the direct line of David? Mary was descended from Solomon's older brother Nathan and hence had a common ancestor with David, but did not come from the direct line of David's progeny. How many Christians wonder about this gaping hole and/or actually ask their religious leaders for answers? Most Christians will come back with the answer that Jesus acquired the necessary direct lineage through Mary's marriage to Joseph or by Joseph adopting him. These answers are insufficient for those who rightly say DIRECT ROYAL LINEAGE FROM DAVID REFERS TO GENETICS/BLOOD AND NOT TO MARRIAGE OR ADOPTION. And then there is the glaringly obvious fact that Mary and Joseph were not yet married at the time of Jesus' birth. From the Christian website: [link to gracethrufaith.com] Q. I was wondering if there is a mistranslation in the bible regarding the lineage of Mary/Joseph. God states that Jesus will be a direct descendant of David, but since Jesus’ Father is God, Jesus has to be a direct descendant of David through Mary’s lineage (otherwise there is no blood relation to David). In Matthew 1:2-16 it provides a ‘family tree’ that claims to end with “Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary. Of her was born Jesus who is called the Messiah.” This indicates Jesus is connected to David only through the marriage of Mary to Joseph, who is then a descendant of David. This doesn’t make Jesus a DIRECT descendant… Furthermore, Matthew 1:17 states “Thus the total number of generations from Abraham to David is fourteen generations; from David to the Babylonian exile, fourteen generations; from the Babylonian exile to the Messiah, fourteen generations.” By my count there are only 13 in the 3rd group. A. Your question has a simple answer, but one that’s not apparent from Scripture. In Biblical times there was no word for father-in-law, just as there was no word for grandfather. Joseph can’t be the son of both Jacob and Heli. According to the Jerusalem Talmud (Chag. 77,4), Heli was actually Mary’s father making him Joseph’s father-in-law. The reason the two genealogies are different is that Joseph was descended from Solomon while Mary was a descendant of Solomon’s older brother Nathan. So Joseph and Mary were actually cousins although many times removed. Since Heli had no sons, Mary had to find a husband from the tribe of Judah like herself to protect her father’s estate.(See Numbers 36) She also needed a direct descendant of Solomon to perfect her son’s claim to the throne of David, since Nathan’s descendants weren’t of the Royal line. Joseph fit the bill on both accounts but like every other descendant of Solomon’s carried a blood curse disqualifying any biological son of his from ever being King of Israel.(Jeremiah 22:28-30) Since Joseph was not the Lord’s biological father, he could adopt Him, qualifying Him to be King without passing Him the curse. Thus, because of the virgin birth, Jesus became the only one in Israel qualified to sit on David’s throne, and remains so to this day. As far as the genealogies go, notice that the passage reads “fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon and fourteen from the exile to the Christ.” (Matt 1:17) Technically the exile occurred before the reign of Jeconiah ended, so Matthew counted him again at the start of the third list, giving each 14 names. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1264458 United States 02/13/2011 10:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | jesus might have been an alien hybrid if he did indeed exist. think about it, he could walk on water he died then was ressurected he healed the sick then again its just a fairy tail. he is not coming back and he never existed. there good stories in the bible sure. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1207205 United States 02/13/2011 10:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
T of G User ID: 1261615 Italy 02/13/2011 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even more important, instead of trying to 'split hairs' by arguing what may have been said by Jesus, or interpreted by so many of His followers. Quoting: T of G 1242676Jesus is NOT some dead relic of the past. He is absolutely ALIVE and as He said, "I will never leave you, or forsake you." He meant it! He has appeared and was photographed Nov 26, 2000 in Medellin Columbia. Check it out at this website for photos: [link to jesusphotos.altervista.org] And what was going on about that time in Columbia? Lots of drug cartel problems, making Columbia a frightening hell on earth to those who lived there. Columbia today is reported to be a much nicer place today. He has appeared to those who really love Him and have total faith in Him. He probably doesn't appear to too many 'intellectuals' since they wouldn't believe Him if they bumped into Him. In 1965 He dictated His book "A Course In Miracles", through a scribe, (psychologist Helen Schucman of Columbia University, NYC. It took 7 years to complete the book. Its being studied WORLDWIDE by MILLIONS today, because we are all completely convinced that it is in fact Jesus who says EVERYTHING in this 1200 page document. And it has been proven to each of us in a way that each of us needs to know that this Book, comes directly from God, through Jesus. In it Jesus says; "This book is not open to interpretation, it is Knowledge, and it comes directly from God." THERE IS NO SENSE TALKING ABOUT JESUS AND NOT FOCUSING ON HIS BOOK 'A COURSE IN MIRACLES' SINCE IT IS FOR US NOW, ESPECIALLY IN THIS TIME OF TROUBLE. AND HE GAVE IT TO US THROUGH WHAT CAN ONLY BE CALLED 'DIVINE INTERVENTION' BECAUSE WE NEED WHAT HE REALLY SAYS AND NOT SOME INTERPRETATION OF SOME RE-INTERPRETED DOCUMENTS OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO. Which to this day, many still do not understand what He said then. ...... We all need to be careful with material channelled through a medium; it is satanically inspired. Satan is very clever and there is a lot of truth contained in such material, in order to hook people into believing it....BUT most people don't understand that Satan, the father of lies, includes 1000 untruths for each truth revealed in order to distract and otherwise disorient well-intentioned people from the true path. Thank you for your concern, and I am sure you are sincere. But you don't have to worry, this is absolutely real. I don't really think this could be called "channeled" since Helen Schucman not only heard Jesus speak, but also saw Him while He was there dictating what she was to scribe. Anyone who really loves Jesus will recognize Him just by looking at what He says in His Book. It is not for everyone, because not everyone is ready for it at this time, and other methods will serve them until they are ready. But Jesus says it is a REQUIRED COURSE, and we only determine when we want to take it. ....... |
Salaama User ID: 1253664 United States 02/13/2011 11:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even more important, instead of trying to 'split hairs' by arguing what may have been said by Jesus, or interpreted by so many of His followers. Quoting: T of G 1242676Jesus is NOT some dead relic of the past. He is absolutely ALIVE and as He said, "I will never leave you, or forsake you." He meant it! He has appeared and was photographed Nov 26, 2000 in Medellin Columbia. Check it out at this website for photos: [link to jesusphotos.altervista.org] And what was going on about that time in Columbia? Lots of drug cartel problems, making Columbia a frightening hell on earth to those who lived there. Columbia today is reported to be a much nicer place today. He has appeared to those who really love Him and have total faith in Him. He probably doesn't appear to too many 'intellectuals' since they wouldn't believe Him if they bumped into Him. In 1965 He dictated His book "A Course In Miracles", through a scribe, (psychologist Helen Schucman of Columbia University, NYC. It took 7 years to complete the book. Its being studied WORLDWIDE by MILLIONS today, because we are all completely convinced that it is in fact Jesus who says EVERYTHING in this 1200 page document. And it has been proven to each of us in a way that each of us needs to know that this Book, comes directly from God, through Jesus. In it Jesus says; "This book is not open to interpretation, it is Knowledge, and it comes directly from God." THERE IS NO SENSE TALKING ABOUT JESUS AND NOT FOCUSING ON HIS BOOK 'A COURSE IN MIRACLES' SINCE IT IS FOR US NOW, ESPECIALLY IN THIS TIME OF TROUBLE. AND HE GAVE IT TO US THROUGH WHAT CAN ONLY BE CALLED 'DIVINE INTERVENTION' BECAUSE WE NEED WHAT HE REALLY SAYS AND NOT SOME INTERPRETATION OF SOME RE-INTERPRETED DOCUMENTS OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO. Which to this day, many still do not understand what He said then. ...... We all need to be careful with material channelled through a medium; it is satanically inspired. Satan is very clever and there is a lot of truth contained in such material, in order to hook people into believing it....BUT most people don't understand that Satan, the father of lies, includes 1000 untruths for each truth revealed in order to distract and otherwise disorient well-intentioned people from the true path. Thank you for your concern, and I am sure you are sincere. But you don't have to worry, this is absolutely real. I don't really think this could be called "channeled" since Helen Schucman not only heard Jesus speak, but also saw Him while He was there dictating what she was to scribe. Anyone who really loves Jesus will recognize Him just by looking at what He says in His Book. It is not for everyone, because not everyone is ready for it at this time, and other methods will serve them until they are ready. But Jesus says it is a REQUIRED COURSE, and we only determine when we want to take it. ....... I have read "A course in Miracles" and the "Urantia" book. Neither is written by the prophet Jesus. |
Khazar User ID: 1264510 United States 02/13/2011 11:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Would anyone like to comment? What do you think? Do you like that interpretation? Quoting: FreedomStandsHello, I think it was great, and will help me a lot in my writings. You must understand youare severely lacking in knowledge in that thereis no such thing as a "Jew": Here are a few things i carry around with me, however you should Google and get some of your own, because i have some that are censored here: This one youwill like; itis much like your writings: Bishop John Shelby Spong: [link to forums.prospero.com] Thereis also one by Benjamin Freedman that i like and i think you will too. Itis titled "Jesus was not a Jew" No Such Thing As a “Jew“: [link to paminifarm.jeeran.com] [link to resistance.jeeran.com] More: [link to www.overlordsofchaos.com] and: [link to www.sweetliberty.org] Truth will set you free John 8:32 |
Bixi User ID: 1259965 Romania 02/13/2011 11:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Unknown History of Mankind... Origin of the Species, From an Alien View... Vatican Prepares for the truth about our Annunaki heritage!... ASTRONAUTS OF ANTIQUITY... Moses and the Spaceships of the Gods...Messiah - His Spaceships... Secrets of the Vatican - UFO's in the Ancient Art... Pope's star watcher to visit Nasa (12th February 2009) and talk aliens...FILM: UFOs in the Bible... ABRAHAM... MOSES AND THE SPACESHIPS OF THE GODS... Rabbi Reveals Name of the Messiah: [link to cristiannegureanu.blogspot.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1264510 United States 02/13/2011 11:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Would anyone like to comment? What do you think? Do you like that interpretation? Quoting: FreedomStandsDon't know where you got the information but it is wrong. The word used for 'son' in the Bible is this: G5207 uihos hwee-os' Apparently a primary word; a “son” (sometimes of animals), used very widely of immediate, remote or figurative kinship: - child, foal, son. So that makes your interpretation null and void. . . . in what language? From where did you get your information? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1234013 United States 02/13/2011 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1234013 United States 02/13/2011 11:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LVPravdaFan User ID: 1163481 Germany 02/13/2011 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't really think this could be called "channeled" since Helen Schucman not only heard Jesus speak, but also saw Him while He was there dictating what she was to scribe. Quoting: T of G 1261615If an adept has something to say, they almost always reincarnate here, a la Bardon. Muhammed saw an "angel" too, as well as Joseph Smith. Which doesn't mean, that this kind of books are necessarily "bad", but they tend to push you, in the wrong direction. Last Edited by LVPravdaFan on 02/13/2011 11:42 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1234013 United States 02/13/2011 11:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | One of the main differences between Muslims and Christians is that it is a Muslim's DUTY to seek knowledge of his/her religion and to sincerely attempt to apply logical reasoning to all facets of everything learned. Most Christians, on the other hand, are not encouraged to ask any questions about their faith AND ARE ACTUALLY DISCOURAGED IN MANY CASES. An average Christian who is not a priest or scholar is discouraged from seeking the logical truth on many topics and often will be told "It is a mystery" and to have "blind faith." Quoting: SalaamaThe Messiah foretold of in the Old Testament was to be a DIRECT descendant of King David. While Joseph, Mary's betrothed, was from the direct line of David, Mary was not. Since Joseph was not Jesus' biological father, how can it be said Jesus came from the direct line of David? Mary was descended from Solomon's older brother Nathan and hence had a common ancestor with David, but did not come from the direct line of David's progeny. How many Christians wonder about this gaping hole and/or actually ask their religious leaders for answers? Most Christians will come back with the answer that Jesus acquired the necessary direct lineage through Mary's marriage to Joseph or by Joseph adopting him. These answers are insufficient for those who rightly say DIRECT ROYAL LINEAGE FROM DAVID REFERS TO GENETICS/BLOOD AND NOT TO MARRIAGE OR ADOPTION. And then there is the glaringly obvious fact that Mary and Joseph were not yet married at the time of Jesus' birth. From the Christian website: [link to gracethrufaith.com] Q. I was wondering if there is a mistranslation in the bible regarding the lineage of Mary/Joseph. God states that Jesus will be a direct descendant of David, but since Jesus’ Father is God, Jesus has to be a direct descendant of David through Mary’s lineage (otherwise there is no blood relation to David). In Matthew 1:2-16 it provides a ‘family tree’ that claims to end with “Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary. Of her was born Jesus who is called the Messiah.” This indicates Jesus is connected to David only through the marriage of Mary to Joseph, who is then a descendant of David. This doesn’t make Jesus a DIRECT descendant… Furthermore, Matthew 1:17 states “Thus the total number of generations from Abraham to David is fourteen generations; from David to the Babylonian exile, fourteen generations; from the Babylonian exile to the Messiah, fourteen generations.” By my count there are only 13 in the 3rd group. A. Your question has a simple answer, but one that’s not apparent from Scripture. In Biblical times there was no word for father-in-law, just as there was no word for grandfather. Joseph can’t be the son of both Jacob and Heli. According to the Jerusalem Talmud (Chag. 77,4), Heli was actually Mary’s father making him Joseph’s father-in-law. The reason the two genealogies are different is that Joseph was descended from Solomon while Mary was a descendant of Solomon’s older brother Nathan. So Joseph and Mary were actually cousins although many times removed. Since Heli had no sons, Mary had to find a husband from the tribe of Judah like herself to protect her father’s estate.(See Numbers 36) She also needed a direct descendant of Solomon to perfect her son’s claim to the throne of David, since Nathan’s descendants weren’t of the Royal line. Joseph fit the bill on both accounts but like every other descendant of Solomon’s carried a blood curse disqualifying any biological son of his from ever being King of Israel.(Jeremiah 22:28-30) Since Joseph was not the Lord’s biological father, he could adopt Him, qualifying Him to be King without passing Him the curse. Thus, because of the virgin birth, Jesus became the only one in Israel qualified to sit on David’s throne, and remains so to this day. As far as the genealogies go, notice that the passage reads “fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon and fourteen from the exile to the Christ.” (Matt 1:17) Technically the exile occurred before the reign of Jeconiah ended, so Matthew counted him again at the start of the third list, giving each 14 names. so, what would a woman do with 72 virgins? |
Khazar User ID: 1264510 United States 02/13/2011 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Jesus = Morning star = Satan Quoting: Anon&on&onJesus = Morning star = Satan Jesus = Morning star = Satan Jesus = Morning star = Satan True story Wrong: Jesus = Bright and morning star Satan = son of the morning Big difference and if you can't see that - well - you need help. I don't know why you're so quick to tell people they are wrong. Both refer to the planet Venus. Lucifer is a term that Christians took to mean Satan when it was a reference to a Babylonian King. Babylonian King's had honorific titles which connected them to Venus. Venus is the Morning Star, known as Lucifer in Latin which can be translated as Light Bearer. Luc is Light, and ifer is bearer. Hello, I was taught that when Lucifer was with Father, in Heaven, his name was Lucifer, but after Lucifer's fall to Earth, Lucifer, Father's most beautiful angel, was then given a new name, and that new name was/is Satan. Father (God to you) does that a lot: He changes peoples' names - very Hollywood if you ask me . . . Truth will set you free John 8:32 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1234013 United States 02/13/2011 11:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Salaama User ID: 1253664 United States 02/13/2011 11:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Khazar User ID: 1264510 United States 02/13/2011 11:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Would anyone like to comment? What do you think? Do you like that interpretation? Quoting: FreedomStandsDon't know where you got the information but it is wrong. The word used for 'son' in the Bible is this: G5207 uihos hwee-os' Apparently a primary word; a “son” (sometimes of animals), used very widely of immediate, remote or figurative kinship: - child, foal, son. So that makes your interpretation null and void. I've never heard of the word you're talking about. Pais is the word used for son in relation to Jesus and God. [link to www.biblestudytools.com] Can you show me more information about the word you're talking about and how it related to Jesus? If your word is used for son throughout the Bible while Pais is used specifically for Jesus, that might mean servant was definitely intended as compared to foal. How bout you look it up in the Bible then look it up in a good Greek dictionary (like strongs) and then tell me that. It is the only word used in the NT for 'son'. Period. . . . The "Strong's" offers both Greek and Hebrew. Did you remember to look up the word in the Hebrew? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1234013 United States 02/13/2011 11:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have read "A course in Miracles" and the "Urantia" book. Neither is written by the prophet Jesus. [/quote tell me , what would a woman do with 72 virgins? isnt that what they promise your human bombs? well what do they promise women? 72 channels with nothing but soap operas and all the chocolate they can eat? i really want to know |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1229997 United States 02/13/2011 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Khazar User ID: 1264510 United States 02/13/2011 11:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hello FreedomStands, I suspect some of these posters may be but babes in Christ, and still on the milk of the Word, which is exciting and fulfilling to me, so we best treat these little creatures with the utmust of tenderness lest we send them a-tumbling over any roadblocks we may accidentally lay down in front of them. Thank you for your post it helped me a lot. I would love to study with you . . . to learn more . . . Peace be with you. |
LVPravdaFan User ID: 1163481 Germany 02/13/2011 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And there is NO MAGIC INVOLVED. Quoting: T of G 1242676Magic is just a trick or illusion. Its not real. When a MIRACLE happens Jesus says, ‘that is the proof that a Power of another world superceded your own.’ Here is the proof, that the course of miracles, wasn't written by Jesus. |
Khazar User ID: 1264510 United States 02/13/2011 12:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | More of your Islamic shit. Quoting: Sandi_T"Oh, you christians have to be muslims because allah is the same god as the bible, only the quran is actually right!" No need to be so hostile really! Do I have to be whatever you are? Lets just be whatever we can. I'm just telling people what your game is. You're as pushy as any christian, but definitely sneakier and much more dishonest. Hello, Bet your are sensing that he is not 100% on all subject matter, but then how can he be? He isnot Jesus. He like all of us is still learning, so you should try to help him and make any corrections in a motherly/fatherly like manner, so as not to throw down any stumbling blocks in his path of growing in Christ. I suspect youare still on the milk of the Word, but he is on the meat of the Word. You have a much longer way to travel than does he, yet his travels will also be very long. Truth will set you free John 8:32 |
Salaama User ID: 1253664 United States 02/13/2011 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... tell me , what would a woman do with 72 virgins? isnt that what they promise your human bombs? well what do they promise women? 72 channels with nothing but soap operas and all the chocolate they can eat? i really want to know We [angels] were your allies in worldly life and [are so] in the Hereafter. And you will have therein whatever your souls desire, and you will have therein whatever you request [or wish] Quran 41:31 ...whatever you wish...pretty much covers everything. Last Edited by Salaama on 02/13/2011 12:19 PM |