|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED?
|
Can it be true?
8/2/2005 8:17 AM
Report abusive post | BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED?
| Quote |
[link to tomflocco.com]
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 11:53 pm Post subject: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED! Reply with quote
TOMFLOCCO.COM
BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED
A Chicago grand jury has indicted the President and Vice-President of the United States along with multiple high officials in the Bush administration
Chicago -- August 2, 2005 -- TomFlocco.com -- U.S. federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgeraldīs Chicago grand jury has issued perjury and obstruction of justice indictments to the following members of the Bush Administration: President George W. Bush, Vice-President Richard Cheney, Bush Chief of Staff Andrew Card, Cheney Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, former Attorney General John Ashcroft, imprisoned New York Times reporter Judith Miller and former Senior Cheney advisor Mary Matalin.
There were no indications given as to whether the President and his top staff members would appear publicly before cameras at the grand jury proceedings, given the gravity of the charges.
Besides the Valerie Plame CIA leak case, the Fitzgerald probe is reportedly far-reaching and expanding much deeper into past White House criminal acts involving Bush-Clinton drug money laundering in Mena, Arkansas to White House involvement in 9.11; but also for sending Americaīs young people to their deaths or to be maimed in Iraq and Afghanistan under false pretenses.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair was indicted for obstruction of justice and is reportedly consulting with members of Parliament and legal aides regarding how to avoid appearing in the U.S.A. for interrogation before Fitzgerald in Chicago.
The revelations emanated from sources close to the grand jury who spoke with federal whistleblower Thomas Heneghen in California who said White House Senior Advisor to the President Karl Rove was also indicted for perjury and was reportedly involved with Mary Matalin in a major Bush administration document shredding operation to cover-up evidence.
Heneghen had reported over ten days ago on a TruthRadio.com broadcast that his sources close to the grand jury said former Secretary of State Colin Powell had been subpoenaed and had testified against President Bush, telling the citizen panel that the President had taken the United States to war based upon lies--a capital crime involving treason under the United States Code.
Heneghen also reported a week ago that Gonzalez and Card had been subpoened and that Tony Blair had defied his subpoena after the response time limit had expired.
Sources close to the investigation report that members of the House, Senate, 9.11 Commission and other members of the media are also under investigation as potential targets by a grand jury regarding obstruction of justice and other oversight failures linked to the 9.11 attacks--indicating that citizen panelists working with Fitzgerald may be seeking a wholesale cleansing of what many have said is a crime-wracked White House and Congress.
Also last Monday, the whistleblower reported that Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts was planning to obstruct justice by calling Fitzgerald for Senate hearings to question the prosecutorīs motives for the far-reaching investigation.
This, giving rise to questions as to whether Roberts and other Republican legislators--some now under secret investigation--would join President Bush in seeking to fire Fitzgerald in the same manner that President Nixon had fired Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox in order to obstruct justice and cut off further investigations into White House crimes.
Two weeks ago Heneghen said he had talked to sources just ten minutes prior to French and U.S. intelligence agents intercepting British intelligence agents who were attempting to bomb the subway underneath the Dirksen Federal Building where Fitzgerald was presiding over grand jury hearings.
Serious questions can also be raised as to whether intelligence forces linked to President Bush and Tony Blair had participated in a failed attempt to scuttle the Fitzgerald probe by literally blowing it up--at a time when UK reports reveal that military-grade explosives were used to blow up the London subway on July 7.
Sources say the alleged Chicago subway bombing attempt has been attributed to an underground and closeted enmity involving warring intelligence and military factions within the United States government.
Moreover, reports indicate that the disturbance occurred at the same time that the Chicago Tribune and local web blogs had reported that the subway had been evacuated for 45-50 minutes regarding a "suspicious package" late on Monday afternoon, July 18.
Also confirming the under-the-radar-screen hostilities involving agents loyal to the administration and others who are disturbed about the cover-up of government involvement in the 9.11 attacks was a recent contact made with this writer by a major New York media outlet which called seeking "names of those who could confirm its own reports of warring factions within the government which were threatening the safety of U.S. citizens."
developing.....please link or copy--and distribute widely.
_________________
TomFlocco |
|
Anders (BBM)
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
letīs hope so!!!!!!! |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
Anders. Any idea how we`d go about proving whether or not this is true? |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
please please please be true |
|
Anders (BBM)
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
5548 I HAVE NO IDEA - oops caps lock off - i dunno much about flocco if he is a whack job or not
wonder what skolnick says? |
|
Concerned Aussie from Perth
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
Well let the show begin. ((((((((-: haha great news. Good one OP!
If itīs true, give it a hour or two for other news sources to follow. |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
fuck it......lets hang em anyway  |
|
rrick
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,"
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Natureīs God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.""We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the
Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,
laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world." |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
President George W. Bush, Vice-President Richard Cheney, Bush Chief of Staff Andrew Card, Cheney Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, former Attorney General John Ashcroft, imprisoned New York Times reporter Judith Miller and former Senior Cheney advisor Mary Matalin.
hmmm
where is Roveīs name? |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
This part is true.
[link to www.suntimes.com]
For legal and political reasons, however, it seems it is Patrick Fitzgeraldīs decision to stay or go. Legally, if President Bush does nothing, he stays on the job even though his term is over. Politically, Bush would face a storm of protest if he fired a man who is investigating his own administration.
Patrick Fitzgeraldīs White House investigation of the leak of CIA agent Valerie Plameīs identity is putting him at the doorstep of Bush advisor Karl Rove. His pursuit of criminality in City Hall contracts and hiring is taking him into Daleyīs inner circle. |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
[link to moblog.dundalklive.com]
Saturday, July 23. 2005
The wheels are coming off the Bush/Blair/VonBatenburg Express
Official Press Release
Tuesday July 19, 2005 3:30:PM Central Time
Tony Blairīs MI-6 Agents Caught Trying To Blow Up Chicago Subway:
To Derail US Attorney Patrick Fitzgeraldīs Grand Jury Investigations of Bush-Blair White House Leaks
By Tom Heneghan & Stew Webb Federal Whistleblowers Heneghan-Webb Presidential & Vice Presidential Candidates 2004
French Intelligence and The U.S. Marshall Service Monday night July 18, 2005 caught eight of Tony Blairīs British MI-6 Agents trying to bomb the Chicago Subway system. A shoot out killed 4 British Agents. Four were captured in the act of Terrorism and arrested. The British Agents part of Bush & Blairīs Al Quaida network were charged in Federal Court today with explosives. The British MI-6 Terrorist Cell Operated out of Laidlaw Corp in Chicago.
Chicago US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald served Tony Blair a subpoena in the CIA Valerie Plame case on July 13, 2005 to answer questions regarding his role in the leaks connected to George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Condi Rice, Andrew Card, Scooter Libby and Karl Rove. Tony Blair has not yet responded to his subpoena. George W. Bush has not responded to his subpoena either. Tony Blair had supplied George W. Bush with falsified British Intelligence stating that Iraq leader Saddam Hussein had obtained "Yellow Cake" Nuclear materials from Niger. This was the reason Bush gave to start the war in Iraq. This has all now been proven to be lies by Bush and Blair.
CIA Valerie Plameīs husband Ambassador Joseph Wilson submitted his report prior to the Bush-Blair lies that Niger never sold yellow cake to Iraq. Wilson came forth stating Bush lied in his State of the Union address to the nation. Valerie Plameīs CIA Network was further investigating Bush & Cheneyīs orchestrated attack on America on 9-11-2001. New York Police Bernard Kerik who ran a FEMA operation out of pier 29 known as Code Angel also known as Tripod II planted the bombs on the 7 World Trade Center Building that were demolished on 9-11-2001. This operation was a US Justice Department operation involving Gary Best of Defense Intelligence Agency a George H. W. Bush Shadow Government Crony who is currently in Prison in the French Guinea for espionage against the French Government. Best has admitted to French Authorities of his 9-11 involvements. As I am writing this press release two more British MI-6 agents were arrested a few minutes ago details are forthcoming.
Also today British Stooge MI-6 Agent Linda Fanton Pike of Iowa tied to Hillary Rodenhurst Clinton, today made death threats against a Investigative Journalist on behalf of Department of Defense agency operatives under Criminal Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. The Journalist was told to stay away from Tom Heneghan & Stew Webb.
Federal Whistleblower Mary Schneider www.maryschneider.us gets bogus mocking email from a 9-11 connected p-tech software company (Mitre) that was used to over ride the Pentagon computers on 9-11-2001. Federal Whistleblower Tom Heneghanīs tires were stolen off his car today in broad daylight, by Bush Goons. Bush & Blair obviously are trying to cause a Terrorist attack in America to derail the Federal Grand Jury Investigations of their roles of the Plame leaks which is violations of National Security Laws and their War Crimes against Sovereign Nation Iraq with intentional falsified reports. Their further Treason Attacks on America involve Rogue CIA, DIA, British MI-6, Russian and Mossad agents who were also involved in the 9-11-2001 World Trade Center Attack and Pentagon attacks.
More to come, stay tuned. |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
[link to www.citypages.com]
What is Fitzgerald trying to prove?
Deputy Chief of Staff and Senior Advisor Karl Rove
Francis Specker
The grand jury investigation of the White House has resurrected a lot of Watergate-era catchphrases, none more apropos than the maxim "itīs the cover-up, not the crime." If Fitzgerald does issue indictments, the primary charges will almost certainly not be violations of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, but obstruction of justice, perjury, and sundry other offenses stemming from White House staffersī efforts to conceal their role in outing Plame from federal investigators. Since the grand jury investigation story went large on July 2 with Michael Isikoffīs Newsweek article confirming that Rove himself spoke to Matt Cooper of Time about Valerie Plame Wilson, the pattern of leaks in the case has militated entirely in this direction.
Seen in this light, the endless speculation about who told what to whom first may be part red herring. Rove is said to have told the grand jury that he first heard about Plame Wilsonīs CIA connection from reporters, not the other way around; he cited Bob Novak as one source and said he could not remember who the other was. Speculation has naturally centered on Judith Miller, the lone reporter caught up in the probe who has not talked to Fitzgerald at all. It would be a boon to Fitzgeraldīs case to demonstrate that the leak originated entirely in the White House, affording him one more prosecutorial bargaining chip. But for purposes of an obstruction of justice investigation, it probably doesnīt matter much in the end whether it was reporters who first told the White House about Plame or the White House that first told reporters. |
|
Anders (BBM)
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
Judith Miller is either CIA or more likely Mossad (both)
she was big buds with Dr David Kelly - who Bliar had murdered to get him off the hook on a number of fronts... |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
Karl Rove, Scot McClellan and others in the WH Senate, and Congress - ALL going down for TREASON right next to Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld...
Itīs all turned to SHIT for BushCo. They have hung themselves. |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
This is only the beginning of their woes on the American side of the pond. The traitors also have to run the gauntlet of the World Tribunal and the Iraqis will most certainly bring charges against them as well as soon as the Americans are forced out. |
|
Anders (BBM)
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
   |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
Hereīs something else for Mr. Fitzgerald to have a look at.
Bush Defies Military, Congress on Torture
By Marjorie Cohn
Monday 01 August 2005
After the grotesque torture photographs emerged from Abu Ghraib prison in April 2004, Bush said, "I shared a deep disgust that those prisoners were treated the way they were treated." He vowed the incidents would be investigated and the perpetrators would "be taken care of."
Bush seemed shocked to learn of torture committed by US forces. But then someone leaked an explosive Department of Justice memorandum that had been written in August 2002. The memo presented a blueprint explaining how interrogators could torture prisoners and everyone in the chain of command could escape criminal liability for war crimes. It said the President was above the law. That memo set the stage for the torture of prisoners in US custody.
Now we learn that, in early 2003, several senior uniformed military lawyers from each of the services voiced vigorous dissents to the policies outlined in the Justice Departmentīs 2002 memo.
Maj. Gen. Jack L. Rives, the Air Force deputy judge advocate general, wrote that several of the "more extreme interrogation techniques, on their face, amount to violations of domestic criminal law" as well as military law. In fact, Rives added, use of many of these techniques "puts the interrogators and the chain of command at risk of criminal accusations abroad." Rives was talking about the well-established concept of universal jurisdiction, according to which any nation has the authority to prosecute any person for the commission of war crimes.
The tactics proposed in the 2002 memorandum also troubled Rives because he felt the new interrogation policies threatened to undo progress the military had made since the Vietnam War. Accusations of war crimes committed by US forces during Vietnam damaged the military "culture and self-image," Rives wrote. Post-Vietnam military programs that emphasize compliance with the laws of war have "greatly restored the culture and self-image of US armed forces," according to Rives.
Moreover, Brig. Gen. Kevin M. Sandkuhler, a senior Marine lawyer, wrote that military lawyers believed the harsh interrogation system could have adverse consequences for American service members. These might include diminished "public support and respect of US armed forces, [as well as loss of] pride, discipline, and self-respect within the US armed forces." The interrogation regime could also jeopardize military intelligence-gathering and efforts to obtain support from allied countries.
The Justice Department "does not represent the services; thus," said Sandkuhler, "understandably, concern for service members is not reflected in their opinion."
But allegations of torture have persisted, even after these concerns were expressed. The continuing allegations have led influential members of Congress to propose amendments to a $491 billion defense bill that would prevent the mistreatment of prisoners.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham has proposed an amendment to define who is an "enemy combatant" for purposes of detention and military trials of detainees at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. At present, Bush claims total discretion to make that determination.
Republican Senator John McCain, a prisoner of war for six years during the Vietnam War, proposes an amendment to set uniform standards for anyone detained by the Defense Department. It would limit interrogation techniques to those contained in the Army field manual, which is currently being revised.
McCain also proposes that all foreign nationals held by the US military be registered with the International Committee of the Red Cross, as required by the Geneva Conventions. This would prevent the holding of "ghost detainees."
The most significant amendment McCain advocates would prohibit the "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment" of anyone in US custody, consistent with our obligations under the Convention against Torture and Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
As ratified treaties, including the Geneva Conventions and the Torture Convention, are part of US law, it shouldnīt even be necessary to pass amendments enshrining already binding obligations.
Nevertheless, Bush has threatened to veto the spending bill "if legislation is presented that would restrict the Presidentīs authority to protect Americans effectively from terrorist attack and bring terrorists to justice."
These are Bushīs buzz words for opposing any interference with his unfettered authority to order the torture of prisoners in US custody.
Bush persists in ignoring the warnings of our top military leaders, who believe American security is endangered by the harsh interrogation policies. And he threatens to defy Congress as well by opposing amendments that would hold him and his administration accountable for torture and inhuman treatment.
A group led by Democratic Senator Carl Levin seeks an amendment calling for an independent commission, like the 9/11 Commission, to investigate the Bush administrationīs interrogation policies and mistreatment of prisoners.
This amendment is probably the most threatening to Bush and his deputies. A truly independent investigation would likely uncover criminal liability all the way up the chain of command to the White House.
Marjorie Cohn, a contributing editor to t r u t h o u t, is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, executive vice president of the National Lawyers Guild, and the US representative to the executive committee of the American Association of Jurists.
[link to www.truthout.org] |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
It would behoove Mr. Fitzgerald to remember that Bush thinks heīs above the law. BushCo has worked "very hard" in manufacturing the UnConstitutional Patriot Acts and other covers to protect HIMSELF from the Law. Tony Blair has copycatted Bush to the extreme. Here again as with The Downing Street Memo is PROOF POSITIVE of PRE-MEDITATION to circumvent accountability and penalty for their criminal actions.
>Bush seemed shocked to learn of torture committed by US forces. But then someone leaked an explosive Department of Justice memorandum that had been written in August 2002. The memo presented a blueprint explaining how interrogators could torture prisoners and everyone in the chain of command could escape criminal liability for war crimes. It said the President was above the law. That memo set the stage for the torture of prisoners in US custody. |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
Furthermore
>As ratified treaties, including the Geneva Conventions and the Torture Convention, are part of US law, it shouldnīt even be necessary to pass amendments enshrining already binding obligations.
Nevertheless, Bush has threatened to veto the spending bill "if legislation is presented that would restrict the Presidentīs authority to protect Americans effectively from terrorist attack and bring terrorists to justice."
These are Bushīs buzz words for opposing any interference with his unfettered authority to order the torture of prisoners in US custody.
Bush persists in ignoring the warnings of our top military leaders, who believe American security is endangered by the harsh interrogation policies. And he threatens to defy Congress as well by opposing amendments that would hold him and his administration accountable for torture and inhuman treatment. |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
Hello??? Wake up!!!
If Bush and Cheney were indicted by a Federal Grand Jury youīd think there would at least be a blurb about in the mainstream news.
There is nada.
You people are guilable. Read the first 3 paragraphs closely and see if you can find the glaring contradiction. |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
Nesara is going to be declared today, all our debts will be forgiven, no taxes, and Iīm getting a new corvette for Christmas. No, really! I had a date with Jennifer lopez last night and got some great head. Tonight Iīm going to be with Paris Hilton. |
|
the loner
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
get serious they own the country nothing will happen,they are the teflon twins nothing will stick to them |
|
Anders (BBM)
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
guilable???
not me Guv... |
|
Kreeper
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
"It would behoove Mr. Fitzgerald to remember that Bush thinks heīs above the law."
Iīm as hopeful as the rest of you, but come on, Bush has been above the law his entire life. And if you get close to proving heīs not, you commit suicide. |
|
Guerilla AC
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
Morning Anders. I wonder what kind of job I could get after dealing with the idiots (p comes to mind) on GLP? |
|
Anders (BBM)
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
good moaning! |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
good moaning! heheh yeah. |
|
von Doom
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
Hey Anders! |
|
Anders (BBM)
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
von Doom! |
|
pop
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
of the many attempts to foil the nwo, im afradi this one too will be foiled, a better attempt would need to be sought.
why?
well because look at all the other attempts in a similar vein that they simply shut the media up on or shrug and flip us off too, as you americans so eloquently put it |
|
Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:08 AM | | Re: BUSH AND CHENEY INDICTED? | Quote |
also rumours are circulating that the airforce has said no go for mini nukes in Iran.
Have threatened to arrest Bushwacky and co.
dam i hope somebody someplace read the oath of office they gave. |
|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
|
