real egyptians were white , new proof , blacks have stolen our heritage

I may have some j3w in me, I don't think I have moorish ancestry. But thanks for taking the ad hominem road, speaks volumes about yourself.

Wrong Asian Indians are the Hamites.
They are still of the Caucasian race but dark.

Noah's son Ham did not change from the Caucasian race into a Negriod race. It's impossible.

Noah just was able to create offspring of varied races, now that's a good argument right there

Who came up with that anyways?

[link to www.eutimes.net]

Unquestionable proof that king tut was European.
Dr Hawass did not realize that by filming the DNA procedure, geneticists would be able to analyse the filmed footage and thus see the results.

Dr Hawass has said many times that he will not disclose the ethnicity of the mummies. Now we know why. It is because they all were Caucasian.

More on the subject.
[link to www.therightperspective.org]

grow up we are so inbreed we are all brothers and sisters nowadays

cute, real cute!

stop arguing with an "idiot"; people will forget which one is has the intelligence!

Genetics have long since proved that the Egyptians were not black.

Note that these are not articles, BUT SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]
Some extracts:
"Libya and Egypt are also the smallest genetic distances away from European populations.
Not a single black royal mummy have ever been found."

and

"The genetic contribution of sub-Saharan Africa appears to be small."

Notice that the link above is not to an article, it is an GENETIC STUDY.
........

Here is another genetic study.
[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

An extract:
"Oman and Egypt's NRY frequency distributions appear to be much more similar to those of the Middle East than to any sub-Saharan African population, suggesting a much larger Eurasian genetic component."
..........

What about this scientific study
[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

An extract:
"Oman and Egypt’s NRY frequency distributions appear to be much more similar to those of the Middle East than to any sub-Saharan African population, suggesting a much larger Eurasian genetic component."
..........

I think the only reason why you stubborn African Americans cling to your believe that the Egytpians were black in the face of such overwhelming scientific proof, is that you have no respect for science, because you do fully grasp the significance and neutrality of science.

No matter which way you slice and dice the facts, the DNA tests proved conclusively that king Tut's DNA is WESTERN European.

This along with the multiple other genetic tests confirm that the Egyptian rules were white.

Did you know that not a single black Egyptian mummy exists?

Of course Whites built Egypt. When I went to school it was common knowledge and taught in schools.

Oueen Tiye was the mother of Akhenaten.
And here is a picture of her corpse.
[link to www.oocities.org]

She is clearly white.

And here is a picture of the mummies of her father and mother.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Also clearly white.

hahahaha

What is more that genetic evidence proves that they were white.


The sphinx was build by the pharaoh Khafra.

See the photo on the right and you will see what Khafra looked like.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

As you can clearly see he had no flat nose like the black Africans.

..........

The mistake most people make is to look at African Americans as representative of the black race. AA's are not and I genetic studies exists that proves that AA's have 13% white ancestry. In the time of the pharaohs their were no African Americans and the blacks were 100% pure. Genetic studies also proof the white ancestry of the Ethiopians etc. Thus to find out what the blacks looked like in the time of the pharaohs, one would have to turn to the 100% pure blacks that are only found in Africa.

They looked like this.
[link to www.google.co.za]

Sorry but you lose....

Think about it this way, all great ancient civilizations have been built by supposed gods who brought knowledge from somewhere else. Sometimes they would teach the natives how to build the civilizations and then go back to where they came from, leaving the natives with the instructions and precepts to keep it functioning (case of mesoamerica), while some others stayed and ruled the civilizations until they either pass away and their lineages became dilluted by interbreeding with the natives, bringing the demise of the civilization.

Sub-saharan negroid Africa never had enough advanced civilizations to be able to claim a civilizing pattern. In fact the mere fact that they cling so badly to Ancient Egypt, which any initiate in the mysteries knows was the refuge for Atlantean survivors, indicate their argument for their own civilizing factor is just ludicrous.

If they could show me at least a dozen "ancient Egypts" in sub-saharan Africa, I'd may consider it, but nothing of the sort? Not even one little civilization that resembles it?

I guess those suppossed negroes who built Egypt must have been EXCEPTIONAL.

Nah, life just doesn't work that way.

Last Edited by Manu-K on 11/01/2011 04:20 AM

It is well documented that the Nubians only ruled Egypt during the last years of the Empire. This was also the reason why the Egyptian empire declined.

The dogon tribe. Their herioglyphs are parallell to that of the Ancient Egyptians. The heiroglyphs describe the workings of the universe. I dont see any white atlanteans there old fellow. Give me PHYSICAL EVIDENCE from the PAST that the ancient egyptians were white, not some biased studies where you havent the slightest clue where they came from.

Here is all the physical evidence you need.

no human being could remain "white skinned" in the climate of Egypt!

not unless they were some lazy a-hole that had slaves do everything for them!

The dogon tribe has knowledge of outer space which no one knows really where they got from, and I don't want to delve on far out theories, but let's agree they didn't got it by themselves either. Other than that those people didn't build ANYTHING of such magnitude as the AE's, so fallacious argument there bro.

And stop asking me for evidence about whites in ancient egypt, many people in this thread already have shown enough evidence for you to keep asking for it.

Reality hits you hard bro.

What difference does it make, dick?
People are people.

And they didn't, they tanned, like white people still do when inhabiting warmer geographies. Now that doesn't mean they don't go back to being white if removed from the warmer climates.

Micro evolution takes more than a few thousand years.

And they didn't, they tanned, like white people still do when inhabiting warmer geographies. Now that doesn't mean they don't go back to being white if removed from the warmer climates.

Micro evolution takes more than a few thousand years.

no, we do not agree on that. There is no evidence the Dogons received any assistance. A white man failed to translate the heiroglyphs correctly (the rosetta stone) and led almost all egyptologists astray. Many articles regarding the HERIOGLYPHS are completely FALSE because of ONE MAN. Same goes for the race of these people. Initiates traveled far and wide to egypt, which explains the mummies, but look at the artifacts, it will show who FOUNDED it. The evidence is right in front of you despite your pompous words. and there are plenty of black mummies, your bias blinds you.




[url] [link to www.archaeology.org]


and if yall want to talk about the curse of ham, let's talk about it. What does this curse entail exactly?

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

Please note that the study linked is not an article but a scientific study and it is published in an accredited scientific journal.

Before I start let me list the names of all the scientists that took part in this scientific study.
J. R. Luis
D. J. Rowold
M. Regueiro
B. Caeiro
C. Cinnioğlu
C. Roseman
P. A. Underhill
L. L. Cavalli-Sforza
R. J. Herrera1

From the following institutions.

Department of Biological Sciences,
Florida International University, Miami
2Seccion de Antropoloxia,
Facultade de Bioloxia, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain;
3Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford
..........
You can read for yourself what the study says, but here is a short extract:

"Oman and Egypt’s NRY frequency distributions appear to be much more similar to those of the Middle East than to any sub-Saharan African population, suggesting a much larger Eurasian genetic component."
..........

What this means id that the encient Egyptians were a mixture between whites and the people in the middle East.
..........

Checkmate
At this point you can go into denial, but the scientific genetic facts are clear.

Here check out this SCIENTIFIC STUDY
[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

AN EXTRACT:
......
In both analyses the main feature of the genetic landscape in northern Africa is an east-west pattern of variation pointing to the differentiation between the Berber and Arab population groups of the northwest and the populations of Libya and Egypt. Moreover, Libya and Egypt show the smallest genetic distances with the European populations, including the Iberian Peninsula. The most plausible interpretation of these results is that, although demic diffusion during the Neolithic could explain the genetic similarity between northeast Africa and Europe by a parallel process of gene flow from the Near East, a Mesolithic (or older) differentiation of the populations in the northwestern regions with later limited gene flow is needed to understand the genetic picture. The most isolated groups (Mauritanians, Tuaregs, and south Algerian Berbers) were the most differentiated and, although no clear structure can be discerned among the different Arab- and Berber-speaking groups, Arab speakers as a whole are closer to Egyptians and Libyans. By contrast, the genetic contribution of sub-Saharan Africa appears to be small.
........

Pay special attention to this line from the paragraph above.

"By contrast, the genetic contribution of sub-Saharan Africa appears to be small."
........

Face it, all you have is denial.

Do you know that the oldest mummy ever found in Egypt, was a Caucasian and he is called Ginger by the colour of his hair.
[link to www.egyptorigins.org]
[link to www.egyptorigins.org]

I find it quite strange that the mummy of Ginger and the Narmer palette and Narmer mace was found at exactly the same place the mummy of Ginger was found.
[link to www.kingtutshop.com]

Look at the profile of Narmer. No flat nose boon he was?????? hahahahaha

Let's see the mummy of Ginger is 5,000 years old and the Narmer palette 4,900 and both were found in the city of Hierakonpolis.

What is more, is that Ginger wasn't the ONLY mummy found, as he was found in a graveyard.

hahahahahaha

And just take a flyer at guessing the race of the other grave inhabitants.

One more notable thing is the absence of any Niccuh bodies.

hahahahahahaha

Look at these statues that are on display in the Egyptian museam in Cairo.

[link to www.bluffton.edu]

All are clearly white.

no doubt many races have been through Egypt, but Egypt was named after Egyptus who was the wife of Ham, she was reportedly a black woman.

Here is picture of RhamsesI mummy.
[link to farm4.static.flickr.com]


Check out his hair.

Your link doesn't work.

I have already explained to you that, yes on latter epochs, negroids did rule egypt, that was right before the demise of their civilization. The founding of Egypt wasn't done by sub-saharan negroids. In fact, in Gobekli Tepe, Turkey, archeological remains have been found from 10.000 years ago which show proto-Sumerian/Egyptian symbology. Yes, Turkey is supposedly where Noah landed after the deluge. You see where this is going? The survivors of the ante-diluvian civilization arrived to Turkey 10.000 years ago and from there they spread to Ancient mesopotamia, North Africa and Europe, bringing their knowledge of civilziation along with them and sharing it with the natives they encountered.

That's how things developed.

[link to a4.l3-images.myspacecdn.com]

These folks, unable to erect civilization, just like the Mayans and Aztecs, were just a lucky recipient of an advanced knowledge that came to them but they coulnd't sustain, and thus only kept what the "gods" shared with them as sacred treasures of the ages, many times obvlivious to their true significance or even forgetting (due to their lack of written language) even their origins.

Reportedly meaning myth.

Look at the genetic evidence, for those are the facts.