Explain this huge, bright object in the sky, please? | |
OsirisDarkstone User ID: 1159350 United States 02/09/2011 10:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As long as we exist within duality and separate ourselves from our higher consciousness, forever believing that the creator is the ultimate authority in the universe and that we cannot ever be a part of that creative process so that we must always rely on something above us we will be forever trapped within and never transcend this dimension. I am a human spiritual being and I am united with fellow human beings that are unjustly treated. This truth should be self evident. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 469144 United States 02/09/2011 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Found a pic from last night: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260121[link to www.meld.no] Taken at N69 4.999', E17 10.617' app. 10 hours ago. This can't be the moon - it's not that big and bright yet? check out the other thread on solar flare, a reflection off the Hubble telescope appears as a streak in the sky, why can't the same flare show up in Norway on your night shot? this time lens flare no doubt... SOLAR FLARE WORKS! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1260121 Norway 02/09/2011 10:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Very beautiful picture thanks :) My friend in Sweden has been telling me about the beautiful aurora going on for many weeks now up there. The camera has to be set on long exposure in order to capture this brilliance. If a planet-x comes into view we will all know it immediately, sure the bigger observatories can keep something quiet for awhile but once amateur astronomers see it then there will be news all over the interwebs... Just the same, thanks for this link op it made me smile :) Quoting: OsirisDarkstoneAuroras has been showing up far south in Scandinavia lately, a lot of stunning pictures to find. [link to www.storm.no] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 970323 United States 02/09/2011 10:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thats Odd,I would rule out planet x because this is too far north. There would have to be more pics from different sources to call it anything more than what Astronut says. It could be something related to the CERN collider. Isnt that up there? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1249903 Italy 02/09/2011 10:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thats Odd,I would rule out planet x because this is too far north. There would have to be more pics from different sources to call it anything more than what Astronut says. Quoting: IntruthIt could be something related to the CERN collider. Isnt that up there? ...It's the Moon. You know, looking how it always looks when people take long exposure shots, which are necessary to cpature auroras. Do none of you know how cameras work? Your reactions are tantamount to agreeing with the next dumb shmuck who posts a picture of a reflection or a lens flare and says "I found something new! And CERN is in Geneva. In Switzerland. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1260383 United States 02/09/2011 10:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Shutter speed tards explain how long the shutter was left open to capture that much "Moon Light" on a non-full moon with that much bright reflextion on the lake. If it is photoshopped WOOT! Nice one beautiful pic either way. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1249903 Italy 02/09/2011 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This cannot be done with prolonged shutter speed. The stars are too pin point and any shutter left open long enough to capture that much light the stars would have streaked even a little bit especially the dimmer, greater distances stars. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260383Shutter speed tards explain how long the shutter was left open to capture that much "Moon Light" on a non-full moon with that much bright reflextion on the lake. If it is photoshopped WOOT! Nice one beautiful pic either way. Clearly not long. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] You know, if this post, which is even at the top of this page, with photos exactly like this dating back to at least October last year, maybe further, is anything to go by. And not to mention how this 'object' matched up with the coordinates of the Moon at the time. But, hey. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1229463 United States 02/09/2011 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1218292 United States 02/09/2011 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, I've checked with Stellarium (sorry for before, Stellaris are some micro controllers :P) and it is looking N-W and not N-E. This is the Moon and the local time must have been somewhat close to 22:00. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1259236This. I confirm with Starry Night Pro. I think if something was out of the ordinary the nice folks would have had different comments. From: Norwegian - detected ▼ To: English ▼ Translate text or webpage Type text or a website address or translate a document. Cancel Listen Read phonetically Norwegian to English translation Northern lights over Eide Pollen (Senja) tonight Like - Missing Horn, and others like this one Reports beand This was a great picture;-) 2 hours ago Reports | Like - like this one Altred Thank beand 2 hours ago Reports | Like Missing Horn When you post pictures like that passes I'm not saying I do not live there !!!!! Really special :-))))))) 2 hours ago Reports | Like Gjesdal Grandiose, what an experience, thank you for sharing pictures. (missunnelig). 35 minutes ago Reports | Like Altred Missing Horn, Gjesdal Thank You Beautiful picture taken at around 10:00pm from a cold, still place on earth: [link to geographic.org] |
klc_infowarrior User ID: 1242991 Canada 02/09/2011 10:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | really weird.. at first i was like "god youre dumb, thats just aurora borealis!".. but yeah.. then i looked to the left.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260124kinda weird how i didnt notice it at first. you didn't see the bright object at first????? mmmk Live the life you love..Pick a God you trust..And don't take it all too seriously... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1218292 United States 02/09/2011 10:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260289 ...Because that's where the auroras are? You know, since last month, and probably before then? [link to images.nationalgeographic.com] Hey, look, it's a picture of the exact same thing, only with reversed positions. Funny, huh? No that doesnt look like the exact same thing at all... Different colors, different shape, light in your pic, dark in the other, much lower in the sky, weird red light to the right side of pic...Much different Your pic looks like the moon and the color of the moon, this doesnt And ya, EISCAT and HAARP are just researching auroras... The one similarity EISCAT has with HAARP is that it has an ionospheric heater. That picture I posted was from November. These auroras have persisted for months, not to mention how common they are up there. And, uh, okay. The moon can look yellow, if you ventured outside, but whatever. Here's five more. [link to www.canadiannaturephotographer.com] [link to static.photo.net] [link to www.canadiannaturephotographer.com] [link to www.spaceweather.com] [link to www.canadiannaturephotographer.com] It's the Moon. You think no-one would be abuzz about a new planet being discovered? Yet another case of people not knowing how cameras function. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1240845 United Kingdom 02/09/2011 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Looks like CGI to me. The hilltops a little to well defined and the tree silhouette in front of water. Plus why are the stars so bright looking if the object is so bright. When a camera is facing a bright object the dimmer objects should look even dimmer than normal. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260140Or its a long exposure and the light could be an airplane flying right towards us. How about some other angles. If it was that spectacular everyone in that town would have a picture. You people are obsessed with CGI. It is a light filter that allows for the exaggeration of luminosity or as others have said, simply night mode and longer shutter exposure. If there were a mass showing of UFOs you people would be the first to shout... oo, oo CGI, there would be an extraterrestrial shaking your hand and you would be shouting.... oo, oo holographic CGI with censor manipulation. Lol Why is discernment so irrational lately!! |
Astronut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 634208 United States 02/09/2011 11:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This cannot be done with prolonged shutter speed. The stars are too pin point and any shutter left open long enough to capture that much light the stars would have streaked even a little bit especially the dimmer, greater distances stars. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260383Hey look, magic! [link to farm4.static.flickr.com] No, I didn't shoot through a telescope for that shot either. Shutter speed tards explain how long the shutter was left open to capture that much "Moon Light" on a non-full moon with that much bright reflextion on the lake. Easy to do if you use a high ISO, fast focal ratio, short focal length lens. A barn door tracker helps too, but may not necessarily be necessary if you do it just right, especially on a low resolution web copy of a photo. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 904928 United States 02/09/2011 11:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1250935 United States 02/09/2011 11:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1052218 United States 02/09/2011 11:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since we don't know what it is, Let's make up a stories About how it must absolutely, positively Be Nibiru or a Wormhole or a UFO or a God That is here to grant us ascension immortality If we only have enough faith And then stick with that story Despite all emerging evidence to the contrary. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1252870 United States 02/09/2011 11:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | just did a little translating, and here is the info on the picture... translated from norwegian to enlgish [link to translate.google.com] Good morning, here it is, a clear sky, beautiful winter weather with the temp: 3.8 Eastern 1.7 m / s Barometer 1030.4 Have a good day everyone it's a morning sky... sunrise... stop being a dickhead and spreading hysteria through hoaxes. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1260433 United Kingdom 02/09/2011 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1260383 United States 02/09/2011 11:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This cannot be done with prolonged shutter speed. The stars are too pin point and any shutter left open long enough to capture that much light the stars would have streaked even a little bit especially the dimmer, greater distances stars. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260383Hey look, magic! [link to farm4.static.flickr.com] No, I didn't shoot through a telescope for that shot either. Shutter speed tards explain how long the shutter was left open to capture that much "Moon Light" on a non-full moon with that much bright reflextion on the lake. Easy to do if you use a high ISO, fast focal ratio, short focal length lens. A barn door tracker helps too, but may not necessarily be necessary if you do it just right, especially on a low resolution web copy of a photo. hehehe lmfao funny funny Your "magical photo" is nothing special at all my 11yo can take that pic with a 3 mp pocket camera! nice try though! |
milk_dot User ID: 1252870 United States 02/09/2011 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1260121 Norway 02/09/2011 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Beautiful picture taken at around 10:00pm from a cold, still place on earth: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1259236[link to geographic.org] Nope, the photographer states that it was taken last night. If it was 10pm, he'd say last evening. Well, guess it has to be the moon then... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1052218 United States 02/09/2011 11:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1260103 United States 02/09/2011 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astronut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 634208 United States 02/09/2011 11:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | hehehe lmfao funny funny Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260383Your "magical photo" is nothing special at all my 11yo can take that pic with a 3 mp pocket camera! nice try though! Good, let's see you do it then. I await your result. Last Edited by Astromut on 02/09/2011 11:54 AM |
Monthly Cycle User ID: 1260458 United States 02/09/2011 12:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | hehehe lmfao funny funny Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260383Your "magical photo" is nothing special at all my 11yo can take that pic with a 3 mp pocket camera! nice try though! Good, let's see you do it then. I await your result. Astronut, what kind of telescope do you have? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1217429 United States 02/09/2011 12:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astronut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 634208 United States 02/09/2011 12:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | hehehe lmfao funny funny Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260383Your "magical photo" is nothing special at all my 11yo can take that pic with a 3 mp pocket camera! nice try though! Good, let's see you do it then. I await your result. Astronut, what kind of telescope do you have? 8" LX200 Classic |
Setheory User ID: 869850 United States 02/09/2011 12:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Monthly Cycle User ID: 1260458 United States 02/09/2011 12:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | hehehe lmfao funny funny Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260383Your "magical photo" is nothing special at all my 11yo can take that pic with a 3 mp pocket camera! nice try though! Good, let's see you do it then. I await your result. Astronut, what kind of telescope do you have? 8" LX200 Classic Cute: |
Roofrabbit User ID: 1123472 Italy 02/09/2011 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |