Armed Services supporters want answers about pending social plan
Among the proposed questions:
"If different types of sexual expression no longer matter, and consensual LGBT conduct and lifestyles are equal to all others, what is the rationale for not having a checkoff box on the induction forms indicating sexual preference?"
"What is the rationale for drawing distinctions between a) Required housing of professed LGBT personnel in deployed military living facilities offering little or no privacy, and b) A similar policy housing heterosexual male and female personnel together in deployed living facilities offering little or no privacy?"
"What rights will male and female personnel have if they disagree with the new LGBT policy for reasons of personal privacy or the desire for modesty in sexual matters?
"Will implementation plans permit consensual sexual relationships off-base but not on-base?"
"What is the definition of a 'partner' or 'committed relationship' for consensual activity? (For example, a 'one-night stand' contacts, partners that change frequently, partners that live together for a long time, etc.)"
"Will implementation plans provide support systems, including legal advice or defense, for persons who experience harassment, verbal coercion/threats, or pressure to engage in sexual activity with same-sex superiors or colleagues?"