Chemtrails: People are starting to wake: Check this out... PIN!

Looks like CBS Atlanta is cashing in on Jessie Ventura's Conspiracy Theory. Interesting to see a MSM story on it.

The official debunkry info is on their website, all you have to do is click the link to be convinced that contrails are real.

Congratulations, you have found a video of the remoddeling of an airliner into a tanker aircraft.
Now, what does this have to do with chemtrails?

[link to www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com]
[link to www.aviationnews.eu]

lol how much air traffic do you need..

i find that anyone who sais its a CONspiracy theory validates the truth and they are the ones believing the CON.

You guys should check this documentary about chemtrails.

Thread: WHAT IN THE WORLD ARE THEY SPRAYING?? (DOCUMENTARY VIDEO)

There's no such thing...

offcourse there is you silly snake actually it's a very good one indeed!

Ignore the serpent with the forked tongue...

Snake is a paid shill

That's actually the documentary of Michael J. Murphy they mention in this clip!

You guys should see it!

Everybody that needs a good laugh should see it!

OK Mr. They're Not Spraying Anything in the Air.

Idiot shill.. The reason they take a commercial passenger airliner and make it like a "tanker" is so it looks normal to everyday folks at airports.. Jesus some people are idiots..

You follow an ignorant rant with a vid that has been debunked more than your Mama, including by the guys that made the video to make TankerEnemy look like the gullible tards they are...

disprove these videos shilltards.. Come on why do they look like passenger airliners but yet they spray? huh huh.. Oh could it just be they are releasing there water supply to make them less heave. or emptying there septic tanks.. or maybe releasing bad fuel.. come the fuck on stop trying to disprove something that you cant disprove..

No, the reason they take an existing airliner is because it is cheaper that way. Why design an entirely new aircraft when there are plenty available that have proven their durability?
Also, as far as I know this KC-767 is a proof of concept for a new production series. Boeing has with the 767 high hopes in getting the new tanker contract in favour of Airbus with a modified A330.

Do you really believe what is said in that video?



So before you start calling people idiots, how about you learn a thing or 2 on this subject. With 8 months of fulltime studying you can get up to the level of knowledge Airline pilots have.

Snake stfu.. You try and try and try to shill out everyone on chemtrails, but you have yet to show anyone any credible proof, hell you havnt shown a single bit of proof, that these arent chemsprayers.. So the videos tell it all.. Or is CG? come on what can u come up with snakey fakey.

Sure, shill..

let the shilling begin...

More fool to you.
If you have nothing constructive to add in a discussion it is best to keep quiet. You only look childish this way.

re you trolling or are you really that much of a sheep you don't do any reasearch before you believe something?

The shown aircraft:

1) Gulfstream 1 athmospheric research aircraft, registration: N701BN.
[link to www.airliners.net]
[link to www.bnl.gov]
The instruments you see are meant to gather samples and data on the atmosphere.

2) KC-135 tanker modified to research the effect of ice accretion on aircraft.
[link to consci.s3.amazonaws.com]
[link to www.airliners.net]
[link to b.imagehost.org]

3) A wire antenna for communication with submarines.
The aircraft in question is a Boeing E-6B.
[link to www.boeing.com]

4) See 1

5) Boeing 747-400 dumping fuel to lower its landing weight below the maximum.
[link to www.youtube.com]

6) Cloud seeding aircraft fitted with silver iodide generators.

7) See 6. Note how this aircraft is not able to reach the altitude commercial airliners fly at.

8 and 9) Weather modification/cloudseeding aircraft. See 7.

10) Boeing E-6B with communication antennas placed on de wingtips. See 3

11) See 3.

12) Commercial aircraft dumping fuel.

13 and 15) Boeing 777-200LR test aircraft.
The tanks are filled with water and interconnected in order to be able to shift the center of gravity and determine its limitations. And the aircraft's reaction towards these changes.
Mass & Balance are very important in predicting aircraft performance.
[link to books.google.com]

14) Airbus A380, See 13. These tanks are fitted to simulate a full passenger load.

16) Boeing E-6B dumping fuel. Different from most 707 based aircraft, these dump points are located in the wingroots instead of wingtips where they had to make room for the antennas mentiones in 10

17) Air Pakistan 747-200 Over Russia

It is not too hard to research this, so can anyone please explain me why anyone who believes this video has not done so?

It is a Boeing 747 modified to be a firefighter:
[link to www.evergreenaviation.com]

Im sure this didnt happen either.





The Ministry of Defence turned large parts of the country into a giant laboratory to conduct a series of secret germ warfare tests on the public.
A government report just released provides for the first time a comprehensive official history of Britain's biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979.

Many of these tests involved releasing potentially dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms over vast swaths of the population without the public being told.

While details of some secret trials have emerged in recent years, the 60-page report reveals new information about more than 100 covert experiments.

The report reveals that military personnel were briefed to tell any 'inquisitive inquirer' the trials were part of research projects into weather and air pollution.

The tests, carried out by government scientists at Porton Down, were designed to help the MoD assess Britain's vulnerability if the Russians were to have released clouds of deadly germs over the country.

In most cases, the trials did not use biological weapons but alternatives which scientists believed would mimic germ warfare and which the MoD claimed were harmless. But families in certain areas of the country who have children with birth defects are demanding a public inquiry.

One chapter of the report, 'The Fluorescent Particle Trials', reveals how between 1955 and 1963 planes flew from north-east England to the tip of Cornwall along the south and west coasts, dropping huge amounts of zinc cadmium sulphide on the population. The chemical drifted miles inland, its fluorescence allowing the spread to be monitored. In another trial using zinc cadmium sulphide, a generator was towed along a road near Frome in Somerset where it spewed the chemical for an hour.

While the Government has insisted the chemical is safe, cadmium is recognised as a cause of lung cancer and during the Second World War was considered by the Allies as a chemical weapon.

In another chapter, 'Large Area Coverage Trials', the MoD describes how between 1961 and 1968 more than a million people along the south coast of England, from Torquay to the New Forest, were exposed to bacteria including e.coli and bacillus globigii , which mimics anthrax. These releases came from a military ship, the Icewhale, anchored off the Dorset coast, which sprayed the micro-organisms in a five to 10-mile radius.

The report also reveals details of the DICE trials in south Dorset between 1971 and 1975. These involved US and UK military scientists spraying into the air massive quantities of serratia marcescens bacteria, with an anthrax simulant and phenol.

Similar bacteria were released in 'The Sabotage Trials' between 1952 and 1964. These were tests to determine the vulnerability of large government buildings and public transport to attack. In 1956 bacteria were released on the London Underground at lunchtime along the Northern Line between Colliers Wood and Tooting Broadway. The results show that the organism dispersed about 10 miles. Similar tests were conducted in tunnels running under government buildings in Whitehall.

Experiments conducted between 1964 and 1973 involved attaching germs to the threads of spiders' webs in boxes to test how the germs would survive in different environments. These tests were carried out in a dozen locations across the country, including London's West End, Southampton and Swindon. The report also gives details of more than a dozen smaller field trials between 1968 and 1977.

In recent years, the MoD has commissioned two scientists to review the safety of these tests. Both reported that there was no risk to public health, although one suggested the elderly or people suffering from breathing illnesses may have been seriously harmed if they inhaled sufficient quantities of micro-organisms.

However, some families in areas which bore the brunt of the secret tests are convinced the experiments have led to their children suffering birth defects, physical handicaps and learning difficulties.

David Orman, an army officer from Bournemouth, is demanding a public inquiry. His wife, Janette, was born in East Lulworth in Dorset, close to where many of the trials took place. She had a miscarriage, then gave birth to a son with cerebral palsy. Janette's three sisters, also born in the village while the tests were being carried out, have also given birth to children with unexplained problems, as have a number of their neighbours.

The local health authority has denied there is a cluster, but Orman believes otherwise. He said: 'I am convinced something terrible has happened. The village was a close-knit community and to have so many birth defects over such a short space of time has to be more than coincidence.'

Successive governments have tried to keep details of the germ warfare tests secret. While reports of a number of the trials have emerged over the years through the Public Records Office, this latest MoD document - which was released to Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker - gives the fullest official version of the biological warfare trials yet.

Baker said: 'I welcome the fact that the Government has finally released this information, but question why it has taken so long. It is unacceptable that the public were treated as guinea pigs without their knowledge, and I want to be sure that the Ministry of Defence's claims that these chemicals and bacteria used were safe is true.'

The MoD report traces the history of the UK's research into germ warfare since the Second World War when Porton Down produced five million cattle cakes filled with deadly anthrax spores which would have been dropped in Germany to kill their livestock. It also gives details of the infamous anthrax experiments on Gruinard on the Scottish coast which left the island so contaminated it could not be inhabited until the late 1980s.

The report also confirms the use of anthrax and other deadly germs on tests aboard ships in the Caribbean and off the Scottish coast during the 1950s. The document states: 'Tacit approval for simulant trials where the public might be exposed was strongly influenced by defence security considerations aimed obviously at restricting public knowledge. An important corollary to this was the need to avoid public alarm and disquiet about the vulnerability of the civil population to BW [biological warfare] attack.'

Sue Ellison, spokeswoman for Porton Down, said: 'Independent reports by eminent scientists have shown there was no danger to public health from these releases which were carried out to protect the public.

'The results from these trials_ will save lives, should the country or our forces face an attack by chemical and biological weapons.'

Asked whether such tests are still being carried out, she said: 'It is not our policy to discuss ongoing research.'


The link is in the youtube page on video above.

Im sure you believe everything your government tells you too.. So when they say here take this pill, it will take the pain away, you will be ok with taking it cause according to whatever transcript they give you with it you will think its truth..

I don't see why not.
I have no data to either confirm or reject this info so I cannot say anyting about it.



Sorry dear, but I don't. I use my own knowledge on the subject to determine what is going on, I don't get it spoonfed by others.

That said, if you disagree with what I say you must disprove it. By simply saying I am a sheep or whatever you don't disprove anything.

So go ahead, explain why you think my posts here are incorrect and back those answers up with factual data as it should be done.

Last Edited by Virga on 02/18/2011 03:29 PM

You guys are starting to bore me come on.. Bring on something good..



ill bring more to the table..

[link to www.thelivingmoon.com]

[link to consci.s3.amazonaws.com]

[link to www.missouriskywatch.com]

[link to www.rense.com]

[link to www.x-plane.com]

[link to www.projectearth.com]

[link to www.ernestlmartin.com]


Do i need more?






[link to rabbithole2.com]



Ill admit the 747fire plane might be real..
[link to www.cargolaw.com]
even tho it kinda looks funny?

LoL.



An as for factual data.. Well I dont have anything a scientist wrote if thats what your asking for... As for the articles that you have provided, well how can you say they are 100% legit?? where u there when they conducted the investigation?? I have pictures and video and news agency's to prove my point what you got?