Wooly Mammoth 65 million years POOF

We too are dinosaurs.

Where in Job?

Not only did does the Bible mention dinosaurs... there are plenty of ancient drawings in caves showing men fighting dinosaurs and I'm not talking about small ones, I'm talking about 50 feet dinosaurs. There are a lot of drawings all over the world showing men lived with dinosaurs. Radiometric dating is not accurate and doesn't prove a thing.
If you want to learn more about this fascinating subject watch the seminars below.

earth is not as old as the tv tells you

Proboscidean Species

Mammoths, mastodons, and elephants emerged from a group of mammals with developed trunks and tusks. This group, called proboscideans, is traced back to 55 million years ago. Although related, mammoths, mastodons, and elephants are from different branches of this proboscidean ancestral tree. The first mammoths developed in Africa, and soon ranged into Europe and Siberia. The ancestral mammoth, M. meridionalis, reached North America about 1.7 million years ago. Over thousands of years, adapting to the North American environment, the ancestral mammoth evolved to become the Columbian mammoth (the American mammoth).



science and google will make you a better person

LESSON TIME:

Dinosaurs translates to "terrible lizzard". last I checked a wooly mammoth is not terrifying nor a lizzard.

The bible doesnt contain the word "Dinosaur". They aren't called dinosaurs but are called the behemoth and the leviathan.

It also says the leviathan spits fire from its mouth. So maybe you would like to tell us next that there were dragons then too.

Fact is, this isnt news, I would assume most people taught in the last 50 years know wooly mammoths as animals of the prehistoric "cave-man" times, and they didnt really coexist with true dinosaurs. The are post impact creatures.

Science says that?
Link to a secular scientific website that says that?

Pleistocene period you tit.
Only 2 million years ago.

65 was Cretaceous period.

You're a moron.

This is what the scientists are claiming today ...

They lived from the Pliocene Epoch from around 4.8 million into the Pleistocene at about 4,500 years ago.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

They use carbon dating around the excavation site to try and prove the dates they arrive at which can varry.

But at one point this creature was prehistoric along with the others until the cave drawings eliminated their fantastical timescale!

Ha ha ha.

The Bible DESCRIBES the "dinosaurs", which is newly invented word.

Earth is far, far older. So are humans.

You are going off of the imaginary geocolumn tat DOES NOT EXIST anywhere on the planet!

When a fossil is discovered the scientists name the strata where it was found by that fossil. The fossil is then dated by the strata in some kind of circular logic.

Ha ha ha.

Geocolumn?
[link to farm5.static.flickr.com]

All mammals floated to the top in a FLOOD which gave us the sediment layers and fossils. They are all the same age top to bottom.

Polystrate fossil
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

I have always been fascinated by this question, ... can someone show me where dinosaurs are quoted in the bible please.

Sorry, the woolly mammoth is not a dinosaur. It's a mammal, just like you and me.

for truth. Nice job OP.

Dinos are described in the book of Job. Other books also refer to dinosaurs calling them dragons.

[link to www.genesispark.org]

video

Dino and man together..
[link to www.archive.org]
[link to www.archive.org]

Dragons are not dinosaurs, Dragons are Arthuriun myths, there has never been proof of Dragons living. Dinosaur bones have been found and dated to millions of years ago. so my question still stands I guess.

I don't even think I want you to answer tbh, I will not believe hearsay from a book that was written by many, yet those many had no forehand knowledge, hearsay is all, so you are flogging a dead horse with me. Thank you for replying though.

Okay mr dino cowboy there was no "dinosaur" just 200 years ago. The word was invented. They were previously called dragons and behemoth as described in the book of Job.

Are you saying scientists didn't revise their dating when the cave art was discovered?

Or that man and dinosaurs didn't walk together?

Are you defending the lies from these scientists who claim fantastic and debunked dating methods?

What about this fossil finger from the cretaceous period?
[link to 75.125.60.6]

And will we then reevaluate the dating of the stegosaurus found in this temple carving?
[link to www.discoverynews.us]

You're fingering me as a neo-Darwinist? You haven't been here long, have you?

Did you know a dragon can be assumed as an unpleasant woman ? Not unbelieveable, but true.
Behemoth, that must mean gigantic, monsterous ... I wonder, what creatures the person who wrote that excerpt actually came across at the time of writing, did he know what an Elephant was ? we wonder.
A book that was written over many years, by many has more standing for a lot, for me it's myth and hearsay.
I will not tar you for what you believe in, that is your prerogative, I shall leave you with your books.
My books are by J.R.R. Tolkein.
Peace.

Ica stones of peru , soft tissue in a t-rex femur bone ????

Please you have to be a blind moron not to recognize the truth.

[link to www.msnbc.msn.com]

[link to viewzone2.com]

the woolly mammoth was not a dinosaur,it was a mammal,that lived after the dinosaurs when man was around to hunt them,that's why you find spears in them,and also whole mammoths frozen,from the ice age.

The same amount of proof that many use to justify belief in aliens is also around to justify coexistence of dino and man. Cave paintings, sculptured figurines, representations in buildings, literary works. The bible talks about behemoth. To the moran who suggested it was an elephant i ask when is the last time you saw an elephant with a tail like a cedar tree? It is most likely a sauropod similar to mokelembembe in the congo. Leviathan was a sea fairing creature. Scientists cant even prove they dont still exist as they know more about the moon than the sea and that isnt saying much. The fiery winged serpent is likely just that. Pterosaurs and pterodactlys may still be living. There are eyewitness accounts from around the world. Who today can prove that ome species didnt breathe some kind of incindiery fluid or some kind of venom that burned skin like a cobra? As time reeled away from the flood days these animals were spotted less and less. By the medieval days a sighting was likely as people spread out. They would be besides themselves and have no name for the beasts. Dragon would be used to describe land air and sea monsters that they had not seen before.

Read an article that some of those frozen mammoths still had food in their mouths.