Nibiru/Planet X Event Timeline

OOOOOOK so now I'm responsible for wars? I sure have a lot of power! you are NUTS.

1. People with your personality are, you are in a group.

2. And you will die when the earth changes comes.

3. I sure hope this makes it easier for you.

The only thing you're making easier for me is my ability to point out what an insane loser you are. You complain about me using certain words (and my personality? lol are you a psychologist? didn't realize we were so close!), but check the last page of this thread, all you've done is use vile language and wish death on others. I am not going to die any time soon and neither are you so GET A JOB.

Yeah, whatever cornfed.

Do you even know what multiverses, branes and dark matter are?

Last Edited by H4LFß4CK$ on 07/29/2011 10:31 PM

And what if Elenin is habited by aliens, supported by dark energy?

“The reason we don't see dark matter directly is that it is made up of very weakly interacting material,” says Hooper. He is the lead author of a paper submitted to Astrophysical Journaltitled, “Dark Matter and the Habitability of Planets,” which describes one theory for dark matter – weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs. “For that reason, it doesn't interact - or do much of anything else - very much. It’s basically inert, and thus doesn't produce much usable energy.”
However, Hooper and Steffen have suggested a way in which what little energy does come from dark matter can keep planets warm. Some parts of the galaxy – in particular the galactic center, as well as the cores of dwarf galaxies that are satellites of our own Milky Way – contain a much higher concentration of dark matter (of the order of hundreds or thousands of times more dense) than the region of space near our sun. Hooper and Steffen have calculated that when dark matter particles scatter with the atomic nuclei within the cores of rocky planets, they lose momentum and become gravitationally-bound and sink to the core of the planet, where they annihilate and release energy.

[link to news.yahoo.com]

And maybe we get a surprise when it closes in?

Nevertheless, with billions of planets predicted to exist in our galaxy, it appears possible that some planets could benefit from dark matter, and these worlds would be very different to Earth.
“Life on a planet heated by dark matter would likely be very different than the life on Earth,” says Hooper. “Many species of planets on Earth, for example, have evolved to collect energy from sunlight. On a dark-matter-powered planet, the energy would be coming from the center of the planet, and life there would have to find other ways of putting that energy to use.”
The heat provided by the annihilations of dark matter, state Hooper and Steffen in their paper, could keep a planet habitable for trillions of years, even beyond the lifetime of its star.
Despite his skepticism, Dartnell recognizes the importance of Hooper and Steffen’s work. “It is an intriguing idea, and astrobiology as a discipline needs a healthy input of fresh, bold ideas like this one.”

This is just one view on what we might be facing, it could also be massive clouds of dark matter following elenin, of course we would not see them!

Last Edited by H4LFß4CK$ on 07/29/2011 10:27 PM

The article is one of the top research articles I've read yet on Nibiru and Elenin.

But Shills dont read they just spew.

Last Edited by upstateny on 07/30/2011 10:10 AM

So true.

But what's the difference?

Just because you can't be given an orgasm, does that make you an expert on everyone else?

Just because you don't think that Nibiru exists, does that mean that it doesn't?


PS- sorry to hear about your personal problems with orgasms.





:)

The visible rays from a black hole is the particles unable to reach speeds above the speed of light and thus never entering dimensions 4-6.

I also believe the angels to live in dimensions 7-9 and God living in dimension 10.

Everything accelerates exponentially through every trio of diemensions and that's why they say that 1000 years on earth is like one day in heaven (dimensions 7-9) Our soul is made out of particles much like the "wimps" and are vibrating at speeds far above the speed of light but are not able to free itself from the body until after death, due to laws of physics.

This is also what CERN is for, to accelerate particles so fast, that you get a glimpse of what's happening in the higher dimensions, even if they do not understand it themselves fully just yet. Using the same kind of technology studying black holes, you would actually be able to "see" them in infinitesonic wavelengths.

In dimension 10, where God lives, and also where the "god-particle" exists, time is infinite, as God is infinite.

Particles in that dimension has accelerated so fast that time stands still.

(1-3+ 4-6+ 7-9 +10 = 4) (with God) + (1-3+ 4-6+ 7+9 = 3) (without God) = 7 which is the holy number.
(1-3+ 4-6+ 7-9 = 3) (without God) + (1-3+ 4-6+ 7+9 = 3) (without God) = 6 times 3 equals 666, the number of the beast, a universe without God, which also could be concidered hell, since it would be a universe without love.

[link to translate.google.com]



"CHALCO, State of Mexico, July 28 .- A new crack about four kilometers long, up to 10 feet wide, opened in the town of Huexoculco, which remains fearful neighbors, as they have also opened tunnels.

The neighbors explained that the new crack is parallel to a line that opened the previous 15 days ago, so some sections are joined by what has been expanded four times.

They believe that the crack is four kilometers long, six deep, 10 meters wide. "

Last Edited by ipitythefool on 07/31/2011 06:16 AM

bump.

9nania , the same girl that predicted the EQ of Japan.


funny coincidence that i leave for nature life begin (max middle) september. Divine plan ftw.

Last Edited by ipitythefool on 07/31/2011 04:43 PM

I guess the horse, the swinger and their socks have gone preparing their "bugout-bags".

Yeah... no one is as good as Nancy at making excuses for failed claims.

You just keep telling yourself that within the next three months.

He's not the one delusional enough to believe in a nonexistent celestial objects based on YouTube videos.

if you hear at shills, they will tell you that those never seen before "changes" are due to fairy and unicorns...and they are totally shameless when they spit such B.S...

Perhaps you can point out which "changes" have "never been seen before".

Well, at least we all know who Nancy is, and she has been sticking her neck out, by being a messenger for the Zetas.

Now, what we do NOT know, is what a "Menow" is, and if an identity has ever been established, in case we want to hold this individual accountable, for all the ridicule it has thrown Nancy's way.

What will happen is this no name identity labeled "Menow" will quietly disappear, when the manure hits the fan, and we will never know who this coward was, who has been hiding behind a computer, and dishing out insults, aimed at Nancy, and her followers, all these years.

Fine. I've got no problem with that.

Just know that when you post things on public forums the public reads them. And there are going to be certain members of the public who may disagree with you. Particularly if they assess what you've written and deem it to be....wrong.



Fine. Just know though, that when you make arguments ilke that...the debate can potentially kind of...end.

I mean....do you see where discussion becomes futile? It's an unfalsifiable claim.

You can claim the Thundercats are riding on jet skis behind Elenin because "science hasn't discovered they're not". You can kind of say anything you want.

Which can leave people wondering how (if at all) to respond.

Still, moving on.



These are all rather well-studied objects/phenomena.

I'm NOT saying there COULDN'T be some absolutely unprecedented, mind-bogglingly unexpected "thing" following Elenin which fits into one of the categories you've listed above.

I'd be all ears....if you just gave a bit more than what you've given. Because what you've given is basically...just a single sentence. The sentence I've quoted above.

I've actually read a lot about stars. I'm not a doctor or a scientist, but stars are one of my favorite things to read about in astronomy. If you were to give some kind of comprehensive idea/theory explaining this lethal star-like object following Elenin....I'd be all ears.

I can say though if something "was" following Elenin it wouldn't be a "distant" supernova because supernovae are....distant. And it wouldn't be a black hole because black holes...don't follow around comets. They'd have no reason to. Black holes are among the most-dense objects in nature. It'd swallow up a comet before it'd ever trail behind it, if anything.



Dark energy/dark matter is a tricky thing. It makes up 80-90% (allegedly) of everything that exists....yet we can't see it or detect it.

Well...we can "detect" it, but in very roundabout ways (such as in the motions of spiral galaxies and gravitational lensing, ect...).

But I'm not entirely sold at all on the "mainstream" idea of dark/energy/matter and I think it's going to be "modified" by future discoveries probably sooner than later.

BUT ANYWAY, in relation to what you wrote....I don't know. Maybe.

See- fine. You have these theories. Great. But...be comprehensive. It's one thing to just throw things out there ("I think whatever it is might be something not discovered by science yet"/"I think Elenin might be carrying with it dark energy/matter") it's something ELSE to back it up with....at least a little evidence.

And I'm not sure what you mean by Elenin comes from "outside" the Solar System....(?)

I haven't read anything about Elenin being an interstellar object. Most comets come from the Oort Clouds, which marks a sort of de facto "border" of the Solar System, but is not outside of it.

But yeah, I haven't read anything about that yet...



You're right.

But it's a futile point.

If you're expecting ANYTHING to EVER be 100% proven without a shred of doubt...it's never going to happen. There's always something "missing".

But there are degrees of evidence. And sometimes the evidence (though never 100%) is profound.

It's up to you I guess. If you want to not believe anything that isn't 100% airtight...that's your right.

But your "ideas" are subject to the same standard.



Lots of people a lot smarter than me do also. I've read some. I think it's very interesting.



lol...



I've never said that.

Never said that. Never will.

I've actually advocated, in many ways, in many threads, the fact that so much in astronomy is as of yet undiscovered is what makes it SO interesting.

I've posted this before- check out any issue of any monthly astronomy magazine. It will be OVERFLOWING with articles about NEW discoveries. As well as articles raising unanswered QUESTIONS.

This is something I've said countless times on this site. You'd search for a very long time if you were trying to find a post of mine where I say we "have all relevant information and understand everything space and our existence in it."

I've never said that. Never will. Don't believe it. Never will. Never have.

What many of you "believers" can't seem to moderate apparently is this: just because there is lots we DON'T know (and there is lots) it doesn't mean there isn't much we DO.

There ARE aspects of astronomy that are VERY well studied.

Have been for centuries. A millenia.

The research is there. The studies are out there for your scrutiny.

The evidence is there. It's ALL there.

If it doesn't meet your personal standards....then fine.

But I've read a lot. And it makes sense to me.




lol...again, I've never said that.

One thing I will agree with you is, yes, anyone who DID think that way would be a fool.



...I have no idea where you got this idea that I thought there was nothing "left to discover".

There's so much.



lol....Where is this condescension coming from? What's so "difficult" to understand about what you wrote?

I'm not saying what you wrote was "dumb" or "nonsensical". It's just....Jesus, don't flatter yourself. It wasn't a "chore".



No, I had no idea. If it's true it's news to me (Elenin is not at the top of my daily "to-do list").... and it's totally interesting.

It's certainly probably not the first or the last.

Shit whizzes through the interstellar medium all the time. There are planets and brown dwarves and asteroids and even stars flung out from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way blasting their way around out there, constantly.

If Elenin did not originate from the Oort Cloud...then I wonder where the hell it came from...? If what you said is true. It's interesting though. I'll go read up on it.

That's what I think though.

(I have to say I don't recall ever seeing the term "hyperbolic" in any of these contexts either....But then again I can't recall ever reading about any extrasolar comets either....I guess I'll read up...)


Ditto.


Cool.




Absolutely. Deal.

On the top of [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov] under the name, you can read; Classification: Hyperbolic Comet

On [link to en.wikipedia.org] you can read; Only a few hundred comets have been seen to achieve a hyperbolic orbit when near perihelion[32] that using a heliocentric unperturbed two-body best-fit suggests they may escape the Solar System. No comets with an eccentricity significantly greater than one have been observed,[32] so there are no confirmed observations of comets that are likely to have originated outside the Solar System.

Sorry about the wiki link, but it was the best I could do.

So what do you think about Elenin now, considering it is not just a small uninteresting dirty snowball, it is actually a once in mankind event.

Absolutely. Deal.


On the top of [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov] under the name, you can read; Classification: Hyperbolic Comet

On [link to en.wikipedia.org] you can read; Only a few hundred comets have been seen to achieve a hyperbolic orbit when near perihelion[32] that using a heliocentric unperturbed two-body best-fit suggests they may escape the Solar System. No comets with an eccentricity significantly greater than one have been observed,[32] so there are no confirmed observations of comets that are likely to have originated outside the Solar System.

Sorry about the wiki link, but it was the best I could do.

So what do you think about Elenin now, considering it is not just a small uninteresting dirty snowball, it is actually a once in mankind event.

(Quoted the wrong person above)

On the top of [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov] under the name, you can read; Classification: Hyperbolic Comet

On [link to en.wikipedia.org] you can read; Only a few hundred comets have been seen to achieve a hyperbolic orbit when near perihelion[32] that using a heliocentric unperturbed two-body best-fit suggests they may escape the Solar System. No comets with an eccentricity significantly greater than one have been observed,[32] so there are no confirmed observations of comets that are likely to have originated outside the Solar System.

Sorry about the wiki link, but it was the best I could do, but as you can see on the jpl, the eccentricity is 1.000062959364038. This has never before happened in the world of science and you have missed it. Usually the eccentricity drops below 1 later but Elenin does not!

So what do you think about Elenin now, considering it is not just a small uninteresting dirty snowball, it is actually a once in mankind event.

What are your thoughts on that NASA and the science world are not talking about this - once in mankind event?

This is actually the only claim I can back up.

The rest of the evidence could be purely circumstantial. They are just a gut feeling that something is wrong, same as millions of other people feel. I'm just trying to make sense about it and waking up other people if I'm right. I feel that I am obligated to.

The rest has to wait until the end of this year and perhaps the next year.

I will not go anywhere if I'm wrong, I actually hope nothing will happen.

If nothing happens, I will post a comment here and on youtube admiting I was wrong.

I sure hope I am.

Last Edited by H4LFß4CK$ on 08/02/2011 09:00 PM