Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,991 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 361,384
Pageviews Today: 442,306Threads Today: 94Posts Today: 1,602
02:43 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!

 
Rev. Star Gazer
Offer Upgrade

08/08/2005 02:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!
OK - what do you guys make of this story?

THE CONCLUSIVE DOCUMENTS PROVING THE 13TH AMENDMENT WAS RATIFIED HAVE BEEN FOUND!

THIS IS SIMPLY EXPLOSIVE AS IT BEGINS TO IRRIGATE OUR AWARENESS WITH ITS IMPLICATIONS! THE SCUM OF OUR SOCIETY AREN´T EVEN CITIZENS BECAUSE THEY HAVE SWORM ALLEGIANCE TO A FOREIGN POWER. NO WONDER WE FIND OURSELVES UNDER ´FOREIGN AID´, ILLEGAL TAXATION, AND IN FACT, EVERYTHING THAT ´WE´ FOUGHT TO GET RID OF IN THE FIRST PLACE! MOST OF CONGRESS ARE ATTORNEYS! THEY EITHER REFUTE THESE FOREIGN OATHS AND TAKE NEW OATHS RETURNING THEIR ALLEGIANCE TO THE BOSS: *WE THE PEOPLE* OR...OUT WITH THE BUMS! NOW!

[link to www.constitutionalconcepts.org]
*********************************************************
Amendment XIII
Passed by Congress May 1, 1810 - Ratified December 9, 1812.

"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the united States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."
*************************************************************​
-------snip from article-------
Considerable controversy surrounds this Amendment - The official position of the Federal Government is that it was never ratified - but - in the past few months there is more than ample evidence that shows the Amendment was properly ratified on December 9, 1812, and if not then, certainly no later than March 10, 1819.

For over 50 years this Amendment was included in the publications of the Constitution for the united States.

Many States, Territories, and even the Federal Government, itself, printed copies of the Constitution containing this Amendment.

It was unlawfully removed by persons unknown for their own personal greed and aggrandizement.

Even though it was properly ratified, it appears that it was never enforced. Thus, all laws, treaties, appointments of officers to government positions, and other acts and actions of the Federal government since 1812 are of questionable validity and may therefore be null and void.

You can examine for yourself the images of the various documents that prove conclusively the validity of the 13th Amendment

It is very interesting to note that only the 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th Articles of Amendment had numbers assigned to them at the time of ratification. The reason behind the numbering was to insure that the removal of the validly existing 13th Amendment was fully hidden by the proposed, and wrongfully numbered new 13th Amendment. To have just numbered the new proposed Amendment as the 13th and then not number any others would have called attention to the facts surrounding the situation. Whoever was behind the removal of the valid 13th Amendment had to number the next few Amendments so as to further hide their unlawful actions.

This Amendment was for the specific purpose of banning participation in government operations by attorneys and bankers who claimed the Title of Nobility of "Esquire." These people had joined the International Bar Association or the International Bankers Association and owed their allegiance to the King of
England. Banning Titles of Nobility began in the Articles of Confederation, continued in two places in the Constitution, and finally was added as an Amendment to the Constitution -- an Amendment that was needed as the other bans had no teeth in them to punish those persons who chose to ignore the Constitutional Law.

The thirteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States was proposed to the legislatures of the several States by the Eleventh Congress, Second Session, on the 1st of May, 1810. The dates of ratification were:
------------------------end snip-----------------
[link to www.constitutionalconcepts.org]

[link to www.rumormillnews.com]

link to www.godlikeproductions.com] alt='damned'>
"The lunatic is on the grass
The lunatic is on the grass
Remembering games and daisy chains and laughs
Got to keep the loonies on the path..."
Broken Cord

User ID: 5435156
United States
12/03/2015 07:00 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!
bump
Disclosure.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16213727
United States
12/03/2015 08:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!
this does deserve a bumpbump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 66246272
United States
12/03/2015 08:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!
[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

bsflag

Fuckin tard
Broken Cord

User ID: 5435156
United States
12/04/2015 09:46 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 66246272


Lawyer much!

5a
Disclosure.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 70883816
Sweden
12/04/2015 09:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!
NO, according to the 13th, they accepted 'titles' from the king of UK (enemy of USA)

The “missing” 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows:

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim,
receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour,
or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain
any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind,
from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power,
such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States,
and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60682038
United States
12/04/2015 09:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!
This site explains things pretty well.

[link to www.keepandbeararms.com]


"BAR ATTORNEYS AND TREASON

Allegiance to the Constitution (the People) or Not

We have in this nation around 80,000 BAR attorneys. According to one source, this is 80 percent of all the attorneys on the planet. Aren’t we lucky to have so many. By being accepted into the BAR, people are given special privileges and are set as above the ordinary citizen. By accepting privileged titles and honor, does their allegiance still lie with the people or does it lie with another authority?

Since the Constitution prohibits titles of nobility (Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 and Section 10, Clause 1: US Constitution), then it stands to reason that any individual who has been given a title of nobility is no longer of the body politic but is treated as a higher separate authority. But, the Constitution also establishes the body politic, the sovereign, as the highest authority. Therefore, BAR attorneys cannot be classed higher than the sovereign and are, in fact, removed as a sovereign since they have accepted allegiance with other than the people."
Mook
NESARA is HERE!

User ID: 61958521
United States
12/04/2015 10:47 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!
Judges and Attorneys are pure Treasonous shit.

This was filed in Colorado court in mid-Oct: [link to annavonreitz.com]
Mook
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25645632
United States
12/04/2015 11:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!
Judges and Attorneys are pure Treasonous shit.

This was filed in Colorado court in mid-Oct: [link to annavonreitz.com]
 Quoting: Mook


the bar is in england not america
Mook
NESARA is HERE!

User ID: 61958521
United States
12/04/2015 11:11 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!
Judges and Attorneys are pure Treasonous shit.

This was filed in Colorado court in mid-Oct: [link to annavonreitz.com]
 Quoting: Mook


the bar is in england not america
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25645632




Yes....Templar Crown Middle Temple. What is your point?


All these pieces of shit represent corporations.....the International Lien is on the IBA, ABA, and US DOJ -- all of which are corps......
Mook
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2091907
United States
12/04/2015 11:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!
attorneys are NOT LAWYERS!

the use of an attorney is considered proof of incompetence, mental retardation or inability to act as an adult by the commercial court system.
Mook
NESARA is HERE!

User ID: 61958521
United States
12/04/2015 11:45 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 13th Amendment - Lawyers are NOT citizens?!
attorneys are NOT LAWYERS!

the use of an attorney is considered proof of incompetence, mental retardation or inability to act as an adult by the commercial court system.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2091907




True.....

a Lawyer is schooled in law.


an Attorney has sworn an allegiance to the Crown as a "debt collector".
Mook

News