FUCKING FLUORIDE!!!

FUCKING EH!! I want this shit out of my community, state and nation! I fear my country is too brainwashed and occupied with useless bullshit!!

I wanna do this shit in my area too. Let me know how it goes.

I'm in Fort Worth. I'll show up at any meeting if I'm free. We filter with our Berkey. Normal people have no idea...because the fluoride makes us stupid.

On the up side, my Lupus has been feeling better since I started drinking diet coke! Mmmmm aspertame is yummy.

Well, one poison at a time. First we must insure the safety of our drinking water. Remember, not only do we drink it; we shower and cook with this shit!!

The bad news: Much talk that Fluoride calcifies the pineal gland (3rd eye), inhibiting people spiritually as well as physically.

The good news: Borax in small doses can eventually extricate it out of the body including the bones. Reverse osmosis filters will get it out of existing drinking water- that's about the only way. Conventional filters e.g. Brita leave it in.

At this point, there are powerful interests using their influence to keep fluoride added to the drinking water for reasons not exclusively financial; think about it: take it out, and over time it will become apparent that fluoride was a cause or contributor to many human health issues. This would leave those responsible for adding it to water legally liable, similar to why most dentists no longer put in Mercury amalgam tooth fillings

This site is full of info, sign up for their emails, sign on to help them get rid of fluoride in your town/city drinking water
[link to fluoridealert.org]




SIGN-ON: Ask HHS to End US Water Fluoridation Program\

[link to salsa.democracyinaction.org]

I think a list is in order. Let's name all the things that can help remove fluoride from the pineal gland.

Borax
Boron
Iodine
Kelp
Beets and Beet powder (contain boron & I think iodine)

Please add to the list.

If we present the facts and stick together, we can make a difference.

I aplogize for my language earlier and I hope it doesn't stumble any of God's people but I am passionate about this issue. I don't care about religon here as I want every man, woman and child to drink water that doesn't harm them..

I live in Central Texas if you wanna take it against the state I will show up if you give me times hell yea

No more fucking around with us

Great site!! Good research!!

California has a mandated water fluoridation program which identifies and prioritizes the top150 cites for fluoridation. Although California mandated water fluoridation, it never funded the program and therefore cannot legally require it. They leave the choice to the cities.

Recently (March '99) California's #1 fluoridation priority, City of La Mesa, said No Thank You. This was soon followed (March '99) by the #4 priority, the City of Escondido, which passed an Ordinance to prohibit fluoridation.

#1 On Fluoridation Priority List Says No Thank You

By unanimous decision, the Board of Directors of Helix Water District, which is listed as first on the California's mandatory fluoridation priority list, took action yesterday to prevent the mandatory fluoridation of their water supplies by directing their staff to advise the California Department of Health and Human Services, a fluoridation task force coalition, and the other water agencies and communities that they service, that Helix will reject any grant offered them that would require that they add fluoride to their water.

The independent decision to reject any funding for fluoridation purposes comes on the heels of a March 9, 1999 unanimous resolution by the City of La Mesa that opposes the fluoridation of its citizens and requests that Helix Water District ensure, "...That every means available and necessary is used to vigorously oppose putting fluoride in the water supply."

Helix Water District supplies approximately 250,000 customers in the east San Diego county cities of La Mesa, El Cajon, Lemon Grove, and parts of Spring Valley. Other water districts, Otay Lakes and Padre Dam, would also be effected, as they receive water from Helix and in turn supply water to the Riverview Water District and Lakeside Water District. Padre Dam is #15 on the fluoridation priority list.

Each of the Directors of the Helix Water District expressed the reasoning behind their individual decision to reject converting their water supply into a delivery system for mass medication, noting that the mission of their water district is to remove impurities by treating the water, not to add to them, or medicate people. Helix is currently undergoing a $28 million upgrade and expansion program, and the Board of Directors may soon consider the use of Ozonation, which would replace the use of chlorine as a primary disinfectant.

The creation of the State's fluoridation priority list was established by the enactment of unfunded mandate AB733 in October 1995, calling for fluoridation by all water suppliers with more than 10,000 connections. Each water district was required to submit an estimate of the capital costs for purchasing and installing fluoridation equipment, with the least cost per customer given the #1 priority.

El Cajon is expected to review the issue this month, as is the northern San Diego county city of Escondido, which is #4 on the priority list.

On March 2, 1999, the voters of the City of Santa Cruz (#12) affirmed a 1998 ordinance enacted by their city council that prohibited fluoridation without a vote of the people, and joined San Diego (#18) and Sunnyvale (#81) with laws that conflict with the State. The Santa Cruz ordinance prohibits the addition of any substance, including fluoride, that is intended to effect humans physically or mentally rather than treat the water.

Marion Standish of the California Endowment, a charitable group created as a result of Blue Cross converting from non-profit to profit status, has reported that they have granted $10 million for the purpose of implementing fluoridation, but are not intent on forcing the funds on unwilling communities. Whether the grant triggers the funding scheme of AB733 is yet to be tested.

Members of Citizens for Safe Drinking Water throughout the state question the sanity of continuing to force fluoridation when the original goal of 1 milligram per day for a child from all sources is already achieved in non fluoridating communities, and that the mass medication amount used to fluoridate exceeds the level that any professional in the country can ethically prescribe for a child 6 years of age and younger and still conform to the revised policy recommendations for total exposure by the American Dental Association and American Academy of Pediatrics.

"When does this stop?", asks David C. Kennedy, a practicing dentist in San Diego and Past President of the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology. "In the Wall Street Journal, December 21, 1998, the U. S. Center for Disease Control admits that 22% of all of our nation's children now display physical signs of fluoride overdose. Since the State made its decision in 1995, there have been six studies that link fluoride to neurological impairment and lower IQ in children. How many more have to suffer before the main stream media and the people who care about our kids and country and future rise up all at once and tell the promoters of adding industrial hazardous wastes to our water to back off ?"


No. 4 On State's Priority List Passes Ordinance to Prohibit Fluoridation

The City of Escondido, which is listed fourth on California's fluoridation priority list, took a stand yesterday to protect their citizens against the State's plan to fluoridate their public water.

Following more than 40 speakers, and at times contentious discussion between Councilmembers, the City Council passed an ordinance that prohibits the addition of any substance to the water, including fluoride, that is intended to treat humans, rather than improve the drinkability of water.

While promoters of converting the water supply to a delivery system for fluoride contended that there was no evidence to show that any harm to individuals had ever come from "optimal" levels of fluoride in the water, Councilmember Keith Beier questioned whether health professionals endorsed the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) revised policy recommendations for controlled dosage drops and tablets that are used as a substitute for fluoridated water in non fluoridated communities.

The revised policy recommendation was published by the AAP and the American Dental Association (ADA) in 1995 in order to reduce the risk of fluoride poisoning to children from over-exposure to fluoride from all sources, not just the water. The AAP and ADA schedules show that infants should have no further exposure to fluoride even if there is no fluoride in their drinking water.

Councilmember Beier further questioned why professionals were required to evaluate a child's weight, growth and development, unusual susceptibility, and total exposure to fluoride from all sources before being able to prescribe even 1/4 of what that child is expected to receive in the water. Beier noted that the amount of fluoride the State was intending to put in the water exceeded the amount that any health professional could ethically prescribe to a child under 6 years of age.

Supporters of the ordinance displayed sodas, fruit juices, white grape juice, baby foods, and cereals bought from their neighborhood stores that contain up to 6 times the amount of fluoride intended for their water, yet contain no labeling so that parents could limit their children's intake.

David Nelson, the fluoridation consultant for the state Department of Health and Human Services, offered the State's opinion that the ordinance would not prevail against the State.

In an aggressive tone, Nelson indicated that they had no intent at this time to force fluoride down the city's throat, but that they certainly had the power to do so, and that it might come to that.

Nelson contended that the determination of which communities were to be fluoridated, and how a $10 million grant from California Endowment for implementation of fluoridation is spent, was his agency's own internal decision, and that they might just skip around the priority list and provide funds to Cities that want to fluoridate.

In what some audience members could only imagine was a mis-statement, although uncorrected, Nelson additionally stated that if the City did not pass the ordinance, and accepted $10 million, the city could sit back and let the State's legal department and the Health and Human Services fight the lawsuits that would come up.

A contentious moment of the meeting occurred in response to Beier's statement that, after his listening to hours of discrepancies between the fluoridation proponents' own facts and representations, and the recognition that the substance to be added to the water was an industrial hazardous waste, he was trying to determine what was driving the ADA and others to push so hard. Referring to the millions of dollars paid to the ADA for the endorsement of fluoride products, Beier suggested that one should just, "follow the money."

Escondido's stance against the State's plan to fluoridate was one of several that took place during the month of March.

[Special thanks for Mayor Pro Tem Beier for having the courage to stand tall for benefit of all citizens]

On March 2, the voters in Santa Cruz affirmed a March 1998 ordinance passed by the city council that prohibited fluoridation without a vote of the people, and expanded the ordinance to include prohibition of any substance intended to affect the physical or mental functions of persons consuming the water.

On March 9, the City of La Mesa voted unanimously to pass a resolution supporting the prohibition of fluoridation, and requested that Helix Water District, which supplies water to their city, ensure, "...That every means available and necessary is used to vigorously oppose putting fluoride in the water supply."

On March 17, Helix Water District, listed as No. 1 on the State's fluoridation priority list, directed their staff to advise the California Department of Health and Human Services, a fluoridation task force coalition, and the other water agencies and communities that they service, that Helix will reject any grant offered them that would require that they add fluoride to their water.

On March 22, members of the Los Angeles chapter of Citizens for Safe Drinking Water filed a lawsuit containing more than 20 causes of action against the Los Angeles City Council and Department of Water and Power, as Los Angeles prepares to fluoridate based on a vote of the City Council. Los Angeles was the last major city in California to allow the people a say, in 1975, which resulted in 213,000 citizens of Los Angeles voting to reject the 1974 City Council's decision to fluoridate.

Fuck this shit

Not necessarily. I live in a town with multiple springs, and every one of them has a concentration of natural fluoride in them.

Also, my community gets mountain runoff water with high fluoride concentrations. They don't artificially add fluoride to the water here, because of this.

As a matter of fact, they send out letters to parents encouraging them NOT to let their kids drink the water here until after the age of 9.

So I bought a Berkey with a PF2 filter.

Water tastes SOOOOOOOO much better now.

Let's start with the communities first. Then, we can move on from there.

There is a diffence between naturally occuring CALCIUM FLORIDE and the SODIUM FLUORINE that is produced from aluminum and fetilizer factories. HUGE!!!

Ban it in water all you want. It will still make it to your children's mouths.

NO!! We can stop it if we inform the water borads.

FUCK!! Come on people, this is the rally point!!!

Let's get together and put pressure on those poor misinformed fucks!!!

SCRUMP!! Join this shit my man!!

Post the information.

There are many, many, forms of fluoride. However, as stated here, most fluoride is a bi-product of some industry. Does the human body use fluoride? yes, just in very small amounts. Nearly all fruits/vegatables contain a type of fluroide, but again, in small amounts, the body needs it, and, in the correct form.

Just wanted to clarify that, that there are many types of fluoride.

Reverse Osmosis filtration removes fluoride, as well as pretty much everything else.

[link to www.fluoridealert.org]

Countries That Do Not Fluoridate Water
Many countries oppose water fluoridation. In 2000, government authorities from various countries were asked if they fluoridated their water and if not, why. Several countries (Portugal, Romania, Denmark, Austria, and China) simply stated that their water was not fluoridated without giving any reasons.

Other countries that did not fluoridate provided the following reasons:
The Netherlands: opposed to putting medical additives into the water.

Belgium: opposed to putting medical additives into the water.

Hungary: ran into technical problems that made fluoridation seem unreasonable.

Switzerland: uses fluoridated salt instead but preserve choice since people can buy non-fluoridated salt.

[Note: The cost of fluoridating salt is borne by the manufacturer rather than by municipalities.]

Luxembourg: “drinking water isn’t the suitable way for medicinal treatment. . . people needing an addition of fluoride can decide by their own to use the most appropriate way, like the intake of fluoride tablets”

Sweden: “Drinking water fluoridation is not allowed in Sweden due to repeal in 1971 of the Drinking Water Fluoridation Act issued in 1962. . . . New scientific documentation or changes in the dental health situation that could alter the conclusions of the commission have not been shown.”

Norway: “we had a rather intense discussion on this subject some 20 years ago, and the conclusion was that drinking water should not be fluoridated. It was therefore up to each individual to decide whether to use fluoride tablets, toothpaste or mouthwash.”

Finland: has no fluoridation because “there are better ways of providing the fluoride our teeth need.” The Finnish Dentists’ Association recommends the use of fluoride pills.

Japan: “there is no need to supply fluoridated water to ALL users because
(1) the impacts of fluoridated water on human health depends on each human being so that inappropriate application may cause health problems of vulnerable people, and,
(2) there is [sic] other ways for the purpose of dental health care, such as direct F-coating on teeth and using fluoridated dental paste and these ways should be applied at one’s free will.”

France: “Fluoride chemicals are not included in the list [of ‘chemicals for drinking water treatment’]. This is due to ethical as well as medical considerations.” (Louis Sanchez, Directeur de la Protection de l’Environment, August25, 2000). France does have fluoridated salt as a choice.

Czech Republic: Stopped fluoridation in 1989 because it was
(1) uneconomical since “only 0.54% of water suitable for drinking water is used as such,”
(2) “unecological,”
(3) “unethical (forced medication),”
(4) it “disregards actual individual intake and requirements”.

India: Rather than putting fluoride into the water, India is removing “the fluoride that pollutes the water naturally. . .we know that fluoride is injurious to health.” Furthermore, it is mandated that toothpaste cartons indicate the fluoride content and state that “children below 4 years of age should not use fluoridated toothpaste as fluoride is injurious to health.” India has a problem with fluorosis in 17 of the 32 states leading the government to recommend that individuals not use fluoridated toothpaste.

Germany: stopped all fluoridation and provided the most extensive reasons for that action via a position statement issued by the DVGW (German Technical and Scientific Association for Gas and Water). As the letter indicated, “The information is dated 1992, but we still fully agree with this statement.”

Where the did the OP go.
Do you take your thread seriously or not?
Or is this just another game, a prank thread done to feel people out?
So many of those kinds of things going on here.
I used to comment lots, now, why? to be a part of some psy-ops or some such thing.

Save yourself a lot of aggravation....buy a reverse osmosis water filter for the house....call it done.

Move on with life.

This is why there's mint in fluoride toothpaste.

Mint opens the pores.

This is why they put fluoride in toothpaste rather than, say, cosmetics. Because the mouth is one of the best routes directly to the bloodstream through the thin skin (made even more direct by the presence of mint to open those pores!).

[link to www.youtube.com]

some other symptoms you may get include, irratable stomach, changes in appetite, dizzyness, headrushes, stupor.

I live in Pecan Grove. I got your back. I like water better than fluoride.

My city voted it out last referendum

Fluoride Deception

[link to www.youtube.com]