========PLANET X "HOAX" ????? >> EVERYONE READ | |
TorontonianGuy User ID: 854403 Canada 03/02/2011 02:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Discovery of Planet X Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1031022Planet X was discovered and photographed in modern times by JPL’s deep space Infrared Electronic Telescope. The year was 1981. At that time the astronomers and scientists working on the project were so elated with their discovery that they released the news of its discovery to the public news media. The story of its discovery was published in the New York Times and the Washington Post in 1981, then picked up by other newspapers and carried all over the world. I have copies of both of the original articles printed in those two major newspapers in my files right now. Any reader can obtain copies for themselves by researching the subject on the Internet. The guy doesn't even know the correct acronym for IRAS (NASA never had an "Infrared Electronic Telescope") let alone what it stands for, yet you expect us to believe he's right about what it discovered? He's not, by the way. IRAS initially found 9 point-like light sources that could not be traced to a visible light source at that time. The 1983 (not 1981, IRAS wasn't even launched till '83) article claims it "could" be a jupiter-like planet OR extra-galactic, they had no idea when it was first observed. IRAS did not find a planet though, it did find a number of infrared-luminous galaxies and intragalactic dust. If you claim that this discovery was actually a planet, which of these 9 initally-unidentified point-like sources was the planet? 0358+223 3h 58m 2.8s 22d 18’ 0” 0404+101 4h 4m 44.7s 10d 11’ 52” 0412+085 4h 12m 32.3s 8d 31’ 13” 0413+122 4h 13m 47.3s 12d 17’ 16” 0422+009 4h 22m 54.0s 0d 56’ 6” 0425-012 4h 25m 12.1s -1d 14’ 50” 1703+049 17h 3m 1.4s 4d 57’ 50” 1712+100 17h 12m 57.8s 10d 4’ 8” 1732_239 17h 32m 51.4s 23d 56’ 36” If you want to know what they actually found, here are the follow-up papers that further researched these point-like sources: Unidentified point sources in the IRAS minisurvey, Houck et al. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 278, March 1, 1984, p. L63-L66 Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, Houck et al., Astrophysical Journal, vol. 290, March 1, 1985, p. L5-L8. Optical counterparts of unidentified IRAS point sources Infrared luminous galaxies, Aaronson and Olszewski, Nature, vol. 309, May 31, 1984, p. 414-417. This pastor is so completely and totally wrong it's embarrassing to even read it. Governments lie ... he may be wrong ...but governments lie |
Jane Smith Forum Administrator User ID: 1215902 United States 03/02/2011 02:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think when the elites go underground, the rest of us should get some heavey equipment and make sure they they stay there. I'm close enough to DIA to help make sure that happens. All I need is access to a big dozer. No air vents, no doors, no lying sack of shit elites. It will make a great archaeologic find in a few thousand years. Quoting: Epic Beard Guywhat makes you think they need air vents ? The shelter at DIA certainly has air vents, and there are going to need air or it's just a mass grave. The vents at DIA are very large and easy to see on Google earth. But even if we can't find the source of air, they has to come out at some poit. That will be "mission impossible" with a few thousand tons of dirt and debry in the doorway. Even if they make it out of their bunkers are they expecting to be welcomed with open arms by survivors? I think not. Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
Astronut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 634208 United States 03/02/2011 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Discovery of Planet X Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1031022Planet X was discovered and photographed in modern times by JPL’s deep space Infrared Electronic Telescope. The year was 1981. At that time the astronomers and scientists working on the project were so elated with their discovery that they released the news of its discovery to the public news media. The story of its discovery was published in the New York Times and the Washington Post in 1981, then picked up by other newspapers and carried all over the world. I have copies of both of the original articles printed in those two major newspapers in my files right now. Any reader can obtain copies for themselves by researching the subject on the Internet. The guy doesn't even know the correct acronym for IRAS (NASA never had an "Infrared Electronic Telescope") let alone what it stands for, yet you expect us to believe he's right about what it discovered? He's not, by the way. IRAS initially found 9 point-like light sources that could not be traced to a visible light source at that time. The 1983 (not 1981, IRAS wasn't even launched till '83) article claims it "could" be a jupiter-like planet OR extra-galactic, they had no idea when it was first observed. IRAS did not find a planet though, it did find a number of infrared-luminous galaxies and intragalactic dust. If you claim that this discovery was actually a planet, which of these 9 initally-unidentified point-like sources was the planet? 0358+223 3h 58m 2.8s 22d 18’ 0” 0404+101 4h 4m 44.7s 10d 11’ 52” 0412+085 4h 12m 32.3s 8d 31’ 13” 0413+122 4h 13m 47.3s 12d 17’ 16” 0422+009 4h 22m 54.0s 0d 56’ 6” 0425-012 4h 25m 12.1s -1d 14’ 50” 1703+049 17h 3m 1.4s 4d 57’ 50” 1712+100 17h 12m 57.8s 10d 4’ 8” 1732_239 17h 32m 51.4s 23d 56’ 36” If you want to know what they actually found, here are the follow-up papers that further researched these point-like sources: Unidentified point sources in the IRAS minisurvey, Houck et al. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 278, March 1, 1984, p. L63-L66 Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, Houck et al., Astrophysical Journal, vol. 290, March 1, 1985, p. L5-L8. Optical counterparts of unidentified IRAS point sources Infrared luminous galaxies, Aaronson and Olszewski, Nature, vol. 309, May 31, 1984, p. 414-417. This pastor is so completely and totally wrong it's embarrassing to even read it. Governments lie ... he may be wrong ...but governments lie Then which of those 9 point-like light sources was planet x? Oh wait, you're just handwaving, never mind. Last Edited by Astromut on 03/02/2011 02:45 PM |
TorontonianGuy User ID: 854403 Canada 03/02/2011 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wiki says IRAS was launched in Jan 1983. So where did the 1981 date come from? Nothing cited before 1984. Unless there was an older model telescope being used in 81 the article is a hoax. Quoting: Mr. ToppitExactly. Googling the term in quotes "Infrared Electronic Telescope" only returns F.M. Riley related postings on the internet. He has no idea what he's talking about, JPL never had a telescope by that name. That you know about .... So you're saying that Mr. Riley knew about a "secret infrared telescope" that he knows was launched by JPL, he even knows what the name was, and it secretly "discovered planet x" which was then publicly published in multiple major papers despite coming from a completely secret and unknown satellite that for some reason no amateur satellite hunter could detect. Do you think your posts through before you post them or do you just let it fly? Show me proof Riley's proof that JPL was operating an infrared telescope called the "Infrared Electronic Telescope" in 1981. It doesn't exist, he's pulling crap out of his rear. No, like my other post ... governments lie ... you do realize this I hope ??? He may have been privy to info from a person that attended one of these 'secret' meetings .... he may be full of shit BUT governments lie (FACT). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1276419 United States 03/02/2011 02:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1282105 United States 03/02/2011 02:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP you say Nibiru will be visible by binoculars in April and appearing in the night sky as a "second moon" visible to the naked eye. Where do you get your information from? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1275040. . . now iam sure the Google search is flooded with information. The Internet will or already has gone crazy getting information out to you all. This is going to be a few fun months. MAN OH MAN AM I EVER GLAD I AM SAVED !!!!!!!!!Thank you Jesus, sweet Jesus. |
Hooch User ID: 152795 United States 03/02/2011 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | +1 So this happened 3600 years ago huh? Funny how the Egyptians wrote nothing of the matter. If planet X was going to be here by 2012 it would be in the asteroid belt right now and we could see it at night. Move out of your mothers basement and get a job. Familiarize yourself with the Kolbrin Bible writings then... quite a clear Egyptian description of the last passing Really? Translate sonny, they wrote nothing of it. The only people that did were supposofly the Sumerians, and it was all bullshit written by that fraud Stitchin. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1031022 Canada 03/02/2011 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wiki says IRAS was launched in Jan 1983. So where did the 1981 date come from? Nothing cited before 1984. Unless there was an older model telescope being used in 81 the article is a hoax. Quoting: Mr. ToppitExactly. Googling the term in quotes "Infrared Electronic Telescope" only returns F.M. Riley related postings on the internet. He has no idea what he's talking about, JPL never had a telescope by that name. That you know about .... So you're saying that Mr. Riley knew about a "secret infrared telescope" that he knows was launched by JPL, he even knows what the name was, and it secretly "discovered planet x" which was then publicly published in multiple major papers despite coming from a completely secret and unknown satellite that for some reason no amateur satellite hunter could detect. Do you think your posts through before you post them or do you just let it fly? Show me proof Riley's proof that JPL was operating an infrared telescope called the "Infrared Electronic Telescope" in 1981. It doesn't exist, he's pulling crap out of his rear. You know and I know He was talking about IRA in 1983. Explain that. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1031022 Canada 03/02/2011 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1279762 United States 03/02/2011 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Joqui User ID: 1172586 United States 03/02/2011 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sires, and Ladies, I believe thouest hath thine facts wrong. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1282295God is a SHE , not a HE. God IS. Gender is irrelevant. You can worhip a tree, a stone, or a statue & call it god if you wish - imho, its a matter of perception. |
Gazmik User ID: 487277 United States 03/02/2011 02:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astronut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 634208 United States 03/02/2011 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know and I know He was talking about IRA in 1983. Explain that. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1031022I already explained what IRAS found. In 1983. You're saying he got both the name of the satellite and the year it operated completely wrong, but we're supposed to trust that he's at all credible about what it found? Sorry, not buying it. Either prove that JPL operated a telescope named the "Infrared Electronic Telescope" in 1981 or this guy has no credibility at all. |
2 1/2 Morans User ID: 402164 United States 03/02/2011 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1238917 United States 03/02/2011 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1282105 United States 03/02/2011 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Makes you wonder if Comet Elenin will be used to explain away Planet X. Quoting: Base_DisclosureTHIS I BELIEVE IS EXACTLY WHAT Comet Elenin IS BEING USED FOR !! . . . i thought Elenin was "Planet X" with a name. Another name for it is Wormwood. Brown Elf whatever is another. It has a lot of nic-names . . . However a rose by any other name is still a rose. |
He-Man User ID: 1282378 United States 03/02/2011 03:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think when the elites go underground, the rest of us should get some heavey equipment and make sure they they stay there. I'm close enough to DIA to help make sure that happens. All I need is access to a big dozer. No air vents, no doors, no lying sack of shit elites. It will make a great archaeologic find in a few thousand years. Quoting: Epic Beard Guywhat makes you think they need air vents ? The shelter at DIA certainly has air vents, and there are going to need air or it's just a mass grave. The vents at DIA are very large and easy to see on Google earth. But even if we can't find the source of air, they has to come out at some poit. That will be "mission impossible" with a few thousand tons of dirt and debry in the doorway. Even if they make it out of their bunkers are they expecting to be welcomed with open arms by survivors? I think not. That's why they are training/preparing with movies and video games about zombies which seems to be really popular these days......cause you see the ZOMBIES ARE US. Master of The Universe |
Setheory User ID: 869850 United States 03/02/2011 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Planet X pushed me down, stole my lunch money and rubbed sand in my ass crack! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 456756Laughed my ass off over this one!! But seriously folks, there is no doomsday scenario on the horizon! I think you'll find that we debunkers are not even saying that. It's just that it is not going to come in the form of an imaginary planet. |
Astronut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 634208 United States 03/02/2011 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: AstronutExactly. Googling the term in quotes "Infrared Electronic Telescope" only returns F.M. Riley related postings on the internet. He has no idea what he's talking about, JPL never had a telescope by that name. That you know about .... So you're saying that Mr. Riley knew about a "secret infrared telescope" that he knows was launched by JPL, he even knows what the name was, and it secretly "discovered planet x" which was then publicly published in multiple major papers despite coming from a completely secret and unknown satellite that for some reason no amateur satellite hunter could detect. Do you think your posts through before you post them or do you just let it fly? Show me proof Riley's proof that JPL was operating an infrared telescope called the "Infrared Electronic Telescope" in 1981. It doesn't exist, he's pulling crap out of his rear. No, like my other post ... governments lie ... you do realize this I hope ??? He may have been privy to info from a person that attended one of these 'secret' meetings .... he may be full of shit BUT governments lie (FACT). So you're saying that Mr. Riley knew about a "secret infrared telescope" that he knows was launched by JPL, he even knows what the name was, and it secretly "discovered planet x" which was then publicly published in multiple major papers despite coming from a completely secret and unknown satellite that for some reason no amateur satellite hunter could detect, but it's all good because "governments lie." That's called handwaving. Last Edited by Astromut on 03/02/2011 03:04 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1067150 United States 03/02/2011 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think when the elites go underground, the rest of us should get some heavey equipment and make sure they they stay there. I'm close enough to DIA to help make sure that happens. All I need is access to a big dozer. No air vents, no doors, no lying sack of shit elites. It will make a great archaeologic find in a few thousand years. Quoting: Epic Beard Guywhat makes you think they need air vents ? The shelter at DIA certainly has air vents, and there are going to need air or it's just a mass grave. The vents at DIA are very large and easy to see on Google earth. But even if we can't find the source of air, they has to come out at some poit. That will be "mission impossible" with a few thousand tons of dirt and debry in the doorway. Even if they make it out of their bunkers are they expecting to be welcomed with open arms by survivors? I think not. Pitchforks and torches await! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1209990 United States 03/02/2011 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BadMoonRising User ID: 727864 United Kingdom 03/02/2011 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Shills are still on the payroll I see... |
2012gregg User ID: 933586 United States 03/02/2011 03:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All the Jesus BS overflowing from this gives away the fact that it's all garbage this ^ in5D: [link to www.in5d.com] Maya 2012: [link to www.maya12-21-2012.com] in5d YouTube Channel: [link to www.youtube.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1276527 United States 03/02/2011 03:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1209990 United States 03/02/2011 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Epic Beard Guy User ID: 1161728 United States 03/02/2011 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know and I know He was talking about IRA in 1983. Explain that. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1031022I already explained what IRAS found. In 1983. You're saying he got both the name of the satellite and the year it operated completely wrong, but we're supposed to trust that he's at all credible about what it found? Sorry, not buying it. Either prove that JPL operated a telescope named the "Infrared Electronic Telescope" in 1981 or this guy has no credibility at all. Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 868423 Canada 03/02/2011 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
tammy User ID: 1258083 United States 03/02/2011 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Discovery of Planet X Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1031022Planet X was discovered and photographed in modern times by JPL’s deep space Infrared Electronic Telescope. The year was 1981. At that time the astronomers and scientists working on the project were so elated with their discovery that they released the news of its discovery to the public news media. The story of its discovery was published in the New York Times and the Washington Post in 1981, then picked up by other newspapers and carried all over the world. I have copies of both of the original articles printed in those two major newspapers in my files right now. Any reader can obtain copies for themselves by researching the subject on the Internet. The guy doesn't even know the correct acronym for IRAS (NASA never had an "Infrared Electronic Telescope") let alone what it stands for, yet you expect us to believe he's right about what it discovered? He's not, by the way. IRAS initially found 9 point-like light sources that could not be traced to a visible light source at that time. The 1983 (not 1981, IRAS wasn't even launched till '83) article claims it "could" be a jupiter-like planet OR extra-galactic, they had no idea when it was first observed. IRAS did not find a planet though, it did find a number of infrared-luminous galaxies and intragalactic dust. If you claim that this discovery was actually a planet, which of these 9 initally-unidentified point-like sources was the planet? 0358+223 3h 58m 2.8s 22d 18’ 0” 0404+101 4h 4m 44.7s 10d 11’ 52” 0412+085 4h 12m 32.3s 8d 31’ 13” 0413+122 4h 13m 47.3s 12d 17’ 16” 0422+009 4h 22m 54.0s 0d 56’ 6” 0425-012 4h 25m 12.1s -1d 14’ 50” 1703+049 17h 3m 1.4s 4d 57’ 50” 1712+100 17h 12m 57.8s 10d 4’ 8” 1732_239 17h 32m 51.4s 23d 56’ 36” If you want to know what they actually found, here are the follow-up papers that further researched these point-like sources: Unidentified point sources in the IRAS minisurvey, Houck et al. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 278, March 1, 1984, p. L63-L66 Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, Houck et al., Astrophysical Journal, vol. 290, March 1, 1985, p. L5-L8. Optical counterparts of unidentified IRAS point sources Infrared luminous galaxies, Aaronson and Olszewski, Nature, vol. 309, May 31, 1984, p. 414-417. This pastor is so completely and totally wrong it's embarrassing to even read it. Governments lie ... he may be wrong ...but governments lie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1275157 United States 03/02/2011 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
2 1/2 Morans User ID: 402164 United States 03/02/2011 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |