SOLAR WATCH * 248 M & 18 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily) | |
| shadasonic slumbering no more User ID: 15732022 11/17/2012 12:25 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It just won't allow a big release earthside yet. Its gonna be late nov. early december my friends. I betcha! What do you say Cesium, if I'm right send me some english fare and if you're right I'll send you one of my american kids!lol Last Edited by shadasonic on 11/17/2012 12:25 AM It is sufficiently clear that all things change, yet nothing truly perishes! It riles THEM to believe that you perceive the web they weave- moody blues |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27375240 11/17/2012 12:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| shadasonic slumbering no more User ID: 15732022 11/17/2012 12:27 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27375240 Flare was here 8 seconds after eruption, plasma from the cme may get to us in the next couple days, will be a shallow particle field and may give us a small storm. If it had been earth facing we may have had a problem! Last Edited by shadasonic on 11/17/2012 12:28 AM It is sufficiently clear that all things change, yet nothing truly perishes! It riles THEM to believe that you perceive the web they weave- moody blues |
| Hugh M Eye User ID: 24287942 11/17/2012 12:27 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | See if you can find NOAA AR11617 on this realtime photo- [link to jsoc.stanford.edu] I'll give you hint...here's the coordinates- Joint USAF/NOAA Solar Region Summary SRS Number 322 Issued at 0030Z on 17 Nov 2012 Report compiled from data received at SWO on 16 Nov I. Regions with Sunspots. Locations Valid at 16/2400Z Nmbr Location Lo Area Z LL NN Mag Type 1610 S22W63 263 0160 Cso 13 10 Beta-Gamma 1611 N12W43 243 0130 Hsx 02 01 Alpha 1612 N08W32 232 0030 Hrx 01 01 Alpha 1613 S23W05 205 0100 Cso 05 04 Beta 1614 N15E05 195 0240 Dai 09 24 Beta 1615 N07W06 206 0020 Cro 07 06 Beta 1616 N19E37 163 0110 Dso 09 13 Beta 1617 S18W18 217 0010 Bxo 01 02 Beta [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] This is kind of shenanigans which bring the "Daily Sunspot Number" into such disrepute. I can barely see a wisp of a dot for 1617, yet in the NE there's at least 2 or 3 new UN-NUMBERED regions with obvious spots staring at me for two days. Maybe they're training a new chimp for the coming holidays, LOL. "There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life." Frank Zappa "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-Albert Einstein |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 12:28 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I just had a look at the Ring Current/Fok Ring for that time and it is getting closer and closer to bleeding through [link to ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov] I think that may be related to why there was some absorption around that time as there is little other data I can see that would account for it. Though I could be wrong. The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| shadasonic slumbering no more User ID: 15732022 11/17/2012 12:31 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | See if you can find NOAA AR11617 on this realtime photo- Quoting: Hugh M Eye [link to jsoc.stanford.edu] I'll give you hint...here's the coordinates- Joint USAF/NOAA Solar Region Summary SRS Number 322 Issued at 0030Z on 17 Nov 2012 Report compiled from data received at SWO on 16 Nov I. Regions with Sunspots. Locations Valid at 16/2400Z Nmbr Location Lo Area Z LL NN Mag Type 1610 S22W63 263 0160 Cso 13 10 Beta-Gamma 1611 N12W43 243 0130 Hsx 02 01 Alpha 1612 N08W32 232 0030 Hrx 01 01 Alpha 1613 S23W05 205 0100 Cso 05 04 Beta 1614 N15E05 195 0240 Dai 09 24 Beta 1615 N07W06 206 0020 Cro 07 06 Beta 1616 N19E37 163 0110 Dso 09 13 Beta 1617 S18W18 217 0010 Bxo 01 02 Beta [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] This is kind of shenanigans which bring the "Daily Sunspot Number" into such disrepute. I can barely see a wisp of a dot for 1617, yet in the NE there's at least 2 or 3 new UN-NUMBERED regions with obvious spots staring at me for two days. Maybe they're training a new chimp for the coming holidays, LOL. I agree Hugh,1617 is a spark and not much more. It is sufficiently clear that all things change, yet nothing truly perishes! It riles THEM to believe that you perceive the web they weave- moody blues |
| shadasonic slumbering no more User ID: 15732022 11/17/2012 12:37 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | See if you can find NOAA AR11617 on this realtime photo- Quoting: Hugh M Eye [link to jsoc.stanford.edu] I'll give you hint...here's the coordinates- Joint USAF/NOAA Solar Region Summary SRS Number 322 Issued at 0030Z on 17 Nov 2012 Report compiled from data received at SWO on 16 Nov I. Regions with Sunspots. Locations Valid at 16/2400Z Nmbr Location Lo Area Z LL NN Mag Type 1610 S22W63 263 0160 Cso 13 10 Beta-Gamma 1611 N12W43 243 0130 Hsx 02 01 Alpha 1612 N08W32 232 0030 Hrx 01 01 Alpha 1613 S23W05 205 0100 Cso 05 04 Beta 1614 N15E05 195 0240 Dai 09 24 Beta 1615 N07W06 206 0020 Cro 07 06 Beta 1616 N19E37 163 0110 Dso 09 13 Beta 1617 S18W18 217 0010 Bxo 01 02 Beta [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] This is kind of shenanigans which bring the "Daily Sunspot Number" into such disrepute. I can barely see a wisp of a dot for 1617, yet in the NE there's at least 2 or 3 new UN-NUMBERED regions with obvious spots staring at me for two days. Maybe they're training a new chimp for the coming holidays, LOL. I agree Hugh,1617 is a spark and not much more. Last Edited by shadasonic on 11/17/2012 12:38 AM It is sufficiently clear that all things change, yet nothing truly perishes! It riles THEM to believe that you perceive the web they weave- moody blues |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 12:39 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | See if you can find NOAA AR11617 on this realtime photo- Quoting: Hugh M Eye [link to jsoc.stanford.edu] I'll give you hint...here's the coordinates- Joint USAF/NOAA Solar Region Summary SRS Number 322 Issued at 0030Z on 17 Nov 2012 Report compiled from data received at SWO on 16 Nov I. Regions with Sunspots. Locations Valid at 16/2400Z Nmbr Location Lo Area Z LL NN Mag Type 1610 S22W63 263 0160 Cso 13 10 Beta-Gamma 1611 N12W43 243 0130 Hsx 02 01 Alpha 1612 N08W32 232 0030 Hrx 01 01 Alpha 1613 S23W05 205 0100 Cso 05 04 Beta 1614 N15E05 195 0240 Dai 09 24 Beta 1615 N07W06 206 0020 Cro 07 06 Beta 1616 N19E37 163 0110 Dso 09 13 Beta 1617 S18W18 217 0010 Bxo 01 02 Beta [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] This is kind of shenanigans which bring the "Daily Sunspot Number" into such disrepute. I can barely see a wisp of a dot for 1617, yet in the NE there's at least 2 or 3 new UN-NUMBERED regions with obvious spots staring at me for two days. Maybe they're training a new chimp for the coming holidays, LOL. Is it not the region just to the North-West of 1613 marked as 2049 here [link to www.solen.info] ? The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Isis One User ID: 14343270 11/17/2012 12:47 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I just had a look at the Ring Current/Fok Ring for that time and it is getting closer and closer to bleeding through [link to ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov] I think that may be related to why there was some absorption around that time as there is little other data I can see that would account for it. Though I could be wrong. I watched this one, and at about 12:00 UTC there is a blob of red coming in the backside, I thought it might be that. [link to iswa.gsfc.nasa.gov:8080] Isis One |
| Hugh M Eye User ID: 24287942 11/17/2012 12:48 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Woweee. The last 5 recorded C-flares have all come from different active regions. That's an unusual occurrence and a piece of suntard trivia if there ever was one, haha. [link to www.lmsal.com] Not sure if this was posted here yet- the Solarsoft/SDO composite movie of the huge filament double-eruption yesterday: [link to sdowww.lmsal.com] "There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life." Frank Zappa "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-Albert Einstein |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 12:48 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | See if you can find NOAA AR11617 on this realtime photo- Quoting: Hugh M Eye [link to jsoc.stanford.edu] I'll give you hint...here's the coordinates- Joint USAF/NOAA Solar Region Summary SRS Number 322 Issued at 0030Z on 17 Nov 2012 Report compiled from data received at SWO on 16 Nov I. Regions with Sunspots. Locations Valid at 16/2400Z Nmbr Location Lo Area Z LL NN Mag Type 1610 S22W63 263 0160 Cso 13 10 Beta-Gamma 1611 N12W43 243 0130 Hsx 02 01 Alpha 1612 N08W32 232 0030 Hrx 01 01 Alpha 1613 S23W05 205 0100 Cso 05 04 Beta 1614 N15E05 195 0240 Dai 09 24 Beta 1615 N07W06 206 0020 Cro 07 06 Beta 1616 N19E37 163 0110 Dso 09 13 Beta 1617 S18W18 217 0010 Bxo 01 02 Beta [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] This is kind of shenanigans which bring the "Daily Sunspot Number" into such disrepute. I can barely see a wisp of a dot for 1617, yet in the NE there's at least 2 or 3 new UN-NUMBERED regions with obvious spots staring at me for two days. Maybe they're training a new chimp for the coming holidays, LOL. But I agree fully,the Sunspot count is often a joke,perhaps they use broken old Human Eyeballs to locate these areas instead of a Magnetogram or other imaging - I can see quite a few small spots center disc that are not Numbered. What do you make of the close to the Equator region on the East limb? The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 12:50 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Woweee. The last 5 recorded C-flares have all come from different active regions. That's an unusual occurrence and a piece of suntard trivia if there ever was one, haha. Quoting: Hugh M Eye [link to www.lmsal.com] Not sure if this was posted here yet- the Solarsoft/SDO composite movie of the huge filament double-eruption yesterday: [link to sdowww.lmsal.com] I favoured this movie [link to sdodata.oma.be] of those events - It looks incredible. The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| SnowboardingAlien User ID: 2230505 11/17/2012 12:53 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27916615 11/17/2012 12:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 12:56 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I just had a look at the Ring Current/Fok Ring for that time and it is getting closer and closer to bleeding through [link to ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov] I think that may be related to why there was some absorption around that time as there is little other data I can see that would account for it. Though I could be wrong. I watched this one, and at about 12:00 UTC there is a blob of red coming in the backside, I thought it might be that. [link to iswa.gsfc.nasa.gov:8080] That may have helped it,the RC is fed by the action from the rest of the Spheres remember. The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 12:58 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | so what happen with the big flare that was supposed to hit today? was that just over-hyped? Quoting: SnowboardingAlien Which One now? Sorry,I need reminding : ) The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27375240 11/17/2012 01:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27375240 Flare was here 8 seconds after eruption, plasma from the cme may get to us in the next couple days, will be a shallow particle field and may give us a small storm. If it had been earth facing we may have had a problem! thanks |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 01:01 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Woweee. The last 5 recorded C-flares have all come from different active regions. That's an unusual occurrence and a piece of suntard trivia if there ever was one, haha. Quoting: Hugh M Eye [link to www.lmsal.com] Not sure if this was posted here yet- the Solarsoft/SDO composite movie of the huge filament double-eruption yesterday: [link to sdowww.lmsal.com] Cool : ) The region just below 1616 looks like it's getting ready to fire up a Channel Eruption [link to halpha.nso.edu] I'd watch that One. The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 01:05 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Woweee. The last 5 recorded C-flares have all come from different active regions. That's an unusual occurrence and a piece of suntard trivia if there ever was one, haha. Quoting: Hugh M Eye [link to www.lmsal.com] Not sure if this was posted here yet- the Solarsoft/SDO composite movie of the huge filament double-eruption yesterday: [link to sdowww.lmsal.com] I noticed I guessed correct at the location of 1617 after looking at your lmsal link above : ) What's my prize - Bread and Water!? The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 01:13 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | See if you can find NOAA AR11617 on this realtime photo- Quoting: Hugh M Eye [link to jsoc.stanford.edu] I'll give you hint...here's the coordinates- Joint USAF/NOAA Solar Region Summary SRS Number 322 Issued at 0030Z on 17 Nov 2012 Report compiled from data received at SWO on 16 Nov I. Regions with Sunspots. Locations Valid at 16/2400Z Nmbr Location Lo Area Z LL NN Mag Type 1610 S22W63 263 0160 Cso 13 10 Beta-Gamma 1611 N12W43 243 0130 Hsx 02 01 Alpha 1612 N08W32 232 0030 Hrx 01 01 Alpha 1613 S23W05 205 0100 Cso 05 04 Beta 1614 N15E05 195 0240 Dai 09 24 Beta 1615 N07W06 206 0020 Cro 07 06 Beta 1616 N19E37 163 0110 Dso 09 13 Beta 1617 S18W18 217 0010 Bxo 01 02 Beta [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] This is kind of shenanigans which bring the "Daily Sunspot Number" into such disrepute. I can barely see a wisp of a dot for 1617, yet in the NE there's at least 2 or 3 new UN-NUMBERED regions with obvious spots staring at me for two days. Maybe they're training a new chimp for the coming holidays, LOL. I agree Hugh,1617 is a spark and not much more. 1610 is beginning to look a little more lively on EVE as she approaches NiNz Corner [link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov] she may pop before even going over the limb yet! The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 01:15 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27375240 Flare was here 8 seconds after eruption, plasma from the cme may get to us in the next couple days, will be a shallow particle field and may give us a small storm. If it had been earth facing we may have had a problem! thanks Hello Canadian AC - that blob is the estimated area of impact I believe. The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| whiteangel User ID: 1775746 11/17/2012 01:21 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | See if you can find NOAA AR11617 on this realtime photo- Quoting: Hugh M Eye [link to jsoc.stanford.edu] I'll give you hint...here's the coordinates- Joint USAF/NOAA Solar Region Summary SRS Number 322 Issued at 0030Z on 17 Nov 2012 Report compiled from data received at SWO on 16 Nov I. Regions with Sunspots. Locations Valid at 16/2400Z Nmbr Location Lo Area Z LL NN Mag Type 1610 S22W63 263 0160 Cso 13 10 Beta-Gamma 1611 N12W43 243 0130 Hsx 02 01 Alpha 1612 N08W32 232 0030 Hrx 01 01 Alpha 1613 S23W05 205 0100 Cso 05 04 Beta 1614 N15E05 195 0240 Dai 09 24 Beta 1615 N07W06 206 0020 Cro 07 06 Beta 1616 N19E37 163 0110 Dso 09 13 Beta 1617 S18W18 217 0010 Bxo 01 02 Beta [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] This is kind of shenanigans which bring the "Daily Sunspot Number" into such disrepute. I can barely see a wisp of a dot for 1617, yet in the NE there's at least 2 or 3 new UN-NUMBERED regions with obvious spots staring at me for two days. Maybe they're training a new chimp for the coming holidays, LOL. Is it not the region just to the North-West of 1613 marked as 2049 here [link to www.solen.info] ? I was going to say the circled area above 1613 and to the west or right. [link to www.solarham.net] I may be paranoid but that doesn't mean I'm wrong. May the Angels clear the way for you. Psalm 91:11-12(NKJV) 11 For He shall give His angels charge over you,To keep you in all your ways. 12 In their hands they shall bear you up,Lest you dash your foot against a stone. |
| Isis One User ID: 14343270 11/17/2012 01:23 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 01:23 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That CME looks pretty awesome on the Cactus site [link to www.sidc.oma.be] . The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 01:29 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | See if you can find NOAA AR11617 on this realtime photo- Quoting: Hugh M Eye [link to jsoc.stanford.edu] I'll give you hint...here's the coordinates- Joint USAF/NOAA Solar Region Summary SRS Number 322 Issued at 0030Z on 17 Nov 2012 Report compiled from data received at SWO on 16 Nov I. Regions with Sunspots. Locations Valid at 16/2400Z Nmbr Location Lo Area Z LL NN Mag Type 1610 S22W63 263 0160 Cso 13 10 Beta-Gamma 1611 N12W43 243 0130 Hsx 02 01 Alpha 1612 N08W32 232 0030 Hrx 01 01 Alpha 1613 S23W05 205 0100 Cso 05 04 Beta 1614 N15E05 195 0240 Dai 09 24 Beta 1615 N07W06 206 0020 Cro 07 06 Beta 1616 N19E37 163 0110 Dso 09 13 Beta 1617 S18W18 217 0010 Bxo 01 02 Beta [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] This is kind of shenanigans which bring the "Daily Sunspot Number" into such disrepute. I can barely see a wisp of a dot for 1617, yet in the NE there's at least 2 or 3 new UN-NUMBERED regions with obvious spots staring at me for two days. Maybe they're training a new chimp for the coming holidays, LOL. Is it not the region just to the North-West of 1613 marked as 2049 here [link to www.solen.info] ? I was going to say the circled area above 1613 and to the west or right. [link to www.solarham.net] We were both correct : ) The B4 Threshold is approaching [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] see if it holds,falls or Flares when hit : ) Last Edited by Spittin'Cesium on 11/17/2012 01:33 AM The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 01:41 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Awesome Video of the ISS anomaly from earlier! [link to www.youtube.com] Wtf is that guys!? Omfgg. The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27918816 11/17/2012 01:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 01:46 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| whiteangel User ID: 1775746 11/17/2012 01:48 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Comet? I may be paranoid but that doesn't mean I'm wrong. May the Angels clear the way for you. Psalm 91:11-12(NKJV) 11 For He shall give His angels charge over you,To keep you in all your ways. 12 In their hands they shall bear you up,Lest you dash your foot against a stone. |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 11/17/2012 01:52 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |