Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,191 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 7,448
Pageviews Today: 10,271Threads Today: 1Posts Today: 42
12:05 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)

 
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 31662450
United States
01/31/2013 02:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
A giant filament erupted in the SE right after the C-flare.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]
finley

User ID: 33376737
United States
01/31/2013 02:55 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Wow thanks Hugh. hf
#Geomagnetic_Storm#
"Amateur Meteorologist"

User ID: 1426914
United States
01/31/2013 03:18 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
A giant filament erupted in the SE right after the C-flare.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


Finally some activity!!!
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
01/31/2013 07:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
:3f54i::3r445:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33385469
United States
01/31/2013 07:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
:3f54i::3r445:
 Quoting: Da fuq


Elephant.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6185582
United States
01/31/2013 07:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Yippee! A C1.1 flare from 1663.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

5ahidingpump2
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


What happened to the C flare on GOES ???

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]
Tiny Trink

User ID: 28990460
United States
01/31/2013 07:34 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
[link to www.youtube.com]


Tiny Trink, Double T, Tink Tink, T x 2

"You are responsible for the Energy you bring into a space" ~ Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor

Shine Brightly as someone is needing your Inner Light to find theirs.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6185582
United States
01/31/2013 07:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Saved them ....

:13113:

:131132:


spock
shenue

User ID: 5263313
United States
01/31/2013 08:54 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Good morning everyone. Group Hug
I stayed up all night to see where the sun went. Then it dawned on me.
coffeePC
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
01/31/2013 11:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Morning Shen.




Top left filament might ruin our day. Combined with the CH stream.


[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov]



[link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu]

Neutron on the left shows a increase and is at the highest I have ever seen it. For whatever reason the Muon shows a decrease, interesting.

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]
The sun remains dead aside from a sad B flare last night.

We have some interesting times ahead folks.

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 11:24 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6185582
United States
01/31/2013 11:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Saved them ....

:13113:

:131132:


spock
 Quoting: TS66


Seriously folks ....

I'm truly amazed a the lack of attentiveness on this thread of late, and the desire to just hear one selves speak.

What I have posted above proves that there is something not only skewed with the solar data we are handed, but that the people left here on this thread couldn't care less about facts, but would rather discuss about whatever pops out of their imaginations.

It's sad to see such a great endeavor by Nin finally meet it's demise.

Sweet dreams all wink
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
01/31/2013 11:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
I thought it was common knowledge we are lied to for the most part? Why sit there and talk about it, the same people that relay that information believe in the standard model of the sun.

Does it surprise you?

Why else is everyone looking for alternative reasons as to why everything is happening.


Right now it does not matter if it was a c or b the sun remains a mystery to everyone atm. It is blatantly obvious anymore we are lied to in certain aspects on all levels in this current system especially if you live in the unitedstates.


I mean everyone has ideas. [link to www.aanda.org]


In the grand scheme of things, we truly don't know for a fact what's happening at the moment.

Goodnight btw


[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]
Bnothin

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 12:04 PM
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
01/31/2013 12:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
A giant filament erupted in the SE right after the C-flare.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye



[link to iswa.ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov]


That had descent amount of ejecta for as much plasma sucked back in. I think we might get smacked around a bit.


I think filament eruptions and CH streams are the new doom.

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 12:23 PM
muse_1111

User ID: 26558348
01/31/2013 12:23 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
A giant filament erupted in the SE right after the C-flare.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye




That had descent amount of ejecta for as much plasma sucked back in. I think we might get smacked around a bit.
 Quoting: Da fuq

ISWA has updated, and they are showing it to be geoeffective on the 3rd - [link to iswa.ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov]
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
01/31/2013 12:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Event Issue Date: 2013-01-31 09:13:23.0 GMT
CME Arrival Time: 2013-02-03 03:15:51.0 GMT
Arival Time Confidence Level: ± 6 hours
Disturbance Duration: 18 hours
Disturbance Duration Confidence Level: ± 8 hours
Magnetopause Standoff Distance: 6.3 Re
Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:15:51 GMT


not bad...

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 12:28 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32806609
United Kingdom
01/31/2013 12:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Don't worry ts66 followed this thread a bit and your input is detremental to learning. go and change your jam rag and educate yourself before wasting keystrokes! ; )
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
01/31/2013 01:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
[link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu]


Cosmic rays going off the chart. They are tweaking the data on the right, does not make any sense.
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
01/31/2013 01:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
[link to halpha.nso.edu]
[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov]
Boom!


arnoldsolardoom!


Most likely just miss us though.



[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov]

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 01:36 PM
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
01/31/2013 01:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Saved them ....

:13113:

:131132:


spock
 Quoting: TS66


Seriously folks ....

I'm truly amazed a the lack of attentiveness on this thread of late, and the desire to just hear one selves speak.

What I have posted above proves that there is something not only skewed with the solar data we are handed, but that the people left here on this thread couldn't care less about facts, but would rather discuss about whatever pops out of their imaginations.

It's sad to see such a great endeavor by Nin finally meet it's demise.

Sweet dreams all wink
 Quoting: TS66


That is a ridiculous fudge(again)from the Liars in Chief.

Thank you for pointing that one out!

And yes,agreed.

sunPeep.
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
01/31/2013 01:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Saved them ....

:13113:

:131132:


spock
 Quoting: TS66


Seriously folks ....

I'm truly amazed a the lack of attentiveness on this thread of late, and the desire to just hear one selves speak.

What I have posted above proves that there is something not only skewed with the solar data we are handed, but that the people left here on this thread couldn't care less about facts, but would rather discuss about whatever pops out of their imaginations.

It's sad to see such a great endeavor by Nin finally meet it's demise.

Sweet dreams all wink
 Quoting: TS66


That is a ridiculous fudge(again)from the Liars in Chief.

Thank you for pointing that one out!

And yes,agreed.

sunPeep.
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


yes, this is way more important. pennywise

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 01:33 PM
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
01/31/2013 01:33 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Cesium, I agree. I don't know if you have this link, but when I'm looking at comparative data (years worth) I use this.
[link to www.lmsal.com]

this graphic now indicates a reversal prior to 2013 also.

[link to s16.postimage.org]

I'm not sure where this graphic comes from, I'm sure I picked it up here after my bookmark fiasco.
 Quoting: TS66


Yes [link to s16.postimage.org] yes.

: )
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
01/31/2013 01:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
[link to halpha.nso.edu]

Rather large Ejecta from that filament.



For those not concerned with gov shills and their data.

10 O clock

[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov]


[link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu] Anyone feel your DNA scrambling yet?

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 01:41 PM
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 31662450
United States
01/31/2013 01:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
A giant filament erupted in the SE right after the C-flare.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye




That had descent amount of ejecta for as much plasma sucked back in. I think we might get smacked around a bit.
 Quoting: Da fuq

ISWA has updated, and they are showing it to be geoeffective on the 3rd - [link to iswa.ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: muse_1111


Event Issue Date: 2013-01-31 09:13:23.0 GMT
CME Arrival Time: 2013-02-03 03:15:51.0 GMT
Arival Time Confidence Level: ± 6 hours
Disturbance Duration: 18 hours
Disturbance Duration Confidence Level: ± 8 hours
Magnetopause Standoff Distance: 6.3 Re
Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:15:51 GMT


not bad...
 Quoting: Da fuq


Thanks for the update, folks. I didn't expect this to be geoeffective due to the SE origin. CACTus Details have clocked this CME at 1500km/s. This is swiftest we've seen facing Earth lately, which makes me wonder how they forecast an 18-hour disturbance. Here's SEEDS movie of CME:

[link to spaceweather.gmu.edu]

CACTus Details:

[link to www.sidc.oma.be]
#Geomagnetic_Storm#
"Amateur Meteorologist"

User ID: 2579388
United States
01/31/2013 01:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Cesium, I agree. I don't know if you have this link, but when I'm looking at comparative data (years worth) I use this.
[link to www.lmsal.com]

this graphic now indicates a reversal prior to 2013 also.

[link to s16.postimage.org]

I'm not sure where this graphic comes from, I'm sure I picked it up here after my bookmark fiasco.
 Quoting: TS66


Yes [link to s16.postimage.org] yes.

: )
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


Sooooo close! :/
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6185582
United States
01/31/2013 01:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
[link to halpha.nso.edu]

Rather large Ejecta from that filament.



For those not concerned with gov shills and their data.

10 O clock

[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov]


hiding
 Quoting: Da fuq


Where the f*** do you think you are getting the data you are posting you bafoon ??????

You truly believe after you've got the answer to it all after being on this thread for a couple of weeks and have the right to deem what is relavent and what is not in your egotistical and limited mind ?????
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
01/31/2013 01:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
[link to halpha.nso.edu]

Hugh, what is your best guess on this big boy?

I didn't think the eruption last night would be geoeffective either. If we are in line of that we are in trouble.




You can tweak graphs and tables. Why would they show that much ejecta then? If they didn't want to raise concern. Calm down you ape.


From this video, one can understand there may be sizeable ejecta headed in our direction. Why would we worry about if the flare was a b or c.


Everyone knows they mess with data from time to time and show the public what they want them to see. (NASA)

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 02:01 PM
MamaHasAwakened

User ID: 5426767
United States
01/31/2013 01:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
bump ing for myself!
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 31662450
United States
01/31/2013 01:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Saved them ....

:13113:

:131132:


spock
 Quoting: TS66


Howdy, '66, we've seen this discrepancy before. The 5-min. plot is not synchronized with the 1-min. plot. You'd think this would be a simple thing to correct for a multi-billion agency, but NOOOoooo. My advice is to never look at the inaccurate 5-min plot, just use the 1-min plot. This is just another example of NOAA's incompetence. We've seen a few M1 flares that look like C-flares on the long plot. I hope they're better at saving the whales or measuring chemtrails, LOL.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6185582
United States
01/31/2013 02:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Hey there, waking up when I did I had no option but to view this but on a 5 minute plot, and have never seen this discrepency before, nor has it been pointed out, and as most of us here know, I'm a hound for facts, proof, data, not conjecture.

If I have missed this somehow in the 2 and a half years I have been on this site, and observing data, please someone, simply show me.
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 31662450
United States
01/31/2013 02:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
[link to halpha.nso.edu]

Hugh, what is your best guess on this big boy?

I didn't think the eruption last night would be geoeffective either. If we are in line of that we are in trouble.




You can tweak graphs and tables. Why would they show that much ejecta then? If they didn't want to raise concern. Calm down you ape.


From this video, one can understand there may be sizeable ejecta headed in our direction. Why would we worry about if the flare was a b or c.


Everyone knows they mess with data from time to time and show the public what they want them to see. (NASA)
 Quoting: Da fuq


Wow, that was huge! I don't think it's earth-directed but we'll wait for the coronagraph images.
SDO composite of that big-ass filament lifting off:

[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov]

Enormous double-ribbon Hyder flare/tsunami wave went right over the horizon:
[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov]

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!