SOLAR WATCH * 252 M & 18 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)

[link to halpha.nso.edu]

Rather large Ejecta from that filament.



For those not concerned with gov shills and their data.

10 O clock

[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov]


[link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu] Anyone feel your DNA scrambling yet?

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 01:41 PM

Thanks for the update, folks. I didn't expect this to be geoeffective due to the SE origin. CACTus Details have clocked this CME at 1500km/s. This is swiftest we've seen facing Earth lately, which makes me wonder how they forecast an 18-hour disturbance. Here's SEEDS movie of CME:

[link to spaceweather.gmu.edu]

CACTus Details:

[link to www.sidc.oma.be]

Sooooo close! :/

Where the f*** do you think you are getting the data you are posting you bafoon ??????

You truly believe after you've got the answer to it all after being on this thread for a couple of weeks and have the right to deem what is relavent and what is not in your egotistical and limited mind ?????

[link to halpha.nso.edu]

Hugh, what is your best guess on this big boy?

I didn't think the eruption last night would be geoeffective either. If we are in line of that we are in trouble.




You can tweak graphs and tables. Why would they show that much ejecta then? If they didn't want to raise concern. Calm down you ape.


From this video, one can understand there may be sizeable ejecta headed in our direction. Why would we worry about if the flare was a b or c.


Everyone knows they mess with data from time to time and show the public what they want them to see. (NASA)

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 02:01 PM

ing for myself!

Howdy, '66, we've seen this discrepancy before. The 5-min. plot is not synchronized with the 1-min. plot. You'd think this would be a simple thing to correct for a multi-billion agency, but NOOOoooo. My advice is to never look at the inaccurate 5-min plot, just use the 1-min plot. This is just another example of NOAA's incompetence. We've seen a few M1 flares that look like C-flares on the long plot. I hope they're better at saving the whales or measuring chemtrails, LOL.

Hey there, waking up when I did I had no option but to view this but on a 5 minute plot, and have never seen this discrepency before, nor has it been pointed out, and as most of us here know, I'm a hound for facts, proof, data, not conjecture.

If I have missed this somehow in the 2 and a half years I have been on this site, and observing data, please someone, simply show me.

Wow, that was huge! I don't think it's earth-directed but we'll wait for the coronagraph images.
SDO composite of that big-ass filament lifting off:

[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov]

Enormous double-ribbon Hyder flare/tsunami wave went right over the horizon:
[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov]

Yeah come to think of it, it's in almost the exact same spot as the filament last week that sandwiched us with another CME.


I am surprised however, at the size and speed of this one. [link to halpha.nso.edu] (It did seem to have a whip motion to it though)

Considering how much Ejecta came out of this last one. [link to halpha.nso.edu]

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 02:21 PM

Good stuff with that there Filament Daffy!

Awesome.

[link to www.youtube.com]

I'd thought the same regarding the Disturbance Duration - Eighteen Hours is quite something...perhaps it is to with a longer reverberation of our MS from a high velocity impact?

I'll need to do a little more reading.

Thank Hugh Sol'Man.

Green light/heat/energy ball again.

[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov]
Top left

[link to postimage.org]

Only ever shows up in that filter.








[link to postimage.org] Wtf is that btw.

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 02:58 PM

We got small ejection on the Mid-Western disc also [link to halpha.nso.edu] .

Um,please don't call my Friend a 'Ape'.

Thanking you ta'.

He called me a bafoon, but in the heat of the moment.

I take it all back.

Here's the earlier filament eruption in the SE-



[link to www.youtube.com]

Coronal Hole 552 is really growing some hey!?

It looks like we may get BigBird Reloaded afterall



Last Edited by Spittin'Cesium on 01/31/2013 02:53 PM

That looked incredible.

I like the clear separation in the Layers of Plasma in that Prominence,great structure.

TS66 is a She by the way : )

If you mean over the horizon, that's our old disappointing behemoth 1654 comin' around again.

:35r3: [link to postimage.org] Curious... That appears the same time as my green ball of energy anomaly. [link to postimage.org]


It appears we have company.








[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] Don't hurt yourself, sol.

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 03:47 PM

Lockheed-Solarsoft SDO close-up movie of NE filament liftoff which they infer caused a partial-halo CME:

[link to sdowww.lmsal.com]

It must be contagious as a much smaller filament just lit up in the NW near mid-disk.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]

What's up with STEREO website today? There's no current mpg movies and when I click on an image I get "not found".
[link to stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov]

By 'that' do you mean the interference?

If so that is due to the Van Allen Belts(I think)when you see the 'Dark Count' begin to rise on EVE Diodes [link to lasp.colorado.edu] you will notice the interference on the EVE Image.

Aye' - And a fine one at that

I'll buy that.

In reference to the earlier earth-directed CME, I thought the CACTus velocity assessment was way too high. It seems that NOAA agrees, calling it a slow event. I like how they diplomatically bemoan the SOHO data gaps just like we do (albeit less diplomatically,haha). From NOAA Discussion-

A second CME was
observed already in progress on LASCO C2/C3 imagery starting prior to
31/0750 UTC. Neither the start time nor the source location were
determined due to a LASCO tracking gap which occurred from 30/2145 to
31/0750 UTC. STEREO A COR2 data suggests that the event began after
31/0709 UTC. Based on analysis of STEREO and LASCO, this event was
determined to be front-sided with an asymmetric partial halo signature.
It is moving on a southeasterly trajectory at a relatively modest
velocity. No x-ray enhancements or associated radio were observed;
suggesting a slow event likely from a filament eruption. As more data
becomes available, additional analysis will be conducted to determine if
the event has geoeffective potential for later this week.

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

Ahha.

This guy is freaking out.

Makes a lot of valid points though.





[link to helios.izmiran.rssi.ru]

That has to be error.


[link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu]
I have never seen it even close to 10,000. I don't get how there is no increase on the right panel.

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 05:29 PM