Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,450 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 356,994
Pageviews Today: 514,026Threads Today: 100Posts Today: 2,770
04:27 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)

 
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
03/30/2013 06:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
I have so much bookmarked info I feel I need to share,here is a little ditty a'la' Cosmic Rays and Climate [link to calderup.wordpress.com] .

'Cosmic ray intensity is in red and upside down, so that 1991 was a minimum, not a maximum. Fewer cosmic rays mean a warmer world, and the cosmic rays vary with the solar cycle. The blue curve shows the global mean temperature of the mid-troposphere as measured with balloons and collated by the UK Met Office (HadAT2).

In the upper panel the temperatures roughly follow the solar cycle. The match is much better when well-known effects of other natural disturbances (El Niño, North Atlantic Oscillation, big volcanoes) are removed, together with an upward trend of 0.14 deg. C per decade. The trend may be partly due to man-made greenhouse gases, but the magnitude of their contribution is debatable' - Plot [link to calderup.files.wordpress.com]

Something a little 'out there' - Cosmic rays and Volcanic eruptions(not saying I agree here) [link to www.sciencedirect.com] - 'Explosive volcanic eruptions triggered by cosmic rays: Volcano as a bubble chamber'

And now back to bashing the nails into Dr.Kieth Strongs AGW Fuckin' Coffin - [link to ktwop.wordpress.com] etc. etc. etc.

If anyone wants any info,just ask - My favs. are overflowing and traction is hard to get at the moment - Though I will continue to 'spam' it until I see buring rubber.

sunhf
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


So, are you thinking CO2 can't be responsible for climate change/warming? That it is would more likely to be cosmic rays when sun is under performing causing a cooling?
 Quoting: Isis One


There is NO warming 0bserved Year on Year for 20 Years Isis - it is totally BS!

See Hughs' post also for this,but also [link to hockeyschtick.blogspot.co.uk] for realistic data.

CO2 is pure Hyperbole.

sun
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
03/30/2013 06:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
ohyeah
 Quoting: TS66


66choruscheer

sun

Last Edited by Spittin'Cesium on 03/30/2013 06:41 PM
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 31662450
United States
03/30/2013 06:49 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
LOL!! Well I wouldn't mind a little communication one on one at this point chuckle

If you look at angstrom 304 SDO and HALPHA during that time frame, a filament that is connected to 1704 and travels slightly above and east , below the monster Cesium pointed out, erupted. It was directly earth facing therefore a little hard to see the emission, but did occur at the same time as reflected on the alert.

Take a look, let me know if you can see it.
 Quoting: TS66


No, I'm sorry, friend, I couldn't see anything near 1704. I slowed down the H-alpha movie and there was a tiny filament at 1707 (right at mid-disk) and something like a cme from beyond the SE limb nearly simultaneous with the B4 flare @ 1708. Maybe sumptin' big below the surface popped and caused the radio emission and all these little events. Usually, I associate Radio Emission alerts with powerful flares and large filament eruptions....so this one was unusual.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]

Last Edited by Hugh M Eye on 03/30/2013 06:51 PM
"There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life."
Frank Zappa

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-Albert Einstein
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37104885
United States
03/30/2013 06:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
LOL!! Well I wouldn't mind a little communication one on one at this point chuckle

If you look at angstrom 304 SDO and HALPHA during that time frame, a filament that is connected to 1704 and travels slightly above and east , below the monster Cesium pointed out, erupted. It was directly earth facing therefore a little hard to see the emission, but did occur at the same time as reflected on the alert.

Take a look, let me know if you can see it.
 Quoting: TS66


no, sorry friend, I couldn't see anything near 1704. I slowed down the H-alpha movie and there was a tiny filament at 1707 (right at mid-disk) and something like a cme from beyond the SE limb nearly simultaneous with the B4 flare @ 1708. Maybe big below the surface popped and caused the radio emission and all these little events. Usually, I associate Radio Emission alerts with powerful flares and large filament eruptions....so this one was unusual.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


It's all I could see myself, certainly no flare ..... demonstration is horribly lacking here online, sigh

But even if it were the filament I'm speaking of, it's still hard to believe it was capable of a radio event either.
Isis One

User ID: 14343270
United States
03/30/2013 07:28 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
I have so much bookmarked info I feel I need to share,here is a little ditty a'la' Cosmic Rays and Climate [link to calderup.wordpress.com] .

'Cosmic ray intensity is in red and upside down, so that 1991 was a minimum, not a maximum. Fewer cosmic rays mean a warmer world, and the cosmic rays vary with the solar cycle. The blue curve shows the global mean temperature of the mid-troposphere as measured with balloons and collated by the UK Met Office (HadAT2).

In the upper panel the temperatures roughly follow the solar cycle. The match is much better when well-known effects of other natural disturbances (El Niño, North Atlantic Oscillation, big volcanoes) are removed, together with an upward trend of 0.14 deg. C per decade. The trend may be partly due to man-made greenhouse gases, but the magnitude of their contribution is debatable' - Plot [link to calderup.files.wordpress.com]

Something a little 'out there' - Cosmic rays and Volcanic eruptions(not saying I agree here) [link to www.sciencedirect.com] - 'Explosive volcanic eruptions triggered by cosmic rays: Volcano as a bubble chamber'

And now back to bashing the nails into Dr.Kieth Strongs AGW Fuckin' Coffin - [link to ktwop.wordpress.com] etc. etc. etc.

If anyone wants any info,just ask - My favs. are overflowing and traction is hard to get at the moment - Though I will continue to 'spam' it until I see buring rubber.

sunhf
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


So, are you thinking CO2 can't be responsible for climate change/warming? That it is would more likely to be cosmic rays when sun is under performing causing a cooling?
 Quoting: Isis One


There is NO warming 0bserved Year on Year for 20 Years Isis - it is totally BS!

See Hughs' post also for this,but also [link to hockeyschtick.blogspot.co.uk] for realistic data.

CO2 is pure Hyperbole.

sun
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


I was pretty sure that was what I was understanding, it is kind of incredulous though, given the mallarky we've been fed. Diabolical, actually. I'm also following the mini "cool down" data as well. Thanks
Spread the word, change the collective conscious......
THERE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH OF EVERYTHING TO GO AROUND

When you are undisciplined, the universe is extremely forgiving and when you are disciplined, the universe is extremely generous. Me
Isis One

User ID: 14343270
United States
03/30/2013 07:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
I think the radio emission event and intense auroras are cosmic ray and gamma ray based. I'm also off to find out if the most recent gamma ray is from the supernova seen in Nostradamus' day.
Spread the word, change the collective conscious......
THERE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH OF EVERYTHING TO GO AROUND

When you are undisciplined, the universe is extremely forgiving and when you are disciplined, the universe is extremely generous. Me
Spittin'Cesium
User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
03/30/2013 07:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
LOL!! Well I wouldn't mind a little communication one on one at this point chuckle

If you look at angstrom 304 SDO and HALPHA during that time frame, a filament that is connected to 1704 and travels slightly above and east , below the monster Cesium pointed out, erupted. It was directly earth facing therefore a little hard to see the emission, but did occur at the same time as reflected on the alert.

Take a look, let me know if you can see it.
 Quoting: TS66


no, sorry friend, I couldn't see anything near 1704. I slowed down the H-alpha movie and there was a tiny filament at 1707 (right at mid-disk) and something like a cme from beyond the SE limb nearly simultaneous with the B4 flare @ 1708. Maybe big below the surface popped and caused the radio emission and all these little events. Usually, I associate Radio Emission alerts with powerful flares and large filament eruptions....so this one was unusual.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


It's all I could see myself, certainly no flare ..... demonstration is horribly lacking here online, sigh

But even if it were the filament I'm speaking of, it's still hard to believe it was capable of a radio event either.
 Quoting: TS66


I was watching like a hawk - when was the radio event 66?

There was a very sudden ejection from the South-East that I reported Hours and Hours back that I observed I made other aware of,in more than one site,then there was a Norther Filament Ejection - earlier I spotted one of the South-West that has now been scrubbed from the H alpha Videos..I have tried finding it now,it has *gone*

There was on the 28th a Type II CME from the South,one mo... [link to www.sidc.oma.be] there it is.

But,if you could tell me the time of the RE,I could help you assign it to a location/event(unless I slept through it that is)

sun
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37104885
United States
03/30/2013 07:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
LOL!! Well I wouldn't mind a little communication one on one at this point chuckle

If you look at angstrom 304 SDO and HALPHA during that time frame, a filament that is connected to 1704 and travels slightly above and east , below the monster Cesium pointed out, erupted. It was directly earth facing therefore a little hard to see the emission, but did occur at the same time as reflected on the alert.

Take a look, let me know if you can see it.
 Quoting: TS66


no, sorry friend, I couldn't see anything near 1704. I slowed down the H-alpha movie and there was a tiny filament at 1707 (right at mid-disk) and something like a cme from beyond the SE limb nearly simultaneous with the B4 flare @ 1708. Maybe big below the surface popped and caused the radio emission and all these little events. Usually, I associate Radio Emission alerts with powerful flares and large filament eruptions....so this one was unusual.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


It's all I could see myself, certainly no flare ..... demonstration is horribly lacking here online, sigh

But even if it were the filament I'm speaking of, it's still hard to believe it was capable of a radio event either.
 Quoting: TS66


I was watching like a hawk - when was the radio event 66?

There was a very sudden ejection from the South-East that I reported Hours and Hours back that I observed I made other aware of,in more than one site,then there was a Norther Filament Ejection - earlier I spotted one of the South-West that has now been scrubbed from the H alpha Videos..I have tried finding it now,it has *gone*

There was on the 28th a Type II CME from the South,one mo... [link to www.sidc.oma.be] there it is.

But,if you could tell me the time of the RE,I could help you assign it to a location/event(unless I slept through it that is)

sun
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium 14589973


13:22

Space Weather Message Code: ALTTP2
Serial Number: 840
Issue Time: 2013 Mar 30 1423 UTC

ALERT: Type II Radio Emission
Begin Time: 2013 Mar 30 1322 UTC
Estimated Velocity: 814 km/s
Description: Type II emissions occur in association with eruptions on the sun and typically indicate a coronal mass ejection is associated with a flare event.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37104885
United States
03/30/2013 07:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Off to bed all.

Get good rest hf
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
03/30/2013 08:05 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Awesome South-East Filament just ejected [link to halpha.nso.edu] !

sun
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesiumsays 14589973


So this was the South-East Filament that did leave with some haste - but does not fit the timeframe of 13:00 for the RE - S0s' video(I think)for today mentioned that after the South-Eastern one there was one in the region you mention 66,I'll recheck to see if it could fit the bill.

My report on the South-Eastern one was around 03:00GMT.

be back nowwink

sun

Edito:so here is the video,but the Northern Filament just fraggled and didn't erupt,per-say -


[link to www.youtube.com]

So,unless it was some kind of freak event,it may be related to a instance Hugh mentioned above,a event off the limb,on the farside(ish).

Hmmmm?

Rest well 66hf

sun

Last Edited by Spittin'Cesium on 03/30/2013 08:12 PM
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 31662450
United States
03/30/2013 08:11 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
ELECTRIC EARTH, ELECTRIC WEATHER-This peculiar powerpoint talk by former high-level USAF scientist Bill Nichols found its way to my inbox. This guy seems to know a lot but he's in such a hurry that it's difficult to follow. It's like he was given 3 mins. to explain superstring theory, LOL. I'm going to watch it several more times because it seems to tie together with much that's discussed here (solar, climate, electromagnetic fields, etc.). He claims to have re-written the book on contrails (!?) and at one point says "chemtrails" and catches himself and says "Forget about that." I'll bet he knows an awful lot about the H.A.A.R.P. project, too, but he doesn't mention it here. Anyway check it out.



[link to www.youtube.com]
"There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life."
Frank Zappa

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-Albert Einstein
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37104885
United States
03/30/2013 08:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Awesome South-East Filament just ejected [link to halpha.nso.edu] !

sun
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesiumsays 14589973


So this was the South-East Filament that did leave with some haste - but does not fit the timeframe of 13:00 for the RE - S0s' video(I think)for today mentioned that after the South-Eastern one there was one in the region you mention 66,I'll recheck to see if it could fit the bill.

My report on the South-Eastern one was around 03:00GMT.

be back nowwink

sun
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


It's the only thing moving on the screen at that time west to east... and it's a big long almost semi circular filament.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]

Am I hallucinating ??? lol.

Good night again wink

:filament30:
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
03/30/2013 08:17 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Awesome South-East Filament just ejected [link to halpha.nso.edu] !

sun
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesiumsays 14589973


So this was the South-East Filament that did leave with some haste - but does not fit the timeframe of 13:00 for the RE - S0s' video(I think)for today mentioned that after the South-Eastern one there was one in the region you mention 66,I'll recheck to see if it could fit the bill.

My report on the South-Eastern one was around 03:00GMT.

be back nowwink

sun
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


It's the only thing moving on the screen at that time west to east... and it's a big long almost semi circular filament.

[link to halpha.nso.edu]

Am I hallucinating ??? lol.

Good night again wink

:filament30:
 Quoting: TS66


Yes,you are correctemundo!

It must be that event.

No worries - I see what you'd see : )

Guten nacht again 66 and yes - I got your 13:22,twice :wink:

Last Edited by Spittin'Cesium on 03/30/2013 08:18 PM
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37104885
United States
03/30/2013 08:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
1711 wink
Isis One

User ID: 14343270
United States
03/30/2013 08:22 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Found this thread when looking for grb's from the Orphuichus Constellation which is the origin of the Kepler Supernova, first observed in 1604. The interstellar wind in coming from the Orphuichus Constellation as determined by IBEX. Maybe, it is what is effecting us now?

Thread: IBEX shows interstellar wind flowing from the same location as Ophiuchus Serpentarius (13th Zodiac)
Spread the word, change the collective conscious......
THERE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH OF EVERYTHING TO GO AROUND

When you are undisciplined, the universe is extremely forgiving and when you are disciplined, the universe is extremely generous. Me
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
03/30/2013 08:26 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
ELECTRIC EARTH, ELECTRIC WEATHER-This peculiar powerpoint talk by former high-level USAF scientist Bill Nichols found its way to my inbox. This guy seems to know a lot but he's in such a hurry that it's difficult to follow. It's like he was given 3 mins. to explain superstring theory, LOL. I'm going to watch it several more times because it seems to tie together with much that's discussed here (solar, climate, electromagnetic fields, etc.). He claims to have re-written the book on contrails (!?) and at one point says "chemtrails" and catches himself and says "Forget about that." I'll bet he knows an awful lot about the H.A.A.R.P. project, too, but he doesn't mention it here. Anyway check it out.



[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


Thank Hugh for that - I think I'll do the same,watch it a few times through,haven't opened it yet though...a busy bee I am at present.

But I'd like to maybe point out with regard the lingering Contrails - There is a good possibility that we have a difference in the regions where Planes are now flying that could lead to a causation of the Water-vapour being able to linger as they have been and then continue to grow instead of being 'burnt' away by direct Sunlight,as we use to see.

I am positive we do also have Chemtrails,but also thinking that we have something else going on in our Atmospheres that may be causing the 'Normal' Contrail to behave much differently than they used to.

I'll get buried into that video later Hugh,thank you again for your awesome posts!

sunStar2.
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
03/30/2013 08:31 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Found this thread when looking for grb's from the Orphuichus Constellation which is the origin of the Kepler Supernova, first observed in 1604. The interstellar wind in coming from the Orphuichus Constellation as determined by IBEX. Maybe, it is what is effecting us now?

Thread: IBEX shows interstellar wind flowing from the same location as Ophiuchus Serpentarius (13th Zodiac)
 Quoting: Isis One


I heard similar - that a Nova Remnant had via its 'magnetic highway' crossed us(or us it)and was the cause for the enhanced CR readings - if they were not mis-readings that is.

I am not saying that is what happened,but I did see similar reports.

sun
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
03/30/2013 08:37 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
1711 wink
 Quoting: TS66


Arrr!

I see some potential spurts from 1707 and maybe a hint of a very small new region in the South-West Quadrant [link to halpha.nso.edu] as well as 1708 sparking a little also.

We'll see : )

Catchya'laters Agentus.

sun
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
shadasonic

User ID: 34416224
United States
03/30/2013 09:13 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
I have so much bookmarked info I feel I need to share,here is a little ditty a'la' Cosmic Rays and Climate [link to calderup.wordpress.com] .

'Cosmic ray intensity is in red and upside down, so that 1991 was a minimum, not a maximum. Fewer cosmic rays mean a warmer world, and the cosmic rays vary with the solar cycle. The blue curve shows the global mean temperature of the mid-troposphere as measured with balloons and collated by the UK Met Office (HadAT2).

In the upper panel the temperatures roughly follow the solar cycle. The match is much better when well-known effects of other natural disturbances (El Niño, North Atlantic Oscillation, big volcanoes) are removed, together with an upward trend of 0.14 deg. C per decade. The trend may be partly due to man-made greenhouse gases, but the magnitude of their contribution is debatable' - Plot [link to calderup.files.wordpress.com]

Something a little 'out there' - Cosmic rays and Volcanic eruptions(not saying I agree here) [link to www.sciencedirect.com] - 'Explosive volcanic eruptions triggered by cosmic rays: Volcano as a bubble chamber'

And now back to bashing the nails into Dr.Kieth Strongs AGW Fuckin' Coffin - [link to ktwop.wordpress.com] etc. etc. etc.

If anyone wants any info,just ask - My favs. are overflowing and traction is hard to get at the moment - Though I will continue to 'spam' it until I see buring rubber.

sunhf
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


So, are you thinking CO2 can't be responsible for climate change/warming? That it is would more likely to be cosmic rays when sun is under performing causing a cooling?
 Quoting: Isis One


There is NO warming 0bserved Year on Year for 20 Years Isis - it is totally BS!

See Hughs' post also for this,but also [link to hockeyschtick.blogspot.co.uk] for realistic data.

CO2 is pure Hyperbole.

sun
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


I completely agree,I haven't been able to pin anything on this in three years. cycle after cycle compilations of energy and variences of that energy. We live in a joke of a conceptual scientific world,force feed us till we puke and give up because of the regurgitated info. Its out there, but when you're given wax wings to fly into the sun your answers had better be found quickly! Don't yell to loud Cesium, they love the bright minds as long as they listen my friendqueenliz
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” – Carl Sagan
Solar Guardian

User ID: 36943454
Malaysia
03/30/2013 10:05 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Guys, what are your opinions on this AC's theory here? Thread: Next 377 day quake cycle to fall on March 31 2013!!!
Isis One

User ID: 14343270
United States
03/30/2013 10:14 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Found this thread when looking for grb's from the Orphuichus Constellation which is the origin of the Kepler Supernova, first observed in 1604. The interstellar wind in coming from the Orphuichus Constellation as determined by IBEX. Maybe, it is what is effecting us now?

Thread: IBEX shows interstellar wind flowing from the same location as Ophiuchus Serpentarius (13th Zodiac)
 Quoting: Isis One


I heard similar - that a Nova Remnant had via its 'magnetic highway' crossed us(or us it)and was the cause for the enhanced CR readings - if they were not mis-readings that is.

I am not saying that is what happened,but I did see similar reports.

sun
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


Thanks for the response, I appreciate it.hf
Spread the word, change the collective conscious......
THERE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH OF EVERYTHING TO GO AROUND

When you are undisciplined, the universe is extremely forgiving and when you are disciplined, the universe is extremely generous. Me
Isis One

User ID: 14343270
United States
03/30/2013 10:22 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
I have so much bookmarked info I feel I need to share,here is a little ditty a'la' Cosmic Rays and Climate [link to calderup.wordpress.com] .

'Cosmic ray intensity is in red and upside down, so that 1991 was a minimum, not a maximum. Fewer cosmic rays mean a warmer world, and the cosmic rays vary with the solar cycle. The blue curve shows the global mean temperature of the mid-troposphere as measured with balloons and collated by the UK Met Office (HadAT2).

In the upper panel the temperatures roughly follow the solar cycle. The match is much better when well-known effects of other natural disturbances (El Niño, North Atlantic Oscillation, big volcanoes) are removed, together with an upward trend of 0.14 deg. C per decade. The trend may be partly due to man-made greenhouse gases, but the magnitude of their contribution is debatable' - Plot [link to calderup.files.wordpress.com]

Something a little 'out there' - Cosmic rays and Volcanic eruptions(not saying I agree here) [link to www.sciencedirect.com] - 'Explosive volcanic eruptions triggered by cosmic rays: Volcano as a bubble chamber'

And now back to bashing the nails into Dr.Kieth Strongs AGW Fuckin' Coffin - [link to ktwop.wordpress.com] etc. etc. etc.

If anyone wants any info,just ask - My favs. are overflowing and traction is hard to get at the moment - Though I will continue to 'spam' it until I see buring rubber.

sunhf
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


So, are you thinking CO2 can't be responsible for climate change/warming? That it is would more likely to be cosmic rays when sun is under performing causing a cooling?
 Quoting: Isis One


There is NO warming 0bserved Year on Year for 20 Years Isis - it is totally BS!

See Hughs' post also for this,but also [link to hockeyschtick.blogspot.co.uk] for realistic data.

CO2 is pure Hyperbole.

sun
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


I completely agree,I haven't been able to pin anything on this in three years. cycle after cycle compilations of energy and variences of that energy. We live in a joke of a conceptual scientific world,force feed us till we puke and give up because of the regurgitated info. Its out there, but when you're given wax wings to fly into the sun your answers had better be found quickly! Don't yell to loud Cesium, they love the bright minds as long as they listen my friendqueenliz
 Quoting: shadasonic


I'm questioning the whole concept of lightyears, something about it doesn't sit right with me. When you realize they can "jimmy" the equations to fit their religion, it really all starts to become ridiculous.
Spread the word, change the collective conscious......
THERE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH OF EVERYTHING TO GO AROUND

When you are undisciplined, the universe is extremely forgiving and when you are disciplined, the universe is extremely generous. Me
Spittin'Cesiumsays
User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
03/30/2013 10:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
I have so much bookmarked info I feel I need to share,here is a little ditty a'la' Cosmic Rays and Climate [link to calderup.wordpress.com] .

'Cosmic ray intensity is in red and upside down, so that 1991 was a minimum, not a maximum. Fewer cosmic rays mean a warmer world, and the cosmic rays vary with the solar cycle. The blue curve shows the global mean temperature of the mid-troposphere as measured with balloons and collated by the UK Met Office (HadAT2).

In the upper panel the temperatures roughly follow the solar cycle. The match is much better when well-known effects of other natural disturbances (El Niño, North Atlantic Oscillation, big volcanoes) are removed, together with an upward trend of 0.14 deg. C per decade. The trend may be partly due to man-made greenhouse gases, but the magnitude of their contribution is debatable' - Plot [link to calderup.files.wordpress.com]

Something a little 'out there' - Cosmic rays and Volcanic eruptions(not saying I agree here) [link to www.sciencedirect.com] - 'Explosive volcanic eruptions triggered by cosmic rays: Volcano as a bubble chamber'

And now back to bashing the nails into Dr.Kieth Strongs AGW Fuckin' Coffin - [link to ktwop.wordpress.com] etc. etc. etc.

If anyone wants any info,just ask - My favs. are overflowing and traction is hard to get at the moment - Though I will continue to 'spam' it until I see buring rubber.

sunhf
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


So, are you thinking CO2 can't be responsible for climate change/warming? That it is would more likely to be cosmic rays when sun is under performing causing a cooling?
 Quoting: Isis One


There is NO warming 0bserved Year on Year for 20 Years Isis - it is totally BS!

See Hughs' post also for this,but also [link to hockeyschtick.blogspot.co.uk] for realistic data.

CO2 is pure Hyperbole.

sun
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


I completely agree,I haven't been able to pin anything on this in three years. cycle after cycle compilations of energy and variences of that energy. We live in a joke of a conceptual scientific world,force feed us till we puke and give up because of the regurgitated info. Its out there, but when you're given wax wings to fly into the sun your answers had better be found quickly! Don't yell to loud Cesium, they love the bright minds as long as they listen my friend:queenliz:
 Quoting: shadasonic


Thank you Shads : )

Do you think I may be being a little to forceful?

You can tell me honestly Br0..you know this...and I respect your opinion!

sun
Spittin'Cesium
User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
03/30/2013 10:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
...


So, are you thinking CO2 can't be responsible for climate change/warming? That it is would more likely to be cosmic rays when sun is under performing causing a cooling?
 Quoting: Isis One


There is NO warming 0bserved Year on Year for 20 Years Isis - it is totally BS!

See Hughs' post also for this,but also [link to hockeyschtick.blogspot.co.uk] for realistic data.

CO2 is pure Hyperbole.

sun
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


I completely agree,I haven't been able to pin anything on this in three years. cycle after cycle compilations of energy and variences of that energy. We live in a joke of a conceptual scientific world,force feed us till we puke and give up because of the regurgitated info. Its out there, but when you're given wax wings to fly into the sun your answers had better be found quickly! Don't yell to loud Cesium, they love the bright minds as long as they listen my friend:queenliz:
 Quoting: shadasonic


I'm questioning the whole concept of lightyears, something about it doesn't sit right with me. When you realize they can "jimmy" the equations to fit their religion, it really all starts to become ridiculous.
 Quoting: Isis One


Yes,there is a issue with Light Years if Light is not actually traveling but is constantly interconnected at all points in 'time' and space..which is what I am leaning toward.

The Rope Hypothesis from the Asshole Bill gaede - with whom I recently fell out with after he thought I was a 'Christian Shill'!

ffs.

What a wanker that man is.

But still,I like the Rope Hypothesis and the Neutron by Bill,it is at least a start at seeing it a little different, beyond GR and the Eu alone ideas.

It cannot be stressed enough though,if you are going to comment on his YT channel...beware!

He threw me under the bus in a instant,the instant I tried to explain the Philosophical principle of Ontology.

Total :asshat: for that he is...I argued bitterly with the asshat for Hours.

Stupid old fool didn't even know what Ontology is.

;sun:
Isis One

User ID: 14343270
United States
03/30/2013 11:21 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Wow, you gave me the words for my intuition, thanks!! I had to look ontology up, the study of being. I know what ontogeny is but didn't know ontology (funny, cause I love words). Its too bad some people find it so hard to have gracious discussions. Jeez!
Spread the word, change the collective conscious......
THERE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH OF EVERYTHING TO GO AROUND

When you are undisciplined, the universe is extremely forgiving and when you are disciplined, the universe is extremely generous. Me
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
03/31/2013 12:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
madness
#Geomagnetic_Storm#
"Amateur Meteorologist"

User ID: 1497928
United States
03/31/2013 01:11 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
[link to www.solarham.net]
Tiny Trink

User ID: 35708013
United States
03/31/2013 04:43 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Much Love,

[link to www.youtube.com]


Tiny Trink, Double T, Tink Tink, T x 2

"You are responsible for the Energy you bring into a space" ~ Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor

Shine Brightly as someone is needing your Inner Light to find theirs.
shenue

User ID: 37182755
United States
03/31/2013 04:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
To those that celebrate it......HAPPY EASTER !!

:sun_happy:
I stayed up all night to see where the sun went. Then it dawned on me.
Luisport

User ID: 37179606
Portugal
03/31/2013 04:50 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
To those that celebrate it......HAPPY EASTER !!

:sun_happy:
 Quoting: shenue


hf Happy Easter everyone!!!

News