Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,979 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,520,288
Pageviews Today: 2,003,439Threads Today: 396Posts Today: 7,976
12:53 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)

 
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
12/17/2011 07:59 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
if lovejoy has lost it`s tail in the close encounter i imagine that confirms :

lovejoy destabilized upon approach, thus formed tail, then stabilized once close encounter too place
it`s charge stabilized because it is the same nature as our suns thus it leaves with no destabilized effects (tail)

or is that to simple ???
 Quoting: aether


Tail is growing back :)

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]
superman

I wonder what this tail is made of? hmm
 Quoting: Anti-GLP Effect

Thread: Comet Lovejoy survives perihelion! (Page 10)

okay what is that telling us
there is a close proximity zone of charge equilibrium as in:
both stable
or
so fucking hot up close tail vaporizes

feels like vaporize
a vaporize zone for the tail seems most likely
comet remains destabilized but not sufficiently to cause break up
and the f... never melted LOL
love it
 Quoting: aether


it still leaves the question of where the tail went as it got close to the corona. Since the shape of the coma and tail is dictated by electric fields, is it possible that the tail actually remained but just took on a different shape that we don't recognise as a tail? And could this tell us any more about the electrical environment of the corona or fields near to the Sun's surface?
 Quoting: observation


good point
so what i am seeing that tells me evaporation as in disappears cause by sun effect on comet
okay same visuals different words
the effect of our sun at close encounter caused the comet tail to become invisible as in it altered lovejoys electric field and switched the tail effect of
yes
our suns e field overwhelmed lovejoys e field at close proximity
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1297814
Germany
12/17/2011 09:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
We have 2 nice prominence lift off's


One to the north west:

:Prominenceliftof:


Helioviewer SDO AIA 304 (closeUp) shows it up:

[link to helioviewer.org]







and the other one on the east side:
:eastsideliffoffd:

Helioviewer SDO AIA 304(closeUp) shows it up:

[link to helioviewer.org]


the lift off in the north produce a cme

:stereobdec171200:

Latest Stere B C2 Movie:
[link to stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov]


:cmestereoadec161:

Latest Stereo A C2 Movie:
[link to stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov]
learner
User ID: 6656225
United States
12/17/2011 10:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
okay so what do we know
lovejoy obit is a somewhere within 200 years
it`s charge effect subdued our suns charged effects
is that because they are of the same charge?
is our sun showing the effect of a close encounter with a object of similar charge as in:
it flat lines?

lovejoy is not a dirty snowball
 Quoting: aether


well as like charges repel
can we say lovejoy on it`s up to 200 year approx became opposite charge to the sun outside of our solar system thus lovejoy and our sun attracted each other
 Quoting: aether


in being attracted to each other our sun flat lining could be a consequence of the attraction effect
 Quoting: aether


So. When two charges are close enough to each other, their fields will interact. Two of opposite charge will neutralize the field in between the charges resulting in a net "external pressure" pushing them together. Two like charges will instead add more stress to the field in between them resulting in a net "internal pressure" pushing them apart.
 Quoting: observation


it`s field
our sun`s flatlined because it`s field(s) have been effected

 Quoting: aether


..affected only partially by interaction with comet?

without knowing/understanding the other interactions that the sun was engaged in during the comet pass, we can not say anything definitive about the singular interaction between sun and solar surfer comet.


-definitely minus points for the 'dirty iceball' hypothesis-
learner
User ID: 6656225
United States
12/17/2011 10:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
if lovejoy has lost it`s tail in the close encounter i imagine that confirms :

lovejoy destabilized upon approach, thus formed tail, then stabilized once close encounter too place
it`s charge stabilized because it is the same nature as our suns thus it leaves with no destabilized effects (tail)

or is that to simple ???
 Quoting: aether


what is stable?

i think it's more likely that the solar and comet charges are opposite. Tails are acquired ionic particles of opposing charge.

i betcha the Solar Surfer leaves with more mass than it arrived with.

too bad there's really no way to know that for sure.
learner
User ID: 6656225
United States
12/17/2011 10:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
and now on to the terrestrial magfield report.

i remain confused with the HAARP magnetic data. Rescaling the time axis drastically changes the magnitude data. i can figure no reason except: they are re-normalizing for the time period. Just as in cosmic ray data, there is no true 'zero'. They pick some value and measure the variation around that: either calling it more or less than 100% or plus or minus 0%. same dif.
so with the HAARP data, i think they pick new 'zeros' for each time span. That's why the monthly chart shows such large deviations compared with the weekly or daily... or something.

in any case, i'm going with the monthly charts... and according to that, we are still doing some weirdness. As i said before on or very near 11.20 the earth rang hard and all the polarities shifted (by almost 1% of total field) and hung out there till roughly 12.2, where we rang again and shifted back to normal, but at a very high level..higher than normal anyway (this is only visible on the monthly chart BTW).

I've uploaded a composite image of three charts: HAARP mag field data, Russian cosmic ray data, and Oulu cosmic ray data.

here:

[link to www.bigupload.com]

a few things to notice:

-the magfield 'ringing' we felt on 12.2 is clearly reflected in both cosmic ray count (i've aligned the charts for easy viewing).

- ever since 12.2 our daily magfield 'rhythm' is back, but at much higher amplitudes.

-the cosmic ray count suddenly shows a very strong diurnal component up until 12.12 and then begins a rapis increase over the next coupla days... comet approaching?

- and finally, on 12.4 Mercury was between us and the sun



i have no idea what any of this means.
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
12/17/2011 10:40 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
learner

bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1297814
Germany
12/17/2011 12:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
SolarWatch--ProminenceLiftOFF;FARSIDE CME;SunspotUpdate--12/17/11




[link to www.youtube.com]


and a closeup of the east one



[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5263313
United States
12/17/2011 12:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
G'day :-)
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 7287115
United States
12/17/2011 04:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
SolarWatch--ProminenceLiftOFF;FARSIDE CME;SunspotUpdate--12/17/11




[link to www.youtube.com]


and a closeup of the east one



[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: IwantToBelieve76

Hail, fellow suntards. Great work IWTB on the videos. I don't mean to nitpick but the lonely C1.2 flare was from 1376 to the north. [link to www.lmsal.com]
We should see more flaring soon as more active regions are popping up in the southern hemisphere and two more in the north should be rising over the limb in the next day or three. The region coming over the southeast limb (seen near that prominence in the video) looks to be producing some flares.
:2new:

More research and analysis needs to be done on the sun's strange zig-zag effect on the comet's tail.
:EUVI_B:

As noted on the Sungrazer update page, this behavior is still unexplained--

"This one is a short animation of four frames from the STEREO-B EUVI instrument at the 171-angstrom wavelength (corresponding to about 1.5million degrees, I believe). The comet is clearly visible racing away from the Sun, leaving a wiggly-tail in its wake! Why the wiggles? We're not sure -- we need to start studying that when we get all of the spacecraft data from STEREO-B this weekend. However, we think there may some kind of helical motion going on, or perhaps there's a projection affect and we're seeing tail material magnetically "clinging" to coronal loops and moving with them. There are other possibilities too, though, and we will certainly investigate those! We should have equivalent images from the STEREO-A spacecraft which we will also get this weekend. When we pair these together, and throw in the SDO images too, we should be able to get an incredibly unique 3-D picture of how this comet is reacting the the intense coronal heat and magnetic loops. We really are going to learn a lot here."

Hi, Shenuee & aether!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7286884
United States
12/17/2011 04:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
G'day :-)
 Quoting: shenuee


and good day to you Shenueepeace
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1297814
Germany
12/17/2011 05:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Hi hugh and all,

haha nphf, yep saw it..grr1dunno1 was first given as 1377...

Well, this happens if you want to early^^

so what, shit happenscheers


Some offtopic maybe...^^

I made some christmas gifts last days and will place them here on dec24...one for our solen queen NINzrez and...surprise..hehe


Latest LASCO C3 Helioviewer CloseUp from our friend...:
[link to helioviewer.org]

seems he has now 2 tails...grinning


Stereo A HI1
[link to stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov]


Czech astronomer Jan Ebr captured this image at sunrise on Dec. 17th

:lovejoydec17from:


[link to www.spaceweather.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1297814
Germany
12/17/2011 06:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Finally some activity...


C 3.2 took place
[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]


I will risk it^^ from Region 1376

:c3flaredec17:
[link to lasp.colorado.edu]

:SDOdec17C3Flare:



2011/12/17 22:47:00 22:58:00 22:55:00 C3.2 N19W02 ( 1376 )

[link to www.lmsal.com]

oops2



and we have another c flare

C 1.2 from the new region south east..sdo shows it up will upload a img

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

LMSAL now:
2011/12/17 23:37:00 23:49:00 23:44:00 C1.2 S19E38
[link to www.lmsal.com]


Edit got it:
:FlareC1newregion:
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 7287115
United States
12/17/2011 10:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Excellent, IWTB! Now one more flare from 1376-C1.9--she's heating up. 1376/1377 region is directly Earth-facing for the next few days. We haven't had an M-flare for over a month so we're overdue for some strong activity.

Here's an SDO/Solarsoft movie of the C3.2:

[link to sdowww.lmsal.com]

Where is that NINzrez anyhoo???
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 7287115
United States
12/18/2011 01:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
A nice prominence was seen on the southeast limb.
:cme1218:

Have yet to see any evidence of a CME.

The newest region on the southeast limb did produce a C1.8 flare.

[link to www.lmsal.com]

Geospace is extremely quiet and the solar wind very slow at 247 km/s.
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 7287115
United States
12/18/2011 02:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
A nice prominence was seen on the southeast limb.
:cme1218:

Have yet to see any evidence of a CME.

The newest region on the southeast limb did produce a C1.8 flare.

[link to www.lmsal.com]

Geospace is extremely quiet and the solar wind very slow at 247 km/s.
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


I must get some sleep now, but I want to be the first to congratulate NINzrez on 500 pages for the SOLAR WATCH thread.
:500pages:

THANK YOU, NIN, AND CONGRATULATIONS ON 500 FUN & INFORMATIVE PAGES!
rockonbanana25abanana2pump2smile_kisssmile_kisschoruscheersdogpilebandflowerblobrsmile_hearheadbanggrouphugbeer2chorus
dance5a dancebroccolianaltanabdancepump2
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 7287115
United States
12/18/2011 02:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
A nice prominence was seen on the southeast limb.
:cme1218:

Have yet to see any evidence of a CME.

The newest region on the southeast limb did produce a C1.8 flare.

[link to www.lmsal.com]

Geospace is extremely quiet and the solar wind very slow at 247 km/s.
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


I must get some sleep now, but I want to be the first to congratulate NINzrez on 500 pages for the SOLAR WATCH thread.
:500pages:

THANK YOU, NIN, AND CONGRATULATIONS ON 500 FUN & INFORMATIVE PAGES!
5abanana2pump2smile_kisschoruscheersdogpilebandflowerblobrsmile_hearheadbanggrouphug::chorus:
dance5a dancebroccolianaltanabdancepump2
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


farsidehidingfarsidehidingfarsidehiding
Vesper33
Silver Pools of Light

User ID: 5245441
United States
12/18/2011 03:13 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
500 Pages!!! Congrats Nin!!!banana2afrobanana2
Perfer et Obdura;Dolor hic tibi proderit olim.Fortes Fortuna Iuvat! (Be Patient & Strong; someday this pain will be useful to you. Fortune favors the brave)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1297814
Germany
12/18/2011 05:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Good Morning all,


Yeah Congrats NINzrez now lets go to 1000! Hope you are back soon

:solarwatch:






[link to www.youtube.com]












Sunspots Update:


The two new groups (talked yesterday, circled) were numbered 1379 and 1380

:SunspotsTodayDec:
Enlarge:

IMAGE ( [link to i1220.photobucket.com] )



Region 1379 emerged on the south-west quadrant and is a CRO type group at 30 millionths


Latest SDO AIA 131 Helioviewer Fulldisc shows you the Flare Activity around 1376
[link to helioviewer.org]

and a closeUP:

[link to helioviewer.org]


made a better version:
[link to helioviewer.org]



CloseUp East Limb with 1380
[link to helioviewer.org]


Lasco C3 says GoodBye to Mr.Lovejoy...you are a Hero
[link to helioviewer.org]
old guard

User ID: 1405158
United States
12/18/2011 08:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
and now on to the terrestrial magfield report.

i remain confused with the HAARP magnetic data. Rescaling the time axis drastically changes the magnitude data. i can figure no reason except: they are re-normalizing for the time period. Just as in cosmic ray data, there is no true 'zero'. They pick some value and measure the variation around that: either calling it more or less than 100% or plus or minus 0%. same dif.
so with the HAARP data, i think they pick new 'zeros' for each time span. That's why the monthly chart shows such large deviations compared with the weekly or daily... or something.

in any case, i'm going with the monthly charts... and according to that, we are still doing some weirdness. As i said before on or very near 11.20 the earth rang hard and all the polarities shifted (by almost 1% of total field) and hung out there till roughly 12.2, where we rang again and shifted back to normal, but at a very high level..higher than normal anyway (this is only visible on the monthly chart BTW).

I've uploaded a composite image of three charts: HAARP mag field data, Russian cosmic ray data, and Oulu cosmic ray data.

here:

[link to www.bigupload.com]

a few things to notice:

-the magfield 'ringing' we felt on 12.2 is clearly reflected in both cosmic ray count (i've aligned the charts for easy viewing).

- ever since 12.2 our daily magfield 'rhythm' is back, but at much higher amplitudes.

-the cosmic ray count suddenly shows a very strong diurnal component up until 12.12 and then begins a rapis increase over the next coupla days... comet approaching?

- and finally, on 12.4 Mercury was between us and the sun



i have no idea what any of this means.
 Quoting: learner 6656225


Something did indeed happen. On 12/4 they stopped the updated polar drift map on SolarIMG. They set it back to early Nov. I sent a message to the webmaster, and his reply was "they are being very hush, hush about it". They still haven't updated it.

[link to solarimg.org]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5263313
United States
12/18/2011 10:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
good morning and contrats NiN!!
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
12/18/2011 11:09 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
It has been speculated here that the comet was larger than first measured....could it be just the opposite, smaller, so that the charge area would be smaller, thus equalizing charge to the sun before it got close.? If there was not much of a potential difference by the time it got to the sun, there would not be a dramatic discharge
 Quoting: observaztion


Could the lack of any significant tail within the corona be due to the corona having a fairly constant charge distribution? So once the nucleus has equalised its charge then it remains equalised until it leaves?
 Quoting: observation


i like this thinking
zacksavage
~~Unbound~~

User ID: 659010
United States
12/18/2011 11:37 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Consider this thread,...

bumped




Z
In time we hate that which we often fear.

--- William Shakespeare
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 7287115
United States
12/18/2011 12:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
It has been speculated here that the comet was larger than first measured....could it be just the opposite, smaller, so that the charge area would be smaller, thus equalizing charge to the sun before it got close.? If there was not much of a potential difference by the time it got to the sun, there would not be a dramatic discharge
 Quoting: observaztion


Could the lack of any significant tail within the corona be due to the corona having a fairly constant charge distribution? So once the nucleus has equalised its charge then it remains equalised until it leaves?
 Quoting: observation


i like this thinking
 Quoting: aether

Perhaps Comet Lovejoy was the benefactor of a COINCIDENCE? The sun has produced an incredible number of CMEs in the past month or more. Maybe its batteries were already discharged and the comets passing came at a fortuitous time when the magnetic fields were at a low ebb. Like sticking your finger in an electrical outlet during a blackout...nothing happens. Just a thought. The traditionalists use the coincidence theory all the time--why can't we?
lflash
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 7287115
United States
12/18/2011 12:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Good Morning all,


Yeah Congrats NINzrez now lets go to 1000! Hope you are back soon

:solarwatch:






[link to www.youtube.com]












Sunspots Update:


The two new groups (talked yesterday, circled) were numbered 1379 and 1380

:SunspotsTodayDec:
Enlarge:

IMAGE ( [link to i1220.photobucket.com] )



Region 1379 emerged on the south-west quadrant and is a CRO type group at 30 millionths


Latest SDO AIA 131 Helioviewer Fulldisc shows you the Flare Activity around 1376
[link to helioviewer.org]

and a closeUP:

[link to helioviewer.org]


made a better version:
[link to helioviewer.org]



CloseUp East Limb with 1380
[link to helioviewer.org]


Lasco C3 says GoodBye to Mr.Lovejoy...you are a Hero
[link to helioviewer.org]
 Quoting: IwantToBelieve76


Good day, IWTB, nice comet storm for NINz!
siren2siren2siren2siren2siren2
:500pages:
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 7287115
United States
12/18/2011 12:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Consider this thread,...

bumped




Z
 Quoting: zacksavage


Howdy, Zack! hi

Looks like page 499 will never end. Guess I jumped the gun there.
cheerschoruscoffeecup
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
12/18/2011 12:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
It has been speculated here that the comet was larger than first measured....could it be just the opposite, smaller, so that the charge area would be smaller, thus equalizing charge to the sun before it got close.? If there was not much of a potential difference by the time it got to the sun, there would not be a dramatic discharge
 Quoting: observaztion


Could the lack of any significant tail within the corona be due to the corona having a fairly constant charge distribution? So once the nucleus has equalised its charge then it remains equalised until it leaves?
 Quoting: observation


i like this thinking
 Quoting: aether

Perhaps Comet Lovejoy was the benefactor of a COINCIDENCE? The sun has produced an incredible number of CMEs in the past month or more. Maybe its batteries were already discharged and the comets passing came at a fortuitous time when the magnetic fields were at a low ebb. Like sticking your finger in an electrical outlet during a blackout...nothing happens. Just a thought. The traditionalists use the coincidence theory all the time--why can't we?
lflash
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


can`t say no to that thought rockon
El Quisqueyano

User ID: 6785972
United States
12/18/2011 01:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
bump for 500!
[link to skreened.com]

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who in the name of charity and good will shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers! And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!" Ezekiel 25:17

"Worst come to worst, my PEOPLES come first" Dilated Peoples
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 7287115
United States
12/18/2011 01:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
A nice prominence was seen on the southeast limb.
:cme1218:

Have yet to see any evidence of a CME.

The newest region on the southeast limb did produce a C1.8 flare.

[link to www.lmsal.com]

Geospace is extremely quiet and the solar wind very slow at 247 km/s.
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


I must get some sleep now, but I want to be the first to congratulate NINzrez on 500 pages for the SOLAR WATCH thread.
:500pages:

THANK YOU, NIN, AND CONGRATULATIONS ON 500 FUN & INFORMATIVE PAGES!
rockonbanana25abanana2pump2smile_kisssmile_kisschoruscheersdogpilebandflowerblobrsmile_hearheadbanggrouphugbeer2chorus
dance5a dancebroccolianaltanabdancepump2
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


Another view of that prominence about two hours after the first. I believe most of it eventually rained back down to the surface.
:prom1218:
Hugh M Eye

User ID: 7287115
United States
12/18/2011 01:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
WOO-HOO! 5-0-0 ! Where's that NINZrez hiding?
siren2farsidesiren2farsidesiren2
MamaHasAwakened

User ID: 1515402
United States
12/18/2011 03:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Yeahhhhhh, congrats on the 500 pages everyone!


cheercheercheercheercheercheercheercheer

News