SOLAR WATCH * Huge X8.2 Flare Sept. 10, 2017! (Updated Daily)

Magnitude 4.2 - WESTERN XIZANG
2011 August 11 22:01:27 UTC
Versión en Español
DetailsSummaryMapsScientific & TechnicalEarthquake Details
This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.
Magnitude 4.2
Date-Time Thursday, August 11, 2011 at 22:01:27 UTC
Friday, August 12, 2011 at 06:01:27 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 30.093°N, 86.746°E
Depth 35 km (21.7 miles)
Region WESTERN XIZANG
Distances 226 km (140 miles) WNW of Xigaze, Xizang (Tibet), China
251 km (155 miles) N of Namche Bazar, Nepal
297 km (184 miles) NNE of KATHMANDU, Nepal
2900 km (1801 miles) WSW of BEIJING, Beijing, China

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 21.6 km (13.4 miles); depth +/- 3.6 km (2.2 miles)
Parameters NST= 19, Nph= 20, Dmin=>999 km, Rmss=1.01 sec, Gp=158°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=5
Source Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usc0005cm3

[link to www.chinadaily.com.cn]

Magnitude 5.2 - SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA
2011 August 11 10:06:33 UTC
Versión en Español
DetailsSummaryMapsScientific & TechnicalEarthquake Details
This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.
Magnitude 5.2
Date-Time Thursday, August 11, 2011 at 10:06:33 UTC
Thursday, August 11, 2011 at 06:06:33 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 39.971°N, 76.993°E
Depth 34.8 km (21.6 miles)
Region SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA
Distances 103 km (64 miles) ENE of Kashi, Xinjiang, China
173 km (107 miles) N of Shache, Xinjiang, China
182 km (113 miles) SSE of Naryn, Kyrgyzstan
3339 km (2074 miles) WNW of BEIJING, Beijing, China

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 15 km (9.3 miles); depth +/- 7.7 km (4.8 miles)
Parameters NST=137, Nph=138, Dmin=362.9 km, Rmss=1.16 sec, Gp= 61°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=9
Source Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usc0005c7m
[link to earthquake.usgs.gov]

Perhaps this EQ was first posted as a 5.8 event and then later modified as sometimes this does happen?

Thread: Earthquake 7.2 china

heyy Zack :)
welcome back from the woods ^^
you missed the largest X flare of this cycle
a X6.9
spaceweather called it a X7

vibrations in all domains are shakin Brother

literally

and we just enterin...

harmonically

We hope



but the Sun people is sad
we not so good in light has our Sun sumohm

but we try and try
tot see somethin

Rha s awakenin ???!!!
All good or not
we enterin v novel domains

stay still open and focused
with vibrant Sun love

The Sun is unitin All

has the coordinator of conscience does...



forget everything
and be greatfull

maiby...
We will see

Thanks Nin,...hope you and yours are doing well:}

Can you direct me to the date of the flare or what page your thread might have covered it??

I take it that it was not earth directed.


Z

it was partially...


but i wonder if this 6.9 ligth x flaire need to be pointed Earth to afect us and more?


its adiferent light

a strob


any signs of any kind of disruptions???


good night to u and yours people 2...

I see.

It all good then and we have to keep on trying!!

True that bold.


Z

hasn't there been three Xs since that date?

here is where it happened and was noted on the thread
Thread: SOLAR WATCH * Huge X8.2 Flare Sept. 10, 2017! (Updated Daily) (Page 219)

Maybe this will be of some help about the earthquake in China....

At the bottom of the web page about the China earthquake there is this statement:
Disclaimer: Unless revised by a geophysicist, automatically determined earthquake locations may be erroneous!

Also it was (A) automatically calculated. Then when it was reviewed by a Geologist a more accurate number was determined.


The web site is here with the explanation:
[link to earthquake.usgs.gov]

Measuring the Size of an Earthquake

Earthquakes range broadly in size. A rock-burst in an Idaho silver mine may involve the fracture of 1 meter of rock; the 1965 Rat Island earthquake in the Aleutian arc involved a 650 kilometer length of the Earth's crust. Earthquakes can be even smaller and even larger. If an earthquake is felt or causes perceptible surface damage, then its intensity of shaking can be subjectively estimated. But many large earthquakes occur in oceanic areas or at great focal depths and are either simply not felt or their felt pattern does not really indicate their true size.

Today, state of the art seismic systems transmit data from the seismograph via telephone line and satellite directly to a central digital computer. A preliminary location, depth-of-focus, and magnitude can now be obtained within minutes of the onset of an earthquake. The only limiting factor is how long the seismic waves take to travel from the epicenter to the stations - usually less than 10 minutes.

Magnitude

Modern seismographic systems precisely amplify and record ground motion (typically at periods of between 0.1 and 100 seconds) as a function of time. This amplification and recording as a function of time is the source of instrumental amplitude and arrival-time data on near and distant earthquakes. Although similar seismographs have existed since the 1890's, it was only in the 1930's that Charles F. Richter, a California seismologist, introduced the concept of earthquake magnitude. His original definition held only for California earthquakes occurring within 600 km of a particular type of seismograph (the Woods-Anderson torsion instrument). His basic idea was quite simple: by knowing the distance from a seismograph to an earthquake and observing the maximum signal amplitude recorded on the seismograph, an empirical quantitative ranking of the earthquake's inherent size or strength could be made. Most California earthquakes occur within the top 16 km of the crust; to a first approximation, corrections for variations in earthquake focal depth were, therefore, unnecessary.

Richter's original magnitude scale (ML) was then extended to observations of earthquakes of any distance and of focal depths ranging between 0 and 700 km. Because earthquakes excite both body waves, which travel into and through the Earth, and surface waves, which are constrained to follow the natural wave guide of the Earth's uppermost layers, two magnitude scales evolved - the mb and MS scales.

The standard body-wave magnitude formula is

mb = log10(A/T) + Q(D,h) ,

where A is the amplitude of ground motion (in microns); T is the corresponding period (in seconds); and Q(D,h) is a correction factor that is a function of distance, D (degrees), between epicenter and station and focal depth, h (in kilometers), of the earthquake. The standard surface-wave formula is

MS = log10 (A/T) + 1.66 log10 (D) + 3.30 .

There are many variations of these formulas that take into account effects of specific geographic regions, so that the final computed magnitude is reasonably consistent with Richter's original definition of ML. Negative magnitude values are permissible.

A rough idea of frequency of occurrence of large earthquakes is given by the following table:

MS Earthquakes
per year
---------- -----------
8.5 - 8.9 0.3
8.0 - 8.4 1.1
7.5 - 7.9 3.1
7.0 - 7.4 15
6.5 - 6.9 56
6.0 - 6.4 210

This table is based on data for a recent 47 year period. Perhaps the rates of earthquake occurrence are highly variable and some other 47 year period could give quite different results.

the last X flare we had was a few days ago
on Aug 9th @ 08:08 UTC
[link to www.lmsal.com]
Thread: SOLAR WATCH * Huge X8.2 Flare Sept. 10, 2017! (Updated Daily) (Page 219)

Thanks for taking the time NiNzrez,...It seems like I interrupted you guys and gals in the middle of something happening now with a quake in China??

I will chill on posting and read a little now and try to catch up with the chase.

Take Care All,...

Z

MAGNITUDE 6.0 QUAKE SHAKES FUKUSHIMA

cant be good ...

for

radioactive material stabilization...

just sayin

japan is suferin and bleedin a lot...


so is this earth quake an efect in any way of the 6.9x ?

no body can say

am i wrong Nin?
dont want to disturb you

I find it interesting that earlier in the day there was this quake posted on USGS in the region at 10:06 UT.

MAP 5.2 2011/08/11 10:06:33 39.971 76.993 34.8 SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA


For the same time and same quake this is what was posted on
EMSC

2011-08-11 10:06:38.5 39.95 N 76.54 E 51 ML 5.5 M SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA RSSC
2011-08-11 10:06:36.7 38.78 N 74.73 E 33 mb 4.9 A SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA LDG
2011-08-11 10:06:34.5 Moment tensors M# SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA MT
2011-08-11 10:06:33.8 40.01 N 77.03 E 41 mb 5.0 M+ SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA INFO
2011-08-11 10:06:33.1 39.97 N 76.99 E 34 M 5.2 M SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA NEIR
2011-08-11 10:06:32.6 39.99 N 77.23 E 10 mb 5.3 A SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA MAD
2011-08-11 10:06:32.5 40.13 N 77.18 E 1 mb 5.6 M SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA NNC
2011-08-11 10:06:32.2 40.05 N 77.24 E 9 mb 5.1 A SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA SC3
2011-08-11 10:06:31.3 39.92 N 77.17 E 10 M 5.3 A SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA GFZ
2011-08-11 10:06:30.6 39.90 N 77.11 E 33 Ms 5.4 M SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA GSRC
2011-08-11 10:06:30.3 40.16 N 77.18 E 10 mb 5.3 M SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA MAD
2011-08-11 10:06:30.3 40.16 N 77.18 E 10 mb 5.3 M SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA MAD
2011-08-11 10:06:18.4 39.48 N 79.33 E 30 mb 4.7 M SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA BUC

And yes there is nothing on USGS of a 7+ or anything even resembling it for the time frame of 22:01UT.

USGS does however report this one..

MAP 4.2 2011/08/11 22:01:27 30.093 86.746 35.0 WESTERN XIZANG

ESMC reports these two...

2011-08-11 22:01:39.7 30.42 N 87.63 E 124 mb 4.5 A WESTERN XIZANG SC3
2011-08-11 22:01:34.1 29.88 N 86.83 E 74 M 7.3 A: WESTERN XIZANG GFZ

Last Edited by tomasgod1 on 08/11/2011 08:12 PM

This was meant to be posted in ITB76's thread but I guess it works here too. Too many tabs open at once.

Most recent large event:
Xizang
Magnitude: 7.2
Origin time: 2011-08-11 22:01:33.3 UTC
Epicenter: 86.81°E 29.86°N
Depth: 65 km
Location: automatic

[link to geofon.gfz-potsdam.de]

Just odd.

Earlier today right after that first post to you, I was checking between the
EQ sites and none of them matched up. More than one discrepancy between
multiple different quakes. What gives?

Matrix is glitchin'...

i noticed the same thing
i had to stop looking cause it was just making me mad
now im trying to find what caused this anomaly seen on this




and also note. it was just pointed out to me that the HARP is lit up right now
Induction Magnetometer

and there is nothing showing on the nict that would cause this
[link to www2.nict.go.jp]

soooo, something is up from something
just not sure what as of right now
if anyone finds any odd readings or anomalies, please post them in reply to this :)

Last Edited by NiNzrez on 08/12/2011 12:05 AM

this video is great
one of the reasons i love glp
so many people looking for the same type of answers, that someone is bound to have put together something very nice for you
like this video
you can see on here very clear waves and thsi "something" enters earths atmosphere
much like the waves that are created around you deep in a pool after you dive in

Crazy stuff...as I stated on the pinned thread on this subject--I haven`t ever seen anything like that...I don`t think they can call that a glitch...sun earth connection..perhaps some damage to our magnetosphere from the last cme letting in magnetic particles...not sure but something isn`t right

there was another filament that lifted off from the north - northeast section of the sun today
here it is on stereo A
[link to stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov]
[link to stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov]
and on B
[link to stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov]
on lasco C2
[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]
on lasco C3
[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

because of it's location and it's far north direction at time of snapping, this will not be geoeffective

we can see it on 3 places on this map view
[link to tropic.ssec.wisc.edu]

Gave you a thumbs up NIN.

thanks ElQ
i did the same :)

Hey NiNzrez. Could this be related in anyway?

[link to 137.229.36.30]

Your need to look at the very end of the graph. The north and the vertical just went postal.