SOLAR WATCH * Huge X8.2 Flare Sept. 10, 2017! (Updated Daily)

personnaly i think the government would rather ignore such events than admit they cant explain it. i would prefer if they would atleast acknoweldge they dont know what they are rather than come up with some of the recent ignorrant methods of trying to debunk us conspiracy junkies. i think thats what creates half of the conspiracy theories to begin with.

some beauty Friday the 13th Aurorae; from Alaska to Latvia
[link to www.facebook.com]



Uranus auroras glimpsed from Earth
April 13, 2012

For the first time, scientists have captured images of auroras above the giant ice planet Uranus, finding further evidence of just how peculiar a world that distant planet is. Detected by means of carefully scheduled observations from the Hubble Space Telescope, the newly witnessed Uranian light show consisted of short-lived, faint, glowing dots – a world of difference from the colorful curtains of light that often ring Earth's poles.

ReadMore:
[link to phys.org]

Your ignorance of the POLITICS of peer review is showing, ha ha, those who seek the truth are not necessarily in charge of its dissemination.

Streaming a live image of prominences on the Sun, taken with a hydrogen-alpha telescope:

[link to www.ustream.tv]

Wow. Thank you.. +++awesome

That's one way to get sunshine on a cloudy day :)

Didn't mean to step on you so hard there about NASA hiding info, only meant to say you have to take each person as separate from the other, personally I think the military has censors in place to control the flow of info - they take orders from the executive branch, it only goes to show that someone is Extremely worried about something when they shut the Data down every time the Sun even hiccups. Should be interesting around the fifteenth when the next plasma stream passes Venus - I have seen at least a couple really bright flashes, like someone struck an arc for an instant during the daylight, no mirrors or car doors opening in the sunlight around, then a rash of earthquakes, who knows maybe has to do with the inner four planets being in the same magnetic sector. I know that science is still very young, we didn't know about electricity or radiation not too long ago, what other form of charge are we missing?

as far as who decides when to shut data down:
[link to thewitness.org]
ha ha

Yeah well, no worries, seems to be the norm on this thread lately.... let's face it, I'm looking for the conspiracy, (psst, that's why I'm here) because I believe in them.

Do I truly believe that NASA is purposely ignoring this anamoly for a reason known only to themselves ???

YES.

Will people be annoyed with that opinion ??? Apparently, although I can't imagine why.

Otherwise, if we get beyond all this I think we are having the same ^^ thoughts ^^, I just wish everyone would take a deep breath before jumping down someone else's throat.

Surprisingly clear detail on the object in the bottom left corner.

[link to stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov]

Last Edited by aaronnoraa711 on 04/13/2012 05:53 PM

whats that^

WOW. Insane.

[link to stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov]

Really is .... now who's going to email NASA and ask ?

Anyone heard from NinZ? I'm getting worried about her.

Surprisingly, no one has posted the appearance of a new active region in the NW comprising of a half-dozen small spots. Region most likely to be numbered 1457 whenever NOAA gets a round 'Tuit", LOL. We may also soon see another active region come over the SE limb.

Latest HMI intensitygram:

[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov]

I've always had an open mind regarding extra-terrestrial beings, but after watching hundreds of fake, mis-leading, or ill-informed videos and listening to countless interviews with "contactees" and "abductees" I've become the ultimate skeptic. The same folks who blindly believe every damn UFO huckster, claim that Faith in the Divine is laughable, backward, and silly nonsense. This I find to be cognitive-dissonance.

I've been an amateur astronomer and sky-watcher for 40 year. I've seen a few weird things that I later was able to identify as either Pentagon secret ops or natural phenomena. I'm definitely intrigued by the Roswell incident, the Travis Walton incident, and Bob Lazar, John Lear, etc. Honestly, I must say that NASA (though they're always prone to falling on their bureaucratic swords) is more trustworthy than R.C. Hoagland and all the folks who have turned the rumored "UFO problem" into an industry rivaling some religious sects. I used to love Richard's appearances on the Art Bell program; and he's been right about a lot of things like water on Mars, water on the Moon, and oceans on Europa, and maybe his "hyper-dimensional physics" will prove to have some validity. However, when he claimed that Comet Hale-Bopp (and later Comet Elenin) were some kind of alien spaceship; he's obviously promoting his Martian Metropolis and Alien Moonbase Bullshit to sell books and videos. The man is not a scientist; he's a former public relations agent.
I'm sorry, but after de-bunking a few dozen NASA image anomalies, I'm just too tired to bother anymore. Let someone else do the research. Remember this--it takes two mins. to post some crazy theory and an hour or two of research to expose and post the obvious truth. My hint to you all....if somebody posts a YouTube about UFO's or anomalies; go to their channel and see how many other videos they posted concerning UFO's or other alarmist fringe theories. IMO, if intelligent aliens ever land here the first order of business would be to exterminate the human infestation, pronto.

Hi Hugh...I agree for the most part with what you say. But the ET's know better than to land here. There are too many wazoo's with rifles that will shoot first.[and I'm talking about the ignorent and military]

ok i have just looked at april 12th the full day from stereo A
EUVI195 all 76 images? all day 76 images????
starts at 3am??
about the same for april 10, 11 about 300 to 400 images. but 20120412 only 76 images.

then i just changed the year to 2011
527 images! the come about 3 minutes apart.

besides not having any weird spots!!! the full day was recorded and posted.
[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]
try it for yourself.

only 76 images and huge spots...527 images and clean?
please tell me i am crazy here... ok i though i might have miss type so before i posted...re-checked....now only 63 imges and many of the spots are gone now!!!!!
all image from 14:45:00 till end of day gone!!!!!
WTF. equiptment malfuction????or ...are they hiding things?

Last Edited by psyoptics on 04/13/2012 09:30 PM

have these satellite taken too much of a beating lately?

all the odd images i think are troubled onboard electronics.
hope not, but this might be the case.
this would be something NASA, with all the cut backs would truly want to hide.

here is good wishes to all the birds in the sky...to keep them working.

no shuttle means no repairman to service them!



Last Edited by psyoptics on 04/13/2012 09:22 PM

The SOHO and STEREO optics were designed for solar observation, not background stars , planets, or galaxies. The raw images we see on a daily basis are "un-processed" lo-res images intended for solar events only. Keep in mind that a week from now the hi-res processed images for today can be seen online. If you see something interesting in the background, do us all a favor and search the Celestia or Solarium models and eliminate any stars, nebulae, or planets which are well-documented before proposing some far-fetched "UFO's sucking-off the Sun theory"....jes' saYIN'.

As someone who believes that other intelligent life exists in the Universe, here's what I say to this;



Any life advanced enough to cross the vastness of space would surely see humans in the same light as we view animals (or worse). Maybe even a pathogen to Earth; just look what we have done to her.

Peace,

DP

Ever Read Whitley Streiber's Communion?

Hey there.. from what I can tell, these are not image corruption or compression artifacts. Whatever it is that we're seeing in these STEREO images is consistent with a physical object in regards to it's structure and the effect on it from it's surroundings. It's seen at a variety of angles and maintains correct perspective (would not happen in artifacts) and is seen at all scales of size (also would not happen with artifacts) and the size scaling appears correct. These objects are consistently shaded in correct reference to the sun as the light source illuminating them (would not happen with artifacts) and can often be seen in sequential frames, traveling a given path and changing in size in a manner that appears proportionally correct for the direction it is traveling (could not happen with artifacts).

I understand skepticism with these types of things, though I'm not labeling these as anything. I don't know what it is that I'm looking at. I do know that I've observed it closely with my best judgement and logic, and I cannot find anything that disagrees that it is physical object(s) I'm looking at. If it ends up due to optics, data, interference, whatever.. I would be no less interested in knowing how that source of error created the effect that I was looking at. That's just the way I am...

Last Edited by aaronnoraa711 on 04/13/2012 11:14 PM

Yep, i find these things midly interesting, ive seen them before on images, and nothing has ever come of them. Some have been artefact images others issues with the equipment, but some are simply left, unexplained (and unmentioned by Nasa). It must be remembered though, that these Sats, have been up there a long time and that in the past few months, bombarded by alot of plasma and energy (im not saying thats what this is, just looking at all sides of the argument).
i say, lets wait and see, personally, if it starts moving toward us...getting bigger and more focused in the images...you may have something, if it buggers off, like most of them do..back to work.

We could all start throwing around 'SWAG's' or 'WAG's', but lets keep an eye on the ball people.
Peace

maybe the sun has a new follower

Got to a B9.8

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

Last Edited by nerdrage88sasr on 04/13/2012 11:22 PM

Yes, actually, and one his sequels (I've forgotten the title). I find this kind of thing fascinating, but in the end I think it's total fiction. Streiber was well-known as a fiction writer before his "communion". Check the bio on another sci-fi writer, L. Ron Hubbard--he was a co-hort in Satanism (a la Aleister Crowley) with Jack Parsons (of JPL fame) before he founded the Church of Scientology. I'm no defender of the so-called Christian churches, but the Pontiffs and preachers have been out-flanked by the sci-fi- alien-demonic priests of the space-age. Maybe I'm also delusional, but I find that G.I. Gurdjieff (Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson) was closer to the "real-deal"... spiritually speaking.
As a disclaimer of full disclosure, I must confess that I'm an Ordained Minister in the Church of the Subgenius and a confirmed failed-athiest backslider....make of it what you will.


Last Edited by Hugh M Eye on 04/14/2012 01:43 AM

Gee, could it be a planet?

NOAA Electron Alert:

Space Weather Message Code: ALTEF3
Serial Number: 1883
Issue Time: 2012 Apr 14 0315 UTC

ALERT: Electron 2MeV Integral Flux exceeded 1000pfu
Threshold Reached: 2012 Apr 14 0300 UTC
Station: GOES13
Potential Impacts: Satellite systems may experience significant charging resulting in increased risk to satellite systems.

GOES Electron Flux:

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

Space winds kicking up again:

Space Weather Message Code: WARK04
Serial Number: 1910
Issue Time: 2012 Apr 14 0240 UTC

WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected
Valid From: 2012 Apr 14 0240 UTC
Valid To: 2012 Apr 14 1200 UTC
Warning Condition: Onset
Potential Impacts: Area of impact primarily poleward of 65 degrees Geomagnetic Latitude.
Induced Currents - Weak power grid fluctuations can occur.
Aurora - Aurora may be visible at high latitudes such as Canada and Alaska.

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

SOHO SW data:
[link to umtof.umd.edu]

ACE SW Data:
[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

Maybe another good night for aurorae!

WOW! A giant pair of auroral lips over Yellowknife, CANADA! Freudian and weird...

[link to www.asc-csa.gc.ca]

LMAO,
Thanks for that Hugh. IM not a Strieber fan meself, just saw a simuarlarity between his idea and what Doom was saying about us as 'animals' to a higher intellegence.

Nearly all those people that came up with some of the most interesting concepts of our minds and uses of such, had Sci-Fi backgrounds, or comic book backgrounds. one of my favourite concepts is by Von Neumann talking about UFO's and secret creatures such as yeti's, Et's etc. He stated..

" these creatures/objects, enter our reality or universe from a kind of parallel universe...they 'bleed over' from another dimension, through the tripwire or trigger effect of our own acknowledgement of their existence."

"The human mind is capable of producing something that, incredibly, is close to a physical reality".

interesting reading and a topic on which i have studied alot (and am in the process of writing a book about). if we think about it, this could even 'bleed over' to effects on the sun, the earth and reality as we see it. Are we 'creating' these effects through our 'belief' that they are real and happening?

enough of the psycho mumbo jumbo...just thought i would share.
Peace