SOLAR WATCH * Huge X8.2 Flare Sept. 10, 2017! (Updated Daily)

Hugh, all your information was very helpful this evening, as always and I come away WAY better informed than I was. Thank you for all the effort.

1564 is just a monster, I wonder if it will intensify while heading to Nin's Hot Spot ? Place yer bets!

Complete loss of satellite signal despite it being a gorgeous day out.

Just popped in to see what was happening if anything, and I see .... nothing lol.

and Canada!!!!


Im surprised no bidy here explains wheres that cme came from... that is morethant twice the size of the Sun....

As of 2010, how many black holes has NASA officially confirmed being in our galaxy ?

Just saw this and wanted to add it for some of the 'out of the box' discussions here

More discussion on seeing the future.... Maybe why NASA can make some predictions on solar storm dates in the future??



Will an observer falling into a black hole be able to witness all future events in the universe outside the black hole?

The normal presentation of these gravitational time dilation effects can lead one to a mistaken conclusion. It is true that if an observer (A) is stationary near the event horizon of a black hole, and a second observer (B) is stationary at great distance from the event horizon, then B will see A's clock to be ticking slow, and A will see B's clock to be ticking fast. But if A falls down toward the event horizon (eventually crossing it) while B remains stationary, then what each sees is not as straight forward as the above situation suggests.
As B sees things: A falls toward the event horizon, photons from A take longer and longer to climb out of the "gravtiational well" leading to the apparent slowing down of A's clock as seen by B, and when A is at the horizon, any photon emitted by A's clock takes (formally) an infinite time to get out to B. Imagine that each person's clock emits one photon for each tick of the clock, to make it easy to think about. Thus, A appears to freeze, as seen by B, just as you say. However, A has crossed the event horizon! It is only an illusion (literally an "optical" illusion) that makes B think A never crosses the horizon.

As A sees things: A falls, and crosses the horizon (in perhaps a very short time). A sees B's clock emitting photons, but A is rushing away from B, and so never gets to collect more than a finite number of those photons before crossing the event horizon. (If you wish, you can think of this as due to a cancellation of the gravitational time dilation by a doppler effect --- due to the motion of A away from B). After crossing the event horizon, the photons coming in from above are not easily sorted out by origin, so A cannot figure out how B's clock continued to tick.

A finite number of photons were emitted by A before A crossed the horizon, and a finite number of photons were emitted by B (and collected by A) before A crossed the horizon.

You might ask What if A were to be lowered ever so slowly toward the event horizon? Yes, then the doppler effect would not come into play, UNTIL, at some practical limit, A got too close to the horizon and would not be able to keep from falling in. Then A would only see a finite total of photons form B (but now a larger number --- covering more of B's time). Of course, if A "hung on" long enough before actually falling in, then A might see the future course of the universe.

Bottom line: simply falling into a black hole won't give you a view of the entire future of the universe. Black holes can exist without being part of the final big crunch, and matter can fall into black holes.

As of 2010, how many black holes has NASA officially confirmed being in our galaxy ?

Just saw this and wanted to add it for some of the 'out of the box' discussions here

How many? Help us out here Batman.

How many? Help us out here Batman.

Hello,One and All!



I hope everyone is Good : )

So,Q..you ask how many Black Holes exist or have been confirmed,I'd stick my neck out and say 0.

Well,that's according to the Nutty Professor Bill Gade : )

Universe = Singularity - Black Holes = Singularity - How can two 'Singularities' exist in one place!?

Here,listen to Bills' thoughts on this end of Relativity -


[link to www.youtube.com]

Just to play Devils Advocate.

Hello,One and All!



I hope everyone is Good : )

So,Q..you ask how many Black Holes exist or have been confirmed,I'd stick my neck out and say 0.

Well,that's according to the Nutty Professor Bill Gade : )

Universe = Singularity - Black Holes = Singularity - How can two 'Singularities' exist in one place!?

Here,listen to Bills' thoughts on this end of Relativity -


[link to www.youtube.com]

Just to play Devils Advocate.
[/quote

Is there not hard evidence that black holes exist?

yes. And you can find it on NASA website for those who only believe with links

How would you define a Black Hole Gabe?

Is this a test?


A black hole itself can't be seen but you can see its effects.


How did I do?

Fine,if you want to toe the official line on 'Black Holes' : )

They say the Physics inside a Black Hole are completely different to those outside it yet it is claimed they Spin,Wander and Radiate energy back into the known Universe,ridiculous when you think about it!

It's claimed that we understand the 'Gravitational Pull' of a object that does'nt even have the same basic Physics as the 'known Universe' yet they cannot even get the convection timescale correct for our closest Star!?

Black Holes are just a cashcow that will pay for eternity because they will never see one or be able to explain how they are supposed to work.

They are Hypothetical Mathematic Objects and not Physical,Scientific reality,Imo.