Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,832 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,577,973
Pageviews Today: 2,518,226Threads Today: 796Posts Today: 17,564
07:13 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Poster Handle Hugh M Eye
Post Content
The ACE SW data shows another spike in density for the EXACT SAME 2 MINUTES as yesterday's spike (15:28-29z). This alone proves to me that it's a glitch. There is no 24-hr time cycle in space except for inside the spacecraft itself.

ACE 6-hr. SWEPAM plot:

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

THEY SAY the data is "nominal", but the glitch may be in their Earth-side downlink or ground computers. I'm open to any other rational explanations...

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]


kim-jong-un-blin
 Quoting: Hugh M Eye


hey Hugh :)
do you have a link to some info showing that there is a 24hr cycle within the ACE spacecraft? i never heard of this
if it was a glitch, we would be seeing it through one sensor
we see it on the speed and density sensor, and we also see it on the Temp sensor as well as Radial Speed
[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

im leaning tword a magnetic connection made at this time under the electric universe
 Quoting: NiNzrez


No, I have no link, but I assume there's a clock since all of the data is time-stamped and satellite communications with Earth must be synchronized somehow.

WAIT, I do have a link to a pdf (I had to download due to computer probs) which in Item 4.1 mentions Data FlowCharacteristics and describes the "Symbol Synchronizer Clock". Here goes...

[link to www.srl.caltech.edu]

I don't have time to dig too deep on this non-issue right now, but here's some links for further investigation for those who may be inclined to pursue this inquiry:

[link to www.srl.caltech.edu]

[link to www.srl.caltech.edu]

The ACE satellite has up for 15 years and prone to trouble in recent times due to the wear and tear of extreme radiation, etc. I always double-check density and wind-speed with the SOHO data for verification. Anything significant should appear on both data plots. Note:at SOHO the density was decreasing at 15:29z.

[link to umtof.umd.edu]
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:



News