Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 3,236 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,456,173
Pageviews Today: 3,537,613Threads Today: 857Posts Today: 15,725
10:49 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject SOLAR WATCH * 312 M & 25 X FLARES starting 3-7-2011 (Updated Daily)
Poster Handle NiNzrez
Post Content
Any CME's with those flares?
 Quoting: Isis One


more than likley there wont be

as a rule of thumb:
when the Xrays spike straight up, then right away goes straight back down = No CME

when the xray flux goes up, slow or spiked (dont really matter) and then lingers there a bit and SLOWLY comes back down = sig for a CME

thats the best way to get an idea if there is or is not a CME before images come out showing it
 Quoting: NiNzrez


That's cool, thank you. I have learned so much from this thread!

I have a question for you in light of what's been going on lately. If a spot flares, like a few C's or M's in a row, does that tend to "weaken" it, meaning it is less likely to let off a big one? Or does it not matter and is just random?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25323670


there is a lot of study done on this subject
often, we do see a large M flare or X flare occure that causes a complex section of the sunspot to become more stable after the flare and then we see the sunspot calm down
[link to adsabs.harvard.edu]
this is the main reason, that after a high M or X flare, you will see some of us talking about the area and complecity of the sunspot.
we do not see this happen much with C flares, they are more of a ramping up of the sunspot, so to speak
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:



News