SOLAR WATCH * Huge X8.2 Flare Sept. 10, 2017! (Updated Daily) | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33376737 United States 01/31/2013 02:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
#Geomagnetic_Storm# User ID: 1426914 United States 01/31/2013 03:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 01/31/2013 07:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33385469 United States 01/31/2013 07:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6185582 United States 01/31/2013 07:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Tiny Trink User ID: 28990460 United States 01/31/2013 07:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.youtube.com] Tiny Trink, Double T, Tink Tink, T x 2 "You are responsible for the Energy you bring into a space" ~ Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor Shine Brightly as someone is needing your Inner Light to find theirs. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6185582 United States 01/31/2013 07:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
shenue User ID: 5263313 United States 01/31/2013 08:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good morning everyone. Watch your thoughts; they become words. Watch your words; they become actions. Watch your actions; they become habits. Watch your habits; they become your character. Watch your character; it becomes your destiny. |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 01/31/2013 11:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Morning Shen. Top left filament might ruin our day. Combined with the CH stream. [link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov] [link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu] Neutron on the left shows a increase and is at the highest I have ever seen it. For whatever reason the Muon shows a decrease, interesting. [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] The sun remains dead aside from a sad B flare last night. We have some interesting times ahead folks. Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 11:24 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6185582 United States 01/31/2013 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seriously folks .... I'm truly amazed a the lack of attentiveness on this thread of late, and the desire to just hear one selves speak. What I have posted above proves that there is something not only skewed with the solar data we are handed, but that the people left here on this thread couldn't care less about facts, but would rather discuss about whatever pops out of their imaginations. It's sad to see such a great endeavor by Nin finally meet it's demise. Sweet dreams all |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 01/31/2013 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Does it surprise you? Why else is everyone looking for alternative reasons as to why everything is happening. Right now it does not matter if it was a c or b the sun remains a mystery to everyone atm. It is blatantly obvious anymore we are lied to in certain aspects on all levels in this current system especially if you live in the unitedstates. I mean everyone has ideas. [link to www.aanda.org] In the grand scheme of things, we truly don't know for a fact what's happening at the moment. Goodnight btw [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] Bnothin Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 12:04 PM |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 01/31/2013 12:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to iswa.ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov] That had descent amount of ejecta for as much plasma sucked back in. I think we might get smacked around a bit. I think filament eruptions and CH streams are the new doom. Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 12:23 PM |
muse_1111 User ID: 26558348 United States 01/31/2013 12:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That had descent amount of ejecta for as much plasma sucked back in. I think we might get smacked around a bit. ISWA has updated, and they are showing it to be geoeffective on the 3rd - [link to iswa.ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov] |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 01/31/2013 12:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Event Issue Date: 2013-01-31 09:13:23.0 GMT CME Arrival Time: 2013-02-03 03:15:51.0 GMT Arival Time Confidence Level: ± 6 hours Disturbance Duration: 18 hours Disturbance Duration Confidence Level: ± 8 hours Magnetopause Standoff Distance: 6.3 Re Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:15:51 GMT not bad... Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 12:28 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32806609 United Kingdom 01/31/2013 12:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 01/31/2013 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu] Cosmic rays going off the chart. They are tweaking the data on the right, does not make any sense. |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 01/31/2013 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to halpha.nso.edu] [link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov] Boom! Most likely just miss us though. [link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov] Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 01:36 PM |
Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands 01/31/2013 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seriously folks .... I'm truly amazed a the lack of attentiveness on this thread of late, and the desire to just hear one selves speak. What I have posted above proves that there is something not only skewed with the solar data we are handed, but that the people left here on this thread couldn't care less about facts, but would rather discuss about whatever pops out of their imaginations. It's sad to see such a great endeavor by Nin finally meet it's demise. Sweet dreams all That is a ridiculous fudge(again)from the Liars in Chief. Thank you for pointing that one out! And yes,agreed. Peep. The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 01/31/2013 01:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seriously folks .... I'm truly amazed a the lack of attentiveness on this thread of late, and the desire to just hear one selves speak. What I have posted above proves that there is something not only skewed with the solar data we are handed, but that the people left here on this thread couldn't care less about facts, but would rather discuss about whatever pops out of their imaginations. It's sad to see such a great endeavor by Nin finally meet it's demise. Sweet dreams all That is a ridiculous fudge(again)from the Liars in Chief. Thank you for pointing that one out! And yes,agreed. Peep. yes, this is way more important. Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 01:33 PM |
Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands 01/31/2013 01:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cesium, I agree. I don't know if you have this link, but when I'm looking at comparative data (years worth) I use this. Quoting: TS66 [link to www.lmsal.com] this graphic now indicates a reversal prior to 2013 also. [link to s16.postimage.org] I'm not sure where this graphic comes from, I'm sure I picked it up here after my bookmark fiasco. Yes [link to s16.postimage.org] yes. : ) The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 01/31/2013 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Rather large Ejecta from that filament. For those not concerned with gov shills and their data. 10 O clock [link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov] [link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu] Anyone feel your DNA scrambling yet? Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 01:41 PM |
Hugh M Eye User ID: 31662450 United States 01/31/2013 01:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That had descent amount of ejecta for as much plasma sucked back in. I think we might get smacked around a bit. ISWA has updated, and they are showing it to be geoeffective on the 3rd - [link to iswa.ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov] Event Issue Date: 2013-01-31 09:13:23.0 GMT Quoting: Da fuq CME Arrival Time: 2013-02-03 03:15:51.0 GMT Arival Time Confidence Level: ± 6 hours Disturbance Duration: 18 hours Disturbance Duration Confidence Level: ± 8 hours Magnetopause Standoff Distance: 6.3 Re Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:15:51 GMT not bad... Thanks for the update, folks. I didn't expect this to be geoeffective due to the SE origin. CACTus Details have clocked this CME at 1500km/s. This is swiftest we've seen facing Earth lately, which makes me wonder how they forecast an 18-hour disturbance. Here's SEEDS movie of CME: [link to spaceweather.gmu.edu] CACTus Details: [link to www.sidc.oma.be] |
#Geomagnetic_Storm# User ID: 2579388 United States 01/31/2013 01:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cesium, I agree. I don't know if you have this link, but when I'm looking at comparative data (years worth) I use this. Quoting: TS66 [link to www.lmsal.com] this graphic now indicates a reversal prior to 2013 also. [link to s16.postimage.org] I'm not sure where this graphic comes from, I'm sure I picked it up here after my bookmark fiasco. Yes [link to s16.postimage.org] yes. : ) Sooooo close! :/ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6185582 United States 01/31/2013 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to halpha.nso.edu] Quoting: Da fuq Rather large Ejecta from that filament. For those not concerned with gov shills and their data. 10 O clock [link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov] Where the f*** do you think you are getting the data you are posting you bafoon ?????? You truly believe after you've got the answer to it all after being on this thread for a couple of weeks and have the right to deem what is relavent and what is not in your egotistical and limited mind ????? |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 01/31/2013 01:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to halpha.nso.edu] Hugh, what is your best guess on this big boy? I didn't think the eruption last night would be geoeffective either. If we are in line of that we are in trouble. You can tweak graphs and tables. Why would they show that much ejecta then? If they didn't want to raise concern. Calm down you ape. From this video, one can understand there may be sizeable ejecta headed in our direction. Why would we worry about if the flare was a b or c. Everyone knows they mess with data from time to time and show the public what they want them to see. (NASA) Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 02:01 PM |
MamaHasAwakened User ID: 5426767 United States 01/31/2013 01:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hugh M Eye User ID: 31662450 United States 01/31/2013 01:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Howdy, '66, we've seen this discrepancy before. The 5-min. plot is not synchronized with the 1-min. plot. You'd think this would be a simple thing to correct for a multi-billion agency, but NOOOoooo. My advice is to never look at the inaccurate 5-min plot, just use the 1-min plot. This is just another example of NOAA's incompetence. We've seen a few M1 flares that look like C-flares on the long plot. I hope they're better at saving the whales or measuring chemtrails, LOL. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6185582 United States 01/31/2013 02:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey there, waking up when I did I had no option but to view this but on a 5 minute plot, and have never seen this discrepency before, nor has it been pointed out, and as most of us here know, I'm a hound for facts, proof, data, not conjecture. If I have missed this somehow in the 2 and a half years I have been on this site, and observing data, please someone, simply show me. |
Hugh M Eye User ID: 31662450 United States 01/31/2013 02:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to halpha.nso.edu] Quoting: Da fuq Hugh, what is your best guess on this big boy? I didn't think the eruption last night would be geoeffective either. If we are in line of that we are in trouble. You can tweak graphs and tables. Why would they show that much ejecta then? If they didn't want to raise concern. Calm down you ape. From this video, one can understand there may be sizeable ejecta headed in our direction. Why would we worry about if the flare was a b or c. Everyone knows they mess with data from time to time and show the public what they want them to see. (NASA) Wow, that was huge! I don't think it's earth-directed but we'll wait for the coronagraph images. SDO composite of that big-ass filament lifting off: [link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov] Enormous double-ribbon Hyder flare/tsunami wave went right over the horizon: [link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov] |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 01/31/2013 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah come to think of it, it's in almost the exact same spot as the filament last week that sandwiched us with another CME. I am surprised however, at the size and speed of this one. [link to halpha.nso.edu] (It did seem to have a whip motion to it though) Considering how much Ejecta came out of this last one. [link to halpha.nso.edu] Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/31/2013 02:21 PM |