Merci Tink
I see the CH/Quake correlations...but cannot figure for the life of me how one location of a CH induces a region on Earth to Quake?
Not at all dismissing it,at all,correlations are there - but where is the connection,physical connection?
I think that is still being sort after,I haz nice one for Volcanic eruptions and Cosmic Rays - 'Explosive volcanic eruptions triggered by cosmic rays: Volcano as a bubble chamber' [
link to www.sciencedirect.com]
All worth consideration.
Sorry, there is no connection. Do earthquakes stop during solar minimum when the coronal holes are at the sun's poles? There's an observed decrease of geomagnetic effects of CHs during minimum, so we should easily see a big dropoff in earthquake activity (if they correlated, which they don't).
"“Usually, at solar minimum, the coronal holes are at the sun’s poles,” says Giuliana de Toma, a solar scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research whose research on this topic helped provide insight for this paper. “Therefore, Earth receives wind from only the edges of these holes, and it’s not very fast. But in 2007 and 2008, the coronal holes were not confined to the poles as normal.”
Coincidental evidence? Not hardly. In 2008 the coronal holes remained at low solar latitudes with their winds pointed directly toward Earth.
Not until 2009 did they move toward the Sun’s poles and geomagnetic effects and sightings of the aurora went proportionally along with it. It’s even been theorized coronal holes may be responsible for minimizing the southward direction of the interplanetary magnetic field as well. Such a combination of all factors are setting the stage for geomagnetic minimum, but study is still needed to help understand and predict such phenomena."
Read more: [
link to www.universetoday.com]
What causes earthquakes?
[
link to duckduckgo.com]
Yes,I have mentioned the obvious periods of non-correlation when there have been Earthquakes,you try and bring that up there!
Wowzers.
Need to play within parameters sucks a bit(a fair bit)but it is without that somewhere I feel I can 'work'.
This is a negative aspect of it,it to me and many others,stands to reason that Quakes gonna' Quake...I hold out hope that he/they/whatever are loking for a specific correlation,as in depth/type of rock,relative locations etc.
I have broached this before,trying to ask for more specifics on WHAT exactly is the mechanism and within what parameters,this always draw a blank and I find myself pissing into the wind.
I do in fact,agree a lot more with Dr. Keith Strongs' videos on this issue,unless I can get some specifics.
S0,if you read this,please can you help a Br0ther out!
If it were just something simple like the Volcanic bubble chamber example or a decrease in CRs suddenly due to increased SW,or whatever would help.
Anyway,until then,Hugh is firmly correct in his position on this matter,until some bloody parameters are laid instead of simply stating 'Hey,CH Et Voila - Ze Earthquakes' - cus' it really doesn't cut the mustard.
Rice and Peas man.
