Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,044 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 746,723
Pageviews Today: 971,994Threads Today: 249Posts Today: 3,466
08:21 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject SOLAR WATCH * Huge X8.2 Flare Sept. 10, 2017! (Updated Daily)
Poster Handle Spittin'Cesium
Post Content
Solar magnetic shutdown?
 Quoting: Da fuq


Well slap my ass and call me Mandy - Give the man a Blowjob.

Yes Da'f,as has been shown,I don't even want to say it again,but here -

'The observed prolonged high maximum of solar activity that occurred during the 11th to 12th centuries’ warming period (the Minor Climate Optimum), which was comparable to contemporary warming or even greater, caused serious climate changes. In Scotland vineyards were cultivated; Greenland completely justified its name of "green land" and was settled by Normans at the end of the tenth and beginning of the eleventh century. But a subsequent deep fall in the temperature (the Maunder minimum, the coldest phase of the Little Ice Age)froze all the channels in Holland, in London froze the Thames, in Paris froze the Seine, and in Greenland caused the glaciers to grow,forcing people to leave its centuries-old settlements.The intense solar energy flow radiated since the beginning of the 1990's is slowly decreasing and, in spite of conventional opinion, there is now an unavoidable advance toward a global temperature decrease, a deep temperature drop comparable to the Maunder minimum (Fig. 5). By the middle of this century the shortage of solar energy received maybe on the order of 0.2% of its maximum average level in the 1980’s; thus, about 3 W/m2
. Although the change in the TSI would be at a level of about 0.07% in the “short” cycle, its influence on the climate would be smoothed out by the thermal inertia of the world ocean. However, if a similar shortage persists over two cycles, the climate will unavoidably change, with atime delay of 17 ± 5 years because of the thermal inertia just noted -
At present, in the 23rd “short” solar cycle,which has extended to 12 years, the upper atmosphere receives in average 0.19 W/m2less solar energy than it did in the 22nd solar cycle. Annually, the shortage is 6 x 10-6th joules/m2,while over an entire cycle, the hemisphere of the earth turned to the Sun – an area of 127.5 x 10-6thp km2– will receive 24 million megajoules less energy than before. The Sun no longer heats the Earth as before. Our planet experiences a shortage of energy comparable with the summed power of 21 million nuclear power plants; it is living under the conditions of a cooling Sun -
The tendency toward a decline in gl0bal temperature 0bserved in 2006-2008 (Fig. 7) will stop temporarily in 2010-2012. Then an increase in the TSI is expected, as solar cycle 24 (a “short” cycle) will temporarily compensate for the declining bicentennial component. But if solar activity in the “short” cycle does not rise sufficiently, the cooling of planet will begin to the deep temperature drop in 2055-2060± 11 years,when temperature will be lower by 1.0 – 1.5 degrees. The following climate minimum will last 45-65 years, after which warming will necessarily begin, but only at the beginning of the 22nd century
(Fig. 8)' [link to www.gao.spb.ru] Titled and by - 'THE SUN DEFINES THE CLIMATE
Habibullo Abdussamatov, Dr. Sc.
Head of Space research laboratory
of the Pulkovo Observatory,
Head of the Russian/Ukrainian joint project Astrometria.

I post that as another correct(ish) 0bservation that we are headed for Maunder Stylee,but the difference with this Russian Scientists predictions and those of Vukcevic and Landscheidt is that he placed the onset a over a Decade later than what is happening now,though he was spot on with the basic real start of the decline beginning at 24s' end in 2011.

Anyways,anyone shocked by this [link to science.nasa.gov] prediction of Cycle 24s' Sunspot Number produced by Hathaway/NASA in about 2006 - I personally think they knew they were lying when they put that out as the Dipole had been predicted to decrease all over the shop [link to www.vukcevic.talktalk.net] .

That's it,I will no longer discuss this,all I will say is I hope we see a second round but after that we will not have a Max again for a Long Time(time period depends on who you'd place more trust in,based of prior predictions and models)I think that M.A.Vukcevic/Theodor Landscheidt are the closest for onset with Dr.Habibullo Abdussamatov(of the above PDF)laying out better the length of time the Cooling will persist for(beyond 2100).

But,I have found a Correlation between Solar Minima. and Volcanic Eruptions of Silica-rich Magmas reaction with Muons as a direct result of Cyclical periods of less Solar output and hence Increased Cosmic Rays,where in 9 out of 11 Eruptions occurred across 306 Years giving a 96.7% correlation...so I am saying large one could *pop* potentially,if this is in fact not just a flukey correlation,here is that anyway [link to www.sciencedirect.com] .

Dawg Tired and frankly,pretty Suicidal,so I am gonna' bounce.

elmo

sun

cry
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP