| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 | TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 9:29 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
with the FBI, were in the hands of Cardinal Francis Spellman, the head
Cardinal of the Catholic Church in New York.
The Catholic Church in the USA, financially can stand up to
all the giant trusts of America. Politically, she looms ever
larger in the White House, in the Senate and in the
Congress. She is a force in the Pentagon, a secret agent in
the FBI and the most subtly intangible prime mover of the S.
S. wheel within a wheel; the Central Intelligence Agency. —
Ibid. p. 271.
Jean Hill was also a witness to the Kennedy murder. In her book,
entitled JFK: The Last Dissenting Witness, she states that during a
conversation her friend, J.B., who was one of the policeman in the
motorcade that was with Kennedy, told her,
“Well, while Kennedy was busy shaking hands with all the
well wishers at the airport, Johnson’s Secret Service people
came over to the motorcycle cops and gave us a bunch of
instructions. The darnedest thing was they told us the
parade route through Dealy Plaza was being changed.”
“Changed? How,” Jean Hill asks. “It was originally supposed
to go straight down Main Street.” J.B. said, “but they said for
us to disregard that. Instead we were told to make the little
jog on Houston and cut over to Elm.” Jean felt her mouth
drop open. “If you’d stayed on Main Street, Kennedy
might’ve been completely out of range of whoever was
shooting at him. My ‘shooter’ behind the wooden fence
definitely wouldn’t have had much chance to hit him from
there.” J.B. stared at her with a straight face. “Maybe that’s
why they changed the route,” he said bluntly. “But that’s not
all. They also ordered us into the craziest escort formation
I’ve ever seen. Ordinarily, you bracket the car with four
motorcycles, one on each fender. But this time they told the
four of us assigned to the president’s car there’d be no
forward escorts. We were to stay well to the back and not let
ourselves get ahead of the car’s rear wheels under any
circumstances. I’d never heard of a formation like that much
less ridden in one, but they said they wanted to let the
crowds have an ‘unrestricted view’ of the president. Well, I
guess somebody got an unrestricted view of him all right.” —
Jean Hill, JFK: The Last Dissenting Witness, Pelican
Publishing, p. 113.
So, the motorcade route through Dallas was changed, and the reason
given was so that the people would have an excellent view of the
president of the United States. The Jesuit assassins sure did!
Other peculiar things happened too. Lyndon Johnson, the vice
president of the United States, was apparently having a real problem.
Continuing with Jean Hill’s conversation with her friend in the
motorcade, |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 9:31 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
“What are you talking about?” Jean asked innocently. “I don’t
understand.” “My friends in the motorcade say he started
ducking down in the car a good 30 or 40 seconds before the
first shots were fired. I’d say that’s just a little peculiar
wouldn’t you?” “Oh, come on, J.B,” Jean Hill said, thinking
he had to be joking. “They obviously weren’t serious, were
they?” “As far as I know they were dead serious.” J.B. said.
“One of them told Maguire that he saw Johnson duck down
even before the car turned onto Houston Street, and he sure
as ____ wasn’t laughing when he said it.” “Well, maybe
Johnson just dropped something on the floor and bent over
to pick it up. I mean there can be a simple explanation.”
“Maybe so.” J.B. said. “I don’t claim to know what his
reasons were but this guy said it sure looked like he was
expecting bullets to be flying. When I heard it, it made me
start wondering about a whole lot of other stuff too.” — Ibid.
pp. 114-116.
Lyndon Johnson was acting as if he knew bullets would soon be flying,
ducking down repeatedly before the shots went off.
Texas law prohibits people that die in the state of Texas from being
removed without an autopsy. Leading doctors at Parkland Memorial
Hospital in Dallas were held at gunpoint as the body of John F.
Kennedy was removed from that hospital without an autopsy. Why?
There was overwhelming evidence that there was more than one bullet
that killed JFK. There was overwhelming evidence that the Warren
Commission report was nothing but lies. There were many bullets that
the doctors would have found that would have shattered the idea that
Lee Harvey Oswald was the loan gunman. That is why an autopsy was
not allowed in Texas. That is why Kennedy’s body was shipped to
Washington D.C. where a federal autopsy could be made, where they
could fabricate the evidence to support the lies of the Warren
commission. There was a Jesuit led conspiracy to kill JFK and they
didn’t want the evidence to get out, no matter how many people had to
be killed in the process.
If there really were several bullets fired that day in Dealy Plaza, then
certainly the car would have contained evidence of this. And so it did.
Three days after the assassination, Carl Renas, head of
security at the Dearborn Division of the Ford Motor
Company, drives the limousine, helicopters hovering over
head, from Washington to Cincinnati. In doing so, he noticed
several bullet holes, the most notable being the one in the
windshield’s chrome molding strip, which he said was clearly
‘a primary strike’ and ‘not a fragment,’ The limousine was
taken by Renas to Hess and Eisenhart of Cincinnati where
the chrome molding was replaced. The Secret Service told
Renas to “keep your mouth shut.” — Charles Crenshaw,
JFK: Conspiracy of Silence, Penguin Books USA, p. 106. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 9:38 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
Renas was the head of security for the Dearborn Division of Ford Motor
Co. Who was the head of that division in 1963 that dispatched Renas
for the task of his life?
Henry Ford II says today that the first time he can remember
meeting Lee Iacocca was in November 1960 when he
summoned the young salesman to his office to tell them he
was giving him command of the Ford division [at Dearborn].
— Robert Lacey, Ford, the Men and the Machine, Ballantine
Books, p. 531.
Lee Iacocca was the man in charge of the Dearborn Division of the
Ford Motor Company, who dispatched Carl Renas to go to Washington
D.C. to get the car that JFK was in when he was assassinated. Iacocca
was the head of the Dearborn Division until he became President of
Ford Motor Company in 1970. Iacocca was part of the cover-up
because he suppressed evidence concerning JFK’s assassination.
What connection does he have with the Catholic Church? In Iacocca’s
autobiography he says,
It took me a number of years to fully understand why I had to
make a good confession to a priest before I went to Holy
Communion, but in my teens I began to appreciate the
importance of this most misunderstood right of the Catholic
Church. In later years, I found myself completely refreshed
after confession. I even began to attend weekend retreats
where the Jesuits in face-to-face examinations of conscience
made me come to grips with how I was conducting my life.
— Iacocca: An Autobiography, Bantam Books, p. 8.
Roman Catholic Lee Iacocca, head of the Dearborn division of the Ford
Motor Co. was the one who dispatched Carl Renas to get the limousine
that had the evidence of multiple bullets that were shot from multiple
guns that killed John F. Kennedy. Isn’t it amazing that many years
later as President of Chrysler, Lee Iacocca went to Congress and asked
for financial help? Since Catholic Iacocca had been such an obedient
servant to his Jesuit masters, another obedient Catholic by the name of
Thomas ‘Tip’ O’Neill used his power as Speaker of the House to get Lee
Iacocca all the money he needed.
There were many people who knew a great deal about the Kennedy
assassination. Unfortunately, almost all of them died under mysterious
circumstances. There was a concerted effort to be sure that no secrets
were ever told. Even Jean Hill stated that several attempts were made
to kill her and her children.
Jim Marrs, author of Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy,
wrote: “In the three-year period which followed the murder of
President Kennedy and Lee Harvey Oswald, 18 material
witnesses died — six by gunfire, three in motor accidents, |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 9:40 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
two by suicide, one from a cut throat, one from a karate chop
to the neck, five from natural causes.” ...A mathematician
hired by the London Sunday Times in February of 1967
concluded that the odds of the number of witnesses involved
in the assassination of John F. Kennedy dying between
November 22, 1963 and that date were 100,000 trillion to
one.... In the time period ranging from November 22, 1963 to
August 1993 over 115 ‘witnesses’ have died or fallen victim
to death by strange circumstances, suicides or murder. —
Craig Roberts and John Armstrong, JFK: The Dead
Witnesses, Consolidated Press, p. 3.
Kennedy was one of many Presidents, kings, Czars, and emperors who
refused to obey the Jesuits and was killed for it. The role of the papacy
in the heinous murder and cover-up of this crime cannot be denied. We
have seen that the Vatican had a motive, the people in key positions to
carry it out, and the people in key positions to cover it up.
There was one group, one organization, whose historical
background was characterized by the planning and
execution of such deeds; that had a lasting consistent
motive, before, during and after the crime; that had the
necessary international connections; that had the money;
that could elicit suicidal self-sacrifice in its members; and
that continued to exist through all phases of the
assassination conspiracy. This is the Roman Catholic
Church. — Emmett McLoughlin, An Inquiry into the
Assassination of Abraham Lincoln, Lyle Stuart, Inc.1963, p.
161.
Winston Churchill, the famous English Prime Minister during World War
Two, once said,
Most men occasionally stumble over the truth, but they pick
themselves up and continue on as if nothing had happened.
We now understand the facts concerning one of the most controversial
events in American history. Will you stumble over the truth here and
go on as if nothing has happened or will you begin to analyze history
and current events in a new light?
Chapter 9: The Waco Massacre |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 9:41 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
THE WACO MASSACRE
A religious group known as the Branch Davidians lived in their
compound they called Mt. Carmel just outside Waco, Texas. On April
19, 1993 agents of the United States government attacked their
compound and murdered helpless women and children with battle
tanks, flame-throwers, and poison gas. Nearly 100 innocent people lost
their lives as a result. What makes this a tragedy of the most terrible
proportions is that the Davidians had done nothing to provoke this
attack by the United States’ government.
The Branch Davidians got along well with those of the surrounding
community. They had some religious beliefs that made them different
from other churches, but, then, many of the so-called standard
churches differ from each other. Their religious differences were
certainly no excuse for the United States government to destroy their
home and their lives, especially without a trial. The First Amendment to
the Constitution guarantees the right to worship God according to the
dictates of one’s own conscience, but the government completely
ignored this right in the massacre at Waco.
An extremely important point to understand is that virtually everything
the government and the news media said about these people were lies.
Many so-called experts delivered testimony that caused the majority of
people to believe the exact opposite of the truth. Because of these
extensive lies, very few people know what the Branch Davidians were
really like, and very few people know exactly what took place during
the siege at Waco. The lies were told in order to try to justify in some
impossible way what the government did there.
The First Amendment to the Constitution says that the government
shall make NO law pertaining to religion. The constitutional rights of
the Branch Davidians were totally ignored. The murderers were guilty
of the most heinous crimes, and they totally got away with it.
The morning before Easter last year, Shirley Burton,
spokeswoman for the Seventh-day Adventist church, said
she got a terrifying phone call. On the line was a church
official in Australia, relaying a warning that the next day, an
explosion of violence would occur in a Waco, Texas, cult that
included dozens of former Adventists. The man got the
warning from parents of a cult member. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 9:42 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
“The parents had just had word that there would be a suicidemassacre,”
Burton said, adding that her mind filled with
images of the 1978 murder-suicide of Jim Jones and 900 of
his followers in Guyana.
Church authorities tipped off Waco police and Easter passed
without incident. But peace came to a bloody end this past
Sunday, when sect members began a shoot out with federal
agents. — The Washington Post, March 3, 1993.
The words “cult” and “sect” are used any time the government or news
media want to cast suspicion on or discredit a particular church group.
Last spring officials of the Seventh-day Adventist church
heard from colleagues in Sydney that the Branch Davidians
were planning a mass suicide for Easter Sunday. About the
same time the State Department got word from sources in
Australia that Koresh’s group was stockpiling arms and
planning suicide. State passed it on to the ATF [the
government’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms]
which began its investigation in June [1992]. — Newsweek,
March 15, 1993.
Both of these articles tell of malicious rumors being circulated about
the Branch Davidians. Nothing ever came of them. David Koresh, the
leader of the Davidians, learned that the ATF wanted to get complete
information about him in June, 1992. Koresh invited the BATF [the
government’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms] to come out
to the Mount Carmel compound in order to look and see what ever they
wanted. Tragically, the BATF refused to come out.
The siege on the Davidian compound began on February 28, 1993.
Instead of simply knocking on the front door, 100 BATF agents
stormed the compound to arrest David Koresh. Koresh went jogging
quite frequently, and the government could have arrested him during
those times, but they weren’t interested in simply arresting Koresh.
The government wanted a confrontation. Unthreatened BATF and FBI
agents opened fire with automatic weapons at the front door and the
walls, knowing that there were innocent women and children inside.
During this siege, four BATF agents were killed. The four BATF agents,
that died on February 28, had all been bodyguards for Bill Clinton from
the time of the Democratic convention until Bill Clinton became
president. These four BATF agents were the only federal agents to die
in the siege at Waco. Linda Thompson’s videotape entitled Waco, the
Big Lie, shows that those BATF agents were not killed or shot at by
Branch Davidians. The tape shows the agents going into the compound
through an upstairs window. It then shows the other BATF agent, who
is out on the roof, actually shooting in through the window where those
BATF agents had just entered. Those four BATF agents, who were
bodyguards of Bill Clinton, were killed by their own people! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 9:43 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
There are many questions in the Waco tragedy that have never been
answered. Why did Bill Clinton go to such extremes at Waco? There
were problems at the Mount Carmel compound in 1987. There was a
shoot out over the leadership of the Branch Davidians between David
Koresh and his followers and George Roden and his followers. Seven
Davidians, at that time, along with David Koresh, were arrested,
indicted, and tried for attempted murder. According to the prosecutor
in the case, McClennan County District Attorney Vic Feazell:
We had no problems. We treated them like human beings
rather than storm-trooping the place. They were extremely
polite people. After the trial, although we didn’t agree with
everything they believed or said, many of the staff were
pretty sympathetic with them. — Houston Chronicle, March
1st, 1993.
The government’s action was a vulgar display of power, being met with
fear and paranoia on the part of the Davidians. If the federal
government had called and talked to the Davidians, the Davidians
would have given them what ever they wanted.
Koresh had another situation involving Federal authorities. On an April
21st, 1993 television interview, Henry McMahon, who owned a gun
store in Waco, stated that
David Koresh has purchased at least fifty thousand dollars
worth of firearms from me. In July of 1992, BATF officers
came to my store, asking about Koresh and his gun
purchases. I called David Koresh, while the BATF were still
in the store. Koresh told me that if there is a problem, tell
them to come out here. I offered to take the BATF agents out
to the Mount Carmel compound to see the firearms that
Koresh had purchased, but the BATF agents declined.
Koresh had been extremely cooperative in 1987 and then again in
1992. There was obviously some sinister reason why Federal agents,
under the leadership of Bill Clinton, perpetrated such cruelty at Mt.
Carmel. Let us investigate the real reason for the Waco massacre.
If David Koresh was the prime target of the government, why was he
not arrested peacefully so that so many innocent lives would not have
been lost? The claims or lies of the BATF were that Koresh never was
out of the compound where he could be arrested. Paul Fatta, a Branch
Davidian who was out on errands when the raid started, made this
comment in many press releases.
David Koresh, others, and myself, have gone jogging down
the road three miles from the compound many times. Why
wasn’t he arrested then? We were off the property severa |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 9:44 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
times.
Why wasn’t Koresh arrested on one of those jogging outings or when
he was in Waco?
Did the Branch Davidians know they were being attacked by federal
agents? David Thibodeau, a Waco survivor, was interviewed on A
Current Affair, a national television show, May 3rd, 1993. He declared
that one of the members of the Branch Davidians, Wayne Martin, a
Harvard-trained attorney, called 911 shortly after the federal agents
stormed the compound. He was put through to another agency, and
the person said, “Well, hi boys, how y’all doin’ out there?” Wayne
Martin screams into the phone, “We’re getting shot at. We’re getting
killed. We’re getting killed.”
Since all 911 calls are preserved, it seems that it would be easy to
confirm this phone call, but as Current Affair reporter Mary Garafolo
stated, “It has become a controversial recording that the police refuse
to release to the press.” There was absolutely no response to that
emergency 911 call. Why not? Only people working for a power that
hates our liberties and freedoms could do such a thing. Jesuit Bill
Clinton, who took a solemn oath to obey the Constitution, totally
ignored the Constitution in the abomination that occurred at Waco.
It is here that the tremendous power of the [Catholic] church
makes itself felt. It is through this [Jesuit] direction that
statesmen are compelled to act, not for the benefit of the
country to which they belong, but for the benefit of the
Church, which controls them. It is here that matters of the
most secret nature are discussed and decided. — M.F.
Cusack, The Black Pope, Marshall Russell & Co., p. 106.
(emphasis added.)
We should explain here that the name, Black Pope, is the name or title
given to the supreme Jesuit general, who is probably the most
powerful man in the world. He remains totally in the background, and
very few even know about him.
Let us next investigate the charges of physical or sexual abuse at the
Mount Carmel compound. James Tom, an ex-Davidian, was the loudest
critic of the Branch Davidians. He stated that David Koresh spanked his
(Tom’s) daughter for 30 to 40 minutes, and Tom, who was standing
right there, did nothing to stop it. If David Koresh truly spanked his
daughter for 30 to 40 minutes, how could a father be so afraid that he
would not intervene to stop it?
Tom declared that Koresh was the image of Charles Manson. If Koresh
was the image of Manson, why would Tom join in the first place? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 9:45 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
When 21 children were allowed to leave the Mount Carmel Center, the
Houston Post stated “The 21 children were psychologically in good
condition. They were in good condition physically and they were also
very well educated.” In fact, the children, who left Mount Carmel, were
not physically, mentally, morally, or psychologically abused at all.
David Koresh was demonized by those most guilty of the massacre to
be some absolutely crazy monster. Bob Ricks, the man in charge of the
Waco massacre, stated that David Koresh was a classical sociopath.
It was Ricks who had been in charge at Waco. — The (UK)
Observer, April 22, 2001.
Attorney General Janet Reno called him “a dangerous criminal.” Fort
Worth News columnist Bill Thompson called him “a vile mass
murderer,” and Bill Clinton referred to him as “dangerous, irrational,
and probably insane.”
These people practice what V. I. Lenin advised: “Call your enemy what
you are, and always tell the exact opposite of the truth.” David Koresh
was demonized to try to justify their heinous crime.
Another most despicable crime of the Waco murderers was the
spraying of CS gas into the compound at the women and small
children. U.S. Congressman Ron Paul stated that
“CS gas is banned under the Paris Convention on chemical
warfare. The U.S. could not use it in war. It is illegal, but they
would use it against their own citizens.” — The Washington
Times, April 23,1993.
Benjamin Garrett, executive director of Chemical and Biological Arms
Control stated,
CS gas would have most harshly affected the children — The smaller
you are, the sooner you would feel the response. — Ibid.
CS gas is one of the most cruel poisons that the government could
have used against the small children. Pictures from the massacre
showed small children, burned black, with their backs arched backward
in what had to have been a most horrible death.
The people that gave the order for CS gas to be pumped into the Waco
compound had called David Koresh some terrible names. They also
stated they pumped the gas in for the sake of the children. The awful
names applied to Koresh apply to them, and the same people, Bill
Clinton, Janet Reno, and Bob Ricks murdered those children at Waco.
With so many crimes committed at Waco by people in high places, we
turn to the aftermath of the Waco tragedy. Many times an event can
be better understood by the events that transpire after it. Who |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:06 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
benefits? Was any controversial legislation passed that would destroy
Constitutional liberty? Was this pay back for something done in the
past?
Two weeks after the massacre at Mount Carmel compound, John
Chafee, a senator from Rhode Island, called for a new law that would
be a nationwide ban on hand gun ownership. It would prohibit the sale,
possession, importing, and exporting of hand guns. Had Chafee’s
proposal become law, it would have torn a huge gap in the 2nd
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which says, “…the right of the
people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Every gun law
that Congress passes is an infringement against this right.
Who wants to disarm American citizens? No one wants to be the
dictator of a nation with 200 million guns around. When the citizens of
a nation are armed, where their right to own guns is not infringed, the
crime rate is extremely low.
Every man in Switzerland is required to have guns in his home,
including assault rifles. Crime in Switzerland is almost non-existent. In
states and cities in America that allow people to carry guns, the crime
rate is extremely low. During World War Two, Hitler wanted to invade
Switzerland. The Swiss told him that he could send his army across the
boarder, but none of his officers would return. Hitler gave the order to
invade Switzerland several times, but his officers simply would not
obey. Switzerland remained safely neutral all during the war.
Who has hated the Constitution from the very beginning? From the
very inception of this country, the Jesuits have sought to destroy the
Constitution. They called the Constitution a Satanic document.
The great French General Lafayette once said,
It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country — the United States
— are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit
priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and
religious liberty. They have instigated most of the wars in Europe. —
Eric Jon Phelps, Vatican Assassins, Halycon Unified Services, p. 54.
The Jesuits used their man, Bill Clinton, to instigate and carry out the
destruction at Waco. They hoped to then be able to pass the illegal
laws that would effectively abolish the 2nd Amendment to the
Constitution in the aftermath. It is easy to identify the Jesuits and the
Jesuit puppets in the United States Congress, because they are the
ones that continually try to get restrictive gun legislation passed.
There was another reason for Waco that Bill Clinton disclosed April
19th and 20th of 1993. This statement was made in the Rose Garden
and can be found in White House press release documents.
I want to say as I did yesterday, I am very sorry for the loss of life
which occurred at the beginning and at the end of this tragedy in
Waco. I hope very much that others who will be tempted to join cults
and to become involved with people like David Koresh will be deterred
by the horrible scenes they have seen over the last seven weeks. And I
hope very much that the difficult situations which federal agents
confronted there and which they will be doubtless required to confront |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:07 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
in other contexts in the future will be somewhat better handled and
better understood because of what has been learned now.
In his own words, Clinton issued a warning and a threat to anyone who
would dare join a religious group that was a so-called cult. To Clinton
and his agents, a cult is a group that is not part of any mainstream
religious organization.
Every major religious organization has been infiltrated and taken over
by the Jesuits. They want everyone to stay in the mainstream
organizations so that they can more easily be indoctrinated. Anyone
outside the main churches will be more difficult to brainwash.
According to Ex-Jesuit priest, Alberto Rivera, all the mainstream
churches were taken over by 1980. Dr. Rivera explained that when he
was under the extreme oath of the Jesuits, he was told that a secret
sign was to be given to the Jesuits world-wide when the ecumenical
movement had successfully wiped out protestantism, in preparation for
the signing of a concordat between the Vatican and the U.S.
The sign was to be when a President of the U.S. took his oath of office
facing an obelisk. For the first time in U.S. history, the swearing in
ceremonies were moved to the West front of the Capitol, and President
Reagan faced the Washington Monument. This happened January 20,
1981. — Jack Chick, The Godfathers, Alberto Part Three, Chick
Publications, page 26.
Waco was a warning not to join an independent church where the truth
about the papacy and the antichrist would be exposed.
Bill Clinton declared that Waco was a warm up, and confronting
religious groups would happen again! Does this sound like the words of
a manbrac would defend the constitutional rights of U.S. citizens, or
does it sound like a Jesuit who is carrying out the plans of the papacy?
Remember, in the secret Congress at Chieri, it was declared,
Protestantism must therefore be utterly abolished... Catholics shall be
imbued with hatred for all heretics [A heretic is anyone who does not
believe the Catholic religion, anyone who opposes the pope, and
anyone who believes the pope is the anti-christ].… We shall strike
deadly blows at heresy.… They little think that Jesuits have in store for
them the censorship gags and flames and will one day be their
masters. — Hector Macpherson, The Jesuits in History, Ozark Book
Publishers, Appendix I.
Bill Clinton was a Jesuit, determined to carry out the Jesuit plan of
Chieri.
Pope John Paul II has stated it very clearly.
The proselytizing activity of the sects and new religious groups of
America is a grave hindrance to the work of evangelization [what he
means is that there are independent religious groups that are hindering
the papacy’s drive to take over the world]… The success of proselytism |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:08 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
by the sects and new religious groups in America cannot be ignored. It
demands of the Church on the continent a thorough study, to be
carried out in each nation and at the international level… For the
response to the challenge of the sects to be effective, there is a need
for an appropriate coordination of initiatives among dioceses, aimed at
bringing about a more effective cooperation through shared projects
which will produce better results. — Pope John Paul II, The Challenge
of the Sects, Exhortation, Article 73.
All of these new religious groups have one thing in common; they all
believe that the evil anti-christ system of Bible prophecy is the papacy.
Malachi Martin discusses these groups and says they
are destined to undergo a series of severe shocks and
mutations as, willy-nilly, they adapt themselves to the new
globalism emanating from more powerful groups. There is no
way that any one of them will be able to maintain itself in any
vibrancy and progressive strength unless it allows — or
suffers — its provincialism to be enlarged beyond the
confines it traditionally observed.… As groups they will have
to face dire alternatives. Either they will become thoroughly
and realistically globalized... Or, as groups, they will remain
in place, diminish in numbers and influence, and finally lose
their identity as operative parts in a new world order. —
Malachi Martin, The Keys of This Blood, Simon and
Schuster, pp. 291, 292.
In other words; everyone who goes along with the Jesuits plan for the
world will be allowed to live and those who do not will experience
Waco! Waco was a warning that the Jesuits want to return the world to
another Dark Age in which all the world becomes the slaves of the
pope. If anyone does not submit to the papacy, they will be treated like
the people at Mt. Carmel.
Here is one last thought. If you were the president of the United States
or the Attorney General at the time of the Waco massacre, and you did
not want to poison small children with CS gas, would you have the
authority to stop it? Of course you would. All you would have to do is
pick up the phone. The fact that Bill Clinton and Janet Reno did not
stop this atrocity is proof that it was their desire that the massacre
took place.
Chapter 10: Distruction in Oklahoma City |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:10 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
DESTRUCTION IN OKLAHOMA CITY
Explosions demolished the Alfred E. Murrah federal building in
Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995. 168 Americans died as a result,
including a number of little children attending a day-care center housed
in the building. The United States government has declared and
steadfastly maintains that it was a fertilizer bomb, inside a Ryder truck
parked in front of the building that caused the damage. We have seen
in previous chapters that in tragic situations like this, what the
government claims happened is totally unbelievable.
Benton K. Partin, a retired Brigadier General and 31 year veteran of
the United States Air Force, is a premiere expert on explosives. He
served as commander of the Air Force Armament Technology Lab, and
was responsible for munitions development for the armed services. He
is a recognized expert as a major guiding force of our modern,
precision, guided, weapons systems.
General Partin did an extensive analysis of the bombing of the Murrah
Building. In his report, he declares,
It is impossible that the destruction to the building could have
resulted from such a bomb alone.
To cause the damage pattern that occurred to the Murrah
Building, there would have to have been demolition charges
at several supporting column bases, at locations not
accessible from the street, to supplement the truck bomb
damage. Indeed, a careful examination of photographs
showing the collapsed column bases reveals a failure mode
produced by demolition charges and not by a blast from the
truck bomb…
Blast through air is a very inefficient energy coupling
mechanism against heavily reinforced concrete beams and
columns…
By contrast, heavily reinforced concrete structures can be
destroyed effectively through detonation of explosives in
contact with the reinforced concrete beams and columns…
The Murrah Federal Building was not destroyed by one sole
truck bomb. The major factor in its destruction appears to
have been detonation of explosives carefully placed at four |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:20 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
critical junctures on supporting columns within the building.
The only possible reinforced concrete structural failure solely
attributable to the truck bomb was the stripping out of the
ceilings of the first and second floors in the ‘pit’ area behind
columns B4 and By. Even this may have been caused by a
demolition charge at column B3. — Benton K. Partin, Bomb
Damage Analysis Of Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, July
30, 1995, (emphasis supplied).
Thus, we see that it was impossible for the truck bomb to have
destroyed the Murrah Building. Other bombs were strategically placed
at the bottoms of the structural columns to do the damage that was
done. Somebody who had access to the Murrah Building, who knew
where the reinforced structural columns were, who had access to the
building plans, placed the bombs that destroyed the building.
News reporters on the scene shortly after the building collapsed
reported that workers were removing bombs that did not go off from
within the building.
The bombs that did explode did not explode simultaneously. The bomb
blasts were recorded on two seismometers, one at the Omniplex
Museum, 4.34 miles northeast of the Building, and the other at the
University of Oklahoma in Norman, 16.25 miles to the southeast. Both
of these seismometers recorded two separate, closely spaced
explosions of approximately equal intensity.
Also, several highly credible witnesses reported hearing separate
explosions. Shortly after the explosions, the bomb squad defused one
unexploded bomb inside the building, and were working on a second.
There is an emerging pattern here. When President Kennedy was
killed, it was declared that a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, had
committed the crime. As we saw in chapter eight, there is a
tremendous amount of evidence that proves there were several
gunmen. Lee Harvey Oswald took the rap, and many others went free.
When the Murrah Building blew up, it was declared that one man was
primarily responsible, Timothy McVeigh. But Benton Partin, a military
explosives expert, showed that it was impossible for the truck bomb to
have done the damage. Others had access to the building plans and
planted explosives around the columns. They were guiltier than
McVeigh, but they went free. Who were the people really responsible
for the Oklahoma City tragedy?
During a live-feed video interview, an Assistant Fire Chief on the scene
stated that the bomb squad was at the Murrah building at seven clock
that morning, two hours before the bombing took place. What were
they doing there two hours before the bombing? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:22 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
Immediately after the explosions, Mayor Ron Nordick, Dr. Randall
Heather, Governor Frank Keating, and numerous news anchors stated
that the FBI and the ATF had confirmed that high explosive bombs
were taken out of the building. Now, the official story is that it was a
fertilizer bomb. Were the governor, the mayor and the news anchors
lying, or were they just not briefed in time for everyone to get their
stories straight?
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms had offices in
the Murrah Building. On the day the Murrah building was
bombed, none of the ATF agents came to work that morning.
The ATF agents, who had children in the day-care center,
did not drop their children off that day. There were no ATF
agents or their children on the casualty list of the Oklahoma
City bombing. — Freedom Network News, June/July 1996,
pp. 5, 6.
This is amazing. A United States government agency, that had offices
in the building, did not report to work that day or bring their children to
the daycare center. Do you suppose they knew what was going to
happen to the building?
On a radio talk show ten days after the bombing,
[Mark] Boswell interviewed 28 year CIA veteran James Black
and assistant Ron Jackson regarding sworn affidavits now in
their possession, sworn by two Justice Department officials
which state that they were part of a ‘Committee of 10’ who
planned the Oklahoma bombing. — Martin O. de Brook,
Cherith Chronicle, May-July, 1995, page 5.
In light of all the evidence, this is the only story that makes sense. As
in the case of Kennedy’s murder, so it is in the Oklahoma City
bombing. High-level agents of the U.S. government, claiming to love
America and our freedom, were serving another master, carrying out
his purposes. As we will see, there was a distinct purpose for the
Oklahoma City bombing. How sickening that so many lives were lost to
answer the call of the papacy!
Like JFK, Waco, and the World Trade Center, the Oklahoma City
bombing leaves a great many questions that demand answers, but
none have been given. Consider some of these questions.
1. Why was U.S. Judge Wayne Alley, whose office was located in the
Federal building, warned several weeks in advance in a Justice
Department memo to be prepared for an unnamed terrorist act
directed against the federal building?
2. Why did the director of the University of Oklahoma’s geological
survey, Dr. Charles Mankin, tell the media that according to two |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:34 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
different seismographic records, there were two blasts?
3. Why has the information of Benton K. Partin not come to the light of
day?
4. Why did the Clinton administration blame right wing radio talk
shows for the incident, and demand the most draconian police state
legislation ever proposed in the United States so quickly after the
blasts? This proposed legislation was so well organized that it was
obvious it had been prepared long before the destruction of the
building.
5. Why was a blizzard of domestic terrorism bills rushed into Congress
in a matter of days after the bombing? These laws include the banning
of virtually all privately owned firearms. Remember Waco?
There were liberty-restricting measures in Congress just prior to the
Oklahoma City bombing that were stalled. Right after the bombing they
were immediately passed.
The Omnibus Counter Terrorism Act of 1995 was on a slow
track in Congress and the subject of a lively debate as to
whether it would violate some fundamental civil liberties,
including the right to confront one’s accuser.
Now, after the Oklahoma City bombing, there are few surer
legislative bets in Washington. Democrats and Republicans
issued news releases Thursday calling for the bill’s quick
passage. — Terror in the Heartland: Terrorism Bill Moves
Very Fast, Orlando Sentinel, April 21st, 1995 (emphasis
supplied).
President Clinton prodded Congress on Friday to move
swiftly on his anti-terrorism legislation and avoid political
‘endless quibbling’ over details. ‘We must not doddle or
delay. Congress must act, and act promptly.’ His 1.25 billion
anti-terrorism package would expand law enforcement’s
investigative and enforcement powers and toughen penalties
for certain crimes. Republicans have reacted favorably to the
proposals Clinton put forward on Wednesday, one week
after the Oklahoma City bombing. — Clinton Urges Swift
Action on Anti-terrorism Legislation, Orlando Sentinel, April
29th, 1995.
The purpose of the Oklahoma City bombing was to get Congress to
pass the anti-terrorism bill without debate. If a debate had taken place,
the issues of constitutional liberties and the creation of a police state
would have been raised. The Jesuits in Congress prefer that the police |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:35 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
state be implemented without the public noticing by creating a climate
of national hysteria using a staged terrorist attack. The bill sailed
through with no debate or discussion.
One of the laws considered for passage after the Oklahoma City
bombing was the gross destruction of the First Amendment advocated
in Charles Schumer’s bill, HR 2580. In this bill, a five-year prison
sentence would be given for publicly engaging in unseemly speculation
and publishing or transmitting by wire or electronic means baseless
conspiracy theories regarding the federal government of the United
States.
We have seen that in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing,
several liberty-restricting laws were passed by Congress very quickly.
The bombing created a climate of fear in America. In this setting, laws
passed with few dissenting voices. In the midst of the hysteria, the
unconstitutional laws could be quickly passed. The people want comfort
and security, and they did not object to the passing of these laws.
These laws seriously eroded the constitutional liberties that have been
the cornerstone of American prosperity for over 200 years. It is
amazing how quickly a normally slow and cumbersome Congress can
act when the agenda is all set.
A conditioning program got well under way after the Oklahoma City
bombing. How many freedoms would Americans give away in order to
feel safe? Do we not see that the powers running our government want
to destroy the Constitution?
People do not realize that governmental power is extremely dangerous.
Down through history, peoples’ worst enemy has been their own
government. When constitutional freedoms are gone, there is nothing
to restrict government from doing anything it wants, and deadly
governmental persecution is the result.
For some time to come Americans will be struggling with
questions that were supposed to draw no closer than
Jerusalem or Belfast or, at worst, Manhattan. Just how much
can they do to make life safer from terrorist attacks? And to
accomplish that, how much should they be willing to give up
in convenience, money, and the freedoms they take for
granted? — Time Magazine, May 1, 1995, page 68,
(emphasis supplied).
Americans just don’t realize that as they give up their freedoms they
are not increasing their security, but decreasing it. They are putting
themselves at high risk for governmental persecution. Already the
government confiscates many hundreds of thousands of dollars worth
of personal property each year without a trial. Already human life is not
considered sacred anymore. Remember Waco? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:36 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
America would not be such a prominent terrorist target if the
government did not make itself so obnoxious to nearly every country in
the world. One hundred years ago, the people of the world loved
Americans and wanted Americans to visit their countries. That certainly
is not the case anymore.
Concrete and steel can help. But countering terrorism at
home raises the hard question: how much should we spend
in cash — and civil liberties? — Newsweek, May 1, 1995,
page 56, (emphasis added).
In this article, Brent Scowcroft, former national security adviser said,
“It’s so easy to do; it takes so few people; the materials are so readily
available. But to counter it is so expensive in dollars and, more
importantly, in civil liberties.”
Is it clear that terror was used, and is still being used, to condition
Americans to give up their constitutional liberties? It was used
successfully at Waco, Oklahoma City, and the World Trade Center.
Doesn’t it make you wonder what will be next?
Who is behind the scenes leading “American” politicians to destroy civil
liberty in America? Who has despised and hated our liberties for over
200 years? Who hates liberty so much that they eliminate people who
stand in their way like pawns in a chess game?
One of the popes stated,
The absurd and erroneous doctrines or ravings in defense of
liberty of conscience are a most pestilential error — a pest,
of all others, most to be dreaded in a state. — Pope Pius IX,
Encyclical Letter, August 15th, 1854.
Liberty of conscience is thoroughly detested by the papacy. Liberty of
conscience is guaranteed ONLY in the First Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States, the Bill of Rights.
In 1864, in his encyclical letter, Pius IX anathematized “those who
assert liberty of conscience and of religious worship.” (Pope Pius IX,
Encyclical Letter, December 8, 1864.) He is saying that anybody who
believes that a person is entitled to freedom to worship God according
to the dictates of their own conscience, should be anathematized. To
anathematize somebody is too confine them to hell; to consider them
to be a heretic worthy of damnation. In Pius’ mind, the Constitution
should burn in hell and anyone who loves it should be burned too.
Liberty of conscience is proclaimed by the United States a
most sacred principle, which every citizen must uphold....
But liberty of conscience is declared by all the popes and
councils of Rome, a most godless, unholy, and diabolical
thing, which every good Catholic must abhor and destroy at |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:37 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
any cost. — Charles Chiniquy, Fifty Years in the Church of
Rome, Chick Publications, page 284.
British Broadcasting journalist Avro Manhattan reported:
The Vatican condemned the Declaration of Independence as
‘wickedness’… and called the Constitution of the United
States ‘a Satanic document.’ — Avro Manhattan, The Dollar
and the Vatican, Ozark Book Publishers, page 26.
In the preface to Samuel B. Morse’s great book, it is written,
The author undertakes to show that a conspiracy against the
liberties of this Republic is now in full action, under the
direction of the wily Prince Metternich of Austria, who
knowing the impossibility of obliterating this troublesome
example of a great and free nation by force of arms, is
attempting to accomplish his object through the agency of an
army of Jesuits. — Samuel B. Morse, Foreign Conspiracy
Against the United States, Crocker and Brewster, volume 1,
p. 4, preface. (emphasis supplied)
Samuel B. Morse and the man who wrote the preface to his great work
understood that the Jesuits and the Holy Alliance were committed to
destroying the freedoms of this great Republic of the United States of
America.
A former priest has written,
We will rule the United States, and lay them at the feet of the
Vicar of Jesus Christ [the pope], that he may put an end to
their Godless system of education, and impious laws of
liberty of conscience which are an insult to God and man. —
Charles Chiniquy, Fifty years in the Church of Rome, Chick
Publications, p. 282, (emphasis supplied).
William Jefferson Clinton, who attended Georgetown University, which
is the Jesuit college in Washington, D.C. pushed Congress to pass the
anti-terrorism bill that was to be a direct assault on the liberties that
we enjoy as Americans. The Oklahoma City bombing was planned,
carried out, and fully known by the Jesuits, the government of the
United States, and by the president. The secret players behind them
all, who have wanted to destroy the liberties of this great Republic for
the last 200 plus years are the Jesuits of the Roman Catholic Church.
They have wanted to put an end to the laws that guarantee our
liberties as United States citizens. In order to bring that about, they
carried out the greatest terrorist bombing on U.S. soil, and in U.S.
history before the World Trade Center, when they did it again.
More attacks will come. Freedoms will be attacked again and liberty will |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:38 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
be taken away. The Jesuits will continue to use many so-called
“American” politicians, who are an integral part of the conspiracy of the
papacy to totally demolish the Constitution and this great Republic.
They are conditioning America and preparing the people for the
inevitable takeover.
Chapter 11: World Trade Center Attack |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:39 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
WORLD TRADE CENTER ATTACK
The story of the destruction of the World Trade Center on September
11, 2001, does not begin on that day. It began shortly after World War
One. After the war, Jesuit Edward Mandell House and Woodrow Wilson
created the League of Nations. When U.S. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge
Sr. kept America out of the League. the Jesuits were furious. This must
never happen again. So, in 1921, under the influence of House, an
organization was formed in the United States called the Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR).
This organization attracted people of power, wealth, and influence. It
enlisted politicians, people from the media, and big businessmen. The
ultimate goal of the CFR was to break down all national boundaries and
to establish a one-world system of government. Rear Admiral Chester
Ward, a member of the CFR for 16 years, stated:
The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one
objective in common — they want to bring about the
surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of
the United States. — Barry Goldwater, With No Apologies,
William Morrow and Company, page 278.
The Jesuits have always hated America and everything this country
stands for, and they work tirelessly to destroy this country.
The great objective of the CFR was the destruction of American
sovereignty and constitutional liberties. To accomplish this, both the
Republican and Democratic parties were to be controlled, and a central
bank was to be created, the Federal Reserve Bank.
When a new President comes on board, there is a great
turnover in personnel, but no change in policy. Example:
During the Nixon [a Republican] years Henry Kissinger, CFR
member and Nelson Rockefeller’s protégé, was in charge of
foreign policy. When Jimmy Carter [a Democrat] was
elected, Kissinger was replaced by Zbigniew Brzezinski,
CFR member and David Rockefeller’s protégé. — Ibid. page
279.
The Jesuits have been extremely successful in carrying out the
purposes of the papacy’s malignant Congress at Vienna, Verona, and |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 10:40 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
Chieri. The Jesuits, with the aid of their CFR, control the highest of
echelons in the political, judicial, business, banking, media, and
religious arenas in the United States. Their plans are right on schedule.
When they failed to get America into the League of Nations after World
War One, they created the CFR, which began immediately to use the
schools, colleges, and the media to condition Americans to accept the
Jesuits’ second attempt to create a world government after World War
Two. America was so conditioned by then that they accepted the
United Nations, and joined.
The Jesuits’ CFR is extremely dangerous to the continued existence of
the American Republic. A few patriots like Chester Ward and President
Kennedy rejected their malicious plans and fought their agenda.
Kennedy paid for his disobedience to the Jesuits with his life. Some of
the past CFR members who were either Jesuits or Jesuit pawns to do
their bidding are Dwight D. Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Adlai
Stevenson, Hubert Humphrey, and George McGovern. Current
members of the Jesuit CFR include Federal Reserve Bank chairman
Alan Greenspan, Congressmen Newt Gingrich and Richard Gephardt,
both presidents George Herbert Walker Bush and his son, George
Walker Bush, Vice president Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Colin
Powell, Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O’Connor, Joseph
Lieberman, and John Chafee. (Chafee was the man who introduced gun
laws after Waco, remember?) Bill Clinton, of course, is a member of
the CFR.
Major companies under Jesuit/CFR control include the Ford Motor
Company, Boeing Corporation, Pepsi-Cola, Heinz Co., Lockheed-Martin,
Time Warner, and Chevron. In the media, NBC, CBS, N.Y. Times,
Washington Post, Newsweek, and Time, are just a few media outfits
dominated by the Jesuits. All these organizations promote the Jesuits’
plan for destroying America. Some top media people who promote the
Jesuit Plan include Tom Brokaw, Barbara Walters, David Brinkley, John
Chancellor, Katharine Graham, and Ted Koppel, all CFR members.
John Swinton, Chief of Staff for the New York Times, who is considered
to be the dean of his profession, made a most bold confession. In
1953, at a New York Press Club, he declared,
There is no such thing, at this date of the world’s history, in
America, as an independent press. You know it, and I know
it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest
opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would
never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my
honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others
of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of
you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions
would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I
allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my
newspaper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 11:13 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
be gone. The business of the journalists is to destroy the
truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of
mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily
bread. You know it, and I know it and what folly is this
toasting an independent press? We are the tools and
vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping
jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our
possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men.
We are intellectual prostitutes. — Multiple contributors, A U.
S. Police Action: Operation Vampire Killer, The American
Citizens and Laumen Association, pp. 18,19, (emphasis
supplied).
Swinton explained so well that the media are under the control of the
rich. We have previously shown that the richest people in America are
either Jesuits or are under their control. The Jesuits are telling us, via
the newspapers, magazines, and every other mass-media
communication outlet, exactly what they want us to believe. One of
their biggest efforts is to make the people of the world believe that the
pope is the great man of peace, when, in reality, the pope and his
Jesuits are working constantly to establish the pope as the supreme
dictator of the world as he was in the Dark Ages. When they
accomplish this, the horrible persecution by the papacy in the Dark
Ages will return. Americans are being beguiled to give up their
constitutional civil liberties and their country. The tragedies we are
witnessing today are blamed on terrorists, but these terrorist
organizations have been infiltrated and controlled by the Jesuits. This
very effectively covers up the footprints of the papacy in these
tragedies.
Let us now turn to the destruction of the World Trade Center on
September 11, 2001. Along with the total destruction of the World
Trade Center, thousands of innocent people died. The negative impact
on America and its economy has been devastating. Multiple businesses
have been ruined by the fallout.
In order to defend against future attacks like this, the United States
Government made a feeble attempt to find the perpetrators of this
atrocity in Afghanistan. But their major thrust in this war against
terrorism has been to take away what is left of the rights and liberties
of American citizens. For some unexplained reason, if the civil rights of
American citizens are taken away, there isn’t supposed to be any more
terrorism. This onslaught against Americans has come from the White
House, the Justice Department, Congress, and the news media. The
people in government take a solemn oath to defend and obey the
Constitution of the United States, but their oath has been shown to be
a gigantic lie. They totally and completely ignore the constitution as
they pass their destructive legislation and executive orders.
From the beginning of his presidency, George Bush has been
promoting the Jesuit agenda. Two months into his presidency, |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 11:16 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
surrounded by cardinals of Rome, the President dedicated a cultural
center in Washington, D.C. to the greatest enemy this Republic has
ever had — the pope of Rome. Bush declared that he is going to
enforce the words and teachings of the pope here in America.
The best way to honor Pope John Paul II, truly one of the
great men, is to take his teachings seriously, to listen to his
words and put his words and his teachings into action here
in America! — Patricia Zapoa, Catholic News Service, March
24, 2001.
John Paul’s words and teachings represent the plan to destroy
Protestantism, to destroy the Constitution of the United States, and to
restore his throne as universal monarch. By his own words, we see that
George Bush is carrying out the plan of the Jesuits to destroy America.
In 1960, John Kennedy went from Washington to Texas to
assure Protestant preachers that he would not obey the
pope. In 2001, George Bush came from Texas up to
Washington to assure a group of Catholic bishops that he
would obey the pope. — Washington Times, April 16, 2001.
Who is calling the shots in Washington, D.C.? If we think it is the
President of the U.S., we are deceiving ourselves.
The pope is the ruler of the world. All the emperors, all the
kings, all the princes, all the presidents of the world are as
these altar boys of mine. — Priest D. S. Phelan, Western
Watchman, June 27, 1912
Should we be surprised if Bush and his fellow altar boys are pushing
the Jesuit program? Should we be surprised to see Bush issuing
executive orders that destroy constitutional liberties? Should we be
surprised to see Congress passing laws that destroy constitutional
liberties?
This is alarming information. The highest echelons in the United States
Government, the highest echelons in business and finance, and the
highest echelons in the schools, colleges, and media, are all claiming to
be Americans. They are all claiming to be working for the betterment of
America. They are all claiming to be working for the preservation of the
Constitution. In fact, they are under the control of the Jesuits, the
most implacable enemies of this Republic. With a patriotic and religious
facade, they are secretly leading America to ruin. Deception is being
practiced by the most sinister of foes, the Jesuits of Rome.
It is here that the tremendous power of the church makes
itself felt. It is through this direction [Jesuits] that statesmen
are compelled to act, not for the benefit of the country to
which they belong, but for the benefit of the Church, which |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 11:17 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
controls them. — M. F. Cusack, The Black Pope, Marshall,
Russell, and Co., p. 106.
What has happened in the aftermath of the World Trade Center
destruction? The day after the center was destroyed the Orlando
Sentinel writes,
Experts, however, say there is much work to be done. And it
will involve much more spending and planning, hardening of
key facilities and, perhaps, higher taxes and forfeiture of
some personal freedoms. — Tighter Security Means Less
Freedom, Orlando Sentinel, Wednesday, September 12th,
(emphasis supplied).
As the United States faces a new war against uncertain and
hidden enemies, the temptation to sacrifice our freedom in
the hopes of protecting ourselves from harm is powerful.
The danger is that we will end up neither safe nor free.
The constitutional protections of speech and privacy that
Americans value so highly reflect a balance between
individual liberty and state security. Just how those lines are
drawn, history teaches, is directly affected by the perceived
threats to our country’s security….
We’re faced with real threats to national security. The
challenge is to meet those threats without endangering our
constitutional character or undermining the freedom and
liberty that are the source of our power. — USA Today,
Thursday, Sept. 13, 2001 (emphasis supplied).
Freedom or safety? Anti terrorism measures may mean
forfeiture of some personal freedoms. — Orlando Sentinel,
Wednesday, September 12th, (emphasis supplied).
In the reader forum of the Orlando Sentinel, Sept. 12th, the question
was raised, “What personal freedoms would you give up to fight
terrorism?” One person, the next day, wrote in and said, “I have no
problem with having to give up something for the greater good of
myself and my brothers and sisters.” This person does not realize that
as the government usurps more and more power; liberty, freedom,
and safety decrease in direct proportion. This person does not realize
that when the government has all the power, no one is safe, and
bloody persecution is the result. Remember Waco?
The main purpose of the World Trade Center tragedy was to make
American citizens willing to give up their freedoms. The World Trade
Center attack was necessary because the bombing in Oklahoma did not
panic the American people enough to get more of the desired so-called |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 11:18 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
‘antiterrorism laws’ passed.
Virginia Sloan realized that if the terrorists wanted to attack
American freedoms they had got some where…
Civil libertarians expect renewed calls for a national
identification card….
And that means storing all the face data collected,
something civil libertarians fear will allow the government to
track any individual. If systems were set up all over a city,
you could be ‘checkpointed’ by camera when you board a
train, stop at a cash machine and enter a store, or the place
where you work. — Time Magazine, Sept. 24, 2001.
One of the scary things about face recognition is that it is notoriously
unreliable. You might be identified as a terrorist because the machine
made a mistake.
Some of the staunchest defenders of individual rights, most
notably the American Civil Liberties Union, so far have been
silent on the issue. The organization forbade its officials from
publicly speculating last week on possible fallout from
Tuesday’s tragedy. The ACLU instead issued a brief
statement urging ‘our leaders to continue to uphold the
principles of liberty the nation holds dear as they pursue
those responsible for this devastating attack on American
soil.’
Privately, libertarians are worried the stampede for added
security will trample cherished freedoms. They point out
some of the proposals making the rounds already were
considered and rejected by the government in the wake of
the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing….
An April 1995 Los Angeles Times poll immediately after the
bombing found 49 percent of those surveyed thought it
would be ‘necessary for the average person to give up some
civil liberties.’ 43 percent disagreed. A follow-up poll…11
months later found only 30 percent still thought civil liberties
would have to be sacrificed and 65 percent said it was
unnecessary. — Orlando Sentinel, September 13, 2001.
There has been an onslaught of media articles and statements
suggesting the giving up of certain civil liberties just as the Jesuit
agenda requires. On October 26, 2001, George Bush signed the
misnamed USA Patriot Act of 2001, which was proposed five days after
the tragedy. Just six weeks after the World Trade Center was
destroyed, this bill was passed. This is truly amazing. It is virtually
impossible for a bill to be conceived, written, debated, and passed this
quickly. You see, they already had the bill written before the tragedy |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 11:20 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
occurred.
The bill enhances the ability of federal authorities to tap
phones, share intelligence information, track Internet usage,
e-mails and cell phones and protect U.S. borders. — Bush
Signs Sweeping New Laws to Combat Terrorism, Reuters
News Service, October 26, 2001.
Laura Murphy of the American Civil Liberties Union stated in that
article, “We cannot as a nation allow very legitimate public anxiety to
immunize the administration and Congress from their obligation to
protect the Bill of Rights and the fundamental values that document
embodies.” In the name of fighting terrorism, the government is taking
away Constitutional liberties and freedoms just as fast as they can.
This will lead to terrible persecution in the United States, which will be
much worse than the physical tragedies themselves.
Lawmakers upset with some of the administrations antiterrorism
actions will question Attorney General John
Ashcroft on the matter.
[Certain Congressmen] say the administration’s actions have
gone too far in infringing on civil liberties. — USA Today,
November 26, 2001, (emphasis supplied).
In the same paper, on the same day, there’s a cartoon of two children,
decorating a Christmas tree. One sings, “He sees you when you are
sleeping, He knows when you are awake, He knows if you have been
bad or good….” The other child says, “Enough about Attorney General
Ashcroft already!”
In America, in the last eight years, there have been three terrible
tragedies: Waco, Oklahoma City, and the World Trade Center. In every
case, the government’s solution to the problems has been greatly
increased government power and the loss of Constitutional liberties
and freedoms. In this short time period of eight years, we have seen a
very serious despoiling of the Constitution, the greatest document ever
created by men. An insidious war is raging against Constitutional
liberty in America. In the aftermath of the World Trade Center
destruction, this certainly has been the focal point of politicians and
media. Claiming to be loyal Americans, agents of the Jesuits in
Congress and the media have been carrying out the their plan to
destroy America with almost no opposition.
Remember, the Jesuits are totally antagonistic to the American
Constitution and everything it stands for. Charles Chiniquy says,
Long before I was ordained a priest, I knew that my church
was the most implacable enemy of this republic. My
professors… had been unanimous in telling me that the |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 11:21 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
principles and laws of the Church of Rome were absolutely
antagonistic to the principles which are the foundations
stones of the Constitution of the United States of America. —
Charles Chiniquy, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, Chick
Publications, p. 283.
Watch carefully as Chiniquy compares the distinctions between the two.
1st. The most sacred principle of the United States
Constitution is the equality of every citizen before the law.
But the fundamental principle of the Church of Rome is the
denial of that equality.
2nd. Liberty of conscience is proclaimed by the United
States, a most sacred principle which every citizen must
uphold, even at the price of his blood. But liberty of
conscience is declared by all the popes and councils of
Rome, a most godless, unholy, and diabolical thing, which
every good Catholic must abhor and destroy at any cost.
3rd. The American Constitution assures the absolute
independence of the civil from the ecclesiastical or church
power; but the Church of Rome declares that such
independence is an impiety and revolt against God.
4th. The American Constitution leaves every man free to
serve God according to the dictates of his conscience; but
the Church of Rome declares that no man has ever had
such a right, and that the pope alone can know and say what
man must believe and do.
5th. The Constitution of the United States denies the right for
anybody to punish any other for differing from him in religion;
but the Church of Rome says that she has the right to punish
with the confiscation of their goods, or the penalty of death,
those who differ in faith from the pope.
6th. The United States have established schools all over
their immense territories, where they invite the peoples to
send their children, that they may cultivate their intelligence
and become good and useful citizens. But the Church of
Rome has publicly cursed all those schools, and forbidden
their children to attend them, under pain of excommunication
in this world and damnation in the next.
7th. The Constitution of the United States is based on the
principle that the people are the primary source of all civil
power. But hundreds of times, the Church of Rome has
proclaimed that this principle is impious and heretical. She
says that all government must rest upon the foundation of
the Catholic faith; with the pope alone as the legitimate and
infallible source and interpreter of the law. — Ibid. p. 284. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 11:23 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
We saw that the President of the United States declared in the
Washington Times that he is going to obey the pope. If so, he must
destroy the Constitution. In the aftermath of the destruction of the
World Trade Center, Bush has apparently been following the pope’s
agenda to the letter.
Nothing is plainer than that, if the principles of the church of
Rome prevail here, our Constitution would fall. The two
cannot exist together. They are in open and direct
antagonism with the fundamental theory of our government
and of all popular government everywhere. — Richard
Thompson, The Papacy and the Civil Power, quoted in Fifty
Years in the Church of Rome, p. 285,
If Catholics ever gain a sufficient numerical majority in this
country, religious freedom is at an end. — The Shepherd of
the Valley, official journal of the Bishop of St. Louis,
November 23rd, 1851.
The destruction of the World Trade Center and the destruction of the
Murrah building in Oklahoma City were planned events for the specific
purpose of creating terror in America so that Americans, in fear, would
give away their Constitutional liberties and freedoms. The Jesuits’ plan
is working extremely well. With politicians, schools and colleges, the
media, and big corporations in their hands, America is being rapidly
defeated by the enemy within.
As American troops prepared to do battle with an extreme Moslem
faction in Afghanistan, USA Today quoted the President as saying, “his
administration is readying a crusade against terrorism.” (USA Today,
September 17, 2001.)
A crusade? Crusades were Catholic holy wars fought during the Dark
Ages against Moslem hordes who refused to relinquish Jerusalem to the
pope. What does George Bush mean by a crusade? Alberto Rivera, an
ex-Jesuit priest, in his crusader series, has made it clear that the
Vatican created Islam to destroy Christians and Jews, protect Roman
Catholics, and to capture Jerusalem for the pope. For the first few
hundred years of their existence, Islam did just that. When it came
time for the powerful generals of the Islamic armies to surrender
Jerusalem to the pope, they, realizing their power, refused to give it
up. Thus, the papacy created the Crusades to drive the Islamic forces
out of Jerusalem, and establish the throne of the pope in Jerusalem.
Why a crusade now? Why are America and extremist Islamic factions
fighting? There are three things the Jesuits wish to accomplish from
this situation. As we have seen, the Constitution has been a thorn in
their side for hundreds of years; they want it destroyed completely. By
continuing to create terror in America, the Jesuits will one day get their
ultimate goal. They also want to pay back the Islamic extremists for |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 322000
11/5/2007 11:25 AM | | Re: TPTB Exposed Bigtime, you want the facts all in one place, READ this | Quote |
disobeying them when they didn’t give the pope Jerusalem when he
wanted it. Finally, war will continue in the Middle East until the weary
multitudes of the world cry out for a peaceful solution to the conflict.
When that time arrives, guess who will be considered the only
peacemaker whose presence in Jerusalem would bring the long coveted
peace? Placing the pope as leader in that troubled region will appear to
be the only answer because the controlled press/media will have
conditioned everyone to the idea. So, the pope will reign in Jerusalem;
mission accomplished.
Let us consider Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden was aided by America
during the Afghan-Soviet conflict in the 1980s and was fighting with
America during the Balkan conflict in the late 1990s. Overwhelming
information reveals bin Laden’s business ties to the Bush family, and
he has had contact with the CIA as late as July, 2000. Osama bin
Laden is a plant just like Lee Harvey Oswald and Timothy McVeigh
were plants. He is being used as the patsy to keep the blame away
from where it really belongs — the Jesuits of the papacy.
Milt Bearden, an ex-CIA Afghanistan operations director and bin
Laden’s intelligence advisor, was interviewed by Dan Rather on
September 12, 2001. Rather wanted Bearden to state that bin Laden
was responsible for the World Trade Center disaster. Bearden stated,
“If they didn’t have an Osama bin Laden, they would invent one.”
Recently, Rick Wiles, speaker for the American Freedom News,
interviewed Dr. Koryagina, the economic advisor to Vladimir Putin,
leader of Russia. In the interview, she discussed secret societies,
criminal and religious organizations that are controlling the world. She
also declared that there is a shadow government seeking to bring down
the United States and bring in world government. She warned in
Moscow, in July of 2001, that the United States would be attacked. She
said that when the American people wake up to what is happening to
them, and who did it, they will be in a state of shock. “Everybody
knows about organized crime and the Mafia. Also people have known
for a long time about secret societies and so forth. During my research,
I started to notice that those structures can be put together and can be
joined. And I realized that right now, we have a criminal monster, a
hybrid of organized crime, Mafia and secret societies that have merged
together.” (aired December 6, 2001)
Will we listen to the words of this renowned Russian economist? Secret
societies are bringing all these agencies together to create a one world
government. When America figures it out, they will be in shock. Dr.
Koryagina said everything but naming the secret society that is calling
the shots, and who masterminded the World Trade Center destruction.
The Jesuits of Rome. |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 | |
|
