| Users Online Now: 2,228 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 879,681 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,164,066 | Threads Today: 285 | Posts Today: 4,401 |
| 09:45 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,228 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 879,681 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,164,066 | Threads Today: 285 | Posts Today: 4,401 |
| 09:45 AM | ||
Financial Tsunami: Worldwide Stock Markets to Crash Monday, 21st MAR. | |
| Hacko User ID: 1300733  Germany03/17/2011 09:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why don't u quote the next sentence in the wikipedia article: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1300733"The latency period for solid cancers caused by excess radiation exposure is 10 or more years; thus at the time of the WHO report being undertaken, the rates of solid cancer deaths were no greater than the general population." And now we have these parties who claim there were 100's of thousands of chernobyl related cancer deaths. And where is their proof for that thesis? I seems in theri desparation all they come up with is "from 1900 to 2000 cancer grew by 40% in Belarus." I ask you: How weak is that? Dude, i can't believe you are this ignorant. Really. Thats why i believe you must be stupid. According to your argument, the statistical proven raise in leukamia and breast cancer within 5 kilometers around nuclear power plants IN GERMANY does not exist. Or it is not related to the radiation. Then what causes it? Nibiru? UFOs? Maybe the rotation of the earth? CMEs? Your farts maybe? But its ok, people tend to refuse to believe things they find scary. You must be a "Green" guy or something similar ridiculous. What have these "proven statistics" in Germany to do with Chernobyl? Can't you refer to my arguments above, that you have to come up with something totally different? |
FreedomFox (OP) User ID: 1293049  United Kingdom03/17/2011 09:11 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Hacko User ID: 1300733 Germany03/17/2011 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Interesting back and forth here, hope things don't slip into name-calling. Ya know, I think OP has some good points, and what's more, we'll be finding out pretty soon about today's markets. Quoting: MrThistle9 1022423I would say, however, that regardless of what happened in the aftermath of Chernobyl, it's the market's PERCEPTION of what might happen in the present situation that will prove decisive, not how many kids are scheduled for leukemia. Also, Chernobyl was a bolt out of the blue, and the Soviet's bungled response, largely due to their paranoid need for secrecy and their cumbersome command and decision-making structure, made things a lot worse. They didn't even admit there was a meltdown for the first few days, as I remember. Anyway, concerning the impact on the international casino. My opinion is, that the Japan incident has no lasting effect. They can "print" this away pritty easily. I mean it's all about confidence, in the USD ponzi scheme, in the FED-gangsters and so on. What really could brake the system is a massive worldwide bank run. The present Japan incident has not the potential to enforce that. Even Lehman had more potential, but from my perspective Lehman was planned before and it got just really critical when Paulson begged in US Congress for the bailout and later Congressman even got blackmailed to vote for the bailout. Interestingly there is a correlation between important bailout decisions in Congress and an immediate steep fall in the DJIA. I think someone at zerohegde found the correlation. |
