Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 3,008 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,286,937
Pageviews Today: 2,021,152Threads Today: 609Posts Today: 13,149
05:01 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

OBAMA TO CUT U.S. NUCLEAR ARSENAL

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1310849
United States
03/23/2011 04:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
OBAMA TO CUT U.S. NUCLEAR ARSENAL
The anointed one is working in earnest to reduce the number of nuclear bombs and stuff because he wants a nuclear weapons-free world.

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration has begun examining whether it can make cuts to its nuclear weapons stockpiles that go beyond those outlined in a recent treaty with Russia.

The classified review is not expected to be completed until late this year, but some Republicans already are worried that it will go too far. On Tuesday, 41 Republican senators warned Obama in a letter not to make major changes in nuclear policy without consulting Congress.

Arms control advocates say the United States is mired in Cold War-era thinking about nuclear deterrence and are pressing the administration to use the review to rethink U.S. nuclear requirements. They say the decisions will be a test of President Barack Obama's commitment nearly two years ago to put the world on a path toward eliminating nuclear weapons.

Obama ordered the nuclear review early last year with an aim of shrinking the nuclear arsenal, but the work, led by the Defense Department, began recently, according to a department spokeswoman, Lt. Col. April Cunningham.

The review will look at issues such as what targets the U.S. would have to hit with nuclear weapons in a worst-case scenario and what kind of weapons it would need to hit them. Rethinking the requirements could open the way to cuts.

In the letter to Obama, Republicans warned against any big reductions from those outlined in the New START treaty, ratified by the Senate and the Russian Duma in recent months. The treaty limits each side to 1,550 deployed warheads — a level military officials have said meets the need of the current directives.

Sharp reductions in nuclear forces "would have important and as yet unknown consequences for nuclear stability," the letter said.

The letter was circulated by Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., a leading opponent of the New START treaty when it was considered in the Senate. It makes clear that significant changes in nuclear policy without consulting Congress could affect consideration of a new treaty with Russia. The 41 lawmakers who signed it include a number who supported New START and represent sufficient numbers to block any treaty. [link to www.foxnews.com]