ALERT!!! FUKUSHIMA FAKE PHOTOS!! THEY ARE HIDING MUCH MORE THAN RADIATION LEVELS

Unknown.. however there is a post early on in the thread that shows the start of the quakes in the day before and times them with possible reactor explosions..

My Japanese neighbors here in the US, who have not been able to contact their family from the north of Japan, don't seem to think this is a hoax.

March 2nd, 4th and 9th !

Is there any other explanation for the spike on those dates before the earthquake?

none that i know of, but pretty much all of the charts that were tracking at that time show some kind of spike days before the quake

What does the neighbors not being able to contact their family have to do with Fukushima I?

Might it have something to do with the tsunami, and displaced and missing persons instead?

I'm still on page 5, but I've been thinking the above for a long time now. The best minds in the world could not have stopped this? They couldn't have imagined the worst case and taken action early on??

Yes, I know Japan supposedly denied help at first. It still makes no sense. These incompetence and helpless acts are getting old.

Kinda missed the maximum water as noted on the chart at the link.

STUXNET IS OUT OF CONTROL....COMING TO A THEATER NEAR YOU SOON!

Yeah I didn't think much about this, but I recall having a sense of it being BS that the generators washed out to sea. It sounded silly to me, on some level.

NOW YOU ARE GETTING IT!

Gotta love people who called Govt. Controlled News and try to expose a conspiracy!! Now that is NEWS!!!

I don't think we've been looking at photos of Fukushima Dai-ichi. In the Wiki photo, there are 3 fully visible towers and one that's set off and behind another...making four towers. BUT...what no one has mentioned is that in the Wiki photos, the towers for Fukushima Dai-ichi are painted with an INTERNATIONAL WARNING color of reddish orange and white. This nuclear plant is in or near a flight path into an airport of some sort, and the towers are painted because they are generally of a higher elevation than the surrounding land and nobody would want a plane to hit them. So I think it's fair to say that Fukushima Dai-ichi (meaning plant 1) is a flat-lander...if its towers really were reddish orange and white as shown in the photo:
[link to en.wikipedia.org]


So far, none of the after-tsunami photos of the exploded reactors show reddish/orange and white towers. Fukushima Daini (2) shows a WHITE tower in Wiki.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

That would suggest that either the plant is not near or in any flight path into an airport, OR it means that there's something BEHIND the plant that is at a higher elevation and would thus be the place for warning strobes, etc. The towers would not need the caution paint job.

Onagawa nuclear power station has WHITE towers.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
It also has a high hill behind it (in the Wiki photo) so the caution paint job wouldn't be needed.


All I can ask is...show me the proper plant with the REDDISH ORANGE AND WHITE TOWERS, and I'll know it's Fukushima 1 (Dai-ichi). Otherwise, I don't buy that F1 is what's been shown in the news. Either it's completely gone, or this is a ruse.

I'm not a pilot, but I'm married to one. Ask a PILOT what those painted towers mean. I did. The first thing my Pilot said was "those towers are in a flight path somewhere." That confirmed my belief. And there's no way the towers could be changed over to all white unless the flight path had been permanently changed.

You make a lot of sense. The part about no melt down especially seemed like a lie.

More vague language from today's update, unless they have speculated on what that substance is: "Steam like suibstance rose from the reactor building at unit 1, 2, 3 and 4 is being observed."
[link to www.jaif.or.jp]

I have been checking in to that. Not that I have found so far. I am going to check recordings from the monitors a few ocean floor research groups have in that area and see if I can find anything there. But they would have to know those types of things are in place.

I am leaning towards maybe they were doing some black market trading, making the stuff or something. Maybe under ground? Idk....but something isn't right, they are definitely hiding something.


^^^ I am typing dyslexic and too tired to fix it lol

Last Edited by KBambi on 03/26/2011 01:56 AM

I don't see why they couldn't be workers' cars, or why there couldn't be cars there post-tsunami. Maybe OP is trying to say that there should be cars piled up and tossed about in the parking lot, from the tsunami/quake and that they would not have been removed by now? So the business-as-usual parking lot is simply out of place?

If that's not what she is saying, then I don't see why cars can't be there now. Am I looking at the right thing? It's the upper right hand corner with the neat lines, and pre-tsunami they looked like perfect little rectangular white things (cars, I guess?) in between lines in some places.

Above, I refer to the photos at:
[link to www.abc.net.au]

What do you mean? I thought OP was saying it was not logical that the vegetation was neat and untouched? Not that it was gone.

The picture below clearly shows thriving vegetation:
[link to img.ibtimes.com]

Posted as a new Thread, and here too.

3-26-11

Well, this is a new clue folks.

How did the virus get to Japan?

Was it in the reactors computer system via some security organization that was out to stop Japan from giving enriched uranium to Iran?

We now see there is viable reason to believe the possibility of the virus getting into the reactors systems is real.

Check it out!

New cybervirus found in Japan / Stuxnet designed to attack off-line servers via USB memory sticks:

[link to www.yomiuri.co.jp]

Qui Bono?

This may be the most plausible thing I read yet. Of course they are trying to save face, especially if they have a shoddy record and even had that one scientist or more quit years ago with a warning the plant wasn't safe.

Either way, I do think we are all being slowly poisoned with radiation now. And I still don't get why something could not have been done sooner to fix this, with experts around the world.

And I almost wonder if someone wanted the quake to mess up the reactors, but I still can't rationalize how even a conniving group of elite global leaders would make the entire planet uninhabitable for *everyone*, including themselves and their families. Why would anyone do that? There are cleaner ways to depopulate, I would think.

OP, I appreciate you summing up all the different sites and reactors. It was getting hard for me to keep track of, and I can see how it would have been easy for someone behind the scenes to purposely mix up images.

Whatever conclusions happen from it, we need to be able to keep details like that straight. Most people would not take the time or be able to take the time to do that. I gave up after one night of making lists of various plants and reactors from the news.

No, we don't deserve to die from the radiation.

Is that gonna be the new insult now?

The carpark looks to be elevated to me, too, in every photo, so I will have to go re-read to see where you say you proved it's not.

"The virus does not cause any damage online, but once it enters an industrial system, it can send a certain program out of control."

"A Symantec engineer who has analyzed the virus said it was made using advanced technology, and it is highly likely a well-funded organization, not an individual, produced it. The virus has spread throughout the globe via the Internet."

"When the USB device is then connected to a computer linked to an isolated server, it can enter the system and take control of it."

"According to the security company, the virus is designed to target a German-made program often used in systems managing water, gas and oil pipelines. The program is used at public utilities around the world, including in Japan."

"The 63 infected computers found in Japan were likely infected sometime after June."


Well...any questions left as to the possibility of the stunet virus attacking the Japan Electric Co computer control system?

For everyone who keeps asking why she thinks the photo is of Sendai, it's in the name of the photo which you can see when you try to save it.

I noticed this too and i considered the fact that Fuku 1 was gone completetly.. its the one closest to Sendai along the coast.. then I realised that the photo is quite old so I considered the possbility that they had simply been painted.. with everything else i was looking at I felt this one i could deal with later.. thanks for bringing it up..

There is ways though to know what your looking for.. by looking at the plant layouts.. the gardens and roads are laid out different in each one, the reactors are laid out different .. even the sea walls are at different angles.. so when you actually look and notice these differences you can tell they are different plants..

Now.. is that to say they are all named as I quoted.. perhaps not.. I simply wanted to state what alot of people didnt realise and that was they are using 4 different plants photos and video and talking about ONE.. which is bs of course.. because they are all in melt down now I believe..

Ok i guess its my own fault that im going to have to pay for that comment for the entirity of this thread.. I would appreciate it though if you actaully read forward a few and saw where I appologised for it.. I was angry and frustrated and it was uncalled for..

I didnt prove it wasnt elevated.. i made a post stating that up until that point I had only used my own eyes to make an estimate of how high it was .. then I went and used an elevation tool and tried to find out the exact elevation..

It still doesnt matter.. a 45ft wave followed by a half a dozen more 20- 30 ft ones, would was up over a 90 ft 45 degree slope with ease..

Yes that is what im saying... there should be cars piled up and tossed about, at the very least all pushed up against the back fence.. everywhere else the cars were moved, tossed like match sticks yet here.. nothing??

Again, im not saying the tsunami doesnt exist.. Im saying that at these plants we are looking at in these photos.. no 45ft tsunami washed over them.. they would be totalled.. gone.. and maybe that is the direction we should be looking at.. the post above that mentions the red and white painted towers.. hasnt been seen in any of the footage.. yet its supposed to be the Fuku 1 plant..

Maybe we are only scratching the surface..

The cars would have been washed away, the same as they were washed away in other areas.

Tsunamis are not tidal waves, they are a continuous stream of water, sometimes moving faster than a plane, they will wash every moveable object away. Some buildings and other constructions however, if they are built in the correct manner will be left as you can see from some other photos that were taken in other areas.

Regarding a nuclear plant, they would have been constructed to the highest standard, hence why they are still standing.

What the hell you on about?? The water would have had every conceivable piece of debris and crap in it as it washed over everything, of course it wouldn't have been "clean" seawater, it would have been black, brown and mud, with the colour of tar.

We are not talking about seawater washing ashore here, but nature at its most brutal!

Thankyou for explaining that but i guess its too hard to expect people to follow every message i post.. So I should explain this shouldnt I..

When I first starting searching to find out all the various plants in japan and which ones were where.. and which ones were damaged, I googled How many nuclear plants in japan.. I got the wiki pages that i've already linked to so i went through each one and found out where they were..

the Onagawa Nuclear plant is located on the Oshika Peninsular, approx 92 km's east from Sendai Airport. [link to en.wikipedia.org]
[link to assets.nydailynews.com]
[link to farm6.static.flickr.com]
Article regarding the damage at Onagawa, Near Sendai..
[link to www.str8tzmag.com]

Now when i started googling for photos, since I now knew that Sendai had the Onagawa plant near it, I googled Sendai power plant.. nuclear power plant in sendai, sendai tsunami.. etc.. that pic on my first message, the first one, was one that came up with the Sendai pictures but it had fukushima on the page.. however I had by this time seen dozens of photos of sendai and had seen it on fire from the aerial shots so when the article was saying it was fukushima and the picture was saying it was sendai I got suspisious..

then last night I realised that the plant on fire was not the nuclear one, but some kind of fuel or other chemical plant in Sendai.. but have since been unable to get a name for it..

So that is how I ended up with that first pic of the fuel plant in sendai posted as the sendai nuke plant.. it wasnt until i really started getting into it i realised people were posting photos of plants with the wrong names on them.


Hope that clears up confusion regarding that sendai pic in my first page message..