Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 913 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 187,104
Pageviews Today: 310,492Threads Today: 98Posts Today: 1,940
04:07 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Let us talk about philosophy
Poster Handle GeistFaust
Post Content
why separate the "one" being ?. . . like in: one is conscious (or not) of one self, for example.


do not forget: Divide and conquer.

we are told and forced to "divide" ourselves, divide the "one", many schools of philosophy, however, we are one, and as one we live, accepting the one will make you free. Not dividing it, I AM "consciousness" is right, I am conscious of myself is wrong, I AM consciousness. THE ONE IS CONSCIOUSNESS.


Have another one for ye all:

Give until in hurts, and when it is hurting . . . give a little more . . . that´s a paradox.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1339131


I respect what you have to say but I have to disagree. This one consciousness is as void as the meaning of existence itself. We need to divide and conquer this is natural necessity. If we do not divide and conquer we are not able to make anything our own. We are not allowed to develop our own individual instinct. The I am therefore I think does not apply to any situation in real life. Rather I think therefore I am applies to every real situation in life. Only the real man can be responsible for himself and not have to depend on others for his existence. I suppose you can say that the act of thinking presupposes a single consciousness. It is merely nonsensical to try to make sense out of this one consciousness. It is better left to be a matter of intuition or of the heart to become a matter of the mind. I do suppose we should strive to unify ourselves with this one consciousness but in all actuality we can only hope for it to unify with us. We need to separate the "one" being because it also necessarily divided from the transcendental being but not by much. It is marginally divided in essence from the transcendental and divine. Separating things out allows us to posit a connection to the divine.
 Quoting: GeistFaust


I aknowledge your respect, and do also respect you.
However: I started with "why separate the "one" being ?" and continued with "one is conscious" ending with "of one self" . . . in all, as you now see, I am refering to us, humans, using the term "one", if I had changed my final line "THE ONE IS CONSCIOUSNESS." to: "I AM CONSCIOUSNESS", would that have changed the content of your reply?

I understand that your "one consciousness" does not refer to my "one" being.
Hence the rest of your reply is a void.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1339131


Yes it most definitely would have changed the content and actually I would have replied in favor and probably with a lot shorter of a reply.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP