The Moon: A perfect orbiting Space Station. Why have we not gone back?? | |
nomuse (not logged in) User ID: 1135643 United States 04/15/2011 02:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Take a peice of bacon or a hamburger and place it in your microwave oven and turn it on for say 8 hours. Than think thats what the assholenauts should look like after slipping through the van allen radiation belt on there way to the moon. Now they claim they did it twice, once going to and once coming from. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1293514Than we have that little problem with the moon dust. If it damaged the gear and suits, think what it did to the lungs of the assholenauts back at the capsule when they unsuited. Whats that, all the assholenauts were fine upon returning and no one came down with moon lung or any other lung disease. Course not, they never went to the moon. Yet, you can stand right next to that microwave and watch that bacon turn to cinders... it's called shielding. That you equate the radiation from a Microwave oven with the extreme radiation found in space is laughable.... No, AC 1042753 did that. AC 1293514 merely pointed out that if you are going to make a stupid analogy, you don't get to pick which part you use and which you don't. And the basic case is correct. The inner VARB is populated by alpha particles, which have trouble getting through a sheet of paper. It is as easy to shield against those particles as it is to protect the operator of a household microwave oven. (Although it is currently done in a different way). (The outer is populated by beta particles, which have a nasty habit of spalling out photons when they hit a metallic objects...but you can do that to them, and stop the resulting spray of photons with the following layer.) (The not-quite-right analogy here would be Israeli tank armor -- which is now the de-facto way every country armors against shaped charges and frangible kinetic-kill weapons.) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1287257 United States 04/15/2011 02:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
R3P User ID: 1343377 United Kingdom 04/15/2011 02:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We were warned off the moon. There are massisve alien basis on the moon. The people there are humanoid but in disagreement with the real rulers of Earth. Check out 'INGO SWANN'. He was a remote sensor and did lots of journeys to the moon for the secret services, travelling using his mind. Most of his books are hard to come by now. There are some good U tube videos. Ingo also said the moon has an atmosphere. We were given a warning to keep off the moon. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1343381 United States 04/15/2011 02:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1276659 United States 04/15/2011 02:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have a close friend that works at Nasa and until recently was deeply involved in the creation of hardware for the (now cancelled) revised moon missions. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1142680According to him, the largest hindrance to returning to the moon and doing ANYTHING other than short stints outside a lander is because of the extreme abrasive nature of moon dust. Suits returned from Apollo missions showed that even in the short walks they did, critical seals on every joint were close to failure due to the damage caused by the dust. He said that it truly was a miracle that there eren't fatalities in the Apollo moonwalks based upon what the suits looked like afterwards. Nasa has continued work since the 70's on developing hard seal technology that works but to no avail. Interestingly enough, one solution they mused was sending nuclear powered robots to the surface first that would use very powerful focused microwaves to turn the dust into a glass-like material. These pre-landing robots would then in essence "pave" sidewalks and pads and such for the later-arriing humans to construct their shelters and such on. Moon dust? I'm not buying that. We have IED suits that protect from full frontal explosions, space probes that endure the inner belt, rovers that have lasted 10 years on Mars, and remote controlled butt plugs. Surely the human race would have developed a solution within a matter of years, if that was the case. How fast did we come up with an alternate solution when silicone breasts were found to be harmful? Boobs and space suits- do you see the similarity? Please report this back to your friend at NASA...or is he your 'uncle'? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1276659 United States 04/15/2011 02:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We were warned off the moon. There are massisve alien basis on the moon. The people there are humanoid but in disagreement with the real rulers of Earth. Quoting: R3P 1343377Check out 'INGO SWANN'. He was a remote sensor and did lots of journeys to the moon for the secret services, travelling using his mind. Most of his books are hard to come by now. There are some good U tube videos. Ingo also said the moon has an atmosphere. We were given a warning to keep off the moon. I've heard quite a bit on this theory. Very interesting to say the least.. Seems out there, but anything is possible... |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1276659 United States 04/15/2011 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1069180 Japan 04/15/2011 02:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I understand we are "Not Welcome" there again. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1287257Plenty of towers and bases there already, just not man made. This is probably the best answer. I'm sorry, but I cannot find my link, but if you search YouTube, maybe you can still find the video of one of the lunar landings that explains it. Yes, they DID land on the moon, and what they found there was NOT what we would not want to believe. NASA is not into being made the laughing stock of the world, so they didn't tell us that they found that the dark side of the moon is already inhabited by aliens, and the aliens DID make contact with the astronauts who walked on the moon. One astronaut was mesmerized and almost fell into their clutches, while the other one was told, "Leave this place, and NEVER come back!" As for the one who was mesmerized, Houston needed to convince him not to go into the volcano-like areas (not that they WERE volcanoes, but that they were SHAPED LIKE volcanoes) where the aliens were staying and instead, run--not walk, but RUN--back to the lunar module so they could lift off IMMEDIATELY before the aliens would attack. They never went back. In short. The reason we DON'T return to the Moon is that they ARE already there, and they ARE more advanced than we are, and if we provoke a war--with our PRIMATIVE technology, it would be STUPID, so we stay away and hope that they will leave us alone. |
meroj User ID: 1323017 United States 04/15/2011 02:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1069180 Japan 04/15/2011 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think this is the video that I was thinking of, and ha-ha, what I described as "volcano like areas" were craters. Does anyone know how to translate Spanish into English? Oh, well, at least, if you listen carefully, you can hear the astronaut and Houston arguing about whether he could go to investigate the aliens or if he had to run back to the spacecraft and get the hell out of there. There are some interesting videos on the video bar on the right, such as a very interesting speach by Neil Armstrong, where he seems to be trying to tell us something, but he is not allowed to, so he said it very cryptically. [link to www.youtube.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1319250 United States 04/15/2011 03:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. House User ID: 1281930 United States 04/15/2011 03:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | White technically and scientifically it is plausible and possible to set up a moon base, mine the moon, and eventually hollow the damn thing out (over hundreds or thousands of years). There is no political interest, no economic interest, no public interest. The only reason why we went to the moon is because we were having the 'biggest dick' contest of all time against the USSR. It was a political ploy to 'show-up' communism. It wasn't for anything noble, it was two nations using pride. Today it should not be a national political interest to exploit space. It should be an international, commercial interest. Until such time that there is an international desire to make money off the materials of the moon, we will not do much more then shoot off a few probes and make and break promises to return to the moon. Sinkhole list: Thread: Sinkholes Updated 28 Dec 2010 find a sinkhole, add it to this thread, please. "Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him." (1 John 3:15, NKJV). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1042753 United States 04/15/2011 03:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | never been there and I think the evidence proving that fact is building every day as we analyze more footage. moon landing was faked Radiation kills and if we dont have the tech to get there now we certainly didnt have the tech back then Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1319250Well, since you only get about 5 rads going through the VARB, I think they'd be okay. |
BoxerLvr User ID: 885750 Puerto Rico 04/15/2011 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Money and public interest.. The moon.. been there, done that, as far as the public is concerned.. not much excitement there Quoting: Anonymous Coward 904314Bingo! It is precisely because it is fashionable for Americans to know no science, even though they may be well educated otherwise, that they so easily fall prey to nonsense. They thus become part of the armies of the night, the purveyors of nitwittery, the retailers of intellectual junk food, the feeders on mental cardboard, for their ignorance keeps them from distinguishing nectar from sewage. — Isaac Asimov |
BoxerLvr User ID: 885750 Puerto Rico 04/15/2011 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm sure there's been lots of discussion on this, but why in 50+ years have we NOT gone back to the moon? With all of the technology we have, you'd think that would have been the first place they'd want to establish a base. WHy build an ISS when you have the moon? And if you were the head of the space agency, wouldn't you WANT to go back and explore? More samples, actual ground exploration....you could use the moon as a stepping stone to exploring other planets....AND work in an almost weightless environment. They could build so many things with ease on the moon... Quoting: Silverstreak 1276659But why haven't we done more?? Or did all nations agree not to colonize for security reasons? (no one wants their enemy orbiting around them like a death star) Thoughts? We did go back! Man went to the moon a total of 6 times between 1969 and 1972. After that the public lost interest.: * Apollo-11 * Apollo-12 * Apollo-14 * Apollo-15 * Apollo-16 * Apollo-17 It is precisely because it is fashionable for Americans to know no science, even though they may be well educated otherwise, that they so easily fall prey to nonsense. They thus become part of the armies of the night, the purveyors of nitwittery, the retailers of intellectual junk food, the feeders on mental cardboard, for their ignorance keeps them from distinguishing nectar from sewage. — Isaac Asimov |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1149306 United States 04/15/2011 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144159 United States 04/15/2011 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you would think given the rate of technology that we would have had a station on the moon years ago. Quoting: Mr. Oysterheadthere is no reason for us to build a base up there.... it costs too much and there would be NO return on the investment... There would be one heck of a return on investment, just in developing the science and technology and industry to do so, it is a much better technology driver than bombing other nations for control over their 'oil' and 'drug' supplies. The spin off returns on the investment from 1961 to 1969 in just the Moon Race alone have been pulling the world along every since. Very little of what you might consider modern standard of living would even yet be in existence without the first race to the Moon. We choose to return to the Moon and colonize it, not because it is easy, but because it is hard. And further more, the U.S.A. should be leading the way. Otherwise the U.S.A. will not be in any position from stopping China from setting up colonies o the Moon and not allowing anyone else to even get out of Low Earth Orbit. China is dead serious about colonizing the Moon. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144159 United States 04/15/2011 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We never went in the first place, hence the 50 plus year absence makes sense. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1342761Dear Spanish Flagged AC, no, you Spaniards never did go to the Moon, that much of what you said is true. However, the U.S.A. did land men on the Moon, and the U.S.S.R did in fact land robotic probes there as well. So, no, Spain did not go to the Moon. There is no reason for Spain to return to the Moon, as it never has gone... not even into Low Earth Orbit. |
Captain T/F.O. Isobel User ID: 1187046 United States 04/15/2011 05:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1149306 United States 04/15/2011 05:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mmmm, Van Allen Radiation Belts? Read an article in Popular Science that stated the reason they (NASA) couldn't go to Mars currently was because of radiation issues. Well gee, Mars is further out from the Sun (less radiation?) so.....? Quoting: G 1117445Except they went AROUND the majority of the Van Allen belts [link to www.youtube.com] [link to www.youtube.com] And Van Allen himself said there was no problem with it. The reason there is a radiation concern with going to Mars is the chance of being hit with a flare goes from very low for the two week trip of Apollo to nearly definite for the multiple months long trip to Mars. |
Jdub User ID: 741538 United States 04/15/2011 05:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144159 United States 04/15/2011 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have a close friend that works at Nasa and until recently was deeply involved in the creation of hardware for the (now cancelled) revised moon missions. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1142680According to him, the largest hindrance to returning to the moon and doing ANYTHING other than short stints outside a lander is because of the extreme abrasive nature of moon dust. Suits returned from Apollo missions showed that even in the short walks they did, critical seals on every joint were close to failure due to the damage caused by the dust. He said that it truly was a miracle that there eren't fatalities in the Apollo moonwalks based upon what the suits looked like afterwards. Nasa has continued work since the 70's on developing hard seal technology that works but to no avail. Interestingly enough, one solution they mused was sending nuclear powered robots to the surface first that would use very powerful focused microwaves to turn the dust into a glass-like material. These pre-landing robots would then in essence "pave" sidewalks and pads and such for the later-arriving humans to construct their shelters and such on. There we go.. yes, pre-lander Robotics to pave the way, the glass-way. I had heard that about the dust problems long ago, from other friends involved in the NASA manned Moon adventures. Have also heard of the possibility of using such robotic pre-cursors to lay down massive tracks of built on the site solar-electric arrays tens of miles long to help provide power sources for other robotic equipment. Actually, the dust may well be a very difficult nut to crack. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1149306 United States 04/15/2011 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I understand we are "Not Welcome" there again. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1287257Plenty of towers and bases there already, just not man made. This is probably the best answer. I'm sorry, but I cannot find my link, but if you search YouTube, maybe you can still find the video of one of the lunar landings that explains it. Yes, they DID land on the moon, and what they found there was NOT what we would not want to believe. NASA is not into being made the laughing stock of the world, so they didn't tell us that they found that the dark side of the moon is already inhabited by aliens, and the aliens DID make contact with the astronauts who walked on the moon. One astronaut was mesmerized and almost fell into their clutches, while the other one was told, "Leave this place, and NEVER come back!" As for the one who was mesmerized, Houston needed to convince him not to go into the volcano-like areas (not that they WERE volcanoes, but that they were SHAPED LIKE volcanoes) where the aliens were staying and instead, run--not walk, but RUN--back to the lunar module so they could lift off IMMEDIATELY before the aliens would attack. They never went back. In short. The reason we DON'T return to the Moon is that they ARE already there, and they ARE more advanced than we are, and if we provoke a war--with our PRIMATIVE technology, it would be STUPID, so we stay away and hope that they will leave us alone. Wow, you are proof that some people will believe anything, no matter how asinine it is. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144159 United States 04/15/2011 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please read the above concerning a REAL reason why manned missions to the moon were not continued. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1142680The tech to get there exists. The tech to exist there safely does not. The technology to exist there safely for long periods of time does not yet exist. So, what. The technology to even get there didn't exist 50 years ago, either. You can't solve a problem if you are unwilling to work the problem. 100 years ago the technology to fly non-stop around the world did not exist, either. 60 years ago the technology to do open heart surgery didn't exist either. We choose to do these things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144159 United States 04/15/2011 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you would think given the rate of technology that we would have had a station on the moon years ago. Quoting: Mr. Oysterheadthere is no reason for us to build a base up there.... it costs too much and there would be NO return on the investment... Actually, there is helium, water, and oxygen in the rocks. Considering helium is finite on the earth, given enough time, it may be economically viable to have a self sustaining moon base. Just the Helium-3 on the Moon alone, in conjunction with hot nuclear fusion would be able to provide massive amounts of electrical power on the Moon with which to do all sorts of things. And yes, it would be very interesting to drill a bunch of shafts 3 miles down into the crust of the Moon just to see what's there. Whatever we have learned in Space has again and again bring brought down to Earth and used here to advance our civilization. Many of us Humans would rather we get colonizing the Solar System in massive numbers than just allow ourselves to lazily just be content to be a constantly culled ZOO herd here on Earth with our human population numbers being constantly culled to only 500 Million People... like the "stuck on Earthers" would have us all be. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144159 United States 04/15/2011 05:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144159 United States 04/15/2011 05:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Exactly, They know why. We got Kicked off the moon.(we know too,now) Quoting: deermeat2112We did not get kicked off the Moon... there was nothing there to kick us off. If anything we discovered that WE had already been there long long ago, and that discovery just blew our corporate mind... and we asked ourselves, what happened to us that it took us thousands of years to get back there. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144159 United States 04/15/2011 05:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think the moon should be towed away for good. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 791516I think Venus should be towed to a new orbit of 91 Million Miles from the Sun, and Mars moved in to a new orbit of 95 Million miles... perhaps that act along would make them both more habitable to humans than Luna, and in only a short time. Just as long as we got them into stable orbits. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144159 United States 04/15/2011 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I understand we are "Not Welcome" there again. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1287257Plenty of towers and bases there already, just not man made. But you can't just go up there and prove that, not even to yourself, now, can you? What if they were man made? I really want to see an entire swarm of long term powered Lunar rovers far beyond Spirit and Opportunity Martian rovers, that can stay and zoom around on the Moon, with HDTV cams just looking at things our telescopes and even Lunar Orbiting cams cannot make out or see. I think we need literally hundred of them if not thousand of them up there at the same time, doing a very massive snoop about.. and all broadcasts from them be fully open channel TV... for the entire world to see... all the time. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144159 United States 04/15/2011 05:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm sure there's been lots of discussion on this, but why in 50+ years have we NOT gone back to the moon? With all of the technology we have, you'd think that would have been the first place they'd want to establish a base. WHy build an ISS when you have the moon? And if you were the head of the space agency, wouldn't you WANT to go back and explore? More samples, actual ground exploration....you could use the moon as a stepping stone to exploring other planets....AND work in an almost weightless environment. They could build so many things with ease on the moon... Quoting: Silverstreak 1276659But why haven't we done more?? Or did all nations agree not to colonize for security reasons? (no one wants their enemy orbiting around them like a death star) Thoughts? You fool, the astronauts received death threats from the Aliens occupying moon bases! Thar Bye See Monstyrs Thar... and Giants in the Land.. don't go.. don't go.. the See-Monstyrs and Giants will git yar azz. |