!!! GRAVITY IS AN ILLUSION... EXPLAINS BRILLIANT PHYSICIST !!!

gravity is created via singularities at the center of mass..
atoms, conscious beings(us), planets, stars, galaxies, super-clusters etc all produce gravity via singularities of different scales at their center. they process consciousness thru the singularity and produce gravity as a result.. the intensity of the gravity 'felt' or measured is in direct relation to the distance away and the scale/size of the singularity.

here's a quick video explaining somewhat.




to get a good handle on the theory this one is 1.5 hours but very good.

the only thing space and time have in common is that it takes time for mass to travel from one point to another in the three dimensional 'matrix'. Time is a component of the measurement of motion. (eg it takes a spacecraft 3 hours to travel 30,000 miles at a velocity of 10,000 mph). Gravity is not effected by, nor is it even necessary for time to exist for gravity to exist. the two are not connected.

Uh huh...

If you can't explain the basic underlying principals, expanding on this lack of knowledge with complex fiction is like racing your engine and spinning your tires while mired to the frame in mud. You're not going to get any where, but you're going to make a lot of noise and waste a lot of time and energy doing it.

Ahhhhhh.......you may want to sit down while I explain something to ya hon.

LEGION

Schwartzchild?



Ok, whatever. he's one of them 'star of david' 'scientists' that attempt explain our existence with 'sacred math'. Ratios are reoccurring in nature only because the design is the result of intelligence

Get fucking real.

Mathematics are not God. You can't show me a single straight line in nature, not even with the motion of light. Without straight lines, mathematical explanations are illusions. Mathe can be used to measure and predict outcomes with established patterns, nothing more

I am disappointed that the comments here only seem to be a few IQ points above the comments on the actual article. Apparently not many understand what he is saying or couldn't be bothered to watch the video.

Its an Illusion.

I don't know if you are referring specifically to me in your judgement, but keep your verdict to yourself until you can answer my questions

+1000

this thread is fucking stupid...

gravity comes from the mass and makeup of this large body. there is gravity on the moon and mars but a lot less because of the mass and make up of the body.

He doesn't even say shit about it.

Learn to actually understand things.

He talks about it as being derived from microscopic actions (no fucking duh) and then fails to expand on what they are...
Just like Einstein. Just like Newton.

/eyeroll

Gravity is Resonance.

Everything Vibrates in the Universe (frequency).

This causes matter/energy (E=MC2) to gather.

All things are just energies in different states.

The Vibration causes an electrical effect... so the electric universe theory is correct.

The electricity is generated buy the vibration of the matter.

The more correct question to be asking is... what is Resonance ?

Schwartzchild geometry [link to casa.colorado.edu] .. your missing the entire point .. the question of this thread is where gravity is derived.. not whether the universe's design is 'intelligent' ... of coarse it is.. it's built of consciousness itself.. thought with infinite density/energy.
and we're swimming in it..

The engineers of life exist, But we were designed not to figure out what they are,Mistakes were made in the design of mankind by giving him a strong worishing instinct wothout having a real live visible God on the earth .
Thats where religion come in with it's hate and wars over policits and race.
What about memory ? HOW DOES IT WORK? How does one remember a voice of 40 years ago, Or knows a black's voice over the phone. Why can our memory and thoughts be effected by smell?

figments lmao

We are here to see who is the best about selling their Illusion...

Shhhhh Don't give it all away you 2.

Its just a ride.

Last Edited by Dark Zen on 04/21/2011 05:29 PM

I wonder what people were saying when it was first stated that the Earth was round... or that that the Earth is not the center of the universe...

Keep in mind that for all we know, we have only "theories" of what is going on outside of our planet, and we don't even have a firm grasp on what's happening under the earth's crust... just more "theories".

For people on a conspiracy website, you all seem awfully close-minded.

Now take down your B.S. flags and listen to what the man has to say.

The more you learn....the more you learn you don't know... if your learning....

gravitize this pin

by Blanche McLanahan

Gravity is a disease of the Earth due to her lack thereof the sun's radiant energy. And just as disease is a symptom of an underlying cause, there too goes gravity manifesting as an effect of a greater causal factor. So, we must look at all the angles and points using these coordinates to isolate the intention of an overall message, so that we might see what relationship we share.

When I saw the equation; L2=EM if (cv) [(hv) (1/2mv2)] =L2, I didn't hear someone say it, nor did I see that written. It took months to align these symbols to a picture in my mind. Then as I labeled it with the correct symbols for understanding, more pictures in my head would surface to be analysed. An ongoing process, as if the acknowledgment of the information downloaded once became conscious, more would move through the subconscious to be acquired.

What I saw and had to work out was an image spinning counter clockwise.....when it stopped, one hand like that on a clock, the larger one was pointing at 120 degrees longitude. The other, the small one was fixed at 45 degrees NW latitude. Just that portion of the image spoke volumes, which took months of synchronicity and confirmation searching through piles of old books......(the artifact in the rubble of time) before I could move on to the next step.....

And gravity = time is what I now assume to be the anomaly.....a figure of speech that relates the relationship of effects resultant of one causal factor converging on expression through an index of refraction.

I found asymmetry in these coordinates.........the true point of origin did not strike the harmonic of light or sound. Instead, I found a second or new point in the degree of refraction where the energy became greater than the mass, shifting the ratios of energy and matter to our current construct.........a contained rest energy creating the wobble, bipolarity the dissention between electro-weak and magnetic-strong fields, a ferric domain in the iron core (planetary and physiological), dissention in the water..A left handed H20 and a right handed H20........dispersing magnetic tides that exhibit equatorial waters purged magnetically of particulate matter, giving one a greater depth in view of the bottom (if there is one) and the further from this point saturation and accumulation of heavy metals, dense waters without end.

In an overall picture I was shone as a comparison the perfect sphere and a line drawn from one point on its periphery, then with a linear magnetic velocity was drawn to the very center. NO line emerged from this center point, rather perfect concentric rings not in number of 6 for the 3 primary and 3 secondary color, rather there were 8, the center which was black and the outer periphery which was white. There was no need to differentiate color in dark bands of light........this was the L2.

This linear magnetic velocity is the light's full potential and when sound, which lies at the density of matter is equaled, a relationship shared in kinetic and potential energy through the mass, then the result is the concentric angular momentum responding to the linear peripheral energy trigger, so (q) = (p) as one and the same, and time is no longer an issue of debate, for there is no measure in between the lightning and thunder, and here sound and light become one in the aether. Here the line is the same as the curve, no motion, just in the stillness of the aether's moment.

Gravity is always attracting, a symptom of a ferric domain, where the mass at the core becomes a stronger but temporary magnet. In my imagination this gave the impression or implication of an incident angle for the linear velocity of light (kinetic potential) that did not equal its reflection, the core or nuclear mass where the energy potentials shift the angular momentum and the light is refracted......it is in this angle of refraction, an index where gravity draws on the contained rest of the mass, and time results to measure the distance in between. This is where Planck's work enters in and the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect is the result of the obstruction in the m-shell of the iron atom, (isotopic bleeds emitting radiation) a radiate anomalous energy or the refraction of light. Planck measured the radiate energy thermodynamically and gave it a number.....6.6256 x 10 to the NEGATIVE 34th power.....it is spinning backwards..........moving counter clockwise.

Going back to the L2=Em if cv x hv x kinetic energy =, so I used Balmer's analysis of hydrogen (the only true bipolar sphere, as there is no neutron at its center) to isolate the differential, or deficit in light's kinetic and potential energy dependent on the mass......... all that remained was .6256 x 10 to the NEGATIVE 3rd power. This isolates the area between 19.5 degrees latitude and 19.47 degrees.

There is obstruction in the 3rd concentric ring whether it be an atom or a planet. And Earth the 3rd rock from the sun has a rainbow of spectral color that outlines both the need and the promise. But her tilt has set our universal circuit and its ballast mislaid, creating time and gravity in lieu of her alignment to the sun, where an incident angle does not equal its reflection.

We are riding on the wrong frequency that prevents us from seeing the light. The 120 degree longitude is not only the stabilizer for time and refraction, but it has the momentum of 60 degrees required to shift us clockwise and in link the true point of origin at Earth's center or core where all on the periphery becomes equidistant no matter where you stand on her surface.


[link to www.missionignition.net]

It may be an illusion but it's an illusion that sticks...

Question?

If i'm at the top of a 100 story sky rise do I feel the gravital pull more or less?

I do like the being pushed theory.
Lets think about the earth not spinning.. Could that be why some will be lifted at the rapture .. if there is no gravity? All i know ios that the older I get the more gravity pushes on my boobs and but.. ugggh gravity.

its constant so.. it is definitely a force and I really think its all related to the roation of heaven;ly bodies..
motion etc.. based on Einsteins stuff.
AWESOME TOPIC.. I had no idea others really couldn't explain gravity.

I love Einstein... but he will be proven wrong...

There are AT LEAST 2 different kinds of gravity...

I provide you this to consider....



A MODIFIED theory of gravity could explain one of astronomy's big mysteries: how spiral galaxies rotate without flying apart.

The favorite theory is that dark matter in the galaxies provides the required extra gravitational pull. But Israeli physicist Mordechai Milgrom had a different idea. In the early 1980s he came up with a theory called modified Newtonian dynamics or MOND, in which extra-strong gravity takes the place of dark matter.

The big problem with MOND has been that it contradicts the well-tested predictions of relativity, and so does not work in systems in which objects are moving at close to the speed of light or under large accelerations. This has meant that it could not make predictions about pulsars, black holes and, most importantly, how the universe came into being in the big bang. But now Jacob Bekenstein of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem has found a way round the problem.

Proponents of MOND believe theirs is a far more elegant explanation than dark matter. While the familiar, conventional force of gravity gets weaker in proportion to the square of distance, Milgrom suggested that there is also another form of gravity whose strength diminishes more slowly, declining linearly with distance.

In MOND, a single parameter explains the motion of stars in hundreds of spiral galaxies. This parameter is the acceleration, a0, below which gravity switches from its normal form to the stronger form. The dark matter theory requires different amounts of the stuff with a different distribution in each galaxy.

To fix MOND's clash with general relativity, Bekenstein has introduced twin fields. One gives rise to the conventional gravitational phenomena, while the second serves as the arena for the phenomena involving the other fundamental forces of nature - the electromagnetic force and the strong and weak nuclear forces.

Bekenstein says his theory is consistent with general relativity, gravity and MOND. "The theory reduces to Einstein's theory of gravity at high speeds and accelerations well above a0, to Newtonian gravity at low speeds and accelerations above a0, and to MOND at accelerations below a0."

The new theory fixes a number of problems with MOND, including its failure to explain the "lensing" of light as it is bent by the gravity of galaxy clusters. "Light is fundamentally relativistic, which is why MOND fails to predict its behavior," Bekenstein says. "With the new relativistic theory, the bending turns out to be much the same as observed."

Bekenstein says his theory is consistent with observations of the solar system and beyond. Intriguingly, it predicts some subtle new effects that might modify gravity in the outer solar system. "It's too early to say, but it might just have something to do with the Pioneer anomaly - the unexpected acceleration being experienced by NASA's Pioneer probes," he says.

Last Edited by Dark Zen on 04/21/2011 06:58 PM

.Define "ILLUSION".

Everything your 5 senses can sense here.

You are not really reading this right now.

What you should be asking is.... Define "YOU".

Gravity is and isn't an illusion.

Yadda yadda yup. The closer I am to the ground the heavier the gravitational pull? Simple answer?