††† KING JAMES BIBLE ONLY? (KJV/KJB/AV) †††

Bumpy

really? you can't rely on any version, but I will say the others stink big time and are worse than the KJV. But the KJV was modified also, as needed by the satanists of this world, so you would support Israel, and as to the bible period, the best of the books were left out, and Paul's crap accepted into it. SAD. His stuff is terrible.

The Chick.com stuff is terrible, really really terrible. Try www.wisdomoftherays.com for more readable material, if you can't handle the Urantia Book.

I believe there are other forums entirely devoted to this type of speculation. You should try them.

You REALLY should checkout all the links and videos I posted, then come back and repeat what you said

You Chick followers are severely deluded, and not very Christian. BTW I prefer the Douay Rheims translation. Although the KJV is good if complete.

Who here is a Chick follower?

Quick to judge much? The link on chick.com has nothing to do with chick.com or Jack Chick

Last Edited by Veresanctus on 04/28/2011 12:21 PM

You reference Chick's hateful gospel so there You are

OP, followed your link from the other thread to here. Thanks.

To start I should say that my most marked-up Bible is my KJV New Scofield Reference Bible, but I do find others helpful.

Have you done similar research on the problems with the AV/KJV?

The lyin of jewduh killed an innocent guy with deceit and useful idiot wageslaves so he could call his own offspring the lord. soloman sacrificed children to his deity moloch while collecting levy tax and 666gold and numbering is.ra.el for satan like his spermdonor before him also accomplished and doing EVIL in the sight of the LORD so his evil bloody temple of demon worship was CAST AWAY

that is why...

Christ's grace is of NO EFFECT for those who justify themselves by law.

Moses wrote a testament AGAINST them for awhoring after other gods, just like solomon, in his new song... deu 31

Moses said they would do EVIL and they DID

For those who delight in unrighteousness are those who are sent the great delusion

King James only?

The following is a chart of the Bible translations in .pdf format, so give it a minute to load:

[link to www.libertyparkusafd.org]

I also have a flickr image on the translations. Hard to read but once you do, its priceless:

[link to www.flickr.com]

Every time I try and find fault in the KJV I end up finding out there are none that are provable.

Yep

Note: there are no problems with the King James; there are only problems with Bible scholars.

I could tell you why the King James is the only Bible for the English speaking people's but then of course it would take a book.

Remember, it was written by God, not man. God never commissioned any Bible expert to write the Bible - He only commissioned willing and obedient fingers!

Think of it this way:

If I gave you a beautiful gold silk tie for Christmas as a gift, would you except it or...

...demand to see the original powdered dyes, inks, silkworms in their silkworm farm, cotton fields for the cotton backing, the seamstress who finished weaving it and the loom she worked on, the stitcher who stitched the name on it, any other machines used, any other processes used, etc ad nauseum and after all that...

...reweave it to your liking!?

Yes, which is why it is good to look at the research of other people, just as we do for the other versions.

My principal concern isn't finding factual problems as much as knowing that any 400-year old text needs "re-translating." There is the temptation of some teachers/preachers to do a personal and biased "re-translating" for their adherents. (Not consciously or maliciously, but we all bring our own points of view to the table when we read a text.)

One very positive thing about the KJV is how it is nicely tied to the Strong's Concordance, though that, too, has to be handled with care, as Strong's provides terse, one-word English equivalents. It is better to use a broader commentary with in-depth discussion.

Again, I have seen some teachers/preachers who use Strong's more to prove a personal point than to let the text speak for itself.

I speak/preach fairly frequently, and I have to admit to a heavy burden I feel when "rightly handling the Word of God" before others. It is difficult to get the "self" out of the way and to let the Word speak directly to the listeners.

Blessings, and thanks for sharing.

Last Edited by Life and Love on 04/28/2011 01:53 PM

2 Timothy 3:16 KJV

All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:



I believe all versions contain the main kernel of Truth

Unfortunately we interpret it incorrectly sometimes

Just an observation:

A friend lets you use his vehicle to get to work. When you arrive at his garage, you see two vehicles > a brand new 2011 Lamborghini and a beat-up 1975 pickup truck.

Which do you choose? Clearly the 2011 car is better in every respect but the older truck works just as well. The answer exposes motives.

What is perfection? Is it flawlessness or is it the appearance only of flawlessness intended?

I never said all versions don't contain some tidbits of truth I said that you can not rely on any other version but the King James version. Almost all versions have the gospel but they also say that Lucifer is Jesus Christ (Morning Star) and that of course is just plain wrong.

Last Edited by Veresanctus on 04/28/2011 02:13 PM

A quick look at the Blue Letter Bible shows the KJV as "Lucifer", some with "shining star," some with "day star", some with "star of the morning."

NKJV has a footnote at Lucifer saying "Lit. Day Star."

None have "morning star" capitalized.

I have never known anyone to be confused by this, have you?

There is nothing wrong with the KJV, except for all those missing books.

Could not disagree with you MORE.....

The KJV of the bible is only one of many..

I am not a 'believer' but was raised catholic and could not wait to get out of that church!!!

but I digress..

If you truly believe the bible is God's word, then why would you want to read it in a translation that goes back hundreds of years...

No one in the bible days spoke like that!!!!!!!

they did not say 'thee' and 'thou', and so on!!!!!

Why not get off your asses and look into at LEAST familiarizing yourself with an interlinear version of the old and new testaments?

Now it's not as 'pretty' or easy to read, but at LEAST you'd get/have a better sense of what was actually being said..

No translation will ever come truly close to the language/s that were spoken then!!!!!

But I DO think that if you REALLY want to read God's word, you should go out and get yourselves an interlinear translation......all this means is that you have the original language, and right beneath it are the english words...

It's not as pretty and poetic as the KJV, but I have to think that if I was a devout christian, that that's the way I'd want to read the bible, or at least be familiar with, for example, how my favorite passages and parts of the bible would read in the original languages..

any thoughts?????

please don't rake me over the coals!!!!!!!

Yes. But you're almost retarded. So, honestly it's hard to take anything you say seriously. Sorry, but honesty is the best policy.

Problem is, "star" is not in the original Hebrew in that passage, neither is "morning" as "morning star" is in several translations like the NIV and CEV...

"Lucifer" is the correct translation of Helel, as it is a proper NAME and is the ONLY place that single word occurs in the bible. You tell ME why that is?

This singles out the KJV, why? I believe it's because the KJV is correct and all the others are corrupt. Similar issue with Acts 14:4 and Easter et al.

There are no "mission books" as sealed in the chapters of Isaiah (66 books of the whole bible line up with the 66 chapters of the book of Isaiah).

eat my cawk ....

So what do you believe was the motive of those who though "Day Star" was a better rendering than "Lucifer?"

And is not the Greek word that KJV translates into Easter "pashca?" (I don't have my Greek interlinear here at work.)

PLEASE watch the videos and links I posted and then after doing so, come back and let me know what you think.

Regarding the "Thee" and "Thou" etc. read this to understand the importance: [link to userpages.bright.net]

King James could not read! So there you go, truth be known.

Am'mi,
Brother,
Yea, thou are close to the truth. A good start is the New Testament is MATTHEW 17:21. The KJV is the promised 7th level according to PSALM 12:6. Also, check if I JOHN 5:7 is there, proves EXODUS 3:15, the trinity. More importantly it needs to be read according to ISAIAH 28:10&13, line upon line:) Indeed the A.V. text of 1611 is Jesus Christ of Nazareth's love letter for all in all.

the LORD bless thee, and keep thee
Shalom

What about the Authentic version of the King James Bible which I have. I have a very tough time finding the Authentic not Authorized KJV by Nelson publishing

OP, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK "KING" JAMES AND HIS EDITOR FRANCIS BACON AN ALCHEMIST HAD YOUR BEST INTERESTS AT HEART AND NOT THEIRS AND THE ELITE???