HAARP is back online! | |
Stupidlikeafox™ User ID: 856639 Canada 04/28/2011 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1361043 United States 04/28/2011 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1341172 United States 04/28/2011 09:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1353166 United States 04/28/2011 09:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1316182 United States 04/28/2011 09:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nexuseditor User ID: 1358331 Australia 04/28/2011 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | During that time, one could just as easily gone to one of the other Induction Magnetometer readouts and seen what was going on. HAARP is a receiver and recorder of data from the ionosphere - 24/7. It picks up signals there which come from other facilities, the Sun, or from its own transmitter, the IRI. The IRI at HAARP is NOT transmitting all the time. It has to be 'booked' in advance by various agencies or bodies. However, it can be activated remotely. The main problem with showing HAARP causes ANYTHING, is that we need to show that the HAARP IRI was active or not. None of those pretty graphs you see on the induction magnetometer show that HAARP was transmitting - they only show what the IM was receiving. Last Edited by I LOVE PENIS on 04/28/2011 09:50 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1326925 United States 04/28/2011 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HAARP was never offline. They merely stopped some of the data feeds from some of their equipment, due to their website being compromised. Quoting: nexuseditorDuring that time, one could just as easily gone to one of the other Induction Magnetometer readouts and seen what was going on. HAARP is a receiver and recorder of data from the ionosphere - 24/7. It picks up signals there which come from other facilities, the Sun, or from its own transmitter, the IRI. The IRI at HAARP is NOT transmitting all the time. It has to be 'booked' in advance by various agencies or bodies. However, it can be activated remotely. The main problem with showing HAARP causes ANYTHING, is that we need to show that the HAARP IRI was active or not. None of those pretty graphs you see on the induction magnetometer show that HAARP was transmitting - they only show what the IM was receiving. thanks for the little lesson so your saying that none of the data released by haarp actually shows transmission details? |
nexuseditor User ID: 1358331 Australia 04/28/2011 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HAARP was never offline. They merely stopped some of the data feeds from some of their equipment, due to their website being compromised. Quoting: nexuseditorDuring that time, one could just as easily gone to one of the other Induction Magnetometer readouts and seen what was going on. HAARP is a receiver and recorder of data from the ionosphere - 24/7. It picks up signals there which come from other facilities, the Sun, or from its own transmitter, the IRI. The IRI at HAARP is NOT transmitting all the time. It has to be 'booked' in advance by various agencies or bodies. However, it can be activated remotely. The main problem with showing HAARP causes ANYTHING, is that we need to show that the HAARP IRI was active or not. None of those pretty graphs you see on the induction magnetometer show that HAARP was transmitting - they only show what the IM was receiving. thanks for the little lesson so your saying that none of the data released by haarp actually shows transmission details? correct, the ONLY data we see on those graphs, is what the various monitoring equipment is reading 24/7. Every now and then, the IRI fires up, and you can see immediately that there is activity on a bunch of different graphs and charts. When that happens, there is usually a lot of corresponding chatter on various newsgroups, such as the ELFRAD list etc. Unlike EISCAT though, HAARP does not let on when it is going to transmit, nor does it publish a timetable retrospectively of what and when the IRI was active. As you can see, 99.9% of people linking HAARP to earthquakes simply do not know what they are talking about. HAARP can be used for many nefarious activities, not least of which is mind/mood control - but using HAARP for earthquake generation is plain stupid, unrealistic, and outdated. Why use HAARP to trigger quakes at all? They perfected manmade earthquake generation in the 1970s, as evidenced by the concerned whistleblowers of the time. And they all alleged this technology was being run out of underground facilities such as Pine Gap and using satellites. Ironically, they probably LOVE the idea that conspiracy-tards blame HAARP for everything - because that means nobody is looking at CERN or other collider facilities, or EISCAT (which WAS ON just before Japan's quake - but nobody seems to mention that one) or any other culprit, such as geomagnetic storms in resonance with lava tubes etc etc. |