It bothers me that you present yourself as some inerrant type being and yet you spell as horribly as all the fundamental Christians on this site. This is, in part, why i suspect you of being such.
It's ADVERSARY
and SEPARATE
and on and on.....
You continually side-step my questions. You graze them at best, which tells me that you know that if you answered them head-on that you might expose yourself, and the bullshit alarms might be set off.
All that I am in my being and in my consciousness does not buy what you are positing. I am far from stupid or unaware. And I would place far greater "faith" in my consciousness than in yours at this point. And so I must ask, doe being whatever you are "an inter-dimensional being" for whatever that is worth, confer any elevated status over us in intelligence or awareness? How is it that you know what you know?
If you are suggesting that a "devil" exists then I must take my leave for a few moment to laugh that one off. And if I can glean the subtext to what you offer, I suspect that you grant Christianity and Jesus a great amount of efficacy, whereas, I grant it none. Love your neighbor? Love god? How droll. How simplistic. How unoriginal. You must do better.
How and why would that which created all that is have any need whatsoever for its creations to perform up to some level of expectation or else? That is the basis of all religious myth and superstition. You need to get a lot more specific. A lot.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1323894At no point did I ever claim to be inerrant. As a matter of fact, I on several posts explained I am created like you and very capable of error and yes I am a bad speller. So what? You have a couple too that I see..."doe being whatever you are"??? does your spelling errors make your arguments more or less valid? Big deal. Move on.
Where did I sidestep your questions? Or do you just not like that I didn't answer them the way you wanted? I'm not going to say 2+2=5 just because your error only allows you to see the world that way, sorry. And I'm not a trained monkey that has to perform for you either, you ask, I gave my answer. Your under no obligation to accept or reject it. If you want clarifications, ask specifics, but if you want me to say 2+2=5 thats never going to happen. If you state your conscioussness is your truth meter, then you must presuppose you are absolutely flawless and perfect, so that upon self reflectiom you become the standard of all truth. I'm sorry to say this but you are not. Accept or reject that as you wish. I claim no elevated status, only a different position, not greater or lesser. How do I know things? How do you know them.?..I was created sentient. Therefore I have the ability to know. Don't you?
As far as you finding certain moral truths as too trite and unorginal for your taste...at what point did the measure of truth become your need for entertainment? Does e=mc2 become any less true or valid because its "old news" and "everyones heard that" Do you really believe that reality is to be re-manufactured and repackaged just so you can be entertained and have your ears tickled? People ask me questions, I answer. If you dont find the answers entertaining enough for your taste, no one is obligating you to read them. I have zero interest in entertaining you, only in answering the question as to the best of my ability. If I say 2+2=4 and you find that too pedantic...well, deal with it. I'm not going to say its 5 just to be original!
The advisary does exist (i'm not going to correct my spelling, this is a simple forum, not a graduate thesis, I simply dont care enough to bother)
The creator does place laws and expectations on its creation. It does so both physically and morally. You can see it in the physical, so why then are you so blind to it in the spiritual? If you try to jump off a cliff and fly, won't the law of gravity correct you in a few moments? And if you try to break moral laws, won't there be consequences as well? Did you ever consider that the reason it is the basis of all religion is because the rest of the world throughout history figured out that moral laws exist? Or is the rest of the world wrong and you correct in this regard? Your error is that you think you are somehow superior to all this...but this is only in your own mind.
As far as getting a lot more specific on the answers, i suggest you get more specific on the questions....again, i'm not here to enterttain you or be your monkey, If I want to discuss topic A, and you want specifics on topic B, then you'll have to ask more specific and less general questions, if you need more clarification, ask for it with specificity, not generality. I'm not going to do all the work for you. Also, I'm not going to shift my focus just to please your pride. Pride is your greatest error, why would I feed that?
