## Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ? | |

DangerwaltUser ID: 28874406 Brazil 01/19/2013 02:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 31557420 United States 01/19/2013 02:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 27197325 United States 01/19/2013 02:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 31557420 United States 01/19/2013 02:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wasn't mathematics introduced by Arabs? I think they write right to left, like the Jews. Curious where the left to right rule in PEDMAS came from. Interesting... the Babylonians were the first to use algebra... but most of the methods and work done in algebra was done during the Islamic Golden Age... the word algebra itself comes from Arabic... However I am no expert but yes I find this insight interesting. THanks. |

caper_26User ID: 32057798 Canada 01/19/2013 02:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wow, this page came alive with some rudimentary stuff. The equation has nothing to do with mnemonics here. Nothing to do with Order of Operations. We all know multiplication and Division are on the same level, as well as add and subtract. Even a step back from that, we don't even have to go left to right if we switch all division to inverse mult. and subt. to adding a negative number. How do we READ the question? You are not a robot or software. The division symbol is a grouping symbol. Everything on the left divided by everything on the right. You know, Dividend; Divisor; Quotient. Now you will say that is untrue, and you must go left to right, and follow order of ops. Ask yourself what is a ÷ a ? Now ask, what is 1a ÷ 1a ? 1a ÷ 1a is not 1 * a ÷ 1 * a. a ÷ a = 1a ÷ 1a (a) ÷ (a) = (1a) ÷ (1a) 6 ÷ 2a = (6) ÷ (2a) = 3/a a = 2+1 6 ÷ 2a = 3/a 6 ÷ 2(2+1) = 3/(2+1) = 1 Read this if you still disagree and try to keep up: [link to cstl.syr.edu] "I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it." |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 3329578 United States 01/19/2013 02:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I can see why people think it is 9 because the problem would never actually be written like this. It is one and here is why... Fractions are the same as division for example. 1 ÷ 2 = .5 Or 1/2 = .5 So if you make this problem into a fraction, which is what you should do, then you get : 6 _________ 2(2+1) Because the 2 belongs with (2+1). You cannot separate it because it need to be distributed. So you get 4+2 when you distribute 6 6 ____ = ____ = 1 4+2 6 It's one! |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 3329578 United States 01/19/2013 02:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 3329578 United States 01/19/2013 02:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wow, this page came alive with some rudimentary stuff. The equation has nothing to do with mnemonics here. Nothing to do with Order of Operations. We all know multiplication and Division are on the same level, as well as add and subtract. Even a step back from that, we don't even have to go left to right if we switch all division to inverse mult. and subt. to adding a negative number. Quoting: How do we READ the question? You are not a robot or software. The division symbol is a grouping symbol. Everything on the left divided by everything on the right. You know, Dividend; Divisor; Quotient. Now you will say that is untrue, and you must go left to right, and follow order of ops. Ask yourself what is a ÷ a ? Now ask, what is 1a ÷ 1a ? 1a ÷ 1a is not 1 * a ÷ 1 * a. a ÷ a = 1a ÷ 1a (a) ÷ (a) = (1a) ÷ (1a) 6 ÷ 2a = (6) ÷ (2a) = 3/a a = 2+1 6 ÷ 2a = 3/a 6 ÷ 2(2+1) = 3/(2+1) = 1 Read this if you still disagree and try to keep up: [link to cstl.syr.edu] caper_26 ^ this |

caper_26User ID: 32057798 Canada 01/19/2013 02:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is quite clear the answer is 1. There are NO laws of mathematics that you work left from right. Confirmed by two PhDs in mathematics... my buddy of course but that is hearsay, but also by the Berkely professor in the video I posted. Quoting: Besides that, you have the obelisk, which clearly does not mean divide by this next number, which is what my calculator does, but it groups numbers into a numerator and denominator. Then, you have a/1a = 1... Then you have every single math problem done in algebra and calc class using variables ever done. This is what really started to let the light in on me and opened my mind. Why the fuck would I do these problems differently than I would do the problem in the OP? Anonymous Coward 31557420 Hey dude, what's happening tonight? There are so many ways of showing the maths to say 1, and blindly using "left to right rule" is the only one that says 9. I actually got in touch with some computer & electrical engineers I graduated with, today, and everyone of them said 1. I am also glad you realize that equations are basically "collapsed" , and there is no "left to right" rule in the real order of operations. This left-to-right thing was introduced by teachers or something. I have a very interesting article for you, that I think you will find interesting. It isn't too long. [link to www.google.ca (secure)] Have a great weekend my man... Last Edited by caper_26 on 01/19/2013 02:27 AM "I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it." |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 31557420 United States 01/19/2013 02:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wow, this page came alive with some rudimentary stuff. The equation has nothing to do with mnemonics here. Nothing to do with Order of Operations. We all know multiplication and Division are on the same level, as well as add and subtract. Even a step back from that, we don't even have to go left to right if we switch all division to inverse mult. and subt. to adding a negative number. Quoting: How do we READ the question? You are not a robot or software. The division symbol is a grouping symbol. Everything on the left divided by everything on the right. You know, Dividend; Divisor; Quotient. Now you will say that is untrue, and you must go left to right, and follow order of ops. Ask yourself what is a ÷ a ? Now ask, what is 1a ÷ 1a ? 1a ÷ 1a is not 1 * a ÷ 1 * a. a ÷ a = 1a ÷ 1a (a) ÷ (a) = (1a) ÷ (1a) 6 ÷ 2a = (6) ÷ (2a) = 3/a a = 2+1 6 ÷ 2a = 3/a 6 ÷ 2(2+1) = 3/(2+1) = 1 Read this if you still disagree and try to keep up: [link to cstl.syr.edu] caper_26 ^ this Anonymous Coward 3329578 Yea he nailed it, and yes it is rudimentary stuff but that is why we are having this problem. Clearly people, including myself, are not as well versed in the rudimentary things as we should be. Now that PDF from Syracuse is great... problem is I am not sure how true the bold part of this statement is: "Do the remaining multiplication and division, a s you come to them, when working from left to right in the expression. (See below for a discussion of this step.)Do the remaining addition and subtraction, as you come to them, when working from left to right in the expression. (See below for a discussion of this step.)" |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 31557420 United States 01/19/2013 02:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is quite clear the answer is 1. There are NO laws of mathematics that you work left from right. Confirmed by two PhDs in mathematics... my buddy of course but that is hearsay, but also by the Berkely professor in the video I posted. Quoting: Besides that, you have the obelisk, which clearly does not mean divide by this next number, which is what my calculator does, but it groups numbers into a numerator and denominator. Then, you have a/1a = 1... Then you have every single math problem done in algebra and calc class using variables ever done. This is what really started to let the light in on me and opened my mind. Why the fuck would I do these problems differently than I would do the problem in the OP? Anonymous Coward 31557420 Hey dude, what's happening tonight? There are so many ways of showing the maths to say 1, and blindly using "left to right rule" is the only one that says 9. I actually got in touch with some computer & electrical engineers I graduated with, today, and everyone of them said 1. I am also glad you realize that equations are basically "collapsed" , and there is no "left to right" rule in the real order of operations. This left-to-right thing was introduced by teachers or something. I have a very interesting article for you, that I think you will find interesting. It isn't too long. [link to www.google.ca (secure)] Have a great weekend my man... caper_26 haha! Thanks bro! This is just the thing I was getting at and literally as I posted my last post, was wishing I could read more about it! haha thanks again for all your help you taught me a lot and helped me realize just how wrong I can be despite how adamantly I believe I am right. |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 27550461 United States 01/19/2013 02:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

caper_26User ID: 32057798 Canada 01/19/2013 02:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Right now I am reading up on the distributive property. Hopefully I will learn exactly how parentheses work. Because, apparently I don't know even though I thought I did... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31557420 There are no examples showing any operators in front of the term being distributed, that I could find. If you do find one, please let me know. The reason the 6/2 doesn't get distributed is because it is not in parentheses. (6/2)(2+1) = [(6/2)2 + (6/2)1] But, 6/2(2+1) we have proven that 2(2+1) is in the denominator, so we have 62(2+1) which is 6(4+2) = 1 We can proven the requirement of ( ) using the same Identity Law Proof, where there is no ( ), like in the a / 1a expression "I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it." |

caper_26User ID: 32057798 Canada 01/19/2013 02:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 25879973 United States 01/19/2013 02:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 13652486 United States 01/19/2013 02:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

caper_26User ID: 32057798 Canada 01/19/2013 02:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 131 pages just proves very succinctly why this country is lagging so far behind the world at math. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27550461 It is just a numbers game. The population of the US is rather large, and the ratio of those people to those who have internet access is quite large as well. There is a high percentage of people who are just "not GREAT at math". This question involves things that go beyond the basics. therefore, you are going to get a LOT of people who will solve this like they were taught in elementary school (left to right, with mult&div first). That is the large percentage of the pop. Then you get people who are well versed in all areas of maths, who are the minority, and show some math facts, and we get called idiot, since we are the "only" one showing that "new" way of doing it, something they never saw before, so they immediately discard it. Anyway, that is MY take on the whole thing, but I am not a philosopher by any means. I actually suck with words, which is why I went the route I did... numbers only!! Ciao. |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 25949545 United States 01/19/2013 02:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wow, this page came alive with some rudimentary stuff. The equation has nothing to do with mnemonics here. Nothing to do with Order of Operations. We all know multiplication and Division are on the same level, as well as add and subtract. Even a step back from that, we don't even have to go left to right if we switch all division to inverse mult. and subt. to adding a negative number. Quoting: How do we READ the question? You are not a robot or software. The division symbol is a grouping symbol. Everything on the left divided by everything on the right. You know, Dividend; Divisor; Quotient. Now you will say that is untrue, and you must go left to right, and follow order of ops. Ask yourself what is a ÷ a ? Now ask, what is 1a ÷ 1a ? 1a ÷ 1a is not 1 * a ÷ 1 * a. a ÷ a = 1a ÷ 1a (a) ÷ (a) = (1a) ÷ (1a) 6 ÷ 2a = (6) ÷ (2a) = 3/a a = 2+1 6 ÷ 2a = 3/a 6 ÷ 2(2+1) = 3/(2+1) = 1 Read this if you still disagree and try to keep up: [link to cstl.syr.edu] caper_26 ^ this Anonymous Coward 3329578 Yea he nailed it, and yes it is rudimentary stuff but that is why we are having this problem. Clearly people, including myself, are not as well versed in the rudimentary things as we should be. Now that PDF from Syracuse is great... problem is I am not sure how true the bold part of this statement is: "Do the remaining multiplication and division, a s you come to them, when working from left to right in the expression. (See below for a discussion of this step.)Do the remaing addition and subtraction, as tyou come to them, when working from left to right in the expression. (See below for a discussion of this step.)"Anonymous Coward 31557420 I think they tell people this so they have some organization when doing math. But it misleads people into thinking it is a law and takes precedence. For example left to right does not matter just order of operators: 10 × 10 + 10 × 10 = 100 no matter if you do right multiplication first or left But division confuses because EVERYTHING beyond a division sign is included if it is grouped. The inclusion ends if another operator is present 6/3+(2+1) is 5 not 1 because it would be rewritten as 6 ______ 3 + 2 + 1 |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 25949545 United States 01/19/2013 03:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How do we READ the question? You are not a robot or software. The division symbol is a grouping symbol. Everything on the left divided by everything on the right. You know, Dividend; Divisor; Quotient. Now you will say that is untrue, and you must go left to right, and follow order of ops. Ask yourself what is a ÷ a ? Now ask, what is 1a ÷ 1a ? 1a ÷ 1a is not 1 * a ÷ 1 * a. a ÷ a = 1a ÷ 1a (a) ÷ (a) = (1a) ÷ (1a) 6 ÷ 2a = (6) ÷ (2a) = 3/a a = 2+1 6 ÷ 2a = 3/a 6 ÷ 2(2+1) = 3/(2+1) = 1 Read this if you still disagree and try to keep up: [link to cstl.syr.edu] caper_26 ^ this Anonymous Coward 3329578 Yea he nailed it, and yes it is rudimentary stuff but that is why we are having this problem. Clearly people, including myself, are not as well versed in the rudimentary things as we should be. Now that PDF from Syracuse is great... problem is I am not sure how true the bold part of this statement is: "Do the remaining multiplication and division, a s you come to them, when working from left to right in the expression. (See below for a discussion of this step.)Do the remaing addition and subtraction, as tyou come to them, when working from left to right in the expression. (See below for a discussion of this step.)"Anonymous Coward 31557420 I think they tell people this so they have some organization when doing math. But it misleads people into thinking it is a law and takes precedence. For example left to right does not matter just order of operators: 10 × 10 + 10 × 10 = 100 no matter if you do right multiplication first or left But division confuses because EVERYTHING beyond a division sign is included if it is grouped. The inclusion ends if another operator is present 6/3+(2+1) is 5 not 1 because it would be rewritten as 6 ______ 3 + 2 + 1 Anonymous Coward 25949545 I can't get the format right on my posts lol But I meant to post 6 __ + 2 + 1 3 |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32567570 Italy 01/19/2013 05:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

DUCM900User ID: 32567570 Italy 01/19/2013 05:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | bottom line: Is 1( = n)1 ?n. Last Edited by DVCMCM on 01/19/2013 05:39 AM To live is to believe in the power of dreams. To dream is to believe in the power of love. To love is to believe in yourself. Luca 21:28 "Ma quando queste cose cominceranno ad accadere, guardate in alto e alzate i vostri sguardi, perché la vostra liberazione è vicina". |

CitizenperthFUKUSHIMA, GLPTARD 24/7/365 User ID: 32253509 Australia 01/19/2013 05:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | nine.. stop it.............. It's life as we know it, but only just. My Fukushima Site: [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie GLP's best Fuku thread: Thread: *** Fukushima *** and other nuclear-----updates and links twitter: @citizenperth |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 24530075 United States 01/19/2013 05:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 25949545 United States 01/19/2013 06:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is not 9. It is 1. You stop it. You cannot separate the 2 from (2+1) If you were to separate it the answer would be 6/2 × 2 +1 which would be 7 but the () are gone so 6/(2*2)+(2*1) which is 3.5.... wait that's not right either... Where did you get the idea that you can separate the 2? 2(2+1) = (2+1)+(2+1) = 6 6/6 = 1 If you can explain to me how the 2 is magically separated then I will say 9. The only way to rid the 2 is dividing the whole problem by 2 Which gives 3/(2+1) still equals 1 |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 4239460 United States 01/19/2013 06:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is this 131 pages it's basic algebra, parentheses first to simplify the equation. Answer is 1. [link to www.math.com] |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 4239460 United States 01/19/2013 06:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is not 9. It is 1. You stop it. You cannot separate the 2 from (2+1) If you were to separate it the answer would be 6/2 × 2 +1 which would be 7 but the () are gone so 6/(2*2)+(2*1) which is 3.5.... wait that's not right either... Where did you get the idea that you can separate the 2? 2(2+1) = (2+1)+(2+1) = 6 6/6 = 1 If you can explain to me how the 2 is magically separated then I will say 9. The only way to rid the 2 is dividing the whole problem by 2 Which gives 3/(2+1) still equals 1 Anonymous Coward 25949545 They get 9 by doing the division first instead of clearing parentheses like you're supposed to. 6/2=3 3(2+1) 3*3=9 durp |

Syrius (OP)User ID: 19364503 United States 01/19/2013 07:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let's fast forward, will there ever be a conclusive answer that everyone agrees on? I don't believe our egos are capable of coming together, ever...which is sad because the language of Mathematics was conceived to be universal, in the grander scheme. Yet, here we are a year later... bickering. The same problem, the same results, some faces familiar... others have just joined the fray. You must ask yourself... because things of this nature have driven good men insane. Perverse, and lost in their thoughts as if they were peddling the newest drug in the lobby. We should resume this discussion with honorable mentions to all the greats. I salute you Pythagoras. His theorem was simple, yet beautiful : a² + b² = c²All around me are familiar faces... Worn out places...Worn out faces... |

caper_26User ID: 32057798 Canada 01/19/2013 08:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

caper_26User ID: 32057798 Canada 01/19/2013 09:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Now you have the likes of this guy, who ONLY teaches "left-right", and changes ALL variables like this: 6x²y²z² ÷ 3xyz to 6*x²*y²*z²÷3*x*y*z equals 2x³y³z³ Really??6x²y²z² ÷ 3xyz = 2xyz and not 2x³y³z³because: 6x²y²z² ÷ 3xyz means (6x²y²z²) ÷ (3xyz) for 2 reasons: 1 - a coefficient is part of the term's value, proven below, and as well with the Identity Law. 2 - The obelus is a grouping symbol. (dividend ÷ divisor) Both 1 & 2 agree with each other. Why? Because true math always does, and never conflicts. If it does, then something is wrong. this guy's entire premise is this "2n = 2 * n" But that is not entirely true. You can evaluate 2n by multiplying, but the VALUE 2n must remain the same. You cannot take 6 the expression 6 ÷ 6 and say it is the same as 6 ÷ 2 * 3. It is so absurd it is deafening. This proves that 2n = (2 * n) and you cannot split any value by inserting a times. We need more people to comment on this video, so that his students don't end up retarded...[link to www.youtube.com] |

ForgottenUser ID: 29097718 United States 01/21/2013 09:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is such a conspiracy in the world that not a SINGLE math site will give you the answer 1. You cant find a single one. They all must be wrong and the few people here that say 1 must be right? EVERY MATH SITE IS WRONG? Is that really what Casper, DUCM, etc are saying? Every single site? [link to imageshack.us] [link to img255.imageshack.us] If someone can show me 1 math website that comes up with 1 I will agree. Even though I can show 10+ websites with 9. I just need 1. One website. Look here. Look how many UP arrows people get for 1. Look how many UP arrows people get for 9. [link to productforums.google.com] Not that is proof, but lines up with this thread. For every 10 people 3 will say 1, 7 will say 9. ALONG WITH EVERY FRIGGIN WEBSITE ABOUT MATH!!! Last Edited by Forgotten on 01/21/2013 10:36 AM Forgotten: Reach me at admin@TheGoldenRuleNow.org |

- If You Missed Last Nights Bundy Show Interview - Heres the Full Show
- Artificial blood 'will be manufactured in factories'
- HOW TRAUMA IS PASSED DOWN THROUGH SPERM
- Global Warming Nut Wishes for “Extreme Weather Event” to Kill Thousands of “Middle-Class White People”
- 2,300 tubes of a deadly virus have gone missing.
- GLPVC The Raw Feed Live Presents Peter Kling LIVE Tonight at 9PM ET
- NBC goes ‘apocalyptic’ over sign in sky
- Very Bad News For Obamacare Opponents In The Government’s Latest Report
- An ice cream maker creates a flavor that includes 25 mg of "Viagra" per scoop!
- 'BLOOD MOONS' SPARK TALK OF APOCALYPSE
- Here is proof that our politicians are bought and paid fo
- 43 states offer some sort of immunity to politicians who break the law
- Can All Cancer Be Cured in Less Than 12 Weeks?
- Pot vending machine to debut
- U.N. climate experts call for ‘near zero’ emissions, global taxes
- The Netherlands Is Experimenting With Glow-In-The-Dark Roads
- How & Where to Watch Tonight’s “Blood Moon” Lunar Eclipse
- NASA’s putting plants inside special ‘pillows’ to grow veggies in space
- DNA nanobots deliver drugs in living cockroaches
- US land claims in Bundy case based on lie-started, treaty-violating, unlawful war on Mexico
- Police are Testing a "Live Google Earth" with "TIVO" Feature, Biometrics
- Social media helping destabilize world, strategist says at War College
- A Pyramid in the Middle of Nowhere Built To Track the End of the World
- One Scientist Genetically Engineers Bird Flu to Prove a Point
- FBI Plans to Have 52 Million Photos in its NGI Face Recognition Database by Next Year