## Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ? | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 16720242 United States 05/28/2012 02:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ...No, 6 total warriors and 1/2 will die. To the victors 3 apples each for a total of 9. Anonymous Coward 1455668 Then write the whole narrative out I thought that I had above. I will check back later. take care. Over and out. You gave up already? LOL You lost me at "the 3 v Anonymous Coward 16720242 Anonymous Coward 1455668 Anonymous Coward 16720242 |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 16720242 United States 05/28/2012 02:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ...No, 6 total warriors and 1/2 will die. To the victors 3 apples each for a total of 9. Anonymous Coward 1455668 Then write the whole narrative out I thought that I had above. I will check back later. take care. Over and out. You gave up already? LOL You lost me at "the 3 vi Anonymous Coward 16720242 Anonymous Coward 1455668 Anonymous Coward 16720242 |

AmiliusUser ID: 16744207 United States 05/28/2012 02:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its about whether you do the juxtaposition first or not count the parenthesis and do the order of operations/PEMDAS first. What is the real answer? Maybe 2(2+1) act as a unit: 2*2+2*1=6. Or maybe the parenthesis do not count and its from left to right. My smart advanced calculator (Texas Instrument) got 9. Last Edited by Amilius on 05/28/2012 02:10 AM |

FaithNoMoreUser ID: 15492911 United States 05/28/2012 02:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I give up. You guys are way hard headed.. The answer is one. Their is no flaw to the equation. Just your thought process. But, of course, you would say there is flaw to the equation. haah hahah that is the funniest thing I have heard today. The equation is flawed. haha Once again, people not being able to properly understand what they are computing is the flaw. This thread is like a Fibonacci sequence. Compute that. "If by the liberty of the press were understood merely the liberty of discussing the propriety of public measures and political opinions, let us have as much of it as you please: But if it means the liberty of affronting, calumniating and defaming one another, I, for my part, own myself willing to part with my share of it, whenever our legislators shall please so to alter the law and shall chearfully consent to exchange my liberty of abusing others for the privilege of not being abused myself." -Ben Franklin |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 16720242 United States 05/28/2012 02:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Patrick BatemanUser ID: 16007253 United States 05/28/2012 02:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I give up. You guys are way hard headed.. The answer is one. Their is no flaw to the equation. Just your thought process. But, of course, you would say there is flaw to the equation. haah hahah that is the funniest thing I have heard today. The equation is flawed. haha Once again, people not being able to properly understand what they are computing is the flaw. This thread is like a Fibonacci sequence. Compute that. FaithNoMore Lol, I am Irish (descent) and extremely stubborn, I will give you that. But you are just as bad as 9 is the correct answer and yes the equation is flawed as well. |

FaithNoMoreUser ID: 15492911 United States 05/28/2012 02:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I give up. You guys are way hard headed.. The answer is one. Their is no flaw to the equation. Just your thought process. But, of course, you would say there is flaw to the equation. haah hahah that is the funniest thing I have heard today. The equation is flawed. haha Once again, people not being able to properly understand what they are computing is the flaw. This thread is like a Fibonacci sequence. Compute that. FaithNoMore Lol, I am Irish (descent) and extremely stubborn, I will give you that. But you are just as bad as 9 is the correct answer and yes the equation is flawed as well. Patrick Bateman haha no explanations. Just claims. keep talking. "If by the liberty of the press were understood merely the liberty of discussing the propriety of public measures and political opinions, let us have as much of it as you please: But if it means the liberty of affronting, calumniating and defaming one another, I, for my part, own myself willing to part with my share of it, whenever our legislators shall please so to alter the law and shall chearfully consent to exchange my liberty of abusing others for the privilege of not being abused myself." -Ben Franklin |

inmate #1310492User ID: 1310492 Netherlands 05/28/2012 02:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 16406360 United States 05/28/2012 02:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 16406360 United States 05/28/2012 02:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

FaithNoMoreUser ID: 15492911 United States 05/28/2012 02:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, the Fibonacci sequence is rather easy to understand. Just add the previous two numbers and keep going. Keep typing and you'll remove all doubt that you are an imbecile. Anonymous Coward 16406360 haha Ok, great you understand it. Now use it to equate the things around you. DO you even know what the equation is called that they use for the sequence? Calling the sequence simple shows how much of it you do not understand.. Shallow. "If by the liberty of the press were understood merely the liberty of discussing the propriety of public measures and political opinions, let us have as much of it as you please: But if it means the liberty of affronting, calumniating and defaming one another, I, for my part, own myself willing to part with my share of it, whenever our legislators shall please so to alter the law and shall chearfully consent to exchange my liberty of abusing others for the privilege of not being abused myself." -Ben Franklin |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 8878507 Netherlands 05/29/2012 07:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Omg so many pages for This question? Quoting: I saw in 0.01 seconds that THE answer is 9 No discussion possible I got a nice question for the math Guys: If Log"2n"(1944) = Log"n" (486√2), determine the value of n^6.(the "2n" and "n" are subscripts of log) I got the answer so i Will say whenever someone got it right Anonymous Coward 0 I guess it depends on your calculations. Anonymous Coward 1280484 Nvm nobody answers so here is THE answer: log_2n 1944 = log_n (486 √2) => log_2 1944 / log_2 (2n) = log_2 (486 √2) / log_2 n => log_2 1944 / (1 + log_2 n) = (log_2 486 + 1/2) / log_2 n => log_2 1944 log_2 n = (log_2 486 + 1/2) (log_2 n + 1) => (log_2 1944 - log_2 486 - 1/2) log_2 n = log_2 486 + 1/2 => (log_2 4 - 1/2) log_2 n = log_2 486 + 1/2 => log_2 n = 2/3 log_2 486 + 1/3 => log_2 n^6 = 6 log_2 n = 4 log_2 486 + 2 => n^6 = 486^4 . 2^2 = 2^6 . 3^20 = 223154201664. |

inmate #1310492User ID: 1310492 Netherlands 05/30/2012 04:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Omg so many pages for This question? Quoting: I saw in 0.01 seconds that THE answer is 9 No discussion possible I got a nice question for the math Guys: If Log"2n"(1944) = Log"n" (486√2), determine the value of n^6.(the "2n" and "n" are subscripts of log) I got the answer so i Will say whenever someone got it right Anonymous Coward 0 I guess it depends on your calculations. Anonymous Coward 1280484 Nvm nobody answers so here is THE answer: log_2n 1944 = log_n (486 √2) => log_2 1944 / log_2 (2n) = log_2 (486 √2) / log_2 n => log_2 1944 / (1 + log_2 n) = (log_2 486 + 1/2) / log_2 n => log_2 1944 log_2 n = (log_2 486 + 1/2) (log_2 n + 1) => (log_2 1944 - log_2 486 - 1/2) log_2 n = log_2 486 + 1/2 => (log_2 4 - 1/2) log_2 n = log_2 486 + 1/2 => log_2 n = 2/3 log_2 486 + 1/3 => log_2 n^6 = 6 log_2 n = 4 log_2 486 + 2 => n^6 = 486^4 . 2^2 = 2^6 . 3^20 = 223154201664. Anonymous Coward 8878507 Did you really expect anyone responding to that? They can't even "agree" wether 6÷2(1+2) is one or nine. Beyond good and evil anything is possible. |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 12805141 United States 05/30/2012 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

omarUser ID: 16938302 United Kingdom 05/30/2012 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Haven't read all the previous pages but when solving an equation one uses BODMAS. This is an acronym for B.......BracketsO.......OfD.......DivisionM.......MinusA.......AdditionS.......SubtractionSo, first the Brackets..1+2=3 now we have 6/2x3 now the "of" which is 2x3=6 now we have 6/6 Do the Division and 6 divided by 6=1 Q.E.D. :spyda: |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 2994564 Canada 05/30/2012 05:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Alright, there's a lot of self-proclaimed experts around these parts. Let's see how your logic holds up against some basic mathematics. Quoting: 6÷2(1+2) = ? I'll give two hints. This is NOT a trick question, and there is only 1 correct answer. All tools used for computation are fair game. (Yes, I saw this somewhere else and decided to post it here.) Best of luck to all you geniuses . Syrius This is old, and the answers STILL 9!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |

Gern BlanstonUser ID: 3562554 United States 05/30/2012 06:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The answer is 1. Its all about the parenthesis. Those of you getting 9 are forgetting that when you are left with 6/2(3) you still have parenthesis around the 3 which have to be dealt with first before you divide. They don't just magically disappear. Still not convinced, 2(1+2) can also be expressed as (2*1)+(2*2) which I think we can all agree on =6, so 6/6=1 I'm sure someone has already mentioned this earlier, but I'm not about to check 80+ pages of math comments. |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 905924 United States 05/30/2012 06:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

eclectic mindUser ID: 12762865 Australia 05/30/2012 06:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Haven't read all the previous pages but when solving an equation Quoting: one uses BODMAS. This is an acronym for B.......BracketsO.......OfD.......DivisionM.......MinusA.......AdditionS.......SubtractionSo, first the Brackets..1+2=3 now we have 6/2x3 now the "of" which is 2x3=6 now we have 6/6 Do the Division and 6 divided by 6=1 Q.E.D. omar almost right.. Rule 1: First perform any calculations inside parentheses. Rule 2: Next perform all multiplications and divisions, working from left to right. Rule 3: Lastly, perform all additions and subtractions, working from left to right. 6÷2(1+2) = ? 6÷2*(3) = ? 6÷2 = 3 * 3 = 9 |

inmate #1310492User ID: 1310492 Netherlands 05/31/2012 02:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 10621441 United States 05/31/2012 02:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 10621441 United States 05/31/2012 02:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

FaithNoMoreUser ID: 15492911 United States 05/31/2012 02:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You both realize it is either or first right? -Ben Franklin |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 10621441 United States 05/31/2012 02:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

FaithNoMoreUser ID: 15492911 United States 05/31/2012 02:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "A common technique for remembering the order of operations is the abbreviation "PEMDAS", which is turned into the phrase "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally". It stands for "Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and Addition and Subtraction". This tells you the ranks of the operations: Parentheses outrank exponents, which outrank multiplication and division (but multiplication and division are at the same rank), and these two outrank addition and subtraction (which are together on the bottom rank). When you have a bunch of operations of the same rank, you just operate from left to right. For instance, 15 ÷ 3 × 4 is not 15 ÷ 12, but is rather 5 × 4, because, going from left to right, you get to the division first. If you're not sure of this, test it in your calculator, which has been programmed with the Order of Operations hierarchy. For instance, typesetting this into a graphing calculator, you will get:" Continue reading here [link to www.purplemath.com] -Ben Franklin |

MrZephyrosUser ID: 6445791 New Zealand 05/31/2012 02:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Haven't read all the previous pages but when solving an equation Quoting: one uses BODMAS. This is an acronym for B.......BracketsO.......OfD.......DivisionM.......MinusA.......AdditionS.......SubtractionSo, first the Brackets..1+2=3 now we have 6/2x3 now the "of" which is 2x3=6 now we have 6/6 Do the Division and 6 divided by 6=1 Q.E.D. omar almost right.. Rule 1: First perform any calculations inside parentheses. Rule 2: Next perform all multiplications and divisions, working from left to right. Rule 3: Lastly, perform all additions and subtractions, working from left to right. 6÷2(1+2) = ? 6÷2*(3) = ? 6÷2 = 3 * 3 = 9 eclectic mind Yes, but you do the multiplication FIRST. That's the rule. The answer is 1. |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 10621441 United States 05/31/2012 02:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

FaithNoMoreUser ID: 15492911 United States 05/31/2012 03:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "A common technique for remembering the order of operations is the abbreviation "PEMDAS", which is turned into the phrase "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally". It stands for "Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and Addition and Subtraction". This tells you the ranks of the operations: Parentheses outrank exponents, which outrank multiplication and division (but multiplication and division are at the same rank), and these two outrank addition and subtraction (which are together on the bottom rank). When you have a bunch of operations of the same rank, you just operate from left to right. For instance, 15 ÷ 3 × 4 is not 15 ÷ 12, but is rather 5 × 4, because, going from left to right, you get to the division first. If you're not sure of this, test it in your calculator, which has been programmed with the Order of Operations hierarchy. For instance, typesetting this into a graphing calculator, you will get:" Quoting: Continue reading here [link to www.purplemath.com] FaithNoMore MATH ONLY HAS ONE SET OF RULES. LOOK AT THE LINK ABOVE.. MULTIPLICATION AND DIVISION ARE THE SAME STEP. YOU WORK THIS STEP LEFT TO RIGHT. YOU CAN NOT STICK YOUR PHILOSOPHY INTO MATH. IT DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY. YOU DON"T LIKE IT? MAKE UP YOUR OWN SET OF NUMBERS AND RULES! -Ben Franklin |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 16960047 United States 05/31/2012 03:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 17013777 United States 05/31/2012 03:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ha, I was dumb back then. It's 1. P.E.M.D.A.S. is the order of operations. Anonymous Coward 10621441 6 divided by 2 can also be written 6 over 1 times 1 over two. Now remove the brackets. 1\2 times 1 equals 1/2. 1\2 times 2 equals 1. 1\2 plus 2 equals 3\2 and times that by 6 since you already changed the division to times and added the recipcal of 2. 6\1 times 3\2 equaqls 18/2 which reduces to 9. Write the equation like this (1 plus 2) 6 divided by 2. Use six to remove the brackets but don't forget to change your division to times and add the recipical of 2 first. The answer is 9. but I dropped out of math. So I could be wrong but 9 checks multiple ways. Do I win the potatoes and bananas. |

- Woman Reveals Mortifying First Date Bathroom Incident in Twitter Rant
- Warning for young children, the elderly, and those with respiratory problems. 22 PA counties are under a Code Orange for May 25th.
- University Scientists Capture Raw Footage of UFO Showing Up At Their Observatory in Norway
- Has Bill Gates gone too far?
- NASA Dropped a 2-ton Kinetic Missile on the Moon: What Did They Destroy?
- Russian News Documentary Confirms that Nibiru Is Headed Towards Planet Earth
- Independent scientists WARN: 'Most currently published research findings are FALSE..
- American doctor sends brutal warning to the public: Money, marketing and legislation are fueling the opioid epidemic
- Government Secrets: Secret Plane in Space for a Year Now, Nobody Knows its Mission [Video]
- Model That Correctly Predicted Every Election Since 1980 Gives 2016 Verdict
- The Illuminati Were Amateurs — The Facts Shows These Five Families Rule the World
- The FBI's Secret Biometrics Database They Don't Want You To See
- Mysteriously, our Genetic Code Stopped Evolving 3 Billion Years Ago
- Consciousness survives after physical organs stop functioning; study proves the mind does not die with the body
- Police could take over your self-driving car
- The FBI Wants to Keep the National Biometric Database a Secret
- Perverts can take photos of you through your TV without you ever knowing
- Are You Letting Witchcraft Into Your Home?
- House erupts in chaos after LGBT vote
- Thousands are dying under government-run healthcare in the UK
- Girl Scouts Now Welcoming Transgender Boys
- HIV cure a step closer after scientists remove virus’s DNA from living tissue
- US Lobbyist insist that Obama will reveal intelligent aliens exist and have visited Earth before end of his final term
- Third Of Cash Owned By 5 U.S. Companies
- Huffington Post Insist Mary and Jesus Were “Transgenders”